news-record.com

NEWS

Hagan co-sponsors corporate tax break

Friday, October 7, 2011
(Updated 10:24 am)

— U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan says her proposal to give corporations a tax break on money they bring to the United States from overseas would create jobs and help break partisan gridlock over economic stimulus plans.

Hagan shares lead sponsor status on the measure with Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican and 2008 presidential nominee.

But critics point to a similar tax holiday in 2004 that did little to spark the flagging economy. They say Hagan’s bill would encourage companies to pursue more aggressive accounting strategies.

Hagan said North Carolina-based companies alone were holding $200 billion in foreign accounts to avoid the 35 percent tax rate they would pay by bringing the money home.
“I want that money back in America,” she said on a conference call with reporters Thursday.

She plans to visit Quintiles, a Durham-based pharmaceuticals consultant with workers in 60 countries, today to illustrate the need for her bill.

The measure has been pushed by large multinational corporations such as Microsoft and backed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which represents some of the country’s biggest employers.

A study the chamber released in August said bringing an estimated $1.4 trillion in offshore holdings back to the United States could lead to the creation of 2.9 million jobs nationwide.

Similar estimates of the benefits have come from the NDN, a progressive think tank.

Critics on the political right and left dispute that notion, pointing to the tax holiday in 2004 that largely led to corporations buying stock with repatriated earnings rather than investing in new equipment or hiring more workers.

“There really doesn’t seem to be anything in place that would keep it from being the failure the 2004 bill was,” said Edwin McLenaghan, a public policy analyst with the liberal N.C. Budget & Tax Center.

Writers for the conservative Heritage Foundation also criticized the idea, saying the “holiday would have little or no effect on investment and job creation.”

Hagan said the bill she and McCain are proposing is different from the 2004 measure.

Companies that bring back money under the holiday but lay off workers over the next two years would pay a penalty. And the measure would allow companies to further lower their tax rate if they can show they used repatriated funds to hire new workers.

“There is no silver bullet, but that’s no reason for inaction,” Hagan said.

The Hagan-McCain proposal comes as the Occupy Wall Street movement gains traction, with protests popping up across the country. Asked what people who are clearly frustrated with what they see as corporate misbehavior might think of a bill to give tax breaks to large companies, Hagan said her measure would help problems people were protesting about.

“If they could see this will be going toward employment opportunities … this is really going to help that situation,” she said.

The Bloomberg financial newswire has reported comments in which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said the Hagan-McCain bill would not pass as a standalone measure but would be combined with other measures meant to spark the economy.

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com
 

Accompanying Photos

Photo Caption: Kay Hagan

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

brian444

October 7, 2011 - 4:17 am EDT

What, exactly, is the plan? No taxes on "money brought back" if certain conditions are met?

whyus

October 7, 2011 - 6:37 am EDT

Devil will be in the details. The good thing is that the arbitrage associated with offshoring has continued to decline as prices and salaries offshore have increased due to competition for labor. In addition, customer service and immigration concerns about offshoring will continue to increase.So, perhaps something along these lines will pass.

retiree

October 7, 2011 - 8:40 am EDT

As long as the money can be tax-free, and maybe limit it to investing in a company's infrastructure and plant and equipment, then it might be a good idea.

Dman94

October 7, 2011 - 8:54 am EDT

OK, I am glad that I did not support John McCain in 2008. And now that Sen. Hagan is co-sponsoring such a trashy bill as this, with McCain nonetheless, just means that she loses my vote in 2014!

STOP ALL of the corporate tax loopholes. Everyone can see that these loopholes DO NOT create jobs, they only fill the pockets of the higher ups and the stock holders with more money! It is no longer about employing an American, rather it is about making the stock holders and the higher ups wealthier!

Come on people, get your heads out of the sand and look at the truth!

infolit

October 7, 2011 - 12:42 pm EDT

I'm with you, Hagan will not get my vote next time. (But neither will the Republican, whomever that is).

Panacea

October 7, 2011 - 8:59 am EDT

Hmm. If I tried to keep money I earned in a foreign country in a foreign account and not pay income taxes on it, I would be prosecuted for tax evasion.

Why do corporations get a break individuals don't?

professional skeptic

October 7, 2011 - 6:24 pm EDT

Terrible idea, Senator Hagan. All this will do is redouble the incentive for corporations to keep their profits overseas, because they know sooner or later the legislators will cave and give them another tax holiday.

What we've got to do is remove the incentives for US corporations to employ overseas workers instead of Americans, NOT strengthen their reasons for wanting to do so.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search