news-record.com

NEWS

Greensboro looking to expand recycling effort

Tuesday, December 27, 2011
(Updated 11:30 am)

— In all the racket over the city’s garbage disposal cost-saving schemes in 2011, one piece of the equation was all but ignored: recycling.

Greensboro’s recycling program, which collects about 30,000 tons annually, has room to grow. And there is good reason to make that a goal.

Ton for ton, last fiscal year Greensboro spent eight times more money to dump waste in a landfill than to recycle it.

Early next year, staff members are expected to give the City Council recommendations for Greensboro’s waste disposal strategy. That discussion likely will include the recycling program and ways to expand it or decrease costs.

“We are doing a good job. We can certainly do better,” said Dale Wyrick, director of the city’s field operations department. “We need the community’s help.”

City Council members spent the past three years debating where to put the roughly 75,000 tons of garbage generated by local households each year.

The arguments hinged on costs of dumping garbage in a landfill. Recycling — and how the city could save money doing it — was never a key part of the discussion.

That needs to change, City Council members said in the recent campaign.

“That’s where we have to focus our effort,” Councilwoman Nancy Vaughan said, “especially when you’ve got vendors coming to us saying, 'We have a plan where it will cost you nothing and possibly make you money.’ ”

The trash residents put in their green city rolling cans gets trucked to a Montgomery county landfill. The cost: $41 per ton.

The stuff people put in their brown recycling cans is hauled to a local recycling center, where private contractor FCR Inc. sorts and sells it. Greensboro gets a share of the money when the company resells the recyclables — an amount that varies every year. The cost last year: $5.03 per ton of recyclables.

“No matter how green you are, no matter how you fall politically, the dollars and cents argument — everybody can relate to it,” Wyrick said.

Greensboro’s recycling program has been ahead of other cities in North Carolina for nearly two decades in its use of rolling containers and sort-free recycling.

But there is room to do more.

The city has collected about 18,000 tons of recyclables from residents for the past three years, according to city records.

That’s less than a quarter of everything residents throw away.

Only about 60 percent of households put out a recycling can, Wyrick said.

Many condo and apartment complexes don’t have recycling bins, making it inconvenient (although not impossible) to recycle. The city is planning to add recycling cans at more than 300 multifamily units, said Sheldon Smith, who oversees the Greensboro recycling program.

City leaders also want to expand the list of items that can be recycled. The program does not accept plastic margarine tubs or yogurt containers.

Smith hopes to change that when the city renegotiates its recycling contract.

“I’m going into the dairy case,” he said.

City leaders want to reduce the fees the city pays to drop off recyclables with FCR.

The market for recyclables is booming, Wyrick said. Other vendors have suggested to city officials that they would take Greensboro’s recyclables at no fee per ton, city officials said.

The recycling contract expires in 2013, but city leaders are hoping to renegotiate sooner.

“I fully expect ... we are going to be able to realize some more savings for Greensboro,” Wyrick said.

Contact Amanda Lehmert at 373-7075 or amanda.lehmert@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

File photo (News & Record)

The right and wrong things to recycle

Think you know what’s recyclable? Maybe not. As much as a quarter of the trash put in Greensboro recycling bins is considered “residue” — stuff the program can’t or won’t recycle. It’s refuse that sometimes has to be picked out by hand before other material can be recycled.

Are you following these rules?

  • Anything you put in your bin should be clean and dry. That means no greasy pizza boxes. The clean ones (think frozen pizza) are OK.
  • No lids, no caps, no nozzles. The city wants your Coca-Cola 2-liters, your empty spray paint cans and your pickle jars. But put the tops in the trash.
  • All plastics are not equal. Plastic shopping and trash bags are not accepted.
  • Unless you are decorating your tree with News & Record paper chain garland, your Christmas decorations likely are not recyclable.
  • Put the tinsel in your green can.
  • Tire recycling is handled by the county. Call Guilford County for more information, 641-3792.

Source: City of Greensboro

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Mick

December 27, 2011 - 8:16 am EST

"They" had better come up with some way to collect more often than every two weeks. We are overflowing just about every pick up.

buzzman

December 27, 2011 - 8:59 am EST

Purchase another can. Haven't done a survey, but it appears that every other week works fine for most folks.

Panacea

December 27, 2011 - 9:33 am EST

Question, Mick:

How large is your recycling container? Is it that little square bin, or is it one of the large rolling containers like what High Point uses?

If the former, I can see why you're overflowing. I had the same problem before High Point switched over to the larger barrels. Now, not so much.

newtogso

December 27, 2011 - 12:07 pm EST

You're right Mick. Between recycling and our compost pile, there is very little which ends up in our trash. Of course the reason our bin is overflowing is because the City keeps forgetting to pick it up!. This is a good move for the City and is very pragmatic - even if it is taking a bit long in coming.

newkid

December 27, 2011 - 7:26 pm EST

Absolutely correct. In regions with aggressive recycling programs, recycled materials are collected on the same frequency as garbage/trash: once each per week. Anything else is just a "lip service" recycling program. Households who recycle correctly generate a greater volume of recyclables than trash.

histrion

December 27, 2011 - 10:10 pm EST

The city used to collect recycs weekly. One imagines they had to cut back for budgetary reasons, not because they simply didn't want to do the work. Are you crushing your bottles and cans, collapsing boxes, and packing the can in an organized way? I've found I can pack an awful lot in there if I just take a few simple steps to compact everything. If that saves the city -- i.e., me -- some money, I'm all for it. Not like they make it much work otherwise.

mamaboilermaker

December 27, 2011 - 9:13 am EST

It would be nice to find ways to encourage reduction, since that is even better than recycling. We overpackage everything these days--guess it goes back to the Tylenol scare of the 80's? With a big family, I buy fewer, larger containers of everything, but I still have a lot of packaging that goes into recycling.

Panacea

December 27, 2011 - 9:31 am EST

I wouldn't say a tamper proof foil and a plastic ring on a bottle of medication is over packaging.

Over packaging is the box the pills come in (which they did before the scare), and using bottle too large for the number of pills inside, which requires the manufacturer to add cotton and a preservative capsule.

But yeah, overpackaging on items in general is a real problem. Most of my waste comes from that kind of crap rather than wasted food.

destinys mother in law

December 27, 2011 - 9:52 am EST

I try to avoid fecal material when I shop

destinys mother in law

December 27, 2011 - 9:53 am EST

Buy second-hand and let the first owner dispose of the wrapping

rooster8786

December 27, 2011 - 10:32 am EST

“No matter how green you are, no matter how you fall politically, the dollars and cents argument — everybody can relate to it,” Wyrick said.
Wyrick, evidently, is as ignorant as the residents of NE Greensboro. Those residents PROVED, with their actions, they cannot, and will NOT, relate to the dollars and cents argument of waste disposal.

timflowers

December 27, 2011 - 1:02 pm EST

I think Greensboro is missing a huge opportunity by not focusing more on green initiatives. We need to do as much as we can, without creating burdensome regulations, to become a leader in environmental protection, sustainability, and renewable energy. Let Raleigh be the tech city and Charlotte the banking city. We can carve our own niche by being the leader in green. Then we can market that nationally to businesses and the media to attract jobs, new residents, and tourists.
We've got to find and embrace a vision for our future that will set us apart and move us forward. What we're known for now is being a has-been textile town with a bunch of squabbling city and county council members. We can do better. Going green may be the answer.

rcare77

December 27, 2011 - 3:02 pm EST

Very happy to see this article. I just recently moved back to Greensboro and wondered why there was no talk about recycling, only talk about the White Street landfill. I am happy to have the city encourage recycling, it's good for everyone!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search