news-record.com

NEWS

Animal cruelty bill approved by House

Wednesday, May 26, 2010
(Updated Thursday, May 27 - 8:40 am)

RALEIGH — The state House voted 113-0  Wednesday to pass Susie’s Law, which would increase the penalties for animal cruelty.

Named for a dog in a well-known Greensboro case, the measure was supported by Republicans and Democrats alike from the Guilford County delegation. 

“No animal should ever have this kind of treatment,” Rep. Maggie Jeffus  said on the floor.

Susie was beaten, set on fire and left for dead. She still has scars and disfigured ears but was able to attend a committee hearing earlier this week to help lobby for the bill.

“I wish you could all meet her,” Rep. Laura Wiley , a High Point Republican told her colleagues. “She’s quite an animal in that she has remarkable trust and fondness for humans even after what she’s been through.”

The person who abused Susie was sentenced to probation, the maximum sentence under current law.

The sentence outraged animal lovers, who lobbied legislators to increase the penalties associated with such crimes so judges would have the option to hand down jail time.

The “Level H felony” specified in Susie’s Law would allow a judge to impose up to eight months in jail for first time offenders.

Nobody spoke against the bill, although Rep. Paul “Skip” Stam , an Apex Republican, did point out that “assault inflicting serious injury on a human being” is only a Class A1 misdemeanor with a maximum sentence for first time offenders of 60 days.

The bill next goes to the Senate. Because it was done outside the usual legislative procedure, senators will have to choose whether to pass the bill as is or send it to a conference committee with their House colleagues.
If the Senate passes it, the bill would next go to Gov. Bev Perdue  for her signature.

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

PitOwner

May 26, 2010 - 4:41 pm EDT

It's a start.
People that abuse, and attack, animals to this degree should serve no less than half the time that would be served for doing the same thing to a human.
Now let's push for stronger punishment for people that allow their animals to attack and injure or kill other animals and people.

linus

May 26, 2010 - 5:15 pm EDT

I am an animal lover but people who commit murder dont even get the right punishment. Laws are no good if we do not have people enforcing the punishment. Something needs to be done in our judical system. NC doesnt hold to their punishments, it will be a slap on the hand as everything else is in this state.

OneVoice

May 27, 2010 - 12:09 am EDT

Now that we have this one out of the way, the legislature needs to strengthen the penalties for predatory sex offenders: first conviction of rape of anyone of any age, life without parole. Do not allow rape to be plea bargained to "indecent liberties" as was the case recently in New Hanover Co. Unless the law is strengthened, it is only a matter of time before NC has its own Chelsea King, Amber Dubois story. NC needs to pass legislation being considered in CA. Chelsea's Law would "allow life sentences for a first offense of forcible sex crimes involving a child under 18, up from the current 15-year to 25-year sentence. The life term would be reserved for cases with aggravating factors that include kidnapping, using a weapon, torture, binding or drugging a victim or a previous sex crime conviction." That legislation, too, should pass 113-0. As much as I love animals and hate to see them abused, I think our women and children deserve protection from abuse first.

soatbs

May 27, 2010 - 10:14 am EDT

While I certainly agree with you on increasing penalties for sex crimes, why is it an either or situation when it's about animals? Passing tougher laws on animal abuse has nothing whatsoever to do with sex offenders, murders or other crimes. Why should other crimes/lack of penalties negate the efforts people make for animals? These are completely different issues. Animal abuse is wrong. Period. The laws currently offer very little in penalties and those laws need to change. Lobby for any other laws you want - that would certainly be more effective than complaining about this law.

d_random

May 27, 2010 - 11:36 am EDT

Studies show 100% of sexual homicide perpetrators started by abusing animals.

SweetAdeline

May 27, 2010 - 1:39 am EDT

Our legislators' time would have been better spent strengthening North Carolina's dog bite laws in which there are so many loopholes that it is almost impossible to hold an owner accountable for the actions of his/her dog. It is a shame and disgrace that our elected representatives aren't as concerned about all the people (mostly children) attacked by dogs in this state as they are about the dogs themselves.

soatbs

May 27, 2010 - 10:43 am EDT

Again, I don't see the connection here. Animal abuse is rampant in this county and in this state and this law is way overdue. It's not an either or situation; passing a law against animal abuse does not mean the legislature can't work on other laws. Why complain about this law? Why not contact your representatives about the laws you want to see changed? Many people work very hard to help animals who have no voice and no vote. You do have a voice and a vote so please use it constructively.

SweetAdeline

June 4, 2010 - 12:06 am EDT

It apparently is an "either or" situation, because I haven't seen any news articles about legislators introducing bills to hold dog owners accountable for the damage done by their animals. FYI, I have contacted my elected officials and so have others but, unfortunately, the dog freaks in this state make a lot more noise. There is nothing wrong with having laws against animal cruelty, but the primary concern of our elected officials should be the safety and rights of their constituents, and as much as the dog freaks would like to believe otherwise, constitutents are people, not dogs!

d_random

May 27, 2010 - 10:53 am EDT

It IS important that animal abusers get a felony on their record. 80% of animal abusers go on to abuse their spouse and children. A person with felony on their record from animal abuse will get MORE time in jail for child abuse. So this law also protects children.

soatbs

May 27, 2010 - 2:08 pm EDT

I agree with you; animal abuse needs to be a felony with jail time. Didn't know they'd get more time for child abuse with an animal abuse on their record - that's a good thing! I just find that so often people seem to resent help for animals and think a law to protect animals somehow cancels out a law to protect people and that's just not the case. I'm all for stiffer penalties for sex crimes, murder, child abuse, etc.

OneVoice

May 27, 2010 - 4:17 pm EDT

soatbs, methinks thou dost protest too much. I have lobbied for several years and will continue to lobby for tougher sentencing for sex offenders. Unfortunately, I am just one voice and have to work to support my family, so I do not have the time to go to Raleigh and speak personally to every legislator. Susie was abused several months ago and the law passes 113-0. Where are these many people you speak of who worked very hard to help animals who have no voice and no vote when a six-year-old child, who has no voice and no vote, is raped? Where are they when an 83-year-old woman is brutally raped and beaten in her own home? My problem is not with Susie's law; it is with our legislators who will pass Susie's law while I have two sex offenders living within a mile of my house and I have two small children. Just as I have only so much time to lobby for tighter sentencing, our legislators have only so much time to debate issues. The fact they chose to debate Susie's Law, while every day women and children are molested in this state tells me they would rather handle the no-brainers than substantive issues. I have pets, both dogs and cats, and I have kids; I will always lobby for my kids first. It is not that I disagree with the law, I disagree with the priorities.

soatbs

May 27, 2010 - 5:31 pm EDT

I completely agree with you on tougher sentences for sex offenders. I would like to see much stiffer penalties for a lot of crimes. No child or adult should ever be raped, assaulted or murdered and it disgusts me to see light sentences given way too often. If there's a law similar to the one in CA then it too should be a no-brainer - no argument there.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search