news-record.com

NEWS

House leaders praise emerging payroll tax cut deal

Wednesday, February 15, 2012
(Updated 3:38 pm)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Congressional leaders of both parties praised an emerging deal Wednesday to extend a payroll tax cut and extra jobless benefits through 2012, but cautioned that bargainers still had to nail down final details.

The rare, bipartisan consensus reflected a desire by both parties to put the long-running drama over the issue to rest and a shared sense that their tentative agreement was probably the best deal they could get. The pact came together after House Republicans conceded that the roughly $100 billion payroll tax cut would not have to be paid for with spending cuts.

"I do expect, if the agreement comes together like I expect it will, the House should vote this week," House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Democrats were pleased that the package will extend the payroll tax cut and extra jobless benefits and will block a 27 percent cut in doctors' Medicare reimbursements that would otherwise occur on March 1.

"We're way down the road from where we were just a few days ago," she said in a brief interview.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., one of the bargainers on the legislation, said there were "just a couple of little wrinkles" left that he believed would be resolved on Wednesday.

"I think a lot of people realize Congress is not enjoying a great reputation," he told reporters. "Both sides recognized the need to get this done."

Lawmakers said among the unresolved items were details of the savings to be used to pay for about $50 billion of the roughly $150 billion package.

Once finalized, the measure would be an election-year victory for President Barack Obama, who made the payroll tax cut a keystone of his largely ignored jobs creation plan in September.

On Tuesday, House Republicans emerging from a closed-door meeting said reaction to the package was generally positive, with some saying it reflected a desire to avoid spending months debating an issue that cost them dearly last year.

In December, the House GOP initially opposed a two-month extension of the tax cut and other benefits that were about to lapse, only to retreat under pressure from outside party leaders and conservatives.

"We've got to move onto another issue," said Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Fla. "I think that's what the mood is."

Republicans were determined that Obama not be able to claim that the GOP was standing in the way of a middle-class tax cut. They would rather spend the months leading up to the November presidential and congressional elections focused on GOP themes of opposing tax increases, higher spending and Obama administration regulations that they say stifle job creation.

The tentative compromise would extend through December the current 2 percentage-point cut in the usual 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax deducted from workers' paychecks. That reduction, which saves $1,000 a year for families earning $50,000, would affect 160 million workers and would otherwise expire on March 1.

It would also prevent extra unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless from expiring March 1 and block a 27 percent cut in reimbursements for doctors who treat Medicare patients. Overall, the legislation would cost roughly $150 billion.

Excluded, aides said, was a collection of expiring tax breaks, largely for businesses buying equipment and other corporate expenses that had been sought by some lawmakers of both parties.

Participants said the Medicare payments to doctors would be paid for by reducing Medicare reimbursements to hospitals and by cutting about $5 billion from an $8 billion program under Obama's health care overhaul aimed at battling obesity and smoking.

The unemployment benefits would be financed with a collection of savings that include government sales of parts of the broadcast airwaves to wireless companies and from boosting federal workers' contributions to their pensions.

In private, some Democrats called it a victory, pointing to the payroll tax cut and unemployment benefit extensions while heading off the GOP's earlier demand that the entire measure be financed with spending cuts and other savings. Others complained that the jobless benefit extensions were not generous enough.

Republicans claimed victory, too, noting their rejection of early Democratic efforts to pay for the payroll tax cut by boosting taxes on millionaires, and with jobless extensions that would be less than the 99 weeks under current law that Democrats wanted to renew.

Aides presented differing figures about how many extra weeks of coverage would be provided, but they roughly agreed that the current 99-week maximum would fall to around 73 weeks for most states. Republicans had wanted to cut the ceiling to 59 weeks.

Republicans abandoned provisions from a House-passed bill that would have required the jobless to pursue a high school equivalency degree to get benefits and let states require recipients to undergo drug testing.

States would be able to test applicants who lost their job because they failed a drug test or are seeking a job that requires one.

They also dropped other House-passed language forcing low-income people to have Social Security numbers to get government checks by claiming the children's tax credit, a move that was aimed at illegal immigrants and caused a furor among many Hispanics.

Early Tuesday, Obama tried turning up the heat on Republicans to strike a deal.

"Just pass this middle-class tax cut. Pass the extension of unemployment insurance," he said at a White House appearance. "Do it before it's too late and I will sign it right away."

 

Accompanying Photos

J. Scott Applewhite (Associated Press)

Photo Caption: House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, accompanied by fellow GOP leaders, talks about an accord on the payroll tax cut negotiations during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, earlier today.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Traveler

February 15, 2012 - 12:16 pm EST

The payroll tax reduction is a very good thing for working Americans.

I am glad to see both parties work to make this happen.

I do have one question: The social security trust fund does not have much of a reserve, if any. What is being done to replace the lost Fica money in the trust fund?

goodtoknow

February 15, 2012 - 12:39 pm EST

Nothing...Harry Reid says there is nothing wrong with social security. Meanwhile the debt is rising, the dollar is shrinking. I believe the administration wants a crisis like Greece so it can declare a take over of some sort. Moving the country into socialism. They're already trying to take away 1st. amendment rights now. They want to see how far they can turn the screw driver little by little.
And if Obama's new budget were passed, that would take 319 billion dollars away from Medicare and Medicaid. They are already taking 500 billion dollars away from Medicare to help pay for Obamacare. There is no FREE cheese and Obamacare is NOT free. It will cost the same and more likely more than health care already costs. Taking away this money from Medicare and Medicaid will bring on RATIONING.

Panacea

February 15, 2012 - 1:14 pm EST

You don't understand how the ACA works, then.

It's primarily insurance reform. The insurance companies ALREADY ration health care in this country.

The general budget cannot "take money away" from Medicare. Medicare is funded by separate taxes. Medicaid is funded through general taxes, and has already undergone significant cuts, especially at the state level, due to shrinking tax revenues not the ACA.

There is nothing wrong with Social Security. Left alone, it would take a couple of decades before we would start to go into the Red. Of course, decreasing the SS payroll tax does not help that situation.

How is the government taking away 1st amendment rights?

Traveler

February 15, 2012 - 2:54 pm EST

Where do you get your information that Medicare is funded through general taxes that are not being "taken away"?

According to the US accounting dept, Medicare is funded primarily through FICA taxes, not income taxes, not something that is "general tax".

The payroll withholding, also called FICA is paid by employers and employees, as well as self-employed. This fund goes to social security and Medicare. My understanding is that the 2% payroll withholding was going to the social security trust fund.

Yes, it will take around 12 or so years until the current payments are projected to exceed current inflows. HOWEVER, the unfunded liabilities of the social security system as well as Medicare will exceed a trillion dollars by 2030, according to the General Accounting Office.

One of the problems with Greece is that that did nothing to fund their unfunded liabilities until dirty stuff hit the fan. I don't want that to happen in America.

This government, Democrats and Republicas, need to correctly communicate to the American public the true amount of unfunded liabilities, and a play to fund them. They need to do that now, not when the barn is burning down.

speakup2

February 15, 2012 - 3:25 pm EST

Thank You Traveler...What many do not seem to understand (which one of the officials even said in this article) Is that there must be cuts to pay for this so called payroll tax deduction. Three guesses where the cuts are going to be. The Giverment (not a misspelling) needs to put the money back into the SS trust and then stop giving these meaningless so called cuts. This is an investment in our futures. This 2% now, is going to be 20% when they start cutting benefits to pay it back. Smoke and Mirrors.

Bosco

February 15, 2012 - 1:21 pm EST

And where's that money coming from?? Fire up the presses Ben. Maybe we can ask that Chinese fellow for it while he's over here. Notice the smile always on his face.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search