news-record.com

NEWS

Bill would put local Internet on hold for year

Wednesday, June 2, 2010
(Updated 11:58 pm)

RALEIGH — Cities and counties would have to stay out of the broadband Internet business for the next year while lawmakers come up with rules to govern when it’s appropriate for local governments to own such systems, under a proposal that cleared the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday.

Five North Carolina municipalities have or are building their own Internet systems and would be allowed to continue those efforts.

But senators said other local governments should wait until lawmakers can lay down guidelines on questions such as when is it appropriate for cities to issue debt to pay for such systems.

If lawmakers do not draw up such rules by the end of the 2011 session, the moratorium would end.

“This is not ... a peace treaty. It is an armistice,” said Sen. Dan Clodfelter , a Mecklenburg Democrat. Debate over prior versions of the bill has been heated, he said, and has not given lawmakers time to consider the issues at hand.

“I just don’t believe ... that government at any level should unfairly compete with the private sector,” said Sen. David Hoyle , a Gaston Republican who has been pushing for harsher versions of the bill, such as one that would have required a public vote before a city borrowed money to create a broadband system.

Utility companies have argued that cities can borrow money at lower rates than businesses and can charge fees to access rights of way, giving governments an unfair edge in the business.

But representatives of city governments have argued that private companies don’t always provide for the needs of residents, who are sometimes left out of the digital revolution by slow or nonexistent Internet service.

The Greensboro City Council passed a resolution opposing the broadband measure Tuesday night, but did so before the bill was revised to be a temporary moratorium.

“In general, it’s an option that we’d like to preserve,” said Assistant City Manager Denise Turner . Greensboro has no immediate plans to go into the broadband business but is competing for the high-speed system that Google has proposed installing in one community across the nation.
Hoyle said language in his bill would exempt Google from the prohibition.

Turner said the city is still reviewing the draft of the bill that cleared committee. But she pointed out that Greensboro was a test market for Time Warner Cable’s tiered-pricing plan.

The plan provoked outrage among consumers that eventually forced the company to back off the idea of charging customers different rates based on how much bandwidth they consumed.

“That’s the type of situation we may not want to be vulnerable to,” Turner said.

Although the measure has support among both Republicans and Democrats in the Senate, its fate in the House is less certain.

Rep. Hugh Holliman , a Lexington Democrat and the House majority leader, said the House might consider the Senate bill but added that making sure everyone has access to high-speed Internet should be a high priority for the state.

“It boils down to whether the industry is serving the people,” Holliman said.

Rep. Bill Faison , the chairman of the House’s Ways and Means and Broadband Connectivity Committee, said he opposes the measure, even if it is a one-year moratorium.

“I can’t see a reason why you would give cable companies and (phone companies) another free year and not have cities in a position to take care of their own needs,” Faison said. “I think that ends up hurting people.”

However, Faison said he’s been told that the bill might not come to his committee.

“I don’t know what’s going to happen with it,” he said.

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com
 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Wilhammer

June 2, 2010 - 3:17 pm EDT

uhoh - more gov't support/sleeping with corporations.

Greensborough

June 2, 2010 - 3:57 pm EDT

This appears to be an instance of the big cable and other internet providers successfully lobbying elected representatives to shut down competition from local governments trying to offer faster, cheaper Internet access. Once again, the consumer loses. The lobbbyists win. The big corporations win. The politicians' campaign coffers grow. And all at the expense of the North Carolina consumer who pays on average more for Internet access than in most countries - even third world countries - in the world.

Where is the outrage??

hatesbiggovt

June 2, 2010 - 7:41 pm EDT

The outrage will begin when collectively we get tired of politics as it is. Vote these fools out of office and get some consumer friendly people that understand that competition is necessary to advance technology.

aliluyya

June 2, 2010 - 10:49 pm EDT

different monkeys + same system = same results as always. Corporations fund the govt and campaigns with donations. The only way to have a citizen-based govt is to have a citizen-funded govt. More specifically, publicly funded elections. Each candidate gets the same amount of money. Politicians can choose to do it now, but they rarely do, b/c it comes with more stringent conditions. If citizens made the use of public funding a crucial issue, things could begin to change, our politics might be able to weasel out from under the thumb of corporations.

"He who has the money has the authority."

CableRep

June 3, 2010 - 6:25 pm EDT

Two points. First, this bill will not prevent cities from getting into the business if they are willing to issue General Obligation bonds after a vote of the people. Second, ask the citizens of Davidson and Mooresville if they are happy their cities borrowed $92 million (without voter approval) to get into the cable business. They are drowning in debt for no reason.

megax

June 5, 2010 - 3:52 pm EDT

This bill places a one-year ban on any municipality to conduct any type of survey or the beginning of a plan to offer "high speed internet" services to its constituents. Secondly, it places a study group in the hands of the following members:
(1) A cable service provider.
(2) A wireless telecommunications service provider.
(3) A local exchange provider that is not a wireless telecommunications service provider.
(4) A local exchange provider that is a wireless telecommunications service provider.
(5) A city that operates a cable system and an electric power system as a public enterprise.
(6) A city that operates a cable system as a public enterprise and does not operate an electric power system as a public enterprise.
(7) A city that is a member of a joint agency established under G.S. 160A‑462 for the operation of a cable system as a public enterprise.
(8) The North Carolina League of Municipalities.

Tell me where in there is the most important person: a citizen?! This bill is utter trash developed by both a filthy senator who's leaving his job to go work for his new masters: the telecommunications lobby.

As for asking about Davidson and Moorseville, let's ask how their systems are finally making a profit after having to replace all the worn-out equipment that had been laid there by guess who, the cable companies! Let's ask Wilson how they're ahead of schedule on paying back bonds that would mean their taxpayers wouldn't pay anything besides normal monthly fees (which happen to be the cheapest in NC, coincidence?)

The original text, which I assume is what you're referring to, would require municipalities to vote on every little decision such as adding customers or replacing equipment. If they are supposed to do that, why shouldn't shareholders in Time Warner or AT&T or Embark have to vote to add people as well if we're talking about fairness?

Face it CableRep, you are here only to spout talking points given to you by your telecommunications lobbyist masters. Go look at the facts before you spout more nonsense.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search