news-record.com

NEWS

Lawmakers push small businesses with tax breaks

Wednesday, May 19, 2010
(Updated 4:43 pm)

RALEIGH (AP) — North Carolina legislators desperate to show they're doing all they can to boost job creation are offering small businesses new tax breaks and other help to try to stimulate new hiring.

"We need to do everything we can to create jobs," said Rep. Bill Owens, D-Pasquotank. "We can't do enough this year to create jobs."

A state House committee on Wednesday approved what its sponsor, House Majority Leader Hugh Holliman, called the General Assembly's first broad attempt to juice job creation by small businesses. The package could cost the state about $80 million over three years, after which the job-creation tax credits expire, according to estimates by legislative fiscal analysts.

The plan would allow businesses with 25 full-time employees or fewer to take a $1,000 tax credit for every job created and kept for three years. Businesses also could get a $250 tax break to help pay the health benefits of each employee earning less than $40,000.

The legislation would expand a tax break for investors in small businesses. Lawmakers also would devote $2.9 million next year to three state programs that provide loans to small companies in rural areas, provide confidential business coaching, and make it easier to get federal technology grants.

Also on Wednesday, the state Senate tentatively approved a proposed annual budget of nearly $19 billion that includes a cut in the highest marginal tax rate for small businesses from 7.75 percent to 6.9 percent — the same as corporate taxpayers.

Separately, Gov. Beverly Perdue has proposed nearly $16 million in tax relief for small businesses. Her idea is for the state to write a $1,000 check to companies that hire workers unemployed for more than 60 days.

"We haven't quite bought into that yet, but it's still on the table," said Holliman, D-Davidson.

Republican leaders have criticized small business incentives offered by Perdue and Democrats as doing little to generate jobs.

A University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill researcher whose report last year to the General Assembly found the state's business incentives programs largely ineffective said targeting breaks for small businesses are more likely to get results.

North Carolina's business tax credits haven't translated into the kind of job creation politicians tout because they come "so far after the fact and in many cases are so difficult to take advantage of they tend to be good things to announce but they're difficult to use," said Brent Lane, director of the UNC Center for Competitive Economies at the Kenan-Flagler Business School.

But the proposed small-business tax breaks may reach a broader range of companies and locations and have the potential to deliver a better bang for the bucks, Lane said.

"If they're focusing on firms that are 25 or fewer that is a pool of (companies) much more likely to create the results they're looking for," he said.

Accompanying Photos

News & Record

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

jeffreyhsykes

May 19, 2010 - 4:21 pm EDT

This seems like a good idea, but I need a lot more details to know where the inevitable "trade-offs" are.

As an administrator for a small business. I do know that any assistance in paying for employee health care is a good step. I also like the three year requirement on the job creation tax break. We need sustainable jobs, not fly-by-night service sector positions.

More details please.

jeffreyhsykes

May 19, 2010 - 4:57 pm EDT

Thanks for posting the full story.

Blair

May 19, 2010 - 6:27 pm EDT

This is pointless for the most part. It shows how little they really understand small business in any real sense. We have had to lay people off at our store because sales are down so much that there is simply not the money to make payroll. Duh, why would I be laying people off if I had the money to pay them? So they want to give me $1,000 to hire someone? What about the other $12,000 I will need for the rest of the years salary - at minimum wage and only 35 hours per week for only 50 weeks of the year? Having another person around doesn't help me sell more product when there is nobody coming into the mall! How does this help me in ANY way? And $250 for health insurance? Do they have any idea the cost of insurance these days? (Probably not since they get taxpayer funded health insurance at no cost to them.) $250 might give MINIMAL coverage for maybe 2 months for a single employee with no family, and no health issues. So I must pay him to not increase my sales AND give him health insurance when I can't even afford it for myself right now because sales are down so far?! Maybe production businesses could create more product which could give them increased stores of inventory - but who is there to BUY it? The ONLY way to spur sales is to CUT PEOPLE'S TAXES! The only way to give businesses more capitol with which to hire is to CUT THEIR TAXES!!! Let us run our own business and quit trying to use meaningless tax "incentives" to control/micro-manage what you clearly know nothing about! Get a clue Raleigh - and Washington!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search