news-record.com

NEWS

Perdue: I won’t vote to ban gay marriage

Saturday, October 8, 2011
(Updated 4:35 am)

— Gov. Bev Perdue said she opposes the proposed constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage, but she offered her opposition in a winding, low-key statement late Friday afternoon.

While the governor said she believes marriage is between one man and one woman, she said the proposed amendment could make it harder to attract jobs to the state.

“I’m going to vote against the amendment because I cannot in good conscience look an unemployed man or woman in the eye and tell them that this amendment is more important than finding them a job,” she said in a prepared statement.

Perdue, a Democrat, cited legal opinions that predict the amendment would interfere with legal protections for all unmarried couples who live together.

The General Assembly, which is controlled by Republicans, voted during a special September legislative session to put the constitutional question on the 2012 primary ballot, scheduled to go to voters in May.

The state constitution does not give the governor veto power over constitutional amendments. But her position, political observers said, would be a powerful platform to fight the amendment should she choose to do so.

Asked if Perdue would campaign against the amendment, a spokeswoman said, “That’s not a question I can answer at this point. I think she would like to focus on creating jobs.”

Equality NC, a group campaigning against the amendment, welcomed the governor’s statement, saying she agrees with one of its main points against the measure.

“The first thing we need to do is let people know how much broader it is than the current law,” said Alex Miller, the group’s interim executive director.

Miller said the amendment would void same-sex partner benefits offered by employers and would interfere with domestic violence protections for unmarried couples living together.

Backers of the amendment dispute that notion, saying clarifying language added before the measure passed the General Assembly eliminates worries about private contracts.

“Clearly, the language of the marriage amendment is carefully worded so it will not hurt job creation,” said Tami Fitzgerald of the N.C. Values Coalition. “If Governor Perdue is really concerned about our state’s economy, why would she support destroying one of the main economic drivers for our state — the family — by refusing to join this effort to protect marriage in our constitution as the legal union of one man and one woman?”

Perdue did not cite any moral case against the measure, sticking to business points in a fashion that political observers say seems designed to walk a line between two camps: She could satisfy calls in the Democratic base that she take a stand against the measure without alienating conservative Democrats who might favor it.

“I understand what she did. But I think she would have been better off being clear and stronger,” said Gary Pearce, a former communications adviser to Democratic Gov. Jim Hunt.

Pearce argued that Perdue could have rallied support among liberal Democrats with a stronger stand while doing little damage to her re-election chances since the issue will likely be out of the headlines by the November general election.

Perdue has put off talking about her position in the past month when asked on camera or microphone, telling reporters she would have something to say later.

Her office released her position less than two hours before the close of business Friday.

“Friday afternoon is traditionally the time you put out something you don’t want people to pay any attention to,” Pearce said, adding that the idea of “taking out the trash” on Friday might be outdated in the Internet age.

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark. binker@news-record.com
 

Accompanying Photos

Joseph Rodriguez (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Gov. Bev Perdue

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

jstevenh1952

October 8, 2011 - 6:45 am EDT

Jobs?......Jobs? Is this the mantra for the next 13 months? She is spineless. This is a social issue clear and simple. Don't be a coward Gov. Stand up for what you believe! Do you belive in the amendment or not?

What political hack!

blackstream

October 8, 2011 - 7:43 am EDT

I agree! What the hell does gay marriage have to do with jobs? The only reason they want to be able to get married is to have the same benefits as a normal married couple. They already have those with only a few exceptions. I don't have anything against those who are gay or even bisexual, but you already have rights and benefits tht others don't get. Our governor, if that's what you want to call the bimbo, is a fence riding hipocrite and the next election she'll face the same fate as the last time.... no vote from me!

Dman94

October 8, 2011 - 8:23 am EDT

blackstream, exactly what rights and benefits do GLBT people have that others don't get right now? Please provide proof with links to support that comment!

And please provide links to support this comment; The only reason they want to be able to get marris is to have the same benefits as a normal married couple {what is normal}. They already have those with only a few exceptions."

The two comments above are nothing more than sound bites from talking bobble heads that have no idea what they are saying. To repeat such only makes one look as silly as they!

Try giving supporting evidence for comments when making them, especially when the comments are over such a strong issue such as same-gender marriage!

jstevenh1952

October 8, 2011 - 9:28 pm EDT

You clearly missed my point. The Gov.s only basis is jobs not for or against based on a rights issue. So I would be fair to assume that if employment was say 4% she would have no stand?

Read the article closely. To draw her support based on her premises is no more than a means to end.

L

OldDaveNJ

October 8, 2011 - 9:47 am EDT

North Carolina was one of the first states to pass laws against interracial marriage, and one of the last to revoke them ... and even then they did so only because they were forced to by the US Supreme Court. Jim Crow laws in NC persisted until very late in the game. This amendment will only further enhance the state's existing record of lagging behind when it comes to providing civil rights for all its citizens. It's hard to isolate the impact of such a track record when it comes to the state being attractive to employers, given all the other factors involved. But I suspect those advising Perdue are right ... it can't help. A state's civil-rights record is, in fact, something that companies look at when considering where they want to invest.

wullumh

October 8, 2011 - 8:19 am EDT

This is unfortunate. Gov. Bev Perdue continues to be a disappointment by opposing the proposed constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. Once again, she demonstrates her support for, and approval of, the liberal lunacy typified by pop culture. Clearly, this leadership void indicates that she has lost touch with the mores of marriage and family supported by the majority of North Carolinians. She simply cannot leave office soon enough. Once she does, perhaps North Carolina can once again celebrate the proud traditions and rich cultural heritage that has made this this state a great place to raise a family and experience the American dream as it was truly meant to be.

Rolling

October 8, 2011 - 8:55 am EDT

Why are people so scared when other people want to live their lives the way they choose to if it doesn't hurt others? The only reason Republicans are doing this is to draw voters to the presidential primary. They will make us look like Alabama and Mississippi. Come on, we're better than that here in North Carolina. Aren't we?

TiaBitta

October 8, 2011 - 9:43 am EDT

Some politicians may be strong enough to vote for the greater good of the people by whom they were elected regardless of personal views. Consider Abraham Lincoln and slavery. What you call a social issue is actually based in religion and we have separation of church and state in this country. The founding fathers were not all Christians. Some were Athiest. The country was formed on the basis of Freedom of Religion. This means we are free to believe how we choose or not believe at all. To vote on an amendment to the State constitution is in direct conflict with separation of church and state. Christians are free to separate themselves and enter a Christian marriage if they so choose. Any other two people should be able to apply and receive a marriage license and
be wed. Marriage as it is currently accepted is not a very successful venture statistically. Rather than holding onto old ideas until we choke the very life out of the state, let's grow and develop and try things differently. Please, before you vote, do some research on statistics and economics to see how this will impact jobs and finances in the state if passed rather than voting with emotion or blind religious faith. What are you all afraid of?

whyus

October 8, 2011 - 8:10 am EDT

She is no different than Obama. He wants and courts Liberal votes but then refuses to support marriage between same sexes by walking the fence. While I don't personally agree with gay marriage, a person should take a stand but that's what one comes to expect from politicians.

InterestedLurker

October 8, 2011 - 10:51 am EDT

Perdue seems more interested in money than she is the welfare of this state. Money & jobs over family and morality? What kind of governor do we have?

OldDaveNJ

October 8, 2011 - 11:03 am EDT

There is nothing immoral or anti-family about affording same-gender couples and their families the same rights, benefits, and protections currently granted to straight married couples. While she is personally opposed to same-gender marriages, perhaps she has some sense that embedding her personal views in the state constitution in ways that will negatively impact same-gender couples and their families, do nothing to enhance the lives of anyone else, and make the state less desirable from a business viewpoint, is just a really bad idea.

77 Hornet

October 8, 2011 - 10:54 am EDT

To: Rolling
"Why are people so scared when other people want to live their lives the way they choose to if it doesn't hurt others?"
It does hurt others. Once they get married they'll want to adopt innocent children. Imagine having to tell your friends you have 2 dads or 2 moms. That's totally wrong and if you'll read the bible you'll see.

OldDaveNJ

October 8, 2011 - 11:54 am EDT

@Hornet -- being raised by same-gender parents does not hurt kids ... in fact, studies show that they do as well as, if not a bit better, than kids in general. I know a number of same-gender couples, including some with kids. Many people I know also are acquainted with such families. Again, the kids typically grow up to be happy, healthy, productive people. Yes, they do have to deal with the occasional bigot who gives them a hard time for having same-gender parents. But the solution to that is for people to stop being so bigoted. Oh -- and there's nothing in the Bible to suggest that kids raised by same-gender parents have problems.

whyus

October 8, 2011 - 11:32 am EDT

I am friends with, and know quite a few gay folks. The ones I know don't seem to believe in what the Bible says unfortunately or want to spin it so as to somehow refute what it says about a man and a women being together to reproduce. I am not a religious fanatic and deplore one group of people thinking they are better than the others. But our country was founded on God and religious beliefs and it something that should not be taken lightly in my opinion.

OldDaveNJ

October 8, 2011 - 12:01 pm EDT

I am also am friends with quite a few gay people. The majority are faithful, active Christians. And actually, the majority of people I know support same-gender marriage, and most of them are faithful, active Christians as well. Maybe the religious views of those that disagree with you on this are not just "spin" as you claim. Maybe they have valid points to make, and you just haven't made the effort to understand their viewpoints. There are reasonable arguments to be made that, of those few Biblical passages commonly used to condemn homosexuality, none actually are addressing the kinds of loving, committed same-gender relationships we are talking about here. They instead are talking about things like gang-rape (the Sodom story), male shrine prostitution that was common in ancient Canaanite/Egyptian societies (Leviticus 18/20, Deuteronomy, 1&2 Kings), and temple prostitution and pederasty (Paul's letters).

Dman94

October 8, 2011 - 12:12 pm EDT

@whyus the reason some GLBT people do not believe in the Bible or are involved in any faith practices is due the constant harrassment that they may have received throughout their life. That is the sad part. Thankfully, there are CHRISTIAN faith groups that are supportative and affirming of GLBT people as human beings created by God.

And if the Bible says that a man and woman are to be together to reproduce, how do you explain men and women who are not able to reproduce or CHOOSE NOT to reproduce? I do not hear any any state or State Legislature proposing an amendment to their State Constitution to make sure that is the only reason for marriage!

And I believe that the history of the US needs to be re-read. The United States of America was NOT founded on God and religious beliefs. If that were the case, which religion's beliefs was the USA founded upon, whose God? You see, that poses great problems. Problems that are not true and need not be an issue in the proposed amendment that is on the ballot in NC in May 2012!

CopOnTheBeat

October 9, 2011 - 2:40 am EDT

Isn't it interesting that most so-called "Christians" are wringing their hands and worried sick about what people do in the privacy of their own homes? You know, casting judgements and whatnot? I guess like most so-called Christians, they take what they need and throw the rest away. I have to give Bev credit for standing up what is right. Give people equal rights. After all, dear Christians, if gays and lesbians get those rights..what is it costing you? Oh, nothing? So please, step aside and go to church and pray for something that's really important and get your noses out of people's private lives. By the way, the Triad's own, Senator Pro-Tem Phil Berger and his GOP cronies are a huge embarassment. I find it ironic that Phil has learned such political craftiness in Raleigh, especially when he was such a mediocre (at best) trial lawyer in this area. And now his son "Junior" is being groomed to run for Congress. That would be an equal disappointment. I don't agree with everything that Bev has done, and I certainly don't agree with everything the President has done. But I'm sick of the so-called Christian right and flag waving idiots telling everyone else how they should be living their own lives. Get a life........please!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search