news-record.com

NEWS

Water rates may increase 9 percent in Greensboro

Wednesday, April 28, 2010
(Updated 2:44 pm)

GREENSBORO — City water users could see a 9 percent rate increase starting July 1.

The change, recommended by the city staff Tuesday, would increase the monthly bill of an average water user by $3.15 to $37.85.

“We think this is what we ought to do to keep the integrity of the water system,” City Manager Rashad Young said.

But City Council members have to make the final decision.

They will likely decide whether to accept the proposed rate increase in coming weeks.

Since 2004, water and sewer rates have increased between 8 and 15 percent every year except 2010. The rate increases have paid for major projects such as the Randleman Regional Reservoir and items like new drinking water quality requirements.

The city needs a 9 percent increase to keep up with the maintenance demands of the water system and to keep the finances of the utility healthy, city staff members said Tuesday. The rate increase would generate $7.5 million.

Staff members also projected the utility would require increases of between 1.25 and 6.6 percent over the next three years.

Councilman Robbie Perkins said the staff made a compelling argument that the rate increase was necessary.

“There is only so much you can do to cut the operating costs out of it. Your major expenditures are pretty clear-cut,” Perkins said.

Other council members said they understood that water resources require capital resources.

“Anybody in business knows you’ve got to invest,” Mayor Bill Knight said. 

But whether he would support the proposed rate increase, Knight said he would have to review the information the staff presented before making that decision.

Councilwoman Trudy Wade, who pushed for the City Council to keep rates flat last year, said she wanted to hear from constituents.

“I would like for the public to hear about this before we decide,” Wade said.

Contact Amanda Lehmert at 373-7075 or amanda.lehmert@news-record.com
 

Accompanying Photos

Stock photo

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

uncwgm

April 27, 2010 - 5:57 pm EDT

Maybe if the city would cut spending and quit building swimming pools and repaving functional bike trails like the on ein Latham park an increase wouldn't be necessary.

There was plenty of money when times were good, why weren't infrastructure improvements made then?

ou812

April 27, 2010 - 7:47 pm EDT

This is the way our City Council raises taxes without having a so called tax increase.

Abner Doon

April 27, 2010 - 8:16 pm EDT

How about them General Fund balances?

DrMaryJohnson

April 27, 2010 - 8:26 pm EDT

I guess Mike Baron (Greensboro's former water conservation manager) is not looking quite so "criminally insane" these days, eh?

There be some EXPENSIVE bass in that lake;)

http://damscam.blogspot.com/

jeaniegnc

April 28, 2010 - 9:38 am EDT

My prediction -- Greensboro residents can expect a healthy increase each and every year and maybe twice a year. Amazing that there are no protests to these increases and residents just accept it and do not question this increase. When the mayor and a councilman stress the need for water rate increases, no need for discussion or further explanation from the city staff. The city staff would not mislead you, now would they?

Mad Dog

April 28, 2010 - 9:38 am EDT

While we are at it, why can't the city bill me for the gallons I use instead of consumption units? It's a lot easier to conserve a gallon here and a gallon there than it is to save 748 gallons(one consumption unit). I was told by the water department that the city "rounds up or down" your consumption unit based on gallon usage. So if someone is monitoring by gallons, why can't the city show me the gallons used on my bill, then convert it to consumption units for billing? That way, you would get a more accurate picture of usage and exact water charges. I get the feeling someone is peeing on my leg and telling me it's raining!

naynay

April 29, 2010 - 7:28 pm EDT

They will bill you for 0 units of usage until you have used an entire unit. If you use .99 units, you are billed 0 units. I have never been told the water department rounds up or down based on gallons. That doesn't make sense. If you have a calculator, you can multiply your units of usage times 748 or whatever and THATS how many gallons you are being billed for. If you want the city to do that for you, then our taxes are going to have to be used to hire a tutor for you. Or maybe they'll raise the rates again.

JayGSO

April 28, 2010 - 9:38 am EDT

Actually, tax increases and the general fund have little to do with water rates. The Water Resources department operates out of its own enterprise fund, meaning they charge for the service they provide and keep the money separate from the general fund. Money generated from water bills goes to Water Resources, not to the general fund for things like swimming pools, bike trails, and back door tax increases. In fact, moving money between those two funds, called commingling of funds, is illegal.

aintme

April 28, 2010 - 9:50 am EDT

Thanks for posting that, Jay. It always slaughters me that the same people on this board are the first ones out of the gate even for things like water rate increases. Naturally no one is a fan of paying higher rates, but water is a bargain in this town even with the increase. Ever been without water when your home well runs dry, electric goes out, etc.? Not fun.

flagstik

April 28, 2010 - 12:31 pm EDT

For the individual that thinks GSO's water rates are a bargain can you provide the facts to back up that comment or are you just one of the local developers that run the city govt.?

JayGSO

April 29, 2010 - 8:25 am EDT

In the related links section of this article just under the picture above, notice the link "Nifty Water Rate Tool". You can use that to compare water rates. Take a look at the NC Water Services dashboard to compare Greensboro's rates to other systems in a variety of ways.

naynay

April 29, 2010 - 7:32 pm EDT

Thank you Jay. If people would spend their freakout time actually looking into the topics they're ranting about, it would actually make the world a better place.

Godschild

April 28, 2010 - 9:49 am EDT

Did city council forget that they wanted to waive homeowners as being responsible for water bills that tenants left behind. This is a way to make up for that loss. It used to be if a tenant left behind any type of balance on an address, the person who owns the property was responsible for the bill. Now that is not the case. They are losing a lot of revenue this way. The people in the water department even admitted this. I think they should track down the offenders or try and cross reference their names at others addresses to make them pay. The citizens across the board shouldn't be held responsible for this decision. Homeowners were getting the bad end of the deal, now we all are getting the bad end of the deal.

Kid A

April 28, 2010 - 10:03 am EDT

Mad Dog is right -- we have no idea how much water we're actually using. 748 gallons is a lot of water; if I use 375 gallons they charge me for the other 375 that I didn't use? Ridiculous. They are taking us for idiots -- it's indicative of the total lack of TRUST in government these days, including Greensboro's.

newkid

April 28, 2010 - 12:08 pm EDT

Yeah, everyone distrusts governments, but they trust the "free market"--companies that drill-and-spill oil, mislead investors, charge hidden fees for banking services...

YeahRight

April 28, 2010 - 2:25 pm EDT

Here we go again... Figures don't lie; but liars figure. It seems to me that many years ago, the county of Guilford was in dire staits. Water shortages abounded. Water was being borrowed from Burlington/Alamance County. Then, the dam to end all dams was built on the Deep River to give Guilford County and Greensboro a mighty supply of water. Why is it, now that things appear to be in good supply, that Greensboro sees fit to wring money out of its citizens for the water they use? Why not bill all of those businesses who are using water to accomodate all of those transient sales tax payers? For years it was stated, we need a coliseum to attract more people. Also, our visitors (more people) help fund our monetary needs by paying our sales tax. I guess there's a monetary shortfall from "more people". So, it's time for the local people to cough up more money to pay for poor planning and good old Greensboro bragging rights. Oh Yeah!! What about all of those commercial entities who are watering their grass in the rain? What about the same folks who don't maitain their irrigation? They use water inefficiently; and they send their deficient usage onto the streets and into the drains.

JayGSO

April 29, 2010 - 8:59 am EDT

Large volume users and businesses or people who waste water due to inefficiency are paying more. The water rates for Greensboro follow a tiered progressive scale that charges more for higher volumes of use.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search