news-record.com

NEWS

Calls, signs target voters in fierce mayor's race

Tuesday, November 8, 2011
(Updated Wednesday, November 9 - 7:30 am)

— A last-minute  phone  campaign urged voters not to cast ballots for either mayoral candidate — incumbent Bill Knight or Councilman Robbie Perkins  — in Tuesday’s election.

In automated calls received by some voters Monday night, a woman said black people won’t be represented by either candidate and asked voters to write-in someone else for mayor. She did not suggest a candidate.

The woman identified herself as a representative of Takeover, a group concerned with the interest of black voters.
But it is not clear who is responsible for the calls. There is no local or state  political action committee registered with that name.

North Carolina state law bans the use of automated calling machines in nearly all cases except messages recorded by candidates or political parties.

Michael Picarelli , executive director of the Guilford County Republican party, said the party had nothing to do with the calls. Local Democratic party officials could not be reached to comment.

Council candidates decried the phone calls — and  signs with a similar message that appeared in some  precincts with high numbers of registered black and minority voters — as a divisive campaign tactic.

“We knew what it was immediately,” said Henry Link, a Lindley Park resident who got the call. “It’s a dirty trick to get black voters not to vote for Perkins. It helps Knight if they don’t. These calls are deliberately designed to deceive black voters.”

Knight did not return calls Tuesday.

Link lives in a precinct Knight won narrowly two years ago but lost to Perkins in last month’s primary.

“People in our area didn’t vote for Knight this last time,” Link said. “That’s why we’re getting them.”

Bert VanderVeen, a District 2 resident and president of the Charles B. Aycock Neighborhood Association, said he received the call, as well as an automated call from Knight’s campaign. When he compared the numbers using caller ID, he came to the same conclusion as some other voters.

“They both came from the same number,” VanderVeen said. “It’s the same Raleigh phone number.”

At least three other voters said they compared the numbers and found them identical. It was unclear Tuesday which service used the number to place the calls or whether it was used by more than one.

Similar signs also popped up at polling places in Lindley Park, near downtown, and in largely-black East Greensboro. The signs are a similar color and design scheme as at-large council candidate Yvonne Johnson,  who is black.

The signs urge voters to write-in a candidate if they are not happy with the mayoral or council candidates. The signs say the effort is not financed by either candidate or their committees.

Perkins called the campaign “disappointing.”

“That type of tactic doesn’t belong in Greensboro,” Perkins said.

“I think people should have more integrity than that,” Picarelli said. “To do something clandestine like that, it’s not something I’d support.”

Jeff Hyde , co-founder of the Tea Party-affiliated political action committee Conservatives for Guilford County, said his group didn’t have anything to do with the campaign, either.

“I don’t know anything about the calls or the signs, so I really can’t say anything about them,” he said.

Contact Joe Killian at 373-7023 or joe.killian@news-record.com

Contact Amanda Lehmert at 373-7075 or amanda.lehmert@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

Lynn Hey (News & Record)

Photo Caption: A campaign sign seen at some polling places Tuesday. 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

rooster8786

November 8, 2011 - 4:04 pm EST

"We knew what it was immediately," said Link, 63. "It's a dirty trick to get black voters not to vote for Perkins. It helps Knight if they don't. These calls are deliberately designed to deceive black voters."
Mr. Link, just in case you didn't know it, the same can be said about the bully Pulpit Forum. Or is it a different kind of deception if it's a phone call asking vs. a "pastor" preaching?
Good thing it's a slow day at the N&R so they could get this non-story out, that may harm their pawn Mr. Perkins before the polls close, because the exact opposite of Mr. Black's race claims could also be said. If the whites don't vote for Mr. Knight, it helps the minority's candidate Mr. Perkins.

capricorn7nc

November 8, 2011 - 5:43 pm EST

Let it go for once and face facts. I live off High Point Rd., and work off West Market and there are no signs in either place, so the claims that they are only in certain neighborhoods makes sense. The motive make sense. As old as I suspect you are rooster8786, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck.....

crash1013

November 8, 2011 - 7:18 pm EST

It is a duck

Abner Doon

November 8, 2011 - 10:30 pm EST

Tactical robocall calls causes communication
and news.

Signs cause communication
and news.

More communication of negative news for Knight
causes fewer votes for Knight.

More communication of a creation of a racial attack
causes more votes for Robbie.

Imagine the daisy chain
with folks crowded around outside talking about the signs.

They mention it in conversations with thier friends,
and everybody belongs to AT&T.

Not a new tactic
nor would it be not unlike what has already occurred.

White Street.

RUCO.

Same thing only different.

Same messaging only different.

What seems to be an attempt to pin it on Knight.

When I did it, they used my home phone number.

The only outcome seems to be more votes for Perkins.

.
.

"...All warfare is based on deception.

…when able to attack we must seem unable,
when using our forces we must seem inactive,
when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far…,
when far away, we must make him believe we are near."

Sun Tzu
.
.
.
"In politics, nothing happens by accident.

If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."

Franklin D. Roosevelt

Theo

November 8, 2011 - 10:45 pm EST

Two terrible choices but both are better than what we had with Yvonne Johnson!

Public Observer

November 9, 2011 - 1:45 am EST

Indeed! I concur, and what a sorry state of affairs we may have to look forward to in the near future if the antics of T. D/B-S are permitted to continue.

sal.leone2011

November 9, 2011 - 6:20 am EST

The blame goes out to the 80% that did not vote.

sal leone

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search