news-record.com

NEWS

N.C. A&T broke policies in track tryout where student died

Tuesday, August 31, 2010
(Updated Wednesday, September 1 - 11:01 am)

GREENSBORO — N.C. A&T said today that one NCAA policy and an unspecified number of university policies were violated during the track tryout that led to the death of a student.

Jospin Milandu, 20, of Knightdale died Aug. 16 after collapsing on the track during team tryouts. Milandu was taken to Moses Cone Hospital, where doctors determined he died from complications of an elevated heart rate, the university said.

The university opened an investigation and formed a committee to see if any policies were broken.

The findings, announced Tuesday in a news release from Nicole Pride, associate vice chancellor for university relations, said that Milandu was participating in a voluntary, unscheduled track tryout.

"Because this activity did not appear on the university’s schedule of athletic events, a number of university policies were violated," the university said in a news release. "Additionally, one NCAA policy was also violated, resulting in what has been determined to be a 'secondary violation.' This violation has been self-reported to the NCAA. As a result of these policy violations, the university’s ability to respond effectively was limited."

The findings determined that the policy violations were "primarily limited to the track program."

The release did not specify what policies were broken. After the death, athletics director Wheeler Brown said that university policy called for all students trying out for a varsity sport to have a complete physical on file and sign a waiver to participate. No trainer was present during the tryouts, he said.

"The university is unconditionally committed to effective oversight of the university’s athletic programs," Tuesday's release said. "Chancellor Martin has instructed the university’s athletics director to assume direct responsibility for all compliance matters related to the university’s track program until further notice."

Accompanying Photos

Courtesy of N.C. A&T

Photo Caption: Jospin Milandu

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

disappointedaggie

August 31, 2010 - 2:32 pm EDT

This is a sad day for North Carolina A&T State University. I am saddened to see the administration and Wheeler Brown, throw the track team and its coach under the bus. The coach has been a valuable coach to the university for over 29 years and this is how they repay him? They repay him by lying that policies were broken? Really....this is just another case of A&T lying to the public. There were no trainers there because they dont have enough trainers...why dont they tell how the university has never provided the track team with a trainer? why dont they tell how their own university policy doesnt require physicals for track team tryouts? It is puzzling to me how the unversity wants everyone to believe that this was the lone act of one person or a team and the AD, trainers, staff and no one were the wiser about the tryout? so thirty some people show up for a tryout and no one in the athletic department knows about it? come on...A&T, lets be real, your policies were flawed, this man and his team did the best they could under the circumstances. But as always, A&T is afraid and scared and dont realize that they just single handily destroyed one of the best track and field programs their university has ever had. Aggie Pride has died!

iamwatchingyou

August 31, 2010 - 5:24 pm EDT

Disappointed Aggie, you really have reason to be concerned regarding the track program and the track coach being thrown under the bus. When things go wrong at A&T never look for management to accept responsibility. When management was advised that an employee was changing grades from failures to passing on high school transcripts management allowed the perpetrator of this academic fraud to handle his own investigation of himself.

beach35

August 31, 2010 - 9:16 pm EDT

An unfortunate situation like this occurs, and people often look for someone to blame. However, the fact is in these types of incidents in sports, and these types of deaths, the athlete in question almost always had an underlying heart condition. From that logical starting point, it becomes a matter of whether the student athlete is responsible for getting his own physical and health checked out, or if it is the school's responsibility.

goodtimes

August 31, 2010 - 2:50 pm EDT

It would really be respectful to run articles on every soldier we have lost in Iraq and Afghanistan, rather than students.

Panacea

August 31, 2010 - 3:42 pm EDT

On the contrary, it's a good thing to show a little light on activities that disregard safety whether it be on a college campus, in public, in government, or on the field of battle.

cantwealljustgetalong

August 31, 2010 - 4:32 pm EDT

Goodtimes how insensitive can you be.. There is a special place for you and for making such a ridiculous comment on the death of anyone.. I hope you make it there soon.. This world needs to be rid of people like you.

yakyak

August 31, 2010 - 3:02 pm EDT

How sad that a promising young man fell victim to University negligence and lack of oversight. Although no amount of money can bring him back, I hope that his family sues A & T and that the outcome results in better care of all aspiring student athletes.

disappointedaggie

August 31, 2010 - 3:07 pm EDT

really yak yak? why not wait and see if this poor boy's death was caused by any negligence? there is no autopsy, no medical documentation or anything saying how and why this poor boy died. typical local ocal greensboro people, let's run off at the mouth without any facts...

Panacea

August 31, 2010 - 3:44 pm EDT

An autopsy was performed. Whenever a young person dies with no immediately explicable reason, an autopsy is always performed.

However, depending on the results, it may not be made public. But the family will get a copy, and regardless of whether they believe the results, or if they think the results are flawed, or if they believe the report is accurate, they have the right to disclose it themselves.

cmchavis

August 31, 2010 - 3:08 pm EDT

I still have pride in A&T. All school make mistakes and place blame. Thats the business.

Also they do put out articles about fallen soldiers, especially if they are local. Why doesn't a student who passed deserve an follow up article. Is it not enough space? I'm confused as to how your comment applies to the story at hand.

HAVE A GREAT DAY!!!!!!

cantwealljustgetalong

August 31, 2010 - 4:35 pm EDT

I am positive that gootimes is both a racist and an idiot.. That it has more to do with a black student than a white soldier.. Just a hunch.. A comment like that can only come from ignorance.. and that is consistent with racists that plague these linees

General Greensboro

August 31, 2010 - 5:21 pm EDT

Please refrain from name calling. We think this is an important article, but if the comments become people yelling at one another we won't hesitate to close them down. Thanks.

goodtimes

September 1, 2010 - 8:14 am EDT

It is the Soldier, not the minister
Who has given us freedom of religion.
It is the Soldier, not the reporter
Who has given us freedom of the press.
It is the Soldier, not the poet
Who has given us freedom of speech.
It is the Soldier, not the campus organizer
Who has given us freedom to protest.
It is the Soldier, not the lawyer
Who has given us the right to a fair trial.
It is the Soldier, not the politician
Who has given us the right to vote.
It is the Soldier who salutes the flag,
Who serves beneath the flag,
And whose coffin is draped by the flag,
Who allows the protester to burn the flag.

brian444

August 31, 2010 - 5:48 pm EDT

What's the scandal? That a practice was held without it being on a schedule? Is the desired situation one in which no physical exertion takes place in the absence of a doctor or trainer? This is a tragic death, but barring some coach forcing him to run past his limits, there's no scandal.

Panacea

September 1, 2010 - 8:39 am EDT

There's a big difference between physical exertion, and the kind of energy that goes into anything athletic.

Also, there's a question of if a sports physical had been done . . . athletes must always be cleared to do the kind of activity sports requires.

There's also the issue of sickle cell trait in young athletes. If this young man had sickle cell trait, he could have had a full blown crisis due to the enormous stress athletics puts on the body.

This tryout should have been supervised by trainers or EMTs.

disappointedaggie

September 1, 2010 - 9:15 am EDT

Again, you are incorrect. Sports physicals are not conducted until AFTER the student has made the team. That is athletic policy. The question is, why dont you ask the AD and administration at A&T why dont they provide the programs with trainers and EMTs?

Gerald Witt

September 1, 2010 - 10:33 am EDT

Here's the NCAA policy regarding physicals and practice:

17.1.5 - Mandatory Medical Examination.

Prior to participation in any practice, competition or out-of-season conditioning activities (or in Division I, permissible voluntary summer conditioning in basketball and football or voluntary individual workouts pursuant to the safety exception), student-athletes who are beginning their initial season of eligibility and students who are trying out for a team shall be required to undergo a medical examination or evaluation administered or supervised by a physician (e.g., family physician, team physician). The examination or evaluation must be administered within six months prior to participation in any practice, competition or out-of-season conditioning activities. In following years, an updated history of the student-athlete's medical condition shall be administered by an institutional medical staff member (e.g., sports medicine staff, team physician) to determine if additional examinations (e.g., physical, cardiovascular, neurological) are required. The updated history must be administered within six months prior to the student-athlete's participation in any practice, competition or out-of-season conditioning activities for the applicable academic year.

disappointedaggie

September 1, 2010 - 10:52 am EDT

That is what the NCAA says. But why doesnt anyone ask the A&T, what their athletic department has instructed their coaches and staff to do in the same situation? Their policy states such physicals are not to be completed until after a student has made the team. See the hypocrisy here!

disappointedaggie

September 1, 2010 - 10:54 am EDT

Also, why doesnt anyone ask A&T why this student, who was a sophomore, didnt have such a required physical on file with the University as required by the NCAA and University? but again, that isnt much of a story.

Gerald Witt

September 1, 2010 - 12:33 pm EDT

That's close to what we've been asking. We first need to know whether there was a physical on file.

busdoc

August 31, 2010 - 6:02 pm EDT

It is tragic that a young man with a promising future lost his life, but he was a twenty year old adult. The decision to try out and to have had a physical was his responsibility. He could have just as easily died while he was training at home over the summer. The university and athletic department should not be held responsible for this sad event. It was afterall only an open try out. Once students athletes make the team and begin training should the university be responsible for their medical needs.

Panacea

September 1, 2010 - 8:54 am EDT

Sorry, but that's not so.

Yes, he was responsible to be in good physical condition (by all accounts he was), and to turn in his physical before trying out. A&T was responsible for collecting the physicals, reviewing them BEFORE a tryout (otherwise, there's no point in getting one), and making sure the athletic environment was safe. Prospective athletes are still students, they are on A&T property, and therefore A&T has a legal and ethical obligation to provide for safety.

disappointedaggie

September 1, 2010 - 10:59 am EDT

ok

JR

August 31, 2010 - 8:36 pm EDT

Can't they get anything right at that University.It seems that every time I hear of news its either mismanaging funds,inproprieties or out right stealing.I wonder whats next.

lovesport

September 1, 2010 - 12:34 am EDT

This is a sad situation for A&T and this young man. First, all students must have a physical on file with the university. they usually give them a month or so to get it. All students trying out for a sport must have a physical on file. The problem with this situation was that the assistant coach thinks he is above the rules. For years, he has tryouts and a student must make a time before they can make the team. This was the fourth day of school, who is is shape to run a time on the fourth day? A trainer was not there because I am willing to bet those trying out did not have a physical or signed release to tryout. This has been done for years, but this time this young man had made up his mind that he was going to make the team. His heart was not in condition to push for a time this early. He ran high school track and he wanted so badly to make the team. The Head coach, an Aggie, has been excellent for many years, he trusts his assistant to much and this time it hurt his program. The person that called the tryout is the one responsible for making sure a trainer and Brown was notified. A trainer would not allow anyone to try out without a physical on file. That's called "covering your ---" Rules were broken and nothing anyone can say will bring back this young man. Coaches will always try to bend rules unless the administration has a firm hand on all situations, not just Football and Basketball. At the end of the day, the University is responsible for Athletic oversight. Don't think for one minute that somebodies head is not going to be thrown under the bus!

disappointedaggie

September 1, 2010 - 10:57 am EDT

the truth will come out.

lovesport

September 1, 2010 - 10:57 am EDT

It seems that people will read and hear what they what. A young man died on the track. He was NOT jogging! He was running to make a time for the team. There is a difference. If you are not trained to run(compete) at a mile, then your heart is not prepared to provide enough oxyen (aerobic) to recover. thus a elevated heart rate. That's why you train first to prepare your body to run and recover at a normal rate. If this was a pre-existing condtion, I am sure he would have known that because he ran high school track. Bottom line, he is dead. Could it have been prevented? Maybe not. Certainly having an experienced or inexperience trainer or person there would certainly reflect better on the University as a whole. Regardless of who is to blame, the coaches are responsible to communicate their intentions to the athletic department. Since I was not there and I doubt you were, we can only suggest what we think. I know the sport of track and field, I cannot discuss policy whether written or verbal.since I really don't know. We have not heard the last of this issue.. I hate it for the young man and his family. the rest of this matter will not change s-----!

disappointedaggie

September 1, 2010 - 11:06 am EDT

He was not running. He was not being timed. He didnt even have on spikes. They were not being evaluated. They were cooling down...jogging then moderate sprinting. There was no sprinting or heavy exertion. Those are the facts. Since you said you were not there, then it is best you dont speak on things you have no idea about. Why would having an inexperienced trainer there be better? For the sake of image? Wouldnt it be better to provide the teams with the necessary personnel they need so they can effectively run their program? I agree with you, these rants and raves and news articles and debates wont change that tragically a young man lost his life. I think is sad that you even stated, that trainer wouldnt have changed anything, but would have reflected better on the university. That is the problem I have. It is about the university throwing someone under the bus to protect a so called image or to protect themselves, they dont want to look bad in the community. They are motivated by fear. There is no blame. There is no fault. No one knows why this poor young man lost his life that day. But it angers me that people are so quick to place blame when they were not there, they dont know long this unversity's athletic department has operated under hypocrisy all for the sake of an image. That is the problem I have as an alumnus of the school and just fellow human being. I cant stand the hypocrisy all for the sake of image.

Gerald Witt

September 1, 2010 - 12:40 pm EDT

lovesport and disappointedaggie, I'd like to talk with you. I'm working on this for the N&R. Please email me at - Thanks.

ATC1

September 7, 2010 - 10:50 am EDT

Can we please refer to the professionals as "athletic trainers?" There's a difference...

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search