news-record.com

NEWS

Schools can't furlough state workers

Thursday, April 8, 2010
(Updated Friday, April 9 - 8:19 am)

GREENSBORO — The Guilford County Board of Education has no authority to furlough employees paid by the state, officials say, complicating efforts to balance the school district’s budget.

Superintendent Maurice “Mo” Green included a two-day furlough in his $651.5 million budget proposal to cover a possible state-funding shortfall.

A furlough, which would affecting workers making more than $25,000 a year, would save $3.4 million , but that option might not be available.

“In terms of furloughs, local school boards could furlough people paid with local dollars,” said Vanessa Jeter , a spokeswoman with the state Department of Public Instruction. “But in terms of other employees, only the legislature or governor could furlough those people.”

This complication comes as the Guilford County Board of Commissioners suggested Thursday that the district’s budget had more room to contract. In a budget review session, commissioners told their peers that they shouldn’t expect increased funding.

Green’s budget also suggests asking the commissioners, who have final budget approval, for an additional $6.4 million .

“Everybody else is getting cut, so a hold-the-line (budget allocation) is generous on the part of the county,” commissioners Vice Chairman Steve Arnold said in the review.

Green’s budget accounts for as much as an additional $14 million shortfall in state revenues along with $9 million in cuts already expected for 2010-11.

Sheri Strickland, president of the North Carolina Association of Educators, suspects the furlough plans could be an attempt to distract teachers from more likely budget cuts.

“I do think that sometimes that is a strategy when you have to make tough economic decisions,” she said. “You start with extreme measures, and when you don’t have to go there, it seems much better than it is.”

The furlough proposal caught teachers’ attention.

“When they said they need to furlough us again, we weren’t very happy,” said Liz Foster , a teacher at The Middle College at GTCC High Point . “We’ve got people barely getting by on $25,000.”

If Green can’t furlough employees — and can’t expect more money from the commissioners — he and the school board will need to look elsewhere to balance the budget.

Commissioners at Thursday’s budget review session made it clear they want to see more cuts, not a budget increase.

Green’s budget seeks $3 million from the commissioners to make up a cut made to the school district’s maintenance funding last year and another $3.4 million to cover higher operating costs.

But several county commissioners took issue with the fact that the school district hasn’t yet used all of the $4 million it did get for maintenance.

Schools officials said they have stretched the money out over the year to avoid being empty-handed if an emergency arrives.

That discussion elevated tensions between the two sides and underscored the trust issues that persist over funding.

“I think the commissioners have said pretty clearly that if an emergency came up, we would find the money,” Arnold said.

Green replied: “We’ve heard that, but we’ve also heard there is no more money. I’m trying to react to what I’m hearing.”

Education advocacy groups already are lining up to lobby for more school funding.

The Guilford Education Alliance , a group made up of local business and community leaders who support education, will hold a news conference today and call for state and local officials to meet the school district’s funding needs.

“We feel very strongly that the community, the county commissioners and the state should be funding our schools,” said Margaret Arbuckle , executive director of the alliance. “It concerns us greatly that we’re starting the budget with almost $30 million in cuts.”

School board member Darlene Garrett balked at the idea of asking the commissioners for more money when Green originally presented his budget proposal. She noted the troubled economy.

“We’re just going to have to tighten our belts like everyone else,” Garrett said.

Contact J. Brian Ewing at 373-7351 or brian.ewing@news-record.com

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Yoda

April 8, 2010 - 2:38 pm EDT

This is sad, the dang lottery is suppose to take care of this, they ran it through on the fact it would fund the schools. Where's the freaking money? Now they will put people out of work. This is crap.

Brian Ewing

April 8, 2010 - 2:47 pm EDT

Yoda,

I'm not sure who you mean by "they," so you might know this already but the state supplanted the lottery money last year. I'll double check but I think it's been over a year since GCS got any cash from the lottery.

JackK

April 9, 2010 - 8:29 am EDT

My memory could be faulty, but I thought lottery money was for capital outlays like new buildings, equipment, upgrading technology, etc. So even if it hadn't been "supplanted" it would not be available for salaries, consumable items, textbooks, etc.

opec

April 8, 2010 - 3:52 pm EDT

"Schools should cut and trust more".

Trust more what? Did I miss something while reading the story?

Brian Ewing

April 8, 2010 - 4:14 pm EDT

Opec,

I meant the commissioners feel the board should trust them more to fund their emergency maintenance needs. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

r1948

April 8, 2010 - 6:39 pm EDT

"Trust me this won't hurt a bit". Spend less money on education, make people dumber, so these worthless commissioners can stay in power.

Paul Daniels

April 9, 2010 - 9:46 am EDT

Jack:

Regarding our exchange yesterday, it appears that Brian has answered your question regarding Mo's authority to furlough state employees. (Good work Brian). This certainly is something we should have known before including it in the proposed budget. As always, kudos to you!

I would think that given our policy of treating state and local employees identically with regard to pay and benefits, that the net effect will be that if we can't furlough everyone we won't furlough anyone.

Best regards,

Paul Daniels

JackK

April 9, 2010 - 11:33 am EDT

I think the more obvious thing is that if the state is in bad economic straits, why would they give to localities the power to do something they would want to do themselves? If anyone is going to furlough workers it will be the state and THEY WILL KEEP THE MONEY!

elsoots

April 9, 2010 - 10:03 am EDT

Thay said it was a EUD. lottery people would vote for it . thay will not use it for school or ed.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search