news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: The cost of giveaways

Thursday, April 15, 2010
(Updated 3:00 am)

There was grumbling at the Triangle Game Conference in Raleigh last week, The News & Observer reported, because North Carolina doesn't give tax credits to video-game developers.

"If we don't offer incentives, I think we're going to start losing companies," an industry insider said.

The Triangle does have a nice cluster of about 30 companies employing 1,200 workers, many of whom are paid very well to design video games that more and more Americans play at home or even on hand-held gadgets. It would be a shame to lose them to other states or even countries that offer lucrative deals.

Not that North Carolina won't get in the game. It's a habitual player. In fact, Gov. Bev Perdue last week proposed a new package of tax breaks and incentives for small businesses, an across-the-board approach that makes more sense than writing legislation that applies to a single industry or even one company -- although North Carolina has done that often enough.

With the state facing another huge budget deficit, however, the issue of tax breaks warrants close examination. The argument that tax relief or special deals help business, and that stronger businesses boost the economy, is powerful. Taken to its logical conclusion, though, it would lead to eliminating all taxes on businesses. What company wouldn't think that was great? But would that count as responsible public policy?

The state's practice of granting special tax breaks draws skepticism from both ends of the political spectrum.

Robert Orr of the conservative N.C. Institute for Constitutional Law opposes incentives, noting that the state "has paid or promised hundreds of millions in public revenue to Google, Apple, Deutsche Bank, Novartis, Siemens Energy and numerous other companies, all while state and local governments reduce public services due to revenue shortfalls."

Elaine Mejia of the liberal N.C. Justice Center, meanwhile, asserts there are "countless examples of costly tax preferences that the state has established over years that have not been evaluated."

This is an important time for leaders in the state's executive and legislative branches to conduct those evaluations and make sure they're not letting needed revenue slip away without the people of North Carolina receiving value in return. They should not fund ineffective state programs or grant unproductive tax breaks.

That's especially imperative when more tax increases are being considered on top of $1 billion in tax hikes enacted last year. This time a hospital tax is on the table.

No tax increases should be in the works unless every tax break already allowed can be justified and every spending program is providing service worth its cost.

It's natural that businesses such as video-game developers want tax breaks, but they also should want to work in a state that has money for schools, roads and other needs.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Panacea

April 15, 2010 - 8:20 am EDT

Tax incentives to business are pure corporate welfare and nothing more. The state NEVER gets any bang for its buck, and most of these companies will NOT move--that's just a threat to scare lawmakers into giving in. Companies who want to come to North Carolina will come whether they get incentives or not. Again, it's a threat, a scare tactic.

Legislators: grow a pair! Say not only no, but hell no!

Panacea

April 15, 2010 - 12:28 pm EDT

Interesting article. However, the author doesn't point out that most of the cannery jobs are held by Western Samoans, not American Samoans--the American Samoans don't want those jobs any more than local North Carolinian's want poultry jobs. The jobs were being worked by non-Americans anyway, probably illegals.

Interested

April 15, 2010 - 11:49 am EDT

I imagine that oh-so-many-years-ago, back when textile jobs were plentiful, most folks were of the opinion that textile manufacturers would never take their production out of state, much less out of the country. I'm sure that plenty of people said "Don't cave. This is just a scare tactic." When operating costs are cheaper elsewhere, mom-and-pop shops may stick close to home, but corporations often will leave.

That is not to say that I am for tax incentives. I'm just saying the issue is not as simple as some people like to think it is, especially in tough economic times with jobs already scarce.

Panacea

April 15, 2010 - 12:57 pm EDT

There's a difference with manufacturing jobs and the technology jobs North Carolina is trying to attract: our manufacturing went overseas for more than just local reasons: the federal tax situation made it particularly attractive for corporations to go to other countries.

Interested

April 15, 2010 - 3:08 pm EDT

Exactly my point. Operating costs were lower somewhere else. Does it matter why the costs were lower - federal tax situation, EPA regulations, minimum wage, incentives, etc? In the end, we will have the same result with technology jobs if another area with equally-qualified employees has lower overall costs. Legislators have a hard time just saying no to incentives when constituents are clamoring for new employment opportunities.

rmacz

April 15, 2010 - 4:21 pm EDT

You folks seem to have forgotten how well Reagan's trickle down economics worked so well in the 80's. Lowering taxes works every time it's tried.
Just wait till Obama's health care taxes hit...we ain't seen nothin' yet. (I know how to spell nothing)

Panacea

April 15, 2010 - 6:59 pm EDT

Actually, trickle down economics did NOT work, because it does not actually exist :) It is a term associated with supply side economics, which is not the same thing.

rmacz

April 15, 2010 - 7:30 pm EDT

Tax revenues went up in the 80's under the leadership of Reagan, unemployment dropped, and the interest rate dropped.
Trickle down did work.

rmacz

April 15, 2010 - 7:33 pm EDT

Beachwalk

April 15, 2010 - 12:59 pm EDT

Lower taxes for everyone, including business will bring more jobs than anything else.

Even the very liberal Chicago Tribune editor is beginning to see the picture.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-illinois-2...
"A decade's worth of hard data suggests that states with no individual income tax created 89 percent more jobs, and had 32 percent faster personal income growth, than did states with the highest income tax rates."
"The report also analyzed 15 policy factors that influence a state's growth prospects — tax burdens, debt service, tort climate, mandated minimum wage, spending limits if any — and ranked Illinois' economic outlook as an alarming 44th in the U.S."

General Greensboro

April 15, 2010 - 1:13 pm EDT

Calling the Chicago Tribune's editorial page liberal, much less very liberal, is a mistake.

It has a long history of support for the GOP. Until it endosed the hometown guy in 2008, the Trib had never endorsed a Democrat in the presidential race.

GG

overtaxed

April 17, 2010 - 12:28 am EDT

GG, can you tell us when the last time the N-R endorsed a Republican in the presidential race?

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search