news-record.com

NEWS

Library may get filters for websites

Tuesday, August 3, 2010
(Updated 10:43 am)

GREENSBORO City library computers could be getting some new restrictions.

City Council members asked City Manager Rashad Young Monday night to find an economically and legally viable way to block pornographic websites at city libraries.

The library computers already are equipped with a device that makes pornographic websites load more slowly, to try to deter users.

And patrons caught viewing adult content on city computers can be banned from libraries up to a year.

Councilman Danny Thompson asked the council to go one step further and prevent the websites from being accessed at city libraries altogether. At the end of Monday’s council meeting, Thompson waved a thick stack of incident reports from this year for the central library.

There were about 100 occasions, he said, where people were asked to leave the central library for the day or banned longer for viewing pornography on city computers.

“I don’t want to mention some of the acts that are going on,” Thompson said.

Thompson hoped the council would ask the city staff to get the kind of software that blocks some websites.

His colleagues agreed with the sentiment. But some argued that they should wait until they better understood what it would take to accomplish Thompson’s goal.

Councilman Zack Matheny wanted more time to find out the costs or other implications of the decision.

“This is not just a black-and-white decision. I think we need to know more information,” said Matheny, who pointed out that City Library Director Sandy Neerman was not in favor of the Internet filters.

Neerman was not at the meeting to offer her advice. But in the past, she has said that filter software does not work and that objectionable items found on sites like Facebook or YouTube would not be practical to block.

Council members also questioned whether blocking certain content would be legal. City Attorney Terry Wood said he would get back to council on that issue.

“I know where you are coming from,” he said. “We just need to make sure that we do it in an appropriate manner.”

Councilman Robbie Perkins, who ultimately joined the full board to vote for the measure, argued that the issue was raised in this manner — at the end of the meeting, without prior notice — as a political ploy.

“I think it’s an attempt to get some of us on council to vote against this so you can slap us with it in a campaign,” Perkins said. “I am dismayed with the way this is being handled without professional guidance from professional staff.”
 

Contact Amanda  Lehmert at 373-7075 or amanda.lehmert@news-record.com 

Accompanying Photos

Photo Caption: The Central Library in downtown Greensboro.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

casper

August 3, 2010 - 9:10 am EDT

Robbie Perkins is always worried about the next election, never about city governance.

Panacea

August 3, 2010 - 9:27 am EDT

I'm not sure about the legalities since porn is constitutionally protected.

Assuming it is legal to block porn sites, it is very difficult to do without also blocking off a lot of legitimate content.

Here's another way to stop the problem. Have a few undercover cops in the library arrest the real perverts who are masturbating at the computers, and make the arrests very, very public. Splash their faces on the news.

That'll put a stop to it.

histrion

August 3, 2010 - 4:59 pm EDT

Doubtful, considering the type of person involved. If they had any shame to begin with...

oh good grief

August 3, 2010 - 10:24 am EDT

I have a theory that part of the attractiveness of the library to porn viewers is that it is PUBLIC -- meaning that as they view porn they can look around and see living people (men, women, and/or children) and further fantasize. I think that is part of the "kick" they get out of viewing porn in a public place.

Perhaps they (porn viewers) should have one designated "porn" room 4 computers "open" to porn sites (the rest of the library would have "filtered" computers). The room should be closed off from the rest of the library but with a small, high (too high for a small or medium-size child to peer into) glass window in the door for security purposes. And place one of those "take-a-number" gizmos at the outside of the door so they can wait in line peacefully knowing they have a number and a definite place in line.

Make the admission to the locked-from-the-outside-only room dependent on the porn viewer supplying their own handi-wipes/baby wipes. Signs on the outside and inside of the door should read: "Before leaving this room please return all furniture to its upright position and wipe down all surfaces you or your bodily fluids have touched by using the cleaning cloths you have so graciously brought with you to gain admission to this room."

ryanshell

August 3, 2010 - 5:14 pm EDT

I don't live in Greensboro at the moment, but do want to add a "that sounds familiar" comment. From my time as a council candidate last year: http://voteshell.com/porn-filter-should-be-implemented-on-library-comput....

Ryan

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search