news-record.com

NEWS

N.C. unemployment rate unchanged

Friday, June 17, 2011

RALEIGH (AP) — For the third straight month, North Carolina's unemployment rate remained at 9.7 percent, as employers shed about 7,400 jobs, according to state figures released Friday.

The May numbers included a loss of about 4,000 jobs in the professional and business services sector, along with other significant losses in health, education and government, according to the state Employment Security Commission.

North Carolina's joblessness was lower than the national figure for May, which was 9.1 percent. The state has exceeded the national rate every month since November 2010, when both were at 9.8 percent. North Carolina's official jobless rate has hovered slightly above or below 10 percent for nearly a year, something that should be a major concern for policymakers, said Gene Nichol, director of the Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity at the University of North Carolina.

"We can't settle into a situation where normal is around 10 percent unemployment without doing significant damage to generations of North Carolinians," he said.

Since May 2010, the unemployment rate has dropped from 10.8 percent. In the last 12 months, the number of employed workers has grown by more than 15,000, and the number of unemployed people has decreased by more than 55,000, state figures show.

But since the start of the Great Recession in December 2007, the state has lost nearly 289,000 jobs, or close to 7 percent of its payroll employment base, according to

John Quinterno of Chapel Hill-based South by North Strategies, Ltd., a research firm specializing in economic and social policy.

"The recovery has not yet delivered much in the way of meaningful job growth," he said.

Official jobless figures tracked by state and federal governments can be simplistic, Nichol said, because they don't count as unemployed people who have stopped looking for work, or people in part-time jobs unsuccessfully looking for full-time work.

"There are different estimates on what a more realistic figure would be, but it would be considerably higher than 9.7 percent," he said.

Also complicating the picture is that the downturn has not had the same effects everywhere. Some regions, like the Research Triangle area, have jobless rates considerably lower than the average, while others — particularly in parts of the west and northeast — struggle with significantly higher unemployment.

Joblessness is also disproportionately severe for blacks, according to a recent study by the North Carolina Budget and Tax Center and the Economic Policy Institute. The report found that the unemployment rate among blacks in North Carolina is about double what it is for whites.

"North Carolina has been hit hard by this recession, but unemployment has hit different parts of the state in different ways," Nichol said.
 

Accompanying Photos

File photo (Associated Press)

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

rmacz

June 17, 2011 - 6:50 pm EDT

Not much to said for "Hope and Change" here.....Ha!
http://www.cnbc.com/id/43441924

1234

June 17, 2011 - 7:06 pm EDT

Remember folks this is the reported LABOR departmental line/number...my wife, step daughter are unemployed and they do not show up as wife quit job/and other is a student that would like to work...my oldest son is volunteering this summer. The rate in NC is more like 20%...

The Presidents Council are all F100 CEO's...why does he not have real working small business owners on the economic business councils? Did you hear that GE is buying half of the Chevy Volts to put in their fleet...payoff?

The Hope and Change has arrived and it is business as usual.

r1948

June 18, 2011 - 1:57 pm EDT

The numbers don't take into account those who have exhausted their benefits so the real number is about twice what they are reporting.

UNCGProf

June 18, 2011 - 3:17 pm EDT

Yeah thankfully we can get by on my salary, so we do not collect benefits even though my husband is probably eligible for them. So I don't think people like him are counted in the stats either, even though he is actively looking for work. And what about all the recent graduates looking for work, they probably arn't collecting benefits. Unless that's not the way they are counting unemployment? Not sure how else they would know about my husband though, it's not like he's registered as unemployed or something.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search