news-record.com

NEWS

District maps to face lawsuit

Monday, November 14, 2011

— A planned legal challenge to Guilford County’s new voting districts is slowly taking shape.

The effort, spearheaded by Democratic county leaders, civil- and voting-rights groups, aims to stop a redistricting plan passed by the Republican-led N.C. General Assembly in August.

The redistricting plan, which cuts the Guilford County Board of Commissioners from 11 members to nine and draws district lines that are more advantageous to Republicans, was cleared by the U.S. Department of Justice earlier this month.

“We’re going to be taking it to court, as far as we need to take it,” commissioners Chairman Melvin “Skip” Alston said.

Alston, a Democrat, is a former leader of the state NAACP. He said he’s been working with that organization, the Southern Coalition for Social Justice and friends who are civil rights attorneys to build a court case to prevent the redistricting.

“We let the Justice Department know our problems with the map and they saw fit to clear it,” Alston said. “But that doesn’t stop us from taking it to state and federal court. We’re going to be arguing it in several ways. Not just based on it being retrogressive in terms of minority participation under the Civil Rights Act, but also in terms of minority influence and the process that was used to get that map.”

Alston and other critics say the map stacks black voters in Districts 7 and 8, each of which has more than 60 percent black voters. That would mean fewer black voters in the remaining districts.

“That’s a problem in terms of the influence black voters can have in any other district,” Alston said.

Alston said there are also due process concerns. The General Assembly put together and passed the maps without any input from Guilford County voters or their elected representatives at the county level.

Republicans say Alston’s objections are ironic given the role he had in a very similar redistricting process in 1991.

That’s the year the board expanded from seven to 11, making it the largest county board in North Carolina.

At the time, it was Democratic lawmakers in Raleigh who redrew the election districts. Guilford Republicans fought the legislative change. County voters approved the districts in a referendum vote. Many voters said they were confused by the referendum. The change to the board came amid a bitter political fight between Republicans and Democrats.

That year Republican commissioners, led by then-Commissioner Steve Arnold, forced out some top county officials, took a number of political adversaries off local boards and slashed county positions and services such as public health and social services to cut taxes.

The ensuing controversy led to a protest march of more than 1,000 people and played a part in getting Alston into county politics 20 years ago.

Alston, then a leader with the NAACP , applauded the move to expand the board and redraw political lines to make them align with the newly constituted countywide school board districts.

He said the creation of nine single-member districts and two at-large seats gave minorities more of a chance to be represented.

Though Republicans did win back control of the board in 1996 they lost it again two years later.

Republican Commissioner Billy Yow has called the 1991 redistricting “setting up a dictatorship” run by Democrats and now says he’ll be glad to see it end.

The new map takes effect in February, but a court challenge could push its implementation past the next election cycle.

Contact Joe Killian at 373-7023 or joe.killian@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

Jerry Wolford (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Melvin “Skip” Alston, chairman of the Guilford County Board of Commissioners, holding the General Assembly’s map in this July photo.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

retiree

November 14, 2011 - 6:59 am EST

If I were a judge I'd ask Alston this question . . .if Blacks are not represented, how can a Black woman get elected to be Mayor, and now can be elected to an at-large seat on the Council? Seems to me the voting rights of Blacks are well-represented since all ethnic voting populations of Greensboro elected Yvonne Johnson despite her being Black. Alston is looking to get 3 guaranteed seats based on race, but if that were the case, what about the Asian population? Should they not have a seat on the council? And of course, our sizeable population of Hispanics would need a guaranteed seat as well.

rooster8786

November 14, 2011 - 9:44 am EST

retiree, Your observation about guaranteed seats based on race is Skip's objective. Unfortunately, confusing city elections, i.e. Yvonne Johnson's history, does not support your argument when speaking of the County Commissioner's board.

Jeramy

November 14, 2011 - 7:29 am EST

Still do not understand why we still need laws on the books that force lines to be drawn based on the racial mix of black and whites only when we have such a diverse population. We are a country that just elected our first biracial president! Come on people as long as we continue to legislate anything based on race, race will continue to be an issue in this country and feed the idiots that prey on it like Skip Alston and Rush Limbaugh, yes they are one in the same just opposite sides of the same worn out coin.

Panacea

November 14, 2011 - 10:12 am EST

Because Guilford County has a history of disenfranchising blacks, that's why.

rooster8786

November 14, 2011 - 11:35 am EST

without specific examples, your accusations, carry little merit. How about the history of the bully pulpit forum, Revs, Johnson & Brown, skip, and the NAACP with their history of playing the race card to keep race relations in turmoil, where their agenda wants them, so they can continue to be "leaders" in their own eyes and small fish in a smaller pond, in my eyes.

buzzman

November 14, 2011 - 8:45 am EST

Certain individuals and groups wish to keep things in turmoil, so they play the race card at every opportunity. Alston needs to concentrate on the efficient operation of Guilford County. We don't need additional tax increases!

rooster8786

November 14, 2011 - 9:41 am EST

We let the Justice Department know our problems with the map and they saw fit to clear it,” Alston said. “But that doesn’t stop us from taking it to state and federal court."
So the Feds cleared it, over skip's objections, and skip wants to sue anyway. NOT one cent should come from the county to support this obvious frivolous and RACE baited lawsuit. If skip is so sure he's right, let him pay for the suit, and if he wins he can sue to recover his legal expenses.
This issue is skip being skip and using his bully pulpit, community activists, and other do-gooder friend's to further his pathetic agenda. With skip's pathetic memory of what the Democrats did when the board went from 7 to 11, maybe he should be tested for early onset dementia?

Panacea

November 14, 2011 - 10:14 am EST

Read the article. It's the NAACP and Coalition for Southern Justice who are suing, not the county. Alston may be supporting the effort individually, but the county is not.

rooster8786

November 14, 2011 - 11:32 am EST

maybe you should read the article, my comments and note the quote marks of skip's comments, that are directly from the article. skip directly said "us" meaning he is involved in this initiative. As I said, if he is, let him and his minions foot the bill for attorney's fees.

Panacea

November 14, 2011 - 11:33 am EST

Skip Alston is not Guilford County. There is nothing in the article to suggest that the Commissioners are involving county resources. Alston is acting as a private individual in concert with organizations he's been involved with for decades.

They are footing the bill.

rooster8786

November 14, 2011 - 1:16 pm EST

"Skip Alston is not Guilford County."

Has anyone told skip?

triadwatch

November 14, 2011 - 10:16 am EST

Who are the lawyers?

jeaniegnc

November 14, 2011 - 10:25 am EST

Panacea, may I ask you to relate examples and dates that reaffirm your statement that "Guilford County has a history of disenfranchising blacks"? Some links to these examples would help. I have lived in Guilford County all my life and I do not remember when we built that history so a little help would be appreciated.

Panacea

November 14, 2011 - 11:52 am EST

Guilford County is covered by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Like many areas of North Carolina, it engaged in poll taxes and literacy tests to keep blacks from voting. These methods date back to the Wilmington Riots of 1900. While many were eliminated by 1920, most of North Carolina continued policies that made it difficult for blacks to vote. Any county with less than 50% of its blacks in 1964 (which included Guilford County) is covered by the Voting Rights Act.

http://www.northcarolinahistory.org/commentary/200/entry
http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/vot/sec_5/covered.php

rooster8786

November 14, 2011 - 12:24 pm EST

If your best "support" of your position is quoting laws that are between 50 & 110 year old, maybe you should get in the modern age and stop relying on past injustices to make excuses for today's problems. It seems to me that blacks are the only group of peoples who, while claiming to want inclusion, continually segregate themselves as a people.

Unaffiliated

November 14, 2011 - 11:42 am EST

We know Skip's & Billy's positions..what about the other 9?

drewwes01

November 14, 2011 - 1:08 pm EST

A primary purpose of course is to challenge the lines in hope of getting the courts to require they be re-drawn to a less GOP friendly way.

But underneath the surface the intent is to delay the impementation of the new lines beyond the next election on the calendar. I'm not certain as to when the new lines were to take hold, but I would assume that a legal challenge would delay their enforcement while pending in the courts. If it were a lengthy challenge it would certainly delay the new lines' implementation beyond 2012, and that's significant enough to file suit to begin with.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search