news-record.com

NEWS

State Sen. Jim Forrester dies

Monday, October 31, 2011
(Updated 3:21 pm)

RALEIGH (AP) — State Sen. Jim Forrester, a physician and social conservative who secured a legislative victory just weeks ago with a constitutional referendum next spring on whether to ban gay marriage, died Monday after a brief hospitalization, according to his daughter. He was 74.

Mary Paige Forrester said the Gaston County Republican died at Gastonia Memorial Hospital in Gastonia shortly after being taken off life support late this morning. Forrester had been in declining health this year. His condition took a turn for the worse over the weekend while visiting the mountains to watch the leaves turn, according to his sister-in-law, Sally Beach. Although Forrester had been hospitalized previously this year, he was at the Legislative Building just last Thursday, using a cane to walk slowly to a government oversight committee.

"He passed very peacefully," his daughter said. The 20-year Senate veteran was surrounded by family members when he died, she said.

Forrester, a family practitioner from Mount Holly and former Air Force one-star general, first joined the Senate in 1991 and often worked on health issues. He most recently represented Lincoln County and parts of Gaston and Iredell counties.

He served briefly as Senate minority leader in 2004, replacing then-Sen. Patrick Ballantine when he resigned to run for governor. In January, Forrester became deputy Senate leader — a largely ceremonial post — when Republicans took over the chamber for the first time in more than a century.

"Jim was a dear friend who I respected and admired," state Republican Party Chairman Robin Hayes, a former General Assembly member, said in a statement. "He had a long and distinguished career serving the people of North Carolina."

Forrester was best known in recent years for regularly filing a bill that would allow voters to decide whether to add a gay marriage ban to the state constitution. Democrats in charge of the Legislature blocked debate and votes on the measure, pointing out that state law already limited marriage to a man and a woman.

The question was approved by the Legislature in September, after elections last fall in which Republicans took over both chambers of the Legislature for the first time since 1870. The referendum, which would make traditional marriage the only domestic legal union recognized by the state, will be on the statewide ballot in May.

"If people reject it and say, 'No, we don't want this in the constitution,' then I'll live with it," Forrester said just after the final legislative vote in September. He said the bill wasn't designed to single out gays and lesbians: "It was just something I thought we needed to do to continue to have a strong family structure here in North Carolina."

Usually known for a mild demeanor, Forrester became a nemesis of the gay-rights movement recently for his pointed comments about the gay community and politics. Last year, he apologized for saying at a local GOP event that "slick city lawyers and homosexual lobbies and African-American lobbies are running Raleigh," a reference to state government.

One gay-rights group said Forrester was trying to promote a "disgraceful form of bigotry" and was "mean spirited." ''He is determined to stomp every gay person into the ground," Faith in America founder Mitchell Gold was quoted as saying in a group web posting in February.

Shortly before the September referendum debate, Forrester called gay-friendly Asheville a "cesspool of sin." He said later he was referring in part to a rally at which women went topless.

Forrester adjusted his resume this fall when his membership status in various medical organizations was questioned by gay rights activists. He said he was being unfairly targeted.

"The gay and lesbian community is trying to discredit me," Forrester said Sept. 30. "I'm not trying to deceive anybody."

Forrester was born in Scotland but moved to the U.S. as a toddler and graduated from New Hanover High School in 1954. He was an Air Force surgeon and had served in the North Carolina Air National Guard, according to his website.

Survivors include his wife, Mary Frances, a Republican activist in her own right; four children; and several grandchildren.

No funeral arrangements had been made as of Monday afternoon.

Accompanying Photos

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

colonel570

October 31, 2011 - 2:25 pm EDT

These people that hate so much are finally starting to die off. Although it is sad to see anyone die this lets other younger people in office that can do good for the american people. This guy didnt like gays but there are plenty of us out there and we arent going anywhere. I hope we elect a homosexual to fill his shoes, since he was a gay hater it only seems appropriate. I nominate Pricey Harrison!

JRL2

October 31, 2011 - 3:23 pm EDT

it's funny how people think people "Hate" others because they disagree with them. I have no hatred toward Gays/Lesbians, I do believe their life style is wrong and it sends the wrong message to our society for many reasons. If I were a politician I would help pass laws against same sex marriage, that doesn't mean I "Hate" them no more than it meant this man hated them.

Inis Magrath

October 31, 2011 - 5:04 pm EDT

@JRL2: I do not know if it really is hatred, but I will tell you that at the very least it FEELS like hatred.

Here's the difference: Without hate, I can disagree with you respectfully all day long, and you can disagree with me. At the end of the day we can both go home and live our lives in peace. We may disagree, but we can respect each other and know we do not hate each other.

But if instead of simply disagreeing with you, what if I worked hard to advocate for our government to pass laws that deprive you the civil rights that the rest of us have, pass laws that deprive you of the right to marry the person you choose, pass laws (in some places) that allow others to fire you from your job just because of who you are? What if I fought day and night to pass laws to keep you from full American citizenship, like being able to serve in the military, or hold a civil service job, or rent an apartment?

Would you still go home at the end of the day with any sense of peace? Would you still believe that I do not hate you and everything about you? Maybe I don't really hate you. But my actions would make you feel like I do.

JRL2

October 31, 2011 - 7:39 pm EDT

Inis,
the difference is that, I don't hate the person, but I do hate the life style. Now understanding the word "Hate" and that is... The emotion of intense dislike; a feeling of dislike so strong that it demands action.

So I can see why someone comes against that life style to the point they are willing to vote against it. And in the case of the deceased he has tried to passed laws against it and has the right to do so. There are laws against things such as "Smoking", "Alcohol", "Drugs" ,"Seatbelts", "Driving to fast" "Running Stop Lights and Signs" Ect.

Now, does the people that pass these laws "Hate" everybody? I don't think so, in fact they will tell people these laws are developed and passed to protect people. When someone breaks the law and gets caught they will say it sure feels like the people enforcing the laws hates them.

Not only that I have heard people say these laws are against their civil rights. If you choose to spend a lot of time trying to pass laws, have at, it's your right. I think what you're presenting is a straw man argument.

Boblovescooking

November 1, 2011 - 12:04 pm EDT

@JLR2 Everything you cited as your examples of laws include the possibility of harm to an individual. Alcohol and cigarettes are two products that if used correctly in excess will kill you. Running Stop lights and signs, driving too fast, and seat belts are designed to save lives. What does a gay marriage ban do except to deny civil rights? There is no scientific evidence, not one shred, that points out any harm that homosexuals do to anyone. Thus, why the law? It isn't necessary anyway. There is already a ban, why put it in the constitution? If the US Supreme Court weighs in on the side of Equal Protection under the 14th amendment to the constitution then the Supremacy clause of the constitution will void it anyway. The whole thing is political posturing at its worst. There are plenty of actual lifestyle choices that I really detest, including the flying of rebel flags, but I'll gladly fight to allow people I disagree with to enjoy the same freedoms I enjoy. What type of precedent will this set?

Homosexuality is not going away. For health safety for the larger community of both heterosexuals and homosexuals monogamy has always been the best choice. Marriage and civil unions are contracts that help encourage monogamy. All of the studies I've seen show marriage on the decline and divorce on the rise. Is this exercise helpful? Groups have been on the move to institute these types of bans and blaming homosexuality for the decline of the "traditional family" for decades and the trends continue.

What about the business argument since we find ourselves in a recession. Do you think national and multinational businesses will want to locate to North Carolina if they have to bring their employees to a place that discriminates?

I guess in the end I'd like to see an educated debate beyond "they make me feel uncomfortable" or "there are two or three references in the bible to say that God doesn't like them." The Bible is a beautiful book, with a lot of lessons that we should follow. I wish people would concentrate on more of the high points and teachings of Jesus that advocated love, then the world would be a much better place.

rf7777

October 31, 2011 - 5:24 pm EDT

While I agree that we are just about one more generation (dying) from this not even being as issue, I know there will always be a population of scared, ignorant people that cling to their mythologies and need to judge people who are different. If we still have so many with us after 70,000+ years, we will certainly have them around for a few hundred more.

nemo0037

October 31, 2011 - 3:13 pm EDT

My sympathy to his family. I assume that they were with him in the hospital in his waning hours. Too bad he fought to deny that right to families that aren't built on the "correct" gender combination.

rightwingnemesis

October 31, 2011 - 6:39 pm EDT

My sympathy is to the family members who recognized his hate and bigotry for what it was. For those who thought he fought for what he believed as if that was a great thing--sorry but I have no sympathy. Forrester was the worst kind of bigot--one who masked it in religion as if Jesus would have hated homosexuals too.
I hope he got to the pearly gates and found out Jesus was gay and God was female....that would really tick him off!

JRL2

October 31, 2011 - 3:14 pm EDT

My prayers go out to his family.

rf7777

October 31, 2011 - 5:16 pm EDT

Blessed be this loving man of God for fighting the sinners. Those Gays with their radical agenda of equal rights called him a hater, but it's not hate when done in the name of a loving god. R.I.P. Good Christian Soldier.

TruthTeller67

November 1, 2011 - 9:26 am EDT

Thank you RF for being so stupid as to tell the truth that you are against the "radical agenda" of equal rights. You are truly despicable person like your dead Senator Hatemonger. Honestly, I feel sorry for him and you since you will both end up in Hell for all the hate in your heart.

johnodrake

October 31, 2011 - 5:52 pm EDT

RIP :sadangel:

jgrierhicks

October 31, 2011 - 8:49 pm EDT

The State is better off now that he is dead.

yakyak

October 31, 2011 - 11:03 pm EDT

This gentleman sounds like a decent man. Too bad he has left such a sad legacy of hate and discrimination.

92Heel

October 31, 2011 - 11:45 pm EDT

One by one these bloated, bigoted, judgmental old codgers will drop dead, and good riddance.

ToddinNC

November 9, 2011 - 6:14 pm EST

I am sure his family misses him, but I can't feel sorry for Sen. Forrester. Any politician who uses his/her position to spread prejudice and oppression gets no sympathy from me!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search