news-record.com

NEWS

Mortgage aid helps homeowners

Sunday, October 2, 2011
(Updated 3:34 am)

— Paul Ouellette was on vacation in Asheville in November when his boss called with the news: The electronics company where he had worked for the past 17 years was about to close.

“At first I said, 'OK ... things happen; you’ve got to live with it,’” said Ouellette, 62. “By the time I got home from the weekend, I had some concern. I thought, 'And I can do what from here?’”

Among the problems he faced was paying the mortgage on the town house where he had lived for 23 years. The answer, at least for the short term, came during a meeting for plant employees before it closed.

The then-newly formed N.C. Foreclosure Prevention Fund would take over mortgage payments for workers who were laid off through no fault of their own while they looked for new work or retrained for a different career.

“I actually thought I would have been back to work long before now,” said Ouellette, who is hoping to find another job in logistics or train as a short-haul truck driver.

Ouellette is typical of the latest wave of laid-off workers who drove North Carolina’s unemployment rate to 10.4 percent in August. He also faces the biggest question for the federally funded foreclosure effort: Will the economy turn around and workers find new jobs before the mortgage assistance program expires?

* * *

In Guilford County, one in every 627 single-family homes is in some stage of foreclosure, according to RealtyTrac, a firm that tracks foreclosed properties nationwide.

The number reflects a situation less dire than the national average but much more severe than the statewide figure of one in 1,680.

On average, foreclosures cost lenders and homeowners $50,000 between legal costs and lost equity, not to mention battered credit ratings and forcing one-time homeowners to find somewhere else to live.

Home values in neighborhoods with concentrations of foreclosed homes suffer. Foreclosed properties contribute to a backlog of unsold housing, further depressing new home construction — a drag on the wider economy.

As part of an effort to turn back the foreclosure tide, the U.S. Treasury Department began paying for programs in 18 states and the District of Columbia through the “Hardest Hit Fund” in late 2010.

North Carolina’s foreclosure prevention fund has $480 million and will help 20,000 families across the state, according to the N.C. Housing Finance Agency.

As of Sept. 20, the program had made commitments to 2,216 families.

If a homeowner is approved, the program pays the mortgage for up to 24 months in most locations, including Guilford and Forsyth counties, and for 36 months in the hardest hit counties, such as Rockingham.

Homeowners use that time to look for work or train for a new career. If homeowners complete the program and stay in their homes for another 10 years, it can be completely forgiven. If the homeowner sells before then, they will have to repay some or all of the loan at no interest, but only if the home sale realizes enough profit.

“We were ecstatic to see this program come along because there was money attached,” said Kathy Banks, director of counseling for the Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Forsyth County.

Until the foreclosure prevention fund came, she said, nobody had put much money toward the growing problem. Counselors could work with homeowners and their banks to modify loans so payments would be more manageable, but lenders won’t make those deals with homeowners who are out of work, Banks said.

“I cannot fix the fact that you’re out of work,” said Sofia Crisp, director of the Guilford County Homeownership Center.

Crisp’s and Banks’ nonprofits are two of the 40 agencies across the state through which homeowners can apply for the foreclosure prevention funds. But the program can’t help everyone.

* * *

Judith Forlines, 59, a widow, has lived in an old farmhouse in Danbury since 1989.

In February 2010, Sam’s Club laid her off from her job as a market representative. Facing mounting bills and limited prospects for work, Forlines said she’d be “out on the street” if the foreclosure prevention program hadn’t come along.

That said, it wasn’t easy to enroll. She had to scrape together enough money to get current on her payments before she qualified. And she’s still relying on friends and church members to keep up the house.

She’s training for a new job in the hotel industry, but jobs are still hard to come by.

Forlines and Ouellette are part of a third wave of the mortgage and economic crisis that began in the last decade, according to housing counselors and others who track mortgage failures.

Around 2007, as the subprime mortgage crisis began to crest, housing assistance agencies saw mainly borrowers in bad loans with sky-high interest rates and fees. A year or two later, borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgages began to appear.

But in the past year or two, homeowners in traditional 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages began seeking help, Crisp said.

Unlike homeowners who took on more debt than they could afford or who got loans with bad terms, this third wave struggled with the sour economy that resulted from the subprime crisis.

“The issue of unemployment has affected every ZIP code I can think of,” Crisp said.

* * *

So far, 75 people statewide have moved to the final stage of the foreclosure prevention loan and taken over their mortgage payments again.

According to RealtyTrac, North Carolina has seen a drop-off in the number of foreclosures over the past year. It’s unclear how much of that is because of the foreclosure prevention program.

“Our belief is it is making a difference,” said Bob Kucab, executive director of the N.C. Housing Finance Agency. “It is reducing foreclosures. It is avoiding those concentrations of foreclosures in communities where there have been plant closings.”

Other factors, such as a scandal involving robotic signatures on mortgage documents, have slowed foreclosures, said Daren Blomquist, a spokesman for RealtyTrac.

The larger question may be what happens in two or three years when this program runs out of money.

“It’s going to be a little bit tougher road to shake this foreclosure problem because of unemployment and the overall slow economy,” Blomquist said.

Also problematic is a mismatch between those who have lost jobs and where new jobs may be created. That’s why the time the foreclosure prevention program gives workers for retraining is critical, Kucab said.

“This is obviously a program that does help homeowners who are in difficult circumstances, but it is also a very sweet deal for the banks,” said Congressman Brad Miller, a Raleigh Democrat who has been active on housing issues.

He said the federal government has avoided pushing banks to suffer the consequences of the over-valued loans or to suffer the actual losses they could be facing.

Until banks grapple with real losses on mortgages — and until a number of factors in the wider economy help build solid demand for houses — the problem will persist, Miller said.

“(This program) is helping people in some circumstances, but it’s not going to be a fix to the housing problem,” he said.

Nor will it cure the unemployment problem. When borrowers like Forlines and Ouellette reach the end of their eligibility for assistance in the next 15 months, there’s no guarantee they will have jobs that let them graduate successfully from the assistance program.

“We don’t know what will happen down the road,” Kucab said, executive director of the N.C. Housing Finance Agency. “The belief is that employment opportunities will be expanding as the economy recovers.”

 

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

File photo (Associated Press)

NEED HELP?

  • N.C. Foreclosure Prevention Program: (888) 623-8631 or www.ncforeclosure prevention.gov
  • Guilford County Homeownership Center: 553-0956 or www.gchcnc.org

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

mssuzq

October 2, 2011 - 4:07 am EDT

Not true!!! You can't "scrape together enough money" to get current on your house payments, then get enrolled in the foreclosure prevention program. You have to show a record of ON TIME payments for 6 months to 1 year before you even apply; if you have missed or been late on even one payment, YOU DON'T QUALIFY! I didn't learn about the existence of this program until I was on the verge of missing my first payment; I TOLD the CCCS counselor plainly that I'd just found out about the program, and would not be able to make my upcoming payment. By the time I could gather the HUGE amount of documentation required, I was told I couldn't qualify because I was already late with that payment!!!!! Even though I told her in advance that I couldn't make the upcoming payment, she NEVER AT ANY TIME told me the rules of the program. This program ONLY helps homeowners who aren't really in trouble yet. Just more lies and half-truths from a government agency. Please, N&R, stop helping to spread this propaganda and report the FACTS about how this program operates!

1234

October 2, 2011 - 6:25 am EDT

I lay much of this housing malaise squarely on the feet of Barney Frank and his Democrape machine. Before anyone should own a home, they should have a year's emergency savings fund beyond the 10-20% down and closing costs. To hand people keys to a home with no money down, no savings for repairs such as replacing a water heater or furnace...or a roof is a crime! A crime against those persons and to the others that have bought homes as an place to live and an investment (and played by the rules).

My wife (prior to getting married) was allowed to get a home with zero money down (no PMI as well!) based on her income INCLUDING child support that had a closing window of just two years...and during the same time period, I had to get a second mortgage to avoid PMI. When I questioned the banking officer, I was told that there were "special programs for groups that the Government wants in homes". She would not discuss further for confidentiality reasons (but I know that my credit score was better, income larger, history of 15 years of one time payments with the same lender) would have made me a far better risk!

Shame on you Barney and Friends!

Panacea

October 2, 2011 - 11:14 am EDT

Barney Frank didn't make anyone sign a loan they couldn't afford.

The problem is with banks who relaxed lending standards so much that anyone with a pulse could get a mortgage.

The Federal Government did not make banks or brokers come up with subprime loans, liar loans (no doc loans), jumbo loans, interest only loans OR make banks securitize these unstable loans and then sell them as "safe" investments to institutional investors.

destinys mother in law

October 2, 2011 - 1:10 pm EDT

So, clearly it's time to further deregulate the whole banking and mortgage industry (so the rich can generate more jobs and homeless people).

terrier2003

October 3, 2011 - 9:00 am EDT

They did threaten to hold back funding if they didn't set up specific programs to help certain classes get into homes...

Barney Frank didn't create the mortgage mess, but he is certainly responsible for the some of the policies. And when the house of cards was falling around him, he denied the reality of the situation. I sorta wished he went through the grief stages faster.

terrier2003

October 3, 2011 - 8:58 am EDT

I appreciate the comment on the emergency fund in addition to what I would say a minimum of 20% down on the house. However they could blow that fund shortly after recieving the mortgage. So it wouldn't mean much. You are talking about a population that bought houses that cost too much and when the balloon payments came due or the interest adjusted they couldn't make the payment. They don't exactly have a lot of financial common sense.

1234

October 2, 2011 - 8:56 pm EDT

Lets see groups endorsed by the democrape party...AKA- ACORN via funding paid for by congress that leaned on the Banks and Mortgage companies to make loans to those that really did not qualify under normal underwriter scrutiny...I WAS TOLD THIS BY BOA VP in Greensboro as to why I had to pay 20% down!

Panacea

October 2, 2011 - 10:27 pm EDT

Well, he certainly wasn't going to tell you the reason lending standards got so tight is because banks like BOA screwed them up in the first place.

Boy, are you gullible. Do a little research on what actually happened.

terrier2003

October 3, 2011 - 9:11 am EDT

Surely you don't think that Wells Fargo, Countrywide (now BOA), etc... are solely to blame in this.

1234

October 3, 2011 - 11:13 pm EDT

This was before 2008...the house of cards had not fallen in yet...and my credit score was over 850...they were doing the reverse discrimination (this guy has the money and the income to pay down more) to spread the risk for those that don't!

Not gullible at all...people were not forced to buy homes...but the Acorn's of the world pushed people into the American dream that ruined it for the others that saved and scraped to pay their dues down.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search