news-record.com

NEWS

N.C. House backs bill on shorter early-voting period

Friday, May 13, 2011

— Voters would have fewer days to cast their ballots during early voting under a bill the state House gave tentative approval Thursday.

House lawmakers must vote again Monday before sending the measure to the Senate.

Under current law, the early voting period runs 17 days, beginning the third Thursday before an election and ending the Saturday before. This measure would cut that time to 10 days, starting on the second Thursday before an election.

“It will save the local governments money,” said Rep. Bert Jones, an unaffiliated lawmaker from Reidsville who caucuses with Republicans.

Jones, the bill’s sponsor, said local boards of elections wouldn’t have to pay as much for poll workers and early voting sites if the early voting period were reduced.

“Wrong,” Guilford County Elections Director George Gilbert said when asked about Jones’ claim.

Gilbert said the county adjusts staffing and the number of early voting locations available based on expected turnout.

“I’ve got to meet the demand of voters,” he said.

Cutting down the days available for early voting won’t cut down the demand for early voting. In 2008, Gilbert said, more than 150,000 people voted early in Guilford County.

Gilbert said cutting the number of days available, especially in a presidential election year such as 2012, could lead the county Board of Elections to open more early voting locations, which would mean hiring more staff, putting out more machines, paying more rent and driving up costs in other ways.

Jones also argued that a shorter voting period would benefit some candidates.

The extended early voting period makes campaigning hard on candidates who have not raised as much money, he argued.

But other lawmakers argued that early voting favors well-organized, if not well-funded, candidates. And, bill opponents argued, a longer early voting period gives people juggling jobs and family more time to vote.

The bill “creates a problem for those people who need the weekend to vote,” said Rep. Alma Adams, a Greensboro Democrat.

She said programs such as “Souls to the Polls,” which encourages church members to vote, have helped increase turnout.

A shorter early voting period also means less time for procrastinators. Under current law, most voters must register at least 25 days prior to an election. But those who miss the deadline can register and vote on the same day during the early voting period — something not available on Election Day.

“It makes me wonder if there are other reasons for shortening the early voting period,” said the Rev. Cardes Brown, president of the Greensboro branch of the NAACP. “It will reduce the turnout of those looking for an opportunity to vote.”

Rep. Mickey Michaux, a Durham Democrat, said the bill may not pass muster with the U.S. Justice Department, which must clear changes to election laws due to the federal Voting Rights Act.

The 61-53 vote was mainly along party lines. However, Rep. John Faircloth of High Point was one of three Republicans to buck his party and vote against the bill.

“I just think we ought to give people as much time to vote as we can,” Faircloth said.

Reps. Alma Adams, Pricey Harrison and Maggie Jeffus, of Greensboro, and Marcus Brandon of High Point, all Democrats, voted against the bill. Rep. John Blust, a Greensboro Republican, voted for the bill.

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

H. Scott Hoffmann (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Bill Wetphal carries a voting sign back inside the Old Guilford County Courthouse in Greensboro on Oct. 14.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Bilbo

May 13, 2011 - 6:58 am EDT

..just another item in the list of things that the GOP is doing to eliminate as many voters as possible...knowing that they do not have the numbers..especially with all the shennanigans that they are doing right now...and must, by any way possible, shrink the voting base....SHAME!!...

ravencottage

May 13, 2011 - 7:40 am EDT

Bilbo do you realize how absurd you appear?

Waldo Leidecker

May 13, 2011 - 10:23 am EDT

Ravencottage do you realize how much of a REPUBLINAZI you appear? The GOP will do ANYTHING to keep the voters away - at least those that aren't driving a Mercedes and wet their pants when discussing "tax cuts for the wealthy."

Mr. JMS

May 13, 2011 - 4:31 pm EDT

Waldo, Do you realize how stupid you sound? Voters will have 10 days to vote. 10 DAYS. Any democrat who can't sober up in 10 days, long enough to vote shouldn't vote anyway.

Interested

May 13, 2011 - 8:36 am EDT

Voters will still have 10 days prior to election day + election day + absentee ballot options to cast their vote. If they can't manage to cast a vote in that time period, they aren't too interested in voting.

The shame is that citizens will still have a more-than-reasonable amount of time to cast their vote and few will relative to the number who are eligible.

Norm*

May 13, 2011 - 7:03 am EDT

Reducing access to the polls as a way to save money? Sad times for North Carolina.

Alf42

May 13, 2011 - 7:19 am EDT

I am for the bill. Do we really need 17 days to vote when one used to be enough? We have done things the Democrats' way in this state for over 100 years. We are still one of the lowest ranking states in the nation in income, education and health. I say give republicans a chance.

There's too many people on this board who play the victim role. Their plight is always the result of someone else, not a result of their attitude and work ethic. When you start thinking like a victim you become one.

hgals01

May 13, 2011 - 7:38 am EDT

If the Democrats were focused of creating jobs in the state when they were in control, we would not have to worry about all these budget matters. The people of Guilford County and state are speaking! People are sick and tired of the dems liberal agenda.

Waldo Leidecker

May 13, 2011 - 10:28 am EDT

So how's that jobs creation thing workin' for the GOP? Oh, that's right. Now that they've lied, cheated, and stolen their way into the House that issue disappeared in a heart beat. They haven't created one single GD job.....surprise, surprise. surprise. Now they're too busy with their relentless quest to screw over the poor, the unemployed, the elderly, and the infirm - all for fun and personal profit. What a bunch of sweethearts.

Mr. JMS

May 13, 2011 - 4:35 pm EDT

Waldo you obviously don't read to much N.C. news. There is hardly a week goes by that Gov. Perdue doesn't try to take credit for some company bringing xxx amount of jobs to N.C.
And how about that new statistic Obama and the left-wingers came up with, "Number of Jobs Saved". What a crock.

The_Doctor

May 13, 2011 - 9:03 am EDT

In the old days, election day was election day. You either voted on election day or you didn't. You could obtain an absentee ballot if you were demonstrably going to be away on election day, but that was it. "Early voting" is just an open invitation to fraud. We don't need it at all. If you can't obtain a traditional absentee ballot and you can't make it to the polls on the actual day of elections, then tough luck.

goodtoknow

May 13, 2011 - 9:11 am EDT

Interesting. Mr. George Gilbert said he has to listen to the demands of the voters. Wow, wouldn't it be neat if the county commissioners listened to the demand of the voters and didn't increase taxes.

Also, I like the long voting lines on election day. That proves who really respects and cherishes the right to vote.

scharrison

May 13, 2011 - 11:08 am EDT

Yeah, we should make it really hard for people to vote, like make them run a gauntlet or an obstacle course before gaining access to the voting booth. Then we would know they really wanted to vote, and weren't just there to get one of those little "I voted" stickers.

Seriously. Long lines are good? If you're that lonely, go rescue a few rescue dogs.

Waldo Leidecker

May 13, 2011 - 10:32 am EDT

Do you wear "hair shirts" as well? The thing that seems to escape all the good little goosestepping anti-tax Teanuts is that if you want services (roads, schools, bridges, government) they have to be paid for - although I know you'd be perfectly happy as long as someone ELSE footed the bill. So much for taking "personal responsibility."

Mr. JMS

May 13, 2011 - 4:39 pm EDT

Maybe if all you toe the line anti business taxocrats would rein in your out of control entitlement spending, we could afford those roads, schools and bridges.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search