news-record.com

NEWS

Council imposes downtown curfew

Wednesday, November 17, 2010
(Updated Thursday, November 18 - 5:33 am)

— The city adopted a curfew Tuesday night prohibiting anyone younger than 18 from being downtown without an adult, as well as stronger ordinances against loitering.

City Council members voted to approve the curfew ordinance 6-3. Council members T. Dianne Bellamy-Small, Jim Kee and Nancy Vaughan voted against it.

The ban on minors — from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. — goes into effect Jan. 1.

[Watch discussions on the ordinance changes here beginning at the 3:07 mark.]

The curfew is aimed at giving police another tool to make downtown safer by preventing teen victimization and criminal activity.

“What we have on the books is not working,” Mayor Bill Knight said. “Something is wrong and we have to fix it. This is a step forward.”

Councilman Zack Matheny, who spearheaded the changes, said they came as a result of discussions with people who own property in or frequent downtown over the past few years about downtown safety at night.

Bellamy-Small said the problem isn’t teenagers, but with irresponsible club owners.

“Teens are not the problem. The time a child comes home should be a parental decision,” she said.

Several residents also spoke out in opposition to the measure, saying it hinders businesses that employ or are frequented by minors.

The ordinance makes exceptions for a minor:

  • Accompanied by a parent or guardian or an adult 18 or older with the parent or guardian’s consent.
  • On an errand, using a direct route, at direction of the parent or guardian until 12:30 a.m.
  • In a motor vehicle, with parental consent, traveling to or from the city; or traveling in a vehicle with a parent, guardian or with an adult 18 or older with the parent or guardian’s consent.
  • Traveling directly to or from a school, religious or recreational activity while accompanied by an adult or sponsored by an entity that accepts responsibility for the juvenile.
  • Who is married.
  • Exercising First Amendment rights, such as freedom of religion, speech or right of assembly.
  • Obtaining a special permit from the police department.

Youth who violate the ordinance will be referred to the juvenile court system.

The ordinance also applies to parents and guardians who allow their children to break the curfew and business owners if they allow minors during curfew hours.

Adults would be charged with a misdemeanor and face fines up to $200.

The council also enhanced the city’s loitering ordinances. It bars anyone blocking city parking decks and businesses that serve alcohol.

The revised loitering ordinances, which passed 8-1, go into effect Dec. 15.

Councilwoman Bellamy-Small voted against the measure.

The new ordinances are part of sweeping changes the city is looking at for improving downtown safety, in light of a shooting Oct. 28 that left five people injured.

In that case, 22-year-old Quinton Campbell of Winston-Salem is accused of shooting four people at the intersection of February One Place and South Elm Street after an argument inside the N Club.

He was then shot by a Greensboro police officer. All of the victims survived.

Campbell faces four counts of attempted first-degree murder.

Although Campbell isn’t a minor, the new ordinances are part of several steps the City Council is considering since the shooting.

They are intended to address public safety concerns downtown and the perception that downtown is unsafe late at night.

Contact Ryan Seals at 373-7077 or ryan.seals@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

File photo (News & Record)

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

beedev

November 17, 2010 - 7:28 am EST

A couple of incidents and now all this. Thanks to Ms. Bellamy-Small, Mr. Kee, and Ms. Vaughan for maintaining level heads.

ej

November 17, 2010 - 7:36 am EST

I agree, no more hanging in Downtown Gboro for me. Hello Winston!

luvdowntowngso

November 17, 2010 - 12:21 pm EST

For those of us who love and have worked so hard to get people to come and enjoy downtown, this is a major blow! Also, the $5 for parking is just totally insane! Greensboro is such a great city to live but most of our leaders don't have a clue how to run a city. It is so sad!

tledford

November 17, 2010 - 3:45 pm EST

"...most of our [']leaders['] don't have a clue..."

You have a gift for understatement. :-)

Panacea

November 17, 2010 - 7:57 am EST

What a silly curfew. There are so many holes in it, any smart kid could get around it. "Well, officer, I know it's 1am, but I am exercising my right of free assembly by hanging out with my 22 year old friends in this parking deck!"

And it's the wrong demographic to target anyway.

Gso Resident

November 17, 2010 - 8:42 am EST

The lowest common denominator of govt is that it will abuse its citizens regardless of oversight. I sense that Chief Miller more so than usual will ponder how such abuse will play out.

I am definitely against the curfew and believe it is ripe for abuse by citizens and police. This is not Charlotte - Mecklenburg. The citizens of Greensboro are far wiser in this regard.

I was struck that the race card was not played during the debate. In my opinion the vote clearly says that a white life and interests are more important than others in the community. There are far greater problems with life and property in the HP road area than downtown many of which have had significant coverage in this newspaper. In my own opinion it seems like the principals of the downtown establishments led by Council member Matheny are kin to the White Citizens Council of days gone by.

It would not surprise me if one of the first items of business this morning for Chief Miller is that he'll be reviewing the status and training of his CDU Unit (civil disturbance unit).

I hope it is never needed.

unbiased

November 17, 2010 - 11:29 pm EST

Uh, there is no "civil disturbance unit". Not that some people with too much time on their hands won't find a dumb reason to protest and break stuff.

downtowndweller

November 17, 2010 - 8:48 am EST

Well we all know the point of the curfew which was never discussed. The vast majority of incidents involved people over 18 so why the curfew? If you look at the demographics of the teenagers, the vast majority of them are black. Its all about making other people more comfortable because they are intimidated by groups of young black people walking down the street. Race is the elephant in the room in this case and i'm surprised the pulpit forum and others have not gotten involved. This is just a sneaky way of banning all these young black teens. Councilman Jim Kee alluded to this when he mentioned "concerns about profiling"

But to be honest I don't know how it can be enforced. If hundreds of teens come downtown are the limited number of police officers going to go around asking each one of them for their IDs? meanwhile when they are doing that other crimes are taking place that involves people over 18.

Also I don't understand what additional loitering ordinances will accomplish when there are already laws on the books. They are just not being enforced. For example, there is a law banning the consumption of alcohol in public spaces which would include the parking decks. That law is already in the books. The police just need to go around and arrest these idiots drinking in the parking decks I don't see why more ordinances are needed to take care of that problem. There are also loitering laws in the books as well.

Voice of Reason

November 17, 2010 - 3:05 pm EST

The downtown police enforce that drinking law an awful lot. More than you can even imagine my friend.

ZamboniMan

November 17, 2010 - 6:02 pm EST

x 2, GPD has definitely stepped up enforcing that and other rules on the books in the parking deck and throughout downtown.

goodtimes

November 17, 2010 - 8:54 am EST

Just another podunk.

pragmatist

November 17, 2010 - 9:00 am EST

This curfew will create the overall perception that downtown is just for over 18 club goers, and those are exactly the people who caused all the violence over the last few weeks.

Ryan

November 17, 2010 - 4:29 pm EST

New ban - everyone older than 18! That ought to take care of the problem.

gsogeek

November 17, 2010 - 5:50 pm EST

Please don't give our city "leaders" any ideas. After this, they might just take you up on the concept.

eric_b

November 17, 2010 - 9:11 am EST

Title VI anyone?

newkid

November 17, 2010 - 9:24 am EST

Totally inane response to the problem at hand...you want to kick somebody out of downtown who is causing trouble? Look at the owner N club....excuse me "Allure" and the other places where the problems have started. But no, they have money and influence...not so for our under 18-year-old residents.

pragmatist

November 17, 2010 - 9:35 am EST

If you tell teens they can't do something, better prepare yourself. I imagine kids are already formulating ways around this law and will drive law enforcement nuts. There are so many loopholes, it's virtually useless:
* "in a motor vehicle, with parent consent, traveling to the city". In other words, if Momma says it's ok for you to cruise up and down Elm Street, you're good.
* "exercising First Amendment rights*. If I were a tattoo parlor, I'd open a local branch of "The Church of Body Modification" downtown, immediately.
* "who is married". Wha? Under 18 and married and you're ok downtown? Genius.
This law is daft. And while the cops are calling moms and dads to find out if Junior has a hall pass, how are they going to monitor the adults who are actually causing the problems?

bsnyder524

November 17, 2010 - 9:49 am EST

I don't understand how the police are going to be able to enforce this, don't citizens have a right to refuse showing ID unless they are being detained?

Panacea

November 17, 2010 - 1:09 pm EST

You can be detained for refusing to show ID. Obstruction of justice: if a cop asks you who you are, you must answer.

CarolinaBorn

November 17, 2010 - 4:32 pm EST

...not according to our current federal administration you can't.

Panacea

November 17, 2010 - 6:42 pm EST

I'll tell you what. Try it and see how far you get.

Bosco

November 17, 2010 - 9:59 am EST

More BS from the ship of fools

Concerned79

November 17, 2010 - 10:07 am EST

They should have started with the Mall!!

Mevashir

November 17, 2010 - 10:17 am EST

Dianne's comments are right on:

"Bellamy-Small said the problem isn’t teenagers, but with irresponsible club owners.

“Teens are not the problem. The time a child comes home should be a parental decision,” she said.

Several residents also spoke out in opposition to the measure, saying it hinders businesses that employ or are frequented by minors."

It is to Greensboro's shame that you need to ban teens from the downtown. Why don't you simply declare the entire dowtown a red light district and then wait for God's inevitable judgment to fall upon our once fine city?

It is both humorous and tragic to see intelligent people like yourselves groping in the dark for a solution when the answer to the wave of violence is so obvious: ban the clubs from Greensboro!

Do they add so much revenue to city coffers that we need to prostitute ourselves by allowing these seedy tawdry places to operate?

Are we so desperate for funds that we need to pimp our public to these joints?

And even if they do bring in revenue, is it worth it when the price we pay is a withdrawal of God's blessings from our city and a rapid descent of satanic curses instead?

Please, Greensboro City Council members, do not worship mammon but love God and respect his children, all the God-fearing citizens of our beautiful city!

In the Name of Jesus Christ,

MIchael Korn

humorous2me

November 17, 2010 - 11:04 am EST

I highly doubt banning clubs from Greensboro is going to help this situation. Clubs are not the problem. As Bellamy-Small said, irresponsible adults are the problem. It is quite possible to enjoy a club and not cause mayhem.

worker ant

November 18, 2010 - 3:33 am EST

With some people, it is not possible to enjoy a nightclub without causing mayhem and violence. The N&R and W FMY give plenty of testimony to the fact.

downtowndweller

November 17, 2010 - 10:28 am EST

Based on the response on all the blogs, most citizens seem to be against this curfew ordinance. I say we start Greensboro's version of a Tea Party and vote those city council persons out of office. We don't need government interfering in our lives. You can bet someone will sue the city over this.

rooster8786

November 17, 2010 - 10:29 am EST

Way to go Greensboro "leaders"!!! You once again have shown your TOTAL ineptitude, grasp of the REAL problems, and passed more ordinances that have NO chance of working. Here are some suggestions that will work without adding more ordinances. 1. ENFORCE the laws already on the books. Drinking in a parking deck; issue citations! 2.Tell the GPD to pay attention. If the same group of people, regardless of age, walk by the same corner several times, tell them to leave downtown or "risk" getting a loitering citation. 3. Get aggressive in enforcing ALE rules and gun laws in clubs. Also, enforce the fire marshall occupancy limits. 4. Block Elm Street, from Market to McGee, to vehicular traffic, excluding EMS. Also close February One place. No street parking or cruising will cause thug wannabes to have to go to their car to get their gun & walk back to find whoever they're looking for. Also, no cruising Elm Street will make it safer for pedestrians. Try a few of these suggestions, instead of punishing a segment of society that has had no issues with the recent incidents by passing a curfew that looks like swiss cheese with it's loopholes.

Bang201

November 17, 2010 - 3:04 pm EST

Just wanted to point out that there are only 2 ALE agents in all of Guilford County and they are responsible for the thousands of alcohol outlets in Guilford County.

Voice of Reason

November 17, 2010 - 3:08 pm EST

Again, the downtown police do a brisk business enforcing these laws. Ask anyone who goes downtown frequently and you'll see this is truly the case.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search