news-record.com

SPORTS

ACC seeks renegotiation of ESPN deal

Friday, October 7, 2011
(Updated 7:14 pm)

GREENSBORO (AP) — Commissioner John Swofford said Friday that the ACC has begun talks to renegotiate its television deal with ESPN after deciding to expand to 14 teams.

In a phone interview with The Associated Press, Swofford talked about the league's TV deal, outlook on expansion and scheduling.

The commissioner said the ACC and ESPN had informally discussed changes to the existing TV deal before starting negotiations last weekend following last month's decision to add Syracuse and Pittsburgh from the Big East. This year, the ACC and ESPN began a 12-year deal worth $1.86 billion to give the network exclusive rights to conference football and men's basketball games.

Swofford wouldn't say how much the new TV deal could be worth.

"My only goal would be the preference of sooner rather than later," Swofford said of reaching a new deal. "We're negotiating with a current partner that we know well and are already well-engaged with."

It's still unclear exactly when Pittsburgh and Syracuse will begin play in the ACC. Big East bylaws require a 27-month notice and $5 million exit fee. That would put the schools' departure in the middle of the 2013-14 sports season unless they reach an agreement with the Big East for an earlier exit.

"We'll be fully and totally respectful of (Big East) bylaws," Swofford said. "The important thing is they're coming and we'll be ready and willing when they're able to join us and prepared to join us. We'll welcome them with open arms when that time comes."

Swofford said he expected the ACC and ESPN would reach a deal before the arrival of the new schools, though he said he didn't know exactly when it would be complete.

As for the ACC expanding to 16 teams, Swofford said it won't anytime soon.

Though at least 10 schools have expressed interest in joining the league, Swofford said Friday the ACC is "very settled" at its new size, enough so that league is moving forward with plans for scheduling and divisional alignments for a 14-team league.

"If there are (expansion) opportunities that present themselves, we'll see," Swofford said. "All of this continues to evolve. But for people to think that we went to 14 to get to 16, that simply would not be an accurate assessment."

Swofford said a 14-team league would continue to have divisions in football, but that could extend to men's basketball for the first time. In addition, the arrival of Pittsburgh and Syracuse will likely mean the men's basketball schedule for league games goes from 16 to 18 games.

He said Pittsburgh and Syracuse will have a say in the scheduling and divisional questions as well.

"We were considering 18 (games) when we were 12 (teams)," Swofford said. "Each of the other major conferences have already gone or are going to 18. That doesn't mean we would necessarily do it, but I think one of the principles you look at as a conference is you want to see each other competitively as much as is feasible and makes sense.

''So there's logic behind the thought that the larger you are as a conference, the likelihood there is you'll play more conference games."

Accompanying Photos

H. Scott Hoffmann (News & Record)

Photo Caption: ACC Commissioner John Swofford

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

rooster8786

October 7, 2011 - 2:59 pm EDT

"SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!" Let me hear you say it now John; "SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!"

Gso Resident

October 7, 2011 - 4:22 pm EDT

What leverage does the ACC have ?

A deal is a deal !

The_Weasel

October 7, 2011 - 7:03 pm EDT

The membership change will allow them to renegotiate, all conference tv deals have language about if membership changes that the deals have to be reworked. Allowed Espn to pay the WAC nothing now that Boise State has left and Nevada, Frenso State, and Hawaii are leaving. So it goes both ways.

Citywatch

October 7, 2011 - 5:36 pm EDT

See you all in Madison Square Garden! In the cold and snow! Be careful what you wish for.

The_Weasel

October 7, 2011 - 6:59 pm EDT

I hope the Basketball tournament doesn't move to New York, I think a random trip there isn't bad, but not more then once every five years. Tournaments should be in Greensboro with only occansional trips to other cities. Football in Charlotte is best location since Greensboro doesn't have a football stadium worth using. Maybe Washington, D.C. on occansion. I hope they remember when it was in Florida nicer weather, but fans were less likely to travel that far and the staduims weren't great, maybe if they replaced/remodeled the one in Jacksonville. If they add a roof to one in Charlotte, D.C., or Jacksonville, I could see the football championship be based there. But I hope not Yankee Stadium or the New Meadowlands, too far. Its like the idea of playing the baseball tournament in Boston, who is going to go? Yes mabye for the first one, but after that?

The_Weasel

October 7, 2011 - 6:47 pm EDT

The ACC should get a lot more money this time around, the current contract is low ($155m) compared to what other conferences, Pac-12 ($250m), Big Ten ($214m), SEC ($205m), Big 12 ($150m), are getting, yes the ACC is not top dog in football, but is still a good football conference that is well represented in the NFL, showing the talent is there and coming to these schools, and with the conference streching from Florida to Massachusetts, soon adding acess to the New York and Pennsylvania markets, they are going to get more money then the $155 million a year they are currently getting.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Local Tickets

View All

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search