news-record.com

NEWS

State will seek waiver on No Child Left Behind requirements

Saturday, September 24, 2011
(Updated 5:10 am)

RALEIGH (MCT) -- North Carolina will seek a waiver from key provisions of the federal No Child Left Behind law, which has been criticized for too much emphasis on high-stakes standardized tests.

President Barack Obama announced Friday that he would give states relief from the 2002 law as long as those states present plans to close achievement gaps and hold schools accountable for graduating students who are prepared for college and careers.

Among other things, No Child Left Behind specified that all students meet proficiency standards in reading and math by 2014. North Carolina, like many states, is far from that goal. Based on data from the 2010-11 year, only 27.7 percent of state schools met "adequate yearly progress" on the standards.

Under the law, North Carolina schools with a certain percentage of low-income families had to offer students extra tutoring or transfers to other schools if they failed repeatedly to make that progress.

Speaking at the White House, Obama said it was time to act because Congress had not revamped the Bush-era education law, which was due for a rewrite four years ago. No Child Left Behind has been on the books for nearly a decade, and while its aims were laudable, Obama said, the law created negative consequences in practice.

"Higher standards are the right goal. Accountability is the right goal. Closing the achievement gap is the right goal. And we've got to stay focused on those goals," Obama said. "But experience has taught us that, in its implementation, No Child Left Behind had some serious flaws that are hurting our children instead of helping them. Teachers too often are being forced to teach to the test. Subjects like history and science have been squeezed out."

Worse, Obama said, schools have lowered standards to avoid being labeled as failures under the law's all-or-nothing criteria. Republican lawmakers have criticized Obama's move, saying it's a bad precedent for the administration to essentially dump provisions of a law enacted by Congress.

The law was signed by George W. Bush in 2002 and had bipartisan support in Congress. Proponents argued the law would increase accountability for teachers and principals and provide parents with transfer options if their children were stuck in failing schools.

It also put a focus on the racial achievement gap by focusing on minority students whose test results were reported in subgroups within schools. But the law has also been criticized by educators for fostering a high-stakes testing environment that turned back progress in the classroom.

Some states and districts have seen cheating scandals in which school officials changed student test answers to improve results.

Critics also said the law unfairly branded schools as failures if one small segment of the student population did not perform well on the tests. Obama cited the example of a charter school in Worcester, Mass., where all graduates in the last three years went on to college but where some students did not meet the technical standards of No Child Left Behind.

North Carolina education officials sent a letter to U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan in August requesting a waiver of No Child Left Behind provisions.

State Superintendent June Atkinson wrote that North Carolina needs "greater flexibility for meeting the goal of improving schools within an accountability system that is both rigorous and fair."

A more formal application will be prepared now that the federal government's new system has been announced, but the August letter offered a framework of North Carolina's plan.

The state wants to focus its resources on the lowest-achieving schools -- those where less than 60 percent of students pass yearly exams. That would include the lowest 5 percent of schools in terms of student achievement.

Under No Child Left Behind, too many schools were classified as "in need of improvement," and the state's resources were spread too thinly, said Lou Fabrizio, the Department of Public Instruction's director of data, research and federal policy.

"Our intention is to really focus that intervention," Fabrizio said.

The state has already undertaken significant changes in education, such as adopting a new "common core" standard curriculum and including student performance as a measure in teacher and principal evaluations. North Carolina made some of the moves as it applied for, and won, a $400 million Race to the Top education grant from the federal government last year.

Other states made similar changes to compete for the big federal grants.

In a conference call Friday with reporters, Duncan said states already had led a quiet revolution from the No Child Left Behind era.

He praised states for "stunning courage, collaboration and creativity."

The federal government, he said, should get out of the way as states create their own systems of accountability.

But, he cautioned, the federal government is not interested in granting flexibility to states operating on a "business as usual" basis.

Duncan said states would be given about six weeks to apply for waivers.

The applications will undergo review, and the first waivers should be granted in December or January. Others can apply in February for review later.

State education officials say they have to figure out the nuts and bolts of their proposal, but they like North Carolina's odds.

"With all of the things that we're doing as a state, we should be in a good position to have our waiver request approved," Fabrizio said.

U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan, a Greensboro Democrat, said in a statement Friday that she's glad North Carolina could get more flexibility, but said a waiver is no substitute for a rewrite of the law by Congress.

"We must come together, Democrats and Republicans, to reform our education laws and put our students first," Hagan's statement said.

Accompanying Photos

File photo (News & Record)

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

goodtoknow

September 24, 2011 - 10:39 am EDT

Do away with the Dept. of Education. Another Fabian Socialist idea administered by Jimmy Carter. Does anyone know any good thing Jimmy Carter did in his Presidency?

It's a toss up of who has been the worst President in the last 100 years, Carter or Obama. Have you noticed that Carter has been very quiet during Obama's rule. That's because Obama is doing everything Carter would do if he were in office. Socialist, both of them.

Panacea

September 24, 2011 - 7:11 pm EDT

Carter's been busy with his humanitarian work.

He rarely criticized Bush . . . if he ever did. Former Presidents usually don't comment much on the policies of their successors.

goodtoknow

September 25, 2011 - 10:52 am EDT

Panacea..On the news I watch Carter has criticized Bush many times and even said he, Bush, was the worst President ever. Now, that's the pot calling the kettle black. Start watching FOX News and you'll see video and hear audio of the type things I have mentioned. It's the Republicans who follow the rule to not comment on the active President. Carter and Clinton both have been very verbal about other Presidents. Carter did several things to make other administrations dislike his humanitarian work. Like going to Korea without being asked and disrupting important talks, and backing Arabs over Isreal. All he had to do is stay home and enjoy his retirement, but he really had to get in the news and mess with the Korean talks. If you'll notice when all the Presidents get together Carter is usually separate from the rest. He doesn't like them and they don't like him.

whyus

September 24, 2011 - 10:44 am EDT

goodtoknow-amazing that I posted exactly the same thing regarding job losses in the N&R before I read your comments regarding Carter and Obama comparisons. Obama is doing this as a political pandering motive to appease the NEA and other do-nothings.

Panacea

September 24, 2011 - 7:14 pm EDT

Oh, come on. Don't tell me you really think NCLB is really improving education and needs to stay in place?

goodtoknow

September 25, 2011 - 11:01 am EDT

I just checked it out.

goodtoknow

September 25, 2011 - 11:02 am EDT

I just checked it out to whyus.

Dman94

September 24, 2011 - 12:42 pm EDT

The US NEEDS a uniform educational code. Having 51 different systems provides NO ONE with an uniform educational code!

What needs to happen is for the US Dept. of Education to draw up a uniform educational form for ALL 50 states AND Puerto Rico. Then, stop pandering to standized tests/testing. Stop paying bonuses to teachers because a % of students pass a test. Teach the basics, INCLUDING foreign language! Mandate that teachers be proficient in their subject and hold them accountable to that! Stop the In School Suspension garbage and go back to corporal punishment! Expel students who are problematic. Do NOT allow said students to "makeup" the work missed during expulsion!

This piece of legislation signed into law in 2002 is a true waste of time and effort. It is NOT a waste of money because it was NEVER fully funded!!! This is the main problem with an education in the US today, no funding to adequately EDUCATE a student!

Until the US places more value on an educated person over the value of a killing machine, then we will continue to see a decline in this ONCE GREAT NATION!!!

jodygodie

September 24, 2011 - 4:24 pm EDT

Federal education standards imposed by the Federal Government are unconstitutional under the 10th Amendment. (Incidentally, you split an infinitive in your comment; shame on you.)

Panacea

September 24, 2011 - 7:23 pm EDT

If that were true, the Supreme Court would have overturned them during the Bush years.

goodtoknow

September 25, 2011 - 11:04 am EDT

Possibly, no one has taken it to court yet. The Supreme Court will not act unless something is presented to it.

JackK

September 26, 2011 - 9:09 am EDT

NCLB has several huge problems. 1) as one writer pointed out, allowing states to set their own standards, and thus to say they are doing well, shows the lie immediately that international tests are administered; 2) any program whose major incentive is to do well to avoid sanctions/punishments is doomed to failure; 3) the program is predicated on at least one faulty premiss, that anyone sitting in a federal or state dept of education can decide what someone needs to know about any subject and what the minimum amount to be judged proficient in that subject might be--any time you aim for a minimum, you get less than you aimed for, and 4) NCLB puts all the pressure on schools--teachers and administrators--and no pressure on students or their parents, without a major upgrade in student and parent desire and academic aspirations, no program is going to work.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search