news-record.com

NEWS

Dog kennel case may lead to law

Sunday, April 11, 2010
(Updated Tuesday, April 13 - 11:46 am)

PLEASANT GARDEN — On its Web site, Rush Kennel bills itself as “North Carolina’s No. 1 dog kennel,” a place where Weimaraners, Labrador retrievers and other breeds frolic in a fenced play yard before the day ends with a massage, pool bath and pedicure.

“We pamper our dogs and make them feel great all over,” proclaims the Web site for the kennel, which is owned by Pleasant Garden businesswoman Sheila Rush Savage.

But the Guilford County Sheriff’s Office and the county Animal Shelter say they found something quite different last week in searching the kennel, after a four-month investigation of the breeding operation that sold purebred puppies for up to $800 each.

Investigators discovered filthy conditions that included large amounts of dog and rat feces, foul drinking water, malnourished dogs infested with such parasites as hookworms and heartworms, some dogs with rampant dental decay, others with severe lacerations and at least one with an eye infection so severe the eye must be removed.

Live electrical wires were strung across the cages, apparently to prevent the dogs from getting out, shelter director Marsha Williams said.

“In front, it looked very nice, very clean and very professional. It was behind the wooden privacy fence where you saw the issues,” said Williams, who helped deputies check out the kennel during their Wednesday raid.

Efforts to reach Savage and other kennel personnel for comment Saturday were unsuccessful. In the aftermath of last week’s raid, the 53-year-old dog breeder faces charges of animal cruelty, as does the shelter’s caretaker, Robert Landreth, 61.

After the two turned themselves in Friday, their lawyer said they had explanations for all the allegations and predicted they’ll be exonerated.

For example, attorney Kent Lively said, a rail-thin Weimaraner taken from the kennel and pictured recently in the News & Record was not underfed.

“(The dog) is an elderly dog and they tend to lose weight at 10 or 11 years old,” Lively said in an interview Friday. “She (Savage) doesn’t allow any of her dogs to be malnourished, is what she tells me.”

Before last week’s arrest, Savage was in the news during a 2007 stint on ABC’s “Wife Swap” reality show, where much was made of her affection for her nine Chihuahuas and poodles.

But evidence emerging so far in the case shows that the animal shelter, Guilford County Animal Control officers and the local Better Business Bureau have been concerned about Savage’s kennel for years.

The shelter took in 40 to 50 abandoned dogs from Savage in the past eight or nine years, Williams said.

“We would have to treat them for whatever illness or other problems they had,” she  said. “They were not in very good shape when they were brought in to us. She said they were tired, like they were too old or she didn’t want to breed them anymore.”
The shelter did not pursue its own investigation of Rush Kennel because it lacked the authority, Williams said:  “Animal Control was bringing them (the dogs) to us for her. We assumed they didn’t have any problems with her at that time.”

A spokesman for Guilford’s animal control program declined to comment on the situation, saying that it involves an ongoing investigation.

Last week’s arrests are the crest of a larger “puppy mill” problem triggered by North Carolina’s lack of a law requiring such operations be licensed and open to inspection by regulators, said Kimberly Alboum, state director of the Humane Society of the United States.

“I have animal control officers contacting me all the time from around the state saying, 'Look, I have what I consider to be a puppy mill here,’ ” Alboum said. “But there’s nothing they can do about it.”

Kennels are licensed and regularly inspected by the state Department of Agriculture only if they breed dogs for sale to pet stores or to research laboratories.

No state law specifically protects dogs raised in such kennels as the Rush facility, where they were sold directly to the public. They are protected only by an all-purpose animal cruelty statute focused mainly on requiring adequate food, water and shelter, Alboum said.

That could change after the General Assembly convenes in May when the House takes up the so-called “Puppy Mill Bill,” a proposal that has already been approved by the state Senate. The bill would license kennels that sell directly to the public through the Department of Agriculture, and give local animal control officers more authority to inspect their operations.

Building a criminal case using only the existing animal-cruelty law is difficult and time-consuming, said the Humane Society’s Alboum, adding she’s not surprised it took Guilford investigators four months to bring charges against Rush Kennel.

Sparked by a letter to the sheriff’s office from a Pennsylvania couple last November, the local investigation eventually unearthed a total of 18 complaints made against Rush Kennel with Guilford animal control officers, the Better Business Bureau and the state Department of Agriculture.

Sheriff’s investigators relied on those complaints, plus evidence from their own undercover dealings with the kennel, in persuading a judge to issue the warrant allowing them to search the Pleasant Garden compound and, ultimately, seize the 97 dogs housed there.

Complaints to the various agencies included:

  • A Winston-Salem woman who purchased two poodles last May. One died from worms two days after purchase. The other was diagnosed with glaucoma.
  • A South Carolina woman who said she went to purchase a Weimaraner puppy from the kennel. She asked to see the dog’s parents and but was told “that it wasn’t allowed,” and also told she could not see where the dogs were kept.
  • A man who reported the puppy he picked up from the kennel in January was infected with worms and parasites, and very underweight. The man said he called the kennel to request copies of X-rays and veterinary records, but an employee refused and became defensive before hanging up on him.
  • A woman who purchased a Weimaraner puppy in 2003. At 22 months the dog developed a “terrible cough, began to appear thin and began to tire easily.” The dog was diagnosed with “multiple heart defects and congestive heart failure.” The dog had to be euthanized. The woman wrote that a cardiologist told her the dog’s conditions were hereditary and “a breeder should not have bred a dog with the defect.”
  • A New York woman who said the Yorkshire terrier puppy she bought in June 2008 arrived at her residence “obviously sick, urinating on itself, lethargic, and “it smelled bad” and “it was not moving.” The woman said she received no medical records with the dog and took it to a veterinarian, where the puppy died.

But Rush Kennel has a mixed record in Guilford County civil court, where it has faced seven lawsuits by disgruntled customers over the years. Two cases were settled out of court, one was dismissed on procedural grounds, and Rush won two and lost two to former customers.

Savage and kennel caretaker Landreth are free on bond now, each facing seven, felony counts of animal cruelty and five misdemeanor allegations of the same crime.

If convicted, they likely would face a maximum penalty of 52 to 56 months of probation under state sentencing guidelines because neither has a criminal record.

Whatever happens in the case, the animal shelter’s Williams will long remember the ugly conditions she saw last week at the place that advertised, “Our top priority is the health and well-being of every dog.”

“It’s just hard to have compassion for someone who does that,” she said of the conditions she observed. “You want to say: Put some of that money back into the animals that are helping you.”
 

Staff writers Jennifer Fernandez and Dioni L. Wise contributed to this story.
 

Contact Taft Wireback at 373-7100 or taft.wireback@news-record.com
 

Contact Ryan Seals at 373-7077 or ryan.seals@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

Jerry Wolford (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Shelter director Marsha Williams and veterinary tech manager Marissa Studivent handle a Weimaraner that weighs 40 pounds, which is 35 pounds less than normal.

Additional Photos

Tips on buying a purebred puppy

The Humane Society of the United States recommends looking at the local shelter first. You can often find purebreds there.

But if you’re going through a breeder, the Humane Society and the American Kennel Club suggest:

Get a referral for a good breeder from your vet, local breed clubs or at a professional dog show.

Visit the breeder. See how the dogs in your breeder’s home interact with the breeder. Are they friendly or do they shy away?

Ask to see the dam or sire of your puppy.

Expect your breeder to ask questions of you, too.

Make sure expectations are clear — in writing is best — of how and when you will pay for the puppy.

Do not send money without speaking to the breeder and checking credentials and references.

If your dog must be shipped long distance, you should only pay half up front and the rest once you’ve had a vet examine the dog.

If the dog is AKC registered, the form should be available when you pick up the animal. Don’t pay for or take the dog home without the form filled out by the seller.
 

More online

More online Sheila Rush Savage appeared in an episode of “Wife Swap” in 2007. Watch an excerpt on YouTube at http://tinyurl.com/ybgh89p.

The full episode airs at 2 p.m. April 21 on Lifetime.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

MiMi

April 11, 2010 - 8:47 am EDT

This is such a sad situation.....and yes....I think something needs to be done....

I also think rules and regulations are meant for everyone to follow....and it seems like sometimes....those who are suppose to protect us and do what is right.....does not follow the law either....but some things are recognized and some things are swept right under the rug....which is not right....

One would not expect a sheriff's deputy would be sent out to "stand guard" on the outside of a property....while a person, who once worked for the city and his wife broke trespassed, broke into the property and removes things which did not belong to them...and then when 911 was called....not one person did anything about this.....so very sad....that this is a pick and choose situation....when just telling a person.....no, you are not allowed to enter someone else's property would have worked......COVER UP ? Oh yes....it is a cover up issue....from the sheriff's office, DA office, courtroom, lawyers and judges.....everyone chose to acknowledge that this even happened....
So my question is this.....when can people really trust those who try to enforce the laws? I do not know....
I think some of them try to do whatever they see fit to do.....whether it is legal and lawful or not.....and then if they are in the wrong....they hide things that they do not want the public to know.....so is this right? Absolutely not.....
it is not what you know.....but who you know....and this needs to stop....

There are so many laws now....that no one can keep up with them....and then when you have people who do not do their job.....and do it right....then it makes it that much harder to trust anyone.....so very sad....

So I truly think it is interesting that some people can get by with anything....and other people can get by with nothing......

Just wanted to share my experience and how the system works.......

Rocketscience

April 11, 2010 - 9:11 am EDT

What the heck are you talking about Mimi?

MiMi

April 11, 2010 - 10:19 am EDT

Rocketscience......my point is that everyone should be held accountable for what they do.....the article stated that on the web.....this place considers itself to the NC Number 1 kennel........but just look at what happened....everyone.....and this should include everyone.....regardless of who they are.....or who they know....

Law officers are suppose to protect people and do what is legally right.....but this does not always happen.....perhaps in a perfect world....but it is easy for some people to point their fingers at other people for things which they have done.....and yet....there are people who can get by with anything.....just because...

So how do you make people do what is right? It should be quite easy.....laws are here for a reason....and everyone should go by them.....laws are not just for a selected group of people....again...it should not matter whether you know someone, worked with someone....or they are kin to you....the law is the law and should be for all of us.....

Now.....do you "GET IT" ?

I bet you are one of the ones who voted for who is trying to run the country.....

ladyjane619

April 11, 2010 - 10:54 am EDT

Ok, that makes no sense in relation to this article. You act as though it was law enforcement who were running this kennel. Some people will use any opportunity to law bash & through in their worthless 2 cents of political "know-it-all".

kikablue

April 11, 2010 - 7:32 pm EDT

What in the world are you smoking or drinking, or both. You are bouncing off the walls.

diane.vanhorn

April 12, 2010 - 12:43 am EDT

Hey mimi...if that last line was " the ones who voted for who is trying to run the country" and you mean OBAMA??.....That would be me! and proud of it!!! as for the article......The presidental election has nothing to do with the issue at hand...which is puppy kennels, and/or miss treatment of animals.........Sounds like you either need to up your antidepressants or get off of them all together.....cause something is not right in your head!
Best of luck finding a professional for what ever issues your dealing with.........!!! :) Anger management is probably something you should look into??? just a thought......

NRay

April 11, 2010 - 10:47 am EDT

I'm not sure I get it either. So,let me get this straight? You believe this simple animal cruelty case is actually a political question, also . . . and that the case is somehow related to the current presidential administration?

Unaffiliated

April 11, 2010 - 10:57 am EDT

This has been going on for a long time @ Rush. Since it's in the Town of Pleasant Garden I remember a previous a Town Council & Town Attorney involved for @ least two years discussing vague comments @ council meetings and going into closed sessions. The public was never given any resolution to the case by that TC or the attorney. I seem to recall a settlement, but court records & the town's records need to be investigated. It's amazing that the current sheriff breaks the case a month before the primary election!

MiMi

April 11, 2010 - 11:16 am EDT

OK.....so this has been going on for a long time......well.....I guess no one really wanted to do anything about it.....and you state.....they went behind closed doors.....I wonder why else has been going on behind closed doors....people in control....can decide on what they want to do.....whether it is legal and lawful or not.....and they can get by with about anything.....Well.....well......and wonder why the current sheriff broke this story wide open.....right before an election.......who would think that a law enforcement might do such as this? Now....now...perhaps the truth is coming out......this was perhaps COVERED UP also.....until the proper time was to reveal it....and then everyone.....everyone.....is saying......what a good job the current people are doing?

NOT.....and if you believe this.....then tough stuff.....the sheriff's department HIDES a lot....probably a lot more than anyone knows about....but this is how they, who have power, can do it.....you might fool some of the people some of the time....but you can not fool all of the people all of the time....and NO ONE can fool GOD.....so take this for what it is worth....

And I just wonder why else these people are hiding.........justice? THERE IS NONE.....

lazareth

April 11, 2010 - 12:48 pm EDT

the article clearly says that the current laws on the books do not include strict laws to cover animal abuse or neglect by owners of these puppy mills.
So I fail to see what the local law enforcement is hiding. They cannot charge someone with breaking the law where no law exists. " Hiding " something isn't the issue here.
The issue it to put laws in place that protect animals.... period...

slebeau1

April 11, 2010 - 2:20 pm EDT

Mimi,
Sounds like you are friends with the ones that got in trouble or you are mad about someone busting you or a friend and have to take it out on the wrong people for the rest of your life. Anyone with a heart will read this story and be very thankful these people were exposed. You are right, NOTHING gets past God, including harming innocent little animals that he created.

MiMi

April 11, 2010 - 3:24 pm EDT

Slebeau.....I am not friends of the ones who got in trouble....nor have I gotten busted for anyone....it is quite simple though....laws should be for everyone.....I do not think anyone should be allowed to do something like trespassing, breaking and entering and removing property while the sheriff's deputy....."stands guard"......one day...if this ever happens to someone you know...and it is swept under the rug....you might "get it" then.....and I do think it is odd that the "kennel bust" came right before the election....almost like someone was trying to get a point over to the public....that they are just doing their jobs......Yeah! Right!.....they could have done this a long time ago...if they had wanted to....as someone else said....they have known about it for some time.....timing seems right....

Wonder how many animals could have saved from this.....if the officials had done something as soon as they knew it?

MiMi

April 11, 2010 - 3:26 pm EDT

Lazareth.....if none of this is included....then why did they bust them? For the heck of it?

And I bet going in "closed sessions" had something to do with it also.....you think?

Ellen

April 11, 2010 - 2:15 pm EDT

MiMi needs to lay off the bottle AND the dot, dot, dots!

MiMi

April 11, 2010 - 3:17 pm EDT

Ellen......perhaps you are the one who needs to lay off the bottle and the dot, dot, dot.....

Ellen

April 11, 2010 - 7:36 pm EDT

Do you use such long pauses when you speak? Bet your friends love engaging you in conversation.

channelred

April 11, 2010 - 3:11 pm EDT

I too had a bad experience with Rush Kennels over the holidays. I put down a down payment for an italian greyhound. I was never shown the littler as promised. I then started seeing horrible accusations online from other customers. When I mentioned this to Rush Kennels, I was told it was a disgruntled employee making these posts. When we received the puppy, I asked Robert the caretaker how many times to feed her. He told me just to throw food in a bowl such as Purina. Their website stated that their puppies were fed the very best food and filtered water. I was in horror when I got my puppy Ruby home, she was malnourished and you could see her ribs.

Here is an email from me and the response that I was given from their manager Lauren at the time:

Linda, (Secretary)

I am concerned with the following post:

Something I had learned first hand about seeing the parents, you can not see the parents because not all of the puppies Shelia sells are from her breeding or her dogs litters. I had a friend who raises Italian greyhounds whom Shelia Rush contacted to buy a puppy from, she falsely presented herself to this breeder as someone who was looking to buy 3 IG's as "FAMILY COMPANIONS', 2 for herself and one for her mother for company. Unfortuanately my friend did not know of this woman and what she does so she sold her the puppies. My friend contacted me about this after the fact, and I told her about Shelia and her "Kennel", she then panicked, I also raise IGs so as a favor I told my friend I would try to find out something about the puppies she had sold. I contacted Shelia who had told my friend in the meantime that she was having problems with one of the puppies fussing constantly ( go figure these puppies were raised in a home and she tried to stick them in her kennels with little contact). So I contacted Shelia under the pretense of purchasing a puppy to see if she would then offer me the puppy she had bought from my friend to me under the assumption it was one of her own breedings. Well, she did offer me this puppy as one of her own breeding as I expected she would.
So even if you did get to see parents you honestly could not be certain that what you were being shown was in reality the parents of the puppy you are buying, since her dogs are not AKC registered you can not rely on a pedigree as registries other than AKC are very lienient and don't requier DNA or parenting as conditions of registry. You can actually register a dog as a bulldog with the other registries that may be a bulldog/boxer mix. All you have to do to register this dog as a bulldog is take it to a vet that will sign the paper from the registry saying it is a bulldog. In telling you this remember Shelia's dogs are not AKC, she employs her own vet on the premises so they will sign the paper for her as she is paying them.
Lastly let me warn everyone if a dog is NOT AKC registered and is registered with some other registry (no matter who the breeder is) think hard before you buy this puppy because you honestly can not be sure if the dog is pure breed or not. Not all of the breeders selling with the other registries are selling puppies knowing they are not purebreed, they may have been misled also, but there are those breeders out there who are knowingly selling these mixed breed puppies as purebreed...so be warned and be careful, I would only trust AK

Now I have to ask, was my puppy bred at your facility? I received an email from you on November 14 stating that the little was born on November 1st, and that I would be contacted for a viewing time. I was never contacted for a viewing time. For you to try and force me to pay a balance on a puppy sight unseen makes me wonder.

I will see you on Saturday, January 2nd. I have already made an appointment to take the puppy to the vet at 3pm the same day so sometime around noon will work best.

Sincerely,

John Ruth

This was Rush Kennels response:

Mr Ruth,
All of our puppies are bred and born here at the facility, the post you read was posted from a competitor breeder, I am sure you are smart enough to know you can not always believe what you read on line. Linda is off on Thursdays, I have read both of your emails. First of all we are a professional breeding facility its our policy to contact customers a few days prior to the puppies release date to set up an apointment time for customers to pick up their puppy, we feel five days is enough time for a customer to make arrangements in most cases. Linda is our Secretary its her job to contact clients five days or so prior to a litters release date. Rush Kennels is a large facility 20 acres, on our property is a breeding facility, a doggie day spa and a boarding facility. December is a busy time of year for us with many customers ordering Christmas puppies we have several litters to care for, I am sure when Linda made the comment that your Yorke was ready she truly ment to say your Italian Greyhound, honest mistake. We have had several employees out with the flu we are working extra hours and doing our best.

Most people in business have different policies, no two are alike, a Veterinarian does noy have a clue on how a breeding facility runs a business, Veterinarians are Doctors not breeders. Our top priority is to breed happy healthy puppies, Rush Kennels has been in business for many years with hundreds of satisfied customers, testimonials are posted on our website guestbook they simply say it all about what our customers think of Rush Kennels. As a customer of ours we want you also to be happy, I will make sure you are not charged a boarding fee. I do apologize for the confussion and thank you for your business. Please call our weekend manager Robert 336-312-7727 when you return from your vacation he will be happy to set you up a pick up time. Happy Hollidays!! Lauren / Manager Rush Kennels

Now if you google Rush Kennels Rip off reports you will see that for every negative post, some employee from the facility posted a bogus "positive" review. My pure bred dog Ruby ($800.00) can also not be registered with the AKC. If you are in the market for a puppy, buyer beware! Do your research. I would not wish this nightmare on anyone.

jsipe29

April 11, 2010 - 4:21 pm EDT

Why would anyone think this was a political move? The reason these things take so long is so that they can get a conviction, not just lock somebody up and then loose the case becouse something wasn't done. Why are people looking for negative things about this case? It looks to me like everyone did a good job here! Oh yea ................, almost forgot the dots.........

MiMi

April 11, 2010 - 6:10 pm EDT

jsipe.....you really think it takes 2 years to get the facts......they are almost as slow as the attorneys are about going to court.....and we all know why the attorneys are slow.....they want to drain people's bank accounts....

I am sure....this just happen to be right before voting time.....no reason....just great timing.....Yeah....right!

Swampg8r

April 11, 2010 - 7:14 pm EDT

I can tell you that prosecuting for animal cruelty is very difficult because in all states, animals are considered property and laws that should be in place are not. So animal control officers (who are NOT law enforcement in most states - they have no power to do search/seizure, arrest, obtain search warrants, etc) must rely on local law enforcement to handle the 'legal' aspects of a cruelty case. And until recently, most law enforcement see animal cruelty as a lesser offense than people crimes. So, yes, it can take a full 2 years of evidence gathering and getting all the i's dotted and t's crossed so that a charge will actually stick.

And by the way, Mimi.......there......is.....no.....reason......to.....use.......all......those......dots. They do make other punctuation marks. Check your keyboard. There's a comma, and even a semicolon! You too can help prevent punctuation abuse.

Ellen

April 11, 2010 - 7:33 pm EDT

Thanks for trying Swampg8r, I tried but she just gave me the "I know you are but what am I?" defense.
Maybe she will wake from her stupor soon and read what she has written?

Waldo Leidecker

April 11, 2010 - 7:15 pm EDT

I'd love to see this woman and her idiot lawyer staked down in the middle of I-85 a let traffic take it's course. What a dispicable, worthless human being - hope the court buries her so deep in prison she doesn't even remember her own name when she gets out.

Ellen

April 11, 2010 - 9:30 pm EDT

Mimi......must.......be........passed........out........with........dots.......swirling........in.......her......head......?

MiMi

April 11, 2010 - 10:02 pm EDT

Ellen.....must.......be........passed........out........with........dots.......swirling........in.......her......head......?

LOL.....LOL....LOL....LOL.....LOL

At least you read the post..........

Ellen

April 12, 2010 - 7:00 pm EDT

so creative. I see you can copy and paste too.

RC

April 11, 2010 - 10:55 pm EDT

I went to the Rush Kennel website...and it is so deceiving. So sad.
I don't really care about how the investigation went on, the important thing is that it happened...and the dogs are no longer in that state...I am so concerned that it took so long to even get anything done about it.
I am so hoping along with all animal lovers in this state of NC that after ALL the animal cruelty, neglect/abuse cases that have been uncovered just this year alone, will get NEW LAWS to prevent this from happening! If the right laws are in place, #1 the law will protect animals at the onset of reported abuse...and the abusers will be arrested and held accountable and will face serious jail time. This is way past due and so out of hand. I was told that if you see a dog in a yard, chained, and starving...if you go into that yard to help that poor defenseless animal, you are committing a crime and can be charged. Please~
Back to this article...the conditions of these animals and the conditions described behind the "perfect picture" front of the kennel was so different from the one they describe on the website...they wanted to make money and they most certainly did not use the money to help these innocent dogs that was putting the money in their pockets...too many complaints and the director of the animal shelter saw it firsthand...don't know how the lawyer can say he expects his client will be cleared of these charges. WE need changes and we need them now!

manxcatlover

April 12, 2010 - 7:32 am EDT

Since they didn't mention the actual bill number in the article I will. In May, House Bill H460 will come up for a vote. You can visit
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Legislation/Legislation.html
to look up the names and contact info for your representatives, please take a moment to write, call, or e-mail them and ask them to support bill H460.

Nope, it won't solve everything, but it will require breeders like Rush Kennels to be regulated and inspected at least once a year.

Also, encourage your friends to adopt rather than buy. The simple truth is that Rush Kennels was in it for the money and if people stopped buying purebred dogs and adopted instead, there wouldn't be the incentive to breed dogs nearly to death.

Unaffiliated

April 12, 2010 - 8:13 am EDT

manxcatlover: I'm confused. This is a House Bill; Where is Senator Don's Bill? Several years ago, as Pleasant Garden's Town Attorney, he dealt with Rush Kennel for the town & my guess is he made money ! What is he attaching "Susie's Law" to? I cannot find a Senate Bill. Do you have that information? Thanks,

Ryan Seals

April 12, 2010 - 9:43 am EDT

Susie's law hasn't been introduced yet. He plans to introduce it in May. The puppy mill legislation is Senate Bill 460.

BeKindToAnimals

April 13, 2010 - 1:34 pm EDT

The only way to get this kind of treatment stopped is by writing your representatives and getting the laws changed. Too bad the perpetrators can't be treated the same way they treat the animals. Then again, look how people treat each other. How can anyone expect people to treat animals with respect when they don't treat each other with kindness? All we can do is try, so write your representatives and change the laws to include harsher punishments. God help us if these people sue and some judge closes his/her eyes to the cruelty and gives them their animals back.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search