news-record.com

NEWS

Area job losses continue to mount

Saturday, September 24, 2011
(Updated 3:00 am)

On the employment front, the bad news keeps getting worse.

Data released Friday by the Employment Security Commission of North Carolina show that the job picture for most cities and counties in the area has worsened over the past 12 months.

Some saw their August unemployment rates equal or surpass those of August 2010.

Some saw higher numbers of unemployed last month than they did a year earlier.

And some saw both.

In Greensboro, for example, the unemployment rate jumped, year over year, by 0.5 percentage point, to 10.8 percent. And the number of people without jobs increased during the same period, from 13,274 to 13, 915.

That double whammy also played out in Winston-Salem; in the counties of Stokes, Rockingham, Randolph, Forsyth and Guilford; and in the region’s three metro areas.

“I’ve noticed that pattern in a number of places,” said John Quinterno, a principal at South by North Strategies, a research firm in Chapel Hill. “The story really hasn’t changed. We have a crisis.

“The labor market is in terrible condition.”

The Greensboro-High Point metro area offers a prime example.

Year over year, the three-county region saw its labor force fall by 0.7 percent, the number of people with jobs fall by 1 percent and the number of people unemployed rise by 1.97 percent.

During that time, the area’s unemployment rate jumped to 11 percent. That’s the metro’s highest rate this year.

Across the area, only one city, Winston-Salem, and one county, Stokes, had unemployment rates below 10 percent in August.

“Our economy is flat (or) down everywhere we look,” said Don Jud, professor emeritus at UNCG’s Bryan School of Business and Economics. “I don’t have any good news anywhere.”

Between August 2010 and August 2011, unemployment rates rose in 76 of the state’s 100 counties and 11 of the state’s 14 metro areas.

In August, jobless rates were at or above 10 percent in 70 counties. And 58 counties had rates last month greater than the current state unemployment figure of 10.4 percent.

From July to August, the unemployment rate increased or stayed the same in 68 counties.

“The increase in unemployment since July is certainly troubling,” Allan Freyer, a policy analyst with the N.C. Budget and Tax Center in Raleigh, wrote in his monthly jobs report.

“But the long-term trend in the unemployment rate is even more cause for concern.”

Since the recession began in December 2007, the state has lost 289,300 jobs, or 6.9 percent of its employment base.

Although the Greensboro-High Point metro area added 2,800 jobs in August, it has lost 900 positions in the past 12 months.

“Conditions, in many ways, have deteriorated over the year,” Quinterno said.

“(And) there is very little evidence that we are going to see any meaningful changes for the rest of the year.”

Contact Donald W. Patterson at 373-7027 or don.patterson@news-record.com
 

Accompanying Photos

Jerry Wolford (News & Record)

Photo Caption: The Army (left) and furniture retailer Furnitureland South were among the 36 companies at the Job Expo and Franchise Fair sponsored by the Greensboro Chamber of Commerce.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

averymaes

September 24, 2011 - 6:05 am EDT

Unemployment numbers are comprised of those that are in the job market for the past 30 days. It does not include those that have not been in the job market in the last 30 days: people who have given up looking; those that have gone off unemployment because it has run out. One solution to unemployment is "High Speed University" check it out

rmacz

September 24, 2011 - 9:35 am EDT

One solution is to vote Obama out...ha!

HotRodLincoln

September 24, 2011 - 6:15 pm EDT

A better soloution is to vote out Phil Berger and Bert Jones.

retiree

September 24, 2011 - 10:25 am EDT

More unemployment this year is a result of the borrowed money running out. The Obama stimulus programs would have worked better if they had given each citizen $500,000 (of borrowed money) and let us spend it on whatever we wanted rather than giving it away to Solyndra and other pie in the sky projects.

whyus

September 24, 2011 - 10:41 am EDT

These times remind me exactly (except for the hyperinflation) of the Jimmy Carter days. Absolutely no faith in the government or leadership. Someone in the White House who was unqualified to hold the office and surrounded by technocrats and socialists. When he gets voted out, watch the market skyrocket.

Dman94

September 24, 2011 - 11:00 am EDT

The market moves at it's own pace/desire. Employment/unemployment are NOT determined by how the stock market is doing. As can be noted over the past 10-12 years, the market has been in somewhat of a bull stage. However, job losses have mounted just as the market has climbed. Anyone with .25 of a brain knows that company's are outsourcing jobs to increase profits, thereby making the stock market look good, yet the job market getting more dismal all the time.

Get a clue and realize that jobs and how the stock market goes are not totally connected as seems to be the inference!

Traveler

September 24, 2011 - 11:58 am EDT

We have a president who has zero experience running anything; not a business, not a governement, nothing. He has surrounded himself with people who have never run anything.

Obama is a great speaker. Unfortunately, his speeches tend to vilify people and institutions that are successful.

The Obama white house doesn't understand how their regulators have scared businesses. They don't understand how their policies have increased the cost of hiring low skilled people, and priced millions of jobs out of the market. They don't understand how people have lost confidence in this administration.

There are things that could and should be done, but this administration will NOT make the needed changes.

Bottom line of basic economics is that the free market determines the cost and value of labor, and the amount of products and services produced. Governement should not try to determine winners and losers.

There are too many questions of what the previous programs have spent, how the money was spent, and why special interests were favored.

Sadly, this president, who came into office with so much support from all Americans, appears to be on the verge of leaving office being compared to Jimmy Carter. Both were good men who failed the presidency.

Alf42

September 24, 2011 - 10:48 pm EDT

Agreed, however, I wouldn't rule out the possibility that this is purposeful. They may not really want to create jobs. There are some hardcore leftists out there who have wanted to cut this country down to size for a long time, and a lot have them have found their way into white house now.

Dman94

September 24, 2011 - 12:25 pm EDT

Jimmy Carter did NOT fail the Presidency! Rather, the American people FAILED President Jimmy Carter! The main problem with our system is the way the free market system has been allowed to control EVERY aspect of the average person's life! Why should my success or failure as a free standing person be determined by the free market system? Why should my wages be determined by the free market system? What is wrong with a fair, decent and LIVABLE wage? Too many people today are only existing, not even surviving! This is due to the free market system!

Too many corporate heads/board of directors have decided to send jobs overseas for pennies on the dollar in wages in comparison to what the basic wage was in the US. This is so that the stockholders can make their money and the "big chiefs" can be paid millions i bonuses for "growing" the company.

If that is free market, you can keep it!

RandolphBloke

September 24, 2011 - 2:24 pm EDT

People in this country don't get that the large businesses are STILL making money hand over fist at this point. They are sitting on record profits and paying out record salaries to those who matter. The ones who don't, the employees are seeing real wages at the lowest level in 50 years. (They've been on a downward streak for the past 30 years, unrelated to anyone in the WH at the moment.)

Next year we'll have someone in the WH who will be beholden to those large companies and will ensure that wage variations continue to go up for the those in control and down for those who provide the real work. Income disparity will at that time be worse than it was in the first part of the 20th century.

RonaldusMagnus

September 24, 2011 - 6:01 pm EDT

The real problem is that the free market is less free than ever. Our tyrannical government is destroying the free market with regulation and a ridiculous tax code that cannot be understood by a team of lawyers. Next, they create trade rules that promote taking your business to other countries that do not put any value on human rights or wage standards(IE communist China). On top of that , our government leaves the border wide open so that illegal immigrants rush in and destroy the wages for what jobs are left. The free market is not free , it needs to be set free! Maybe you should consider moving to Russia...

saabman

September 25, 2011 - 9:04 pm EDT

Son were do you live ??? Free Market has never Been Free and if it were not for Government intervention the Wages would be a lot lower then what they are now. So I ask you Were Do You Live???

Alf42

September 24, 2011 - 10:55 pm EDT

So you think the government mandating a wage is the answer? How is that going to help? Companies will just continue to move to countries where they can pay a lower wage. That's quite a naive stance.

And by the way, what's your solution? Socialism? Communism?

Waldo Leidecker

September 25, 2011 - 10:12 am EDT

That's right moron, we should ALL work for fifty cents an hour like our Chinese friends.

Doug Johnson

September 24, 2011 - 6:30 pm EDT

You should be paid exactly what you are worth to a company, no more no less.
I always read this griping about moving off shore.
Yet Jeff Immelt, who on Obama group to make jobs in the Us, is moving much of GE to China
So why would Obama want him, GE owns NBC and MSNBC, and they are both in the tank for Obama..
Wonder why no griping about this?
Don't hear much about Boeing in SC either.
Of course Brad Miller vote to allow the NLRB, to control this plant..
Yet not a peek, from the liberal media in this area.
Then there's the case of Gibson guitar, seems the liberal media missed this to!
Yet Michele Bachmann, can get the city john Wayne was born in, and you get a half page on it.

.

Alf42

September 24, 2011 - 10:43 pm EDT

Ask yourself, if you were trying to destroy the US private sector economy, on purpose, what would you do differently than what Obama is doing? This is not simple incompetence, it's purposeful, and it's becoming harder to ignore.

johnodrake

September 25, 2011 - 9:46 am EDT

Liberal free thread

Waldo Leidecker

September 25, 2011 - 10:10 am EDT

Since the Republinazis lied and cheated their way into controlling the House by coercing the terminally greedy and feeble minded into voting for them, the only jobs they've created have been for themselves and their highly paid lobbyists. They've been way too busy destroying what's left of the country in the pathetic hope they'll weasel back power in 2012 and as such can only be regarded as the "Allmighty Dollar" worshipping traitors they truly are. Reward the rich, punish the poor - vote Republican!

scribonz

September 25, 2011 - 7:53 pm EDT

Anyone who wasn't completely politically biased would vote against both Republicans and Democratic incumbents next election. The bunch of Republicans that were elected to improve the economy in 2010, took over the House of Representatives and have done nothing but throw roadblocks on any measures to turn the economy around. This country needs a centrist party to keep the extremists in both parties in check.

saabman

September 25, 2011 - 8:26 pm EDT

I'm a retired Warrant Officer 3 with 24 years of active service in the ARMY: Look you need to put the blame were it belongs. On a Republican congress and their highly paid lobbyists friends, They are the ones destroying the middle class and private sector under the Guise of Shady Economics. The government is not destroying the free market "Terminal Greed is" and most of you KNOW this. Regulations and Tax codes have always been their , so don't use that as and Excuse for your Childlike Behavior are your out right Disrespect towards the President . An yet you Republicans always Invoke Ronald Reagan presidency as your Rallying Cry!! As a Former Member of the OLD GUARD ! I can tell you this President Reagan cared about the middle class and private sector and under President Reagan Tax's were at it's Highest! He used Bipartisanship to move the United States forward not backwards as the Republicans are doing now.!! So do not Blame President Obama if he is more REAGANES then your so called candidates of Dumb,Dummer,Dope,Clueless, and Beaviss and Butthead. But I really think in my heart THAT> Some of you REPUBLICANS ARE WHAT EVERY YOU CALL YOURSELVES THIS WEEK? WOULD RUN THE UNITED STATES IN THE GROUND BEFORE YOU LET PRESIDENT OBAMA WIN OFFICE AGAIN!!
YOU CAN SAY YOUR NOT RACIST BUT YOUR ACTIONS SAY OTHERWISE. PRESIDENT REAGAN WAS A MAN OF HONOR!!! You Republicans are just COWARDS.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search