news-record.com

NEWS

'A new day’ for alcohol agency

Sunday, October 23, 2011
(Updated 7:30 am)

— Leaders say the city ABC Board has rebounded as a stronger organization than the one mired last year in a controversy that led to the ouster of its general manager.

The board hired a new general manager, reformed operating and personnel policies, bolstered ethics training, and broadened the pool of administrators who make business decisions as a result of last year’s twin investigations, according to board members and city officials.

“It’s a new day,” said Jesse “Skip” Warren, chairman of the local board. “I think in many ways, it has been a very good year for us.”

But the agency that sells liquor and supervises its distribution in Greensboro still has a way to go before returning to the profitability of years gone by.

That profitability is important to residents because it pumps millions into the city budget each year. More ABC profit means less pressure on the City Council to raise taxes.

The board sent the city $2.44 million in profit during the 2011 fiscal year that ended June 30 — down $100,000 from 2010 and way down from the $3 million it turned over at its peak five years ago.

But this year is looking better, and the local ABC system is poised to cut the city a check for almost $664,000 in quarterly profit distribution, said Fred McCormick, the new general manager.

“We’ll be sending them $131,000 more than we sent for the same quarter last year,” said McCormick, the local ABC’s veteran finance officer who took the reins in May after several months as interim manager.

By law, the local ABC board gives the city 91.75 percent of revenue after expenses, the rest to Guilford County and several towns lacking ABC stores.

The board is upping its distribution to local government partly by holding back $50,000 less each quarter in the “working capital” it’s allowed.

The best thing that could happen to boost ABC profits would be a turnaround in the sour economy to loosen consumers’ purse strings, said City Council member Mary Rakestraw, council liaison to the ABC board.

Rakestraw added that she is very pleased with how smoothly things seem to be running under McCormick, a sentiment seconded by local board members Yolanda Leacraft and Roger Cotten.

The local board also mended fences with the N.C. ABC Commission, the Raleigh-based agency that oversees the state’s 168 local ABC systems.

State ABC leaders started the investigation last year by the N.C. Division of Alcohol Law Enforcement, which ultimately caused local board members to fire former manager Katie Alley.

They dismissed her after investigators found what one described as “a pattern of petty corruption” in which Alley allegedly solicited and took liquor, concert tickets, travel, meals and other things of value from liquor distributors who sold through the local board’s 16 ABC stores.

Uncertain of findings against a manager they trusted, local board members created some friction with the state by hiring private investigators to take a second look at those allegations and at the local system’s overall operations. The independent inquiry confirmed the ALE’s probe, and local officials dismissed Alley.

To the extent the local board’s initial skepticism rubbed state ABC the wrong way, it seems to have blown over.

“Greensboro is current with us in everything that we expect,” said Jon Williams, chairman of the state commission.

Williams said the local controversy happened in an era when managers of some larger, local ABC systems thought they could flout basic ethics.

“Some of these folks may have been reinforcing each other’s misunderstanding of what was acceptable,” Williams said.

In addition to Greensboro, ALE investigations uncovered similar wrongdoing in Charlotte, Wilmington and, more recently, Asheville. All the misdeeds occurred before 2010, when state officials cranked up investigations that led to the recent passage of a law increasing the accountability of local ABC boards.

In recent months, McCormick and the Greensboro board followed suggestions stemming from the local investigations to rewrite the personnel manual so it clearly defined expectations. Likewise, they created the board’s first formal operations manual to outline the proper way to do everything from opening a store to disposing of damaged liquor.

McCormick also increased the number of ABC employees who attend board meetings and who meet with liquor company sales reps.

“There are no evening meals, no luncheons or anything like that,” McCormick said of the meetings with sales reps.

In addition, board members took a state-mandated course on ethics earlier this year. And the same course will be offered soon to local ABC employees, McCormick said.

Increasing the board’s contact with ABC staff is a significant reform, said board attorney Mike Fox.

“That’s a change because when Ms. Alley was general manager, with few exceptions, she was the choke point for information to and from the board,” Fox said.

One of the last remaining vestiges of the controversy is a complaint about her firing that Alley filed with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Fox said.

Both sides have presented their cases, he said, but it’s unclear when the EEOC will rule.

Contact Taft Wireback at 373-7100 or taft.wireback@news-record.com
 

Accompanying Photos

Nelson Kepley

Photo Caption: Katie Alley before the start of the Greensboro ABC Board meeting July 22.

Additional Photos

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

reasonable

October 23, 2011 - 10:24 am EDT

Taft- What is your story? The new day of citizens paying more taxes? If profitability is down, the new day looks like Doomsday. Do you think the readers are iditots? Pollices are good but I want the board to give more money to the city and county so I don't have to pay more in taxes. Board members are pleased since you do not know about all the lawsuits that Fox is "choking" you in knowning and the city in knowing. Why is the city getting less. McCormick was quoted as sayng the ecomony is slow- really, sales are up (higher than they have ever been) but profit is down. Sound like a new day should be new board members and new adminsitrators.

News Savy

October 24, 2011 - 8:45 am EDT

I expect more from the News and Record. I don’t see any difference in what the former administrator was fired from and what the city departments are doing- the fire department is entertained, the city council gets free passes to anything at the coliseum, senators get freebies to ACC tournaments, and the Governor is in China spending tax payers money. Oh there is a difference- the former ABC administrator made money and profits were high for the ABC and the other departments lose money. The current administration and board members think everything is going well- whatever this lady did to cause her departure, it is unfair what happened to her and I hope she sues the ABC, the City, and the News and Record for every dollar she can get- since no one cares that profits are not as good.

TrickorTreat

October 23, 2011 - 10:43 am EDT

This looks more like a trick article! Profits are down but the board is better- what logic is that? Shouldn't the story be sales are up, profits are down. Why? What expenses are going on that would curtail the profits? Why does the current administrator need so many people making decisions for him- isn't he the leader? Why is the news not covering what the expenses are- how much is Mike Fox getting for his "leadership"- when they are payingover 100,000 for administrators in the office i addition to over 400,000 for Mike Fox's services? What are the car allowances for McCormick and Queen? Why are they drving a board car but being given a car stipend? What do their business credit card expenses look like? What are the other vendor expenses? If someone looks into this, it may be a new day indeed!
Why is Skip Warren and Nancy Stweart still on the board- they have over extended their time on the board? Council rules are 2 terms- they have had 3 terms. What are they holding over the Council to keep them on the board?

constitution one

October 23, 2011 - 8:24 pm EDT

the ABC board assures only one thing:. No competition and inflated prices and more government employees. This should be private enterprise. Less cost to taxpayers (we pay salaries) and provide products in the same way more "enlightened" states employ. Cut out the governtmental "middle man" and let the marketplace set the pace..
Think about it. More government or common sense.? It's our system.

demarisinyamouth

October 24, 2011 - 4:06 am EDT

I'll drink to that.

TrickorTreat

October 24, 2011 - 6:06 am EDT

Wasn't the ABC slated to privatize??? It appears that Ms. Alley was fired for running the Board as a business and made a lot of money. Now there is lower of money being made. The board is going backwards. How can Chair Warren be on the board if he thinks things are going good? I would like to see some good reporting, not what the record published- the story was that money being made was less and the city taxes will go up but the author did not write that. What are the salaries for ABC employees, what does their health insurance, 401K, longevity, disability insurance, life insurance, and other costly benefits cost taxpayers? The Governor should privatize the system and ask Ms. Alley to head up the state system.

OccupyABC

October 24, 2011 - 8:22 am EDT

I rally everyone to Occupy ABC-Does the Greensboro Council have anything to do with this group of inept board members? Mary Rakestraw and Yolanda Leecraft are not very smart if they think the current leaders are doing a good job with our money and they don't know how to read a financial report if they think 2.6 million is better than 3 million. I don’t view what Alley did as corrupt; the current council and abc board are corrupt. They remove a person that made over 3 million for the city and replaced it with a veteran employee and now the city gets 2.4 million. Who cares if she went to concerts becasue now sales are up but the citizens get less. What happened to the additional 600,000 plus money? There needs to be a complete audit- one that is controlled by no employees and no board members. Someone needs to get to the bottom of this. Another example of corrupt government that cost taxpayers- Let's Occupy ABC!!!

Retiree05

October 24, 2011 - 8:37 am EDT

Worked under 3 general managers and I would support her being in Raleigh. McCormick is being untruthful- there are no additional staffers attending board meetings. Sounded good- 2 staffers attended when past managers were there. And the state commission and legislatures changed the rules so you can not be taken out by sales reps. As a retiree I know that past general managers were given similar gifts of concert tickets, ball games and the like. Board members and employees went too. So what exactly has McCormick done other than collect a $150,000 salary package which includes car allowance, longevity, 401k, vacation, etc. At least Ms. Alley was truthful whether we liked what she said or not and made us perform- the board members and administration now are slack.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search