news-record.com

NEWS

Senate passes video sweepstakes ban

Tuesday, June 22, 2010
(Updated 3:04 pm)

RALEIGH — A kind of video gambling sweeping the state would be outlawed under a bill that passed the Senate 47-1 Monday night.

The measure targets Internet sweepstakes games that have popped up in gas stations, bars and stand-alone shops throughout the state.

“There are communities that are experiencing real problems with this,” said Sen. Phil Berger, an Eden Republican who voted for the bill.

The lone “no” vote came from Sen. Julia Boseman, who said that she didn’t oppose the ban itself. But the Wilmington Democrat said she had introduced her own legislation that would have brought the games under the control of the Lottery Commission and taxed them.

“I think it’s an opportunity ... that we could bring in additional revenue to the state,” Boseman said.

Boseman’s remarks echo sentiments put forward by the sweepstakes industry itself, which has poured on a massive lobbying and public relations effort during the past couple of weeks. Lawmakers report getting hundreds of e-mails from people on both sides of the issue. “There is more than $500 million on the table in new revenue if the legislature would only regulate and tax it,” said William Thevaos, president of the Entertainment Group of North Carolina, a trade group for the industry.

The promise of extra revenue could be tempting as lawmakers are struggling to find money to pay for schools and human services, but lawmakers have moved in the opposite direction during the past five years.

The General Assembly voted in 2006 to do away with stand-alone video-poker machines. That law took full effect in July 2007. Internet sweepstakes machines started filtering into the state soon afterward.

Under the sweepstakes system, players buy phone or Internet time and are given entries into a sweepstakes. The outcome, according to operators, is predetermined and players are merely revealing their sweepstakes entries in an entertaining way.

In 2008, the General Assembly enacted a second video poker ban, this one aimed specifically at sweepstakes. But operators quickly changed how their games were programmed and played and the practice continued.

Backers of the Senate bill say it will stamp out the legal gray area in which video sweepstakes have been operating.

Many outlets hand players disclaimers telling them they’re not gambling, but lawmakers pushing the ban disagree. They say the machines have the look and feel of casino-style games and are luring those who can least afford to play.

“They represent gambling on a massive, commercialized scale,” said Sen. Josh Stein, a Raleigh Democrat and the bill’s lead sponsor.

Estimates cited during the past week have put the number of video sweepstakes locations between 600 and 1,000.

Many businesses use various types of sweepstakes to promote their businesses, including fast food restaurants and grocery stores. Fears that a video sweepstakes ban would outlaw what lawmakers describe as “legitimate sweepstakes” led to the legal language that created the original loophole and has delayed consideration of this year’s ban legislation.

Those concerns appear to be fading. “We think it has successfully left alone the legitimate sweepstakes that retailers and soda bottlers have used for years,” said Andy Ellen, a lobbyist for the N.C. Retail Merchants Association.

The bill targets sweepstakes machines rather than sweepstakes themselves, saying that it shall be unlawful to “conduct a sweepstakes through the use of an entertaining display.”

The bill now goes to the House, where Speaker Joe Hackney says he personally backs the measure. It will likely get a hearing in one committee before making it to the floor.

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

File photo (News & Record)

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

repodon

June 22, 2010 - 6:24 am EDT

What do you think the united states government and the north carolina state government is it in its self is nothing but a gambling scheme in its self why trust the liers when they do the total opposit of what they say they are going to do when we vote for them. The state government is a gamble i dont trust none of them theifs criminals . The only reason why it is illegal to steal is because the government dont like compitition is the only reason .Now back to the main story if you decide to spend your money what ever way you like whos business is it not theres as long as they get there greedy hands in the cookie jar to get the tax money i mean the part of the taxes that is owed not a handfull extra you bastereds

repodon

June 22, 2010 - 6:49 am EDT

also the last time i checked on my pay check it said my name don not the north carolina state government nor did it say bev perdue or any body else i worked for this money not them , also it says on all of my money in god we trust , i trust god i do not trust the government what so ever. W e need to stand as one and reunite and get our rights back before its to late we will have no rights here shortly The next thing they will tell you and me when we can breath and what bill to pay next instead of us paying what bills first

wscbd

June 22, 2010 - 8:31 am EDT

There is a key labeled "Shift" on your keyboard. Practice using it.
Another looks like this: ,
It's called a "comma". Learn about it.
There's another that looks like the comma, but is raised slightly: '
It's called an apostrophe. It can also come in handy. But don't over-use it. Many southerners use apostrophes even when they are not needed.
Finally, there is a book known as a "dictionary". In this book, you will find the definition and spelling of virtually any word.
You're welcome.

CarolinaBorn

June 22, 2010 - 8:54 am EDT

Repodon is entitled to his opinions regardless of how they come across. Get over yourself....there must be a better way to spend your time.

When you achieve perfection, let us know.

wscbd

June 22, 2010 - 9:08 am EDT

Sure. And when you achieve mediocrity, let us know. Keep trying your hardest, and one day you may get there!

Freedom Fighter

June 22, 2010 - 9:58 am EDT

Dear wscbd:

Periods and commas should be placed inside quotation marks. Keep feeling superior though, yankee boy.

Sincerely,

A Southerner

wscbd

June 22, 2010 - 10:02 am EDT

Periods and commas are to be placed within quotations when the quote is a statement, such as:
He said, "You are an imbecile."
This is not the case in a statement such as:
"Moron" is synonymous with "imbecile". Either applies to you.
Thank you. Come again.

wscbd

June 22, 2010 - 10:09 am EDT

Oh, and since when does being born & raised in Greensboro make one a "yankee"?

CarolinaBorn

June 22, 2010 - 10:10 am EDT

Freedom Fighter,

It doesn't take much on our part to reach the "legend in your own mind" status that wscbd has attained. He, however, will always be an arrogant yank.

wscbd

June 22, 2010 - 10:35 am EDT

Yep, that's me. Just a Yank, despite living in NC for most of my life and never living farther north than DC.
Interesting theory. Well, not really, but I'll humor you.

Freedom Fighter

June 22, 2010 - 11:11 am EDT

The following is from:
http://grammartips.homestead.com/inside.html

Whenever we have to use a question mark or an exclamation point with a sentence that ends in a quotation, we follow the dictates of logic in determining where the question mark or exclamation point goes. If it is part of the quotation itself, we put it inside the quotation marks, and if it governs the sentence as a whole but not the material being quoted, we put it outside the quotation marks.

~Have you read the assigned short story, "Flowering Judas"?

~No, but I did finally get around to reading last week's assignment, "Where Are They Now?"

When it comes to commas and periods, though, logic doesn't enter into the equation, at least not in the United States. Universal American usage places commas and periods inside the quotation marks, regardless of logic.

~"Diane," she said, "put the book down and go outside for a little while."

~"I will in a minute," she replied, "as soon as I finish this chapter."

This rule applies even when the unit enclosed at the end of the sentence is just a single word rather than an actual quotation:

~To get to the next page, just press the little button marked "Enter."

The only exception is when that last little item enclosed in quotation marks is just a letter or a number, in which case the period or comma will go outside the closing quotation marks:

~The buried treasure was marked on the map with a large "X".

~The only grade that will satisfy her is an "A".

~On this scale, the highest ranking is a "1", not a "10".

--------------------------------------------------------------------
To summarize for the purported non-yankee who just wants to feel superior:
The General Rule is to place commas and periods to the left of quotation marks.
There are exceptions but your mistake did not meet the criteria.
Modern American usage (which prevails in Time, Newsweek, etc.) tends to adhere to the G.R. without exceptions, which are seen as arbitrary.

Anyway, this is a message board and not a court filing. The care exercised in these writings may not reflect the socio-economic status, intelligence, or sobriety of the writer. They may, however, make someone who hates living in his own skin feel better and superior.

And hey, "Aren't you really the failed pedagogue, getaclue with wscbd serving as a sockpuppet?"

leftlane

June 22, 2010 - 11:04 am EDT

wscbd your really being a donkey!

General Greensboro

June 22, 2010 - 11:07 am EDT

Thanks for the grammar lesson. Class dismissed.

Now let's move along to something else such as, oh, the video sweepstakes ban.

GG

Freedom Fighter

June 22, 2010 - 11:18 am EDT

Dear John Robinson:

Why do you feel it is appropriate to have a message board nag? The NR had one redeeming quality years ago: a message board where there could be some discourse. Now, so many are banned that most just see the Yvonne or wscbd regurgitation of the pro-black agenda and just click through.

Hey -- Any word on the race of the pieces of garbage who beat up the skinny White kid?

How is that investigation going? Any White leaders looking into that HATECRIME?

Any newspapers looking into it? Or does that incident not fit your worldview?

FF

obiwon

June 22, 2010 - 9:12 am EDT

"saying that it shall be unlawful to “conduct a sweepstakes through the use of an entertaining display.”

that part of the new law would indicate it is illegal to advertise the NC Lottery on billboards and TV. The funny little man in the dress up clown suit that advertises the NC Lottery is certainly an "entertaining display". Of course, that's not the real reason the politicians shut down the sweepstakes centes. It's because it competes against their NC Lottery and pulls money away from it. How stupid are they? North Carolina has a $ 1.1 billion deficit and estimates are by regulating and taxing the 600 current establishments, they could bring in around $ 500 million. Does anyone do the math? That erases half the deficit and lets those who play - pay... Those that don't play do not get their taxes raised by the elite politicians in NC. Sorry Don Vaughan. You lost 7 votes for your next election in my family. I hope others in Guilford County remember that Don Vaughan and Katie Dorsett voted to ban them and therefore increase your taxes on other items like gas, cigarettes, drinks (alcohol and otherwise). So, go ahead and vote for them again and let them continue to raise your taxes and overlook ways to save your family money.
Watch the House of Reps in NC and vote against those that push it also.

Interested

June 22, 2010 - 9:54 am EDT

I always wonder why people say: "We'll vote them out of office next time." I read this sort of comment regularly, whether the issue is local, state, or national.

Wouldn't it be more effective to contact your senator or representative BEFORE they vote to let them know how you feel regarding a particular issue? Wouldn't it be more effective to suggest others do the same?

leftlane

June 22, 2010 - 11:07 am EDT

I totally agree they say we have a education lottery for our schools , but the more money the lottery takes in, the more schools cut staff or close completely ......something just doesn't add up!

General Greensboro

June 22, 2010 - 11:20 am EDT

All I ask is for the discussion to get back on topic.

It doesn't, so it ends.

GG

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search