news-record.com

OPINION

A&T, UNCG budget cuts hurt entire community

Sunday, May 9, 2010
(Updated Monday, May 17 - 1:21 pm)

By Linda P. Brady and Harold L. Martin

As chancellors of the two largest public universities in the Piedmont Triad, we take to heart our mission to educate the workforce of tomorrow as well as our responsibility to help enhance the quality of life for the communities in which we live.

Part of what makes N.C. A&T State University and the University of North Carolina at Greensboro distinctive is our connection to Greensboro and the Triad. Thanks to the generous support of our local community and taxpayers across the state, collaborations such as the Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering were made possible.

By training our local workforce in industries of the future and facilitating collaborations between world-class researchers and businesses, we are working together more closely than ever before to deliver a strong return on taxpayer investments. Unfortunately, the budget cuts recently recommended by Gov. Bev Perdue for the next fiscal year would result in permanent and substantial damage to our institutions' academic core, and our ability to prepare students to compete successfully in today's global economy.

N.C. A&T and UNCG worked diligently to handle this current fiscal year's cuts with minimal damage to our academic core and have dealt with reductions principally by reducing funding for administration.

In the current fiscal year, the UNC system permanently reduced its budget by 6 percent or $162.5 million in addition to a one-time reversion of $134 million and targeted those cuts on administrative costs in order to protect the classroom.

Although the UNC system accounts for only 13 percent of General Fund appropriations, last fiscal year it contributed nearly 30 percent of the budget reversions imposed across state government, bringing the total cuts to the UNC system budgets this year to almost $300 million.

The General Assembly's budget for 2010-11 already reduces the university system budgets by another 2 percent. An additional 3.9 percent budget reduction, resulting in total cuts of nearly 6 percent, would cut directly into the academic core, significantly reducing the quality of academic instruction and student experience at A&T and UNCG.

The previous round of budget cuts already has resulted in fewer courses and bigger classes, but further cuts could change the very nature of our campuses.

A&T and UNCG would have to eliminate more than 900 course sections resulting in 25,000 fewer "seats" in classrooms. Fewer classes mean students can't take the courses they need to graduate. Retention and graduation rates would undoubtedly decline as a result. Additional budget cuts would reduce the number of student majors in high-priority degree programs, such as teacher education, nursing and the sciences, because of limited course availability.

The current proposed cuts of nearly 6 percent also would significantly reduce services provided to our students beyond the classroom. Students would see fewer academic advisers, fewer financial aid officers and fewer mental health counselors.

The proposed cuts would likely force departments to postpone hiring research faculty, let temporary appointments lapse and leave research positions unfilled. The cuts threaten to slow our research growth and, in turn, our ability to help create much-needed jobs.

A thriving community requires creative researchers, innovative teachers, skilled nurses and some of the brightest minds in the world of business and technology. Our universities are strategically connected and uniquely poised to deliver these needs not only for Greensboro but the entire Triad region and beyond.

As economic engines and centers of innovation for the Triad, our teaching, research and outreach have never been more important to this region's economic future. The recommended budget cuts threaten our ability to equip students with the skills needed to compete in a knowledge-based global economy and diminish our ability to contribute to economic development.

Join us in asking our legislative leaders to minimize cuts to our universities and to preserve academic quality, fiscal integrity and access to education. Our students and our community deserve no less.

Linda P. Brady is chancellor of UNCG; Harold L. Martin is chancellor of N.C.A&T.
 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

igliigli

May 9, 2010 - 8:29 am EDT

I strongly agree that the budget cuts are damaging academics at all UNC schools. But if the UNC schools do not have enough money for academics, why are they spending a dime on sports? Get rid of the coaches and sports teams and use the money for academics.

2fer

May 9, 2010 - 12:57 pm EDT

In theory, sports funding comes from independent athletic organizations which get their money from private sources, not the universities' budgets. This is a farce, however, since UNC gets ~$10,000,000 from the legislature to fund athletic scholarships for out-of-state students, and there are precious few academic professors who earn as much as coaches with consistently losing records.
The "return" on this investment is supposed to be in the form of increased donations by graduates for academic programs, a reputation that attracts an improved pool of students which would include more out-of-state students paying higher tuition, and an even better qualified core of teachers and researches who would garner more grant money. This is the intention, and some schools say it works. It doesn't work for us, and we have redirected some of our educational donations because of increased emphasis on athletics at our alma mater.

Gso Resident

May 9, 2010 - 10:18 am EDT

I don't think I've scrolled through an article as quickly as this one. I suppose it is for lack of credibility of its authors.

Its obvious that UNCG, A&T and others have been focused on the "business" of education for many years. Now the realities of "business" have caught up with them.

It's pretty clear that both institutions don't quite know what to do about it. Business's in every community across this country are adjusting and retooling for the new economy. When these two clown acts at UNCG and A&T can present such a plan then maybe they'll be something of value here to read.

nclawkid

May 9, 2010 - 11:12 am EDT

Where's your plan?

2fer

May 9, 2010 - 12:42 pm EDT

I am no friend of Chancellor Brady and don't know yet Chancellor Martin, but this is one of the stupidest, spitefullest, most uninformed comments I've read on these blogs. Gso Resident simply doesn't have the slightest idea what has been done and is being done at our universities, or it is willing to misrepresent their programs and plans for whatever selfish purpose it thinks it is furthering.
Gso Resident totally ignores the Bryan Business School, the patents, publications, and technology start-ups that have originated in both our universities, and the excellence of their programs that cover a wide range of fields, producing outstanding graduates, including education majors, who will influence the entire nation in this and the next generation. Is there room for improvement? Sure, as in all things human, but any improvement will be built on a solid foundation of educational and research excellence already in place thanks to the hard work and careful planning and budgeting of previous and current administrators and teachers.

Gso Resident

May 9, 2010 - 1:13 pm EDT

"Although the UNC system accounts for only 13 percent of General Fund appropriations, last fiscal year it contributed nearly 30 percent of the budget reversions imposed across state government, bringing the total cuts to the UNC system budgets this year to almost $300 million."

I'm not the only one. Looks like the legislature has some concerns too. The authors suggest sending a little note to Raleigh to support their cause. Just drive by these places. Its like a Google campus with Hyatt Regency's on them. Visit them with your college bound son or daughter or pay the tuition bill.

Well I have news for you. The little notes have already been sent to Raleigh and they haven't been for this cause. It furthermore shows how out of touch with reality these administrators are. They'll make the changes because there are no more 18 month sabbaticals that pay $180,000 for a daily visit to the Chancellor's Lounge

snapandwhistle

May 9, 2010 - 1:31 pm EDT

I just have to say that you are full of crap. Your solution is to build new buildings out of sticks and mud then? The buildings being built are 100 year buildings, meant to last and not be rebuilt during their useful life. That doesn't make them the "Hyatt Regency." That makes them a good investment and money well spent. Are you saying that you would send your children to a school with really bad housing because you knew that they were being thriftier? No, you would send your children to a place where they would be safe and comfortable. Thank you for sending your little notes to Raleigh. Once they read that some whacko is encouraging less spending on universities, they'll want to distance themselves from your point of view.

bogerd

May 10, 2010 - 11:52 am EDT

Both NCAT and UNCG are great contributors to the triad community, the state, the nation and the world. To further cut these budgets would produce a definite shortfall on the economic growth and educational productivity in our state. The educational institutions are the ones who provide the workers and leaders who will create growth across the state and the nation. Therefore, by no mean should these institutions' budget be cut any further.

Wilhammer

May 10, 2010 - 2:17 pm EDT

GSO Resident often, if not always, comments in a very negative way on all things involving gov't and often without much valid logic or facts - best to ignore it all.

teaparty

May 17, 2010 - 10:15 am EDT

Let's be real. Nobody likes to cut budgets and no one likes to raise taxes. But how can UNCG and A&T look you in the face and ask for help when they (administrators) are the very ones who can not make sound financial decisions. For example, A&T allows faculty and administrators to retire under a "Phased retirement" that doesn't retire. Say What? Phased retirement? Yes, you can work at A&T for almost 30 years, get a $100,000.00 plus salary and health benefits and before you reach FULL retirement go into phased retirement and teach one class for $100,000.00 per year with full health benefits. Just look at soon to phase retire Associate Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs Dr. Kenneth Murray, P.E. And he is just one of 20 such faculty/administrators to get earn $100,000.00 plus per yr to teach one class. Let's see, there's also at least one maybe two past Chancellors still on A&T's payroll, several past Deans and chairs in Engineering. The list goes on. Hey, there is at least $ 3 million dollars in overhead and salaries that can be cut without asking Gov. Perdue for anything. WoW!!!!!!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search