news-record.com

NEWS

County backs mental hospital plan

Friday, December 16, 2011
(Updated Thursday, March 15, 2012 - 9:49 am)

— Guilford County has thrown its weight behind a proposed psychiatric hospital that would treat criminal patients in High Point.

County Manager Brenda Jones Fox made it more difficult for the High Point City Council to block the hospital through rezoning.

A protest petition, signed by Fox on behalf of the county, concerns the land the county is trying to sell to GEO Care of Boca Raton, Fla., as a site for the hospital.

The deal is worth $3.1 million to the county.

As the owners of the property, the county can file a petition to prevent the rezoning. The City Council will need a vote of seven of its nine members to pass the rezoning in face of the protest petition. That will likely be difficult.

High Point Mayor Becky Smothers, who spearheaded opposition to the hospital, said she was surprised the county took the action when it did. The county filed just before 5 p.m. on Tuesday. That’s just a day before the deadline for protest petitions on the issue, which will be heard at Monday’s High Point City Council meeting.

“It did surprise me,” Smothers said. “A lot of things can happen when there’s enough money.”

At issue is a plan to consolidate forensic mental health units at two state-run hospitals — Dorothea Dix Hospital in Raleigh and the Central Regional Psychiatric Hospital in Butner — into one 90-bed unit, privately run under state contract.

Such hospitals house patients in the criminal justice system who need treatment before they stand trial or who have been ordered to receive treatment in a secure hospital as part of their sentence. The proposal includes patients who need minimum, medium and maximum security supervision.

Opposition to the hospital from neighbors in High Point’s Five Points area, business owners and City Council members in High Point initially sparked a move to rezone the area, which would prevent such a hospital from opening there. City Council members said they would rather see the area — at the interchange of U.S. 311 and Greensboro Road — used for commercial development, with restaurants and hotels.

But after GEO Care flew six neighbors and business owners from Five Points to see another of their hospitals, a large group of residents spoke at a High Point Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in favor of the project. That commission backed the hospital, unanimously voting against rezoning. At their Thursday meeting, the county commissioners passed a resolution supporting the protest petition in an 8-2 vote.

Commissioners Paul Gibson and Bill Bencini were the dissenting votes, both saying the county manager should have consulted the board before filing a protest petition.

Bencini, who represents High Point and is a former member of the City Council there, also reminded his fellow commissioners that High Point has land-use jurisdiction and doesn’t have to ask the commissioners’ permission to rezone.

Several commissioners had strong words for the High Point City Council, though. Most called it a transparent attempt to torpedo the county’s land sale and the planned hospital through otherwise unnecessary rezoning.

“I think that High Point really disrespected the whole notion of everything we sought to do when they sought to rezone our property without our request,” said Commissioner Billy Yow. “They did this in a plot to try to undermine the sale of the property. It’s just wrong. It’s not good politics and it shouldn’t even be good ethics.”

Commissioner Bruce Davis, who also represents High Point, said he was skeptical of the hospital at first, but has come to think it’s a positive move for the city and the county.

“I was the biggest opponent when I first heard of this sale,” Davis said. “But it was out of ignorance — not knowing what was at stake, not knowing what the company was bringing, not knowing the positive economic impact that this would bring to my community.”

Davis said the county and city of High Point don’t often see a company wanting to pay top-dollar for land these days and offering to bring in jobs without a request for incentives or tax breaks.

Bencini said he’s confident the High Point City Council, which he left to take his current commissioners’ seat, is considering all the angles.

“I think the city does understand the economic potential,” Bencini said. “But they’re also sensitive to the concerns that many in the community have expressed.”

Contact Joe Killian at 373-7023 or joe.killian@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

News & Record

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

sanders

December 16, 2011 - 3:18 am EST

forensic hospital is good idea. it is needed and will bring jobs. it does need to be safe and professionally run with proper support from law enforcement.and the community.

Panacea

December 16, 2011 - 7:47 am EST

The Five Point area isn't exactly the brightest part of town. The thought a hotel or restaurants would build there is a pipe dream. Those kinds of businesses aren't going to invest in a part of town populated with pawnshops, thrift stores, older small businesses, and a borderline neighborhood.

The hospital is a different matter; they won't care what the neighborhood is like. It's not like the patients will be getting day passes to go off campus; this will be a locked unit. But it will be easy to access the courts in High Point, and easy for visitors to find off 311.

This hospital will be a great economic driver for High Point. It will provide local jobs for nurses, security, housekeepers, administrators, grounds keepers, dietary and more. Opponents aren't thinking it through. They heard "mental health" and their brains quit processing after that.

DrMaryJohnson

December 16, 2011 - 8:33 am EST

You left out doctors in your list of job openings, Pan. But hey, they're never in your equations for economic/social success anyway.

Opponents living in the "borderline neighborhood" probably are thinking it through, just not in ways high-minded healthcare-executive-wannabes would want. Best to politically run them over in the mad dash for money - and then tell them their brains "aren't processing" . . . in a state that has already made a mess of everything remotely associated with mental health.

It always amuses me when county and city politicians in this area lecture anyone on ethics.

Panacea

December 16, 2011 - 12:52 pm EST

And you never miss an opportunity to be nasty for nastiness' sake. Nice to see you still true to form, Doc.

And I stand by what I said: opposition was based on the stigma attached to mental illness, and not thinking about the new businesses that will come to the area to cater to the families of patients visiting, or locals working there: the restaurants, hotels, and other things people would need easy access to. It's actually a chance to revitalize the neighborhood.

DrMaryJohnson

December 16, 2011 - 2:18 pm EST

Pan, I've missed a lot of opportunities lately. So much material, so little time.

It's HARDLY "nastiness for nastiness sake" to call someone on their snobbery. Your comment (which you apparently did not read before you hit "submit") was LOADED with the kind of progressive "we smarter-than-thou folk know best" tripe that put mental health (and several towns in this area) on life support in the first place.

If you want this project to succeed, you're going to have to do a whole lot better making your argument than accusing those who oppose it (translation: those who will have to live with it) of being bigoted and brain dead.

General Greensboro

December 16, 2011 - 2:39 pm EST

Tone it down, you two.

GG

Panacea

December 16, 2011 - 4:47 pm EST

Just what did I say that has anything to do with mental health being on life support?

Nothing. Not one thing.

You just like to over generalize rather than craft a specific argument.

As it so happens, while I don't live in Five Points itself, I am not very far from there. And I didn't accuse anyone of being either bigoted or brain dead. I said they were not thinking it through, not the same thing.

terrier2003

December 16, 2011 - 9:50 am EST

Seems that Bruce Davis should be more supportive of the citizens... and while I agree that the 5 points area isn't a particularly florishing destination, if you plop down a mental hospital for the criminally insane there it never will be. HPU is expanding and who knows what the future holds for the school, but it is a mile away from this location. Wonder if all that new jersey money at the school will think twice about sending their kids...

rooster8786

December 16, 2011 - 10:10 am EST

Seems to me this is going to turn into the White Street Landfill of High Point. A company "bribed" nearby residents to garner support and the politicians see tax revenue & jobs, both re-electable bullet points. What happens in a few years when the realization of things are not as promised comes to fruition and people are "stuck" with a mental hospital for a neighbor?

first affirmative

December 16, 2011 - 10:33 am EST

Sell the High Point Evergreens for a mere $3.1 million? Are you kidding? The Great Recession can't go on forever, and the property will then be worth at least three times its current asking price. I say don't do a thing until we get the 2012 election sorted out, and that includes the local candidates as well!

Panacea

December 16, 2011 - 12:56 pm EST

I'm sure that's what the Japanese said at the beginning of their "Lost Decade." Which is on track to be a lost TWO decades for them; things never really got better.

Property values are not going to recover to pre-2007 levels any time in the foreseeable future. Developers need to make their buying and selling plans based on the economics of today, not pipe dreams of the future.

Even if the economy gets a boost from a GOP win in the White House (which it does more often than not), that does not translate to skyrocketing property values. Only a hot economy will do that, and that's not something EITHER candidate can deliver until Congress gets off its duff and deals with the deficit, taxes, and entitlements in a realistic manner (meaning BOTH parties are going to have to do things their political bases will hate).

itsjustron

December 16, 2011 - 11:18 am EST

I dunno, but this whole idea, just seems insane to me..

Oh..

Oops!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search