news-record.com

NEWS

Poverty rises in Guilford schools

Monday, April 5, 2010
(Updated Tuesday, April 6 - 7:55 am)

GREENSBORO — Nearly half of Guilford County schools will reach high-poverty levels this fall, making them eligible for major federal funding, according to school district officials.

The school district announced Monday that 50 schools — four more than this school year — will have enough students receiving a free or reduced-price lunch to meet thresholds for additional federal funding through the Title I program. Five schools will be added to the list; one, Pruette SCALE Academy, will drop off.

Title I is part of the No Child Left Behind law that gives additional funding to high-poverty schools but also enacts sanctions on those schools if they fail to meet testing goals.

The Title I designation can mean hundreds of thousands of dollars more for a school. That money can be used to hire more teachers, provide additional training and increase parent skill-building opportunities, among other things.

As of February, 53 percent of students qualify for a free or reduced-price lunch. That’s an increase of about 6 percent over 2007.

Despite the increase in poverty, district officials say, the additional funding will be a benefit for schools.

“There’s a positive local impact because these schools will now have additional funding to determine the best strategies to increase student achievement,” said Kelly Hales, the school district’s director of Title I.

 If Title I schools fail to meet their testing goals, they can face sanctions that can include allowing families to move their children to another school within the district.

Irving Park Elementary in Greensboro has been one of these “opt-in” schools for several years, but it too will join the list of Title I schools this fall.

Melissa Nixon, principal of Irving Park, said her school has teetered on the poverty threshold for several years. Finally being eligible for the additional money will be a welcome change. “Now, we’ll be able to have additional resources those other schools had access to,” she said.

Students living in subsidized housing attend the school. But Nixon has seen an increase in the number of parents who have recently been laid off or had a pay cut.

“There are kids this year I’ve seen receiving free or reduced lunch that you hadn’t in years prior,” she said.

Irving Park could get about $300,000 in Title I funding this fall, Nixon said.

She hopes to hire several teachers to help improve reading and math scores, among other things. She believes the school will avoid sanctions.

But just as easily as schools make the list, they can be taken off. Hales said she advises principals to be careful how they use the money because it can be fleeting.

No Child Left Behind requires that any school where 75 percent of students receive a free or reduced-price lunch be a Title I school, but school districts can lower that threshold to allow more schools into the program.

Last year during its budget discussions, the school board debated lowering those thresholds, hoping the additional funding might offset a budget shortfall. The board abandoned the idea, fearing it would lead to more schools under sanction.

It isn’t clear how much longer this program will exist. The Obama administration is in the process of a major overhaul of No Child Left Behind.

Contact J. Brian Ewing at 373-7351 or brian.ewing@news-record.com 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

piperscot

April 5, 2010 - 8:41 pm EDT

I would like to see a detailed story written about the application process and the audit process. Fraud is potentially rampant in this program since there is so little review of applicants real qualifying data. The schools are encouraged to acquire more free meal applicants in order to receive additional Federal funding. This is the great, unspoken scandal in school funding and no one at the N&O will ever really touch this story.

iamwatchingyou

April 5, 2010 - 9:56 pm EDT

You are right on target. I could have not have said it better myself

Paul Daniels

April 6, 2010 - 3:52 pm EDT

All:

I have no problem helping those who, for one reason or another, can't help themselves. We should not, however, encourage dependence on government.

I believe that there is a great deal of evidence to suggest that large numbers of people (more than half in many audits) who are receiving free or reduced lunches either cannot prove their eligibility when audited or don't respond to requests for information when audited. The last audit for which I have information in GCS produced the same results. This indicates to many (including me) that there is much fraud in the system. The problem is that it is a "self-reporting" process and that applicants are judged eligible or ineligible based on the information they provide. Moreover the USDA which runs the school lunch program prohibits schools from auditing more than 3% of those receiving benefits. It is fair to say that like many others, USDA does not really care, or even want to know about the fraud.

The reason for turning a blind eye is simple: Money! The more Title I students you have in a school system the more money you are eligible for.

Very truly yours,

Paul Daniels,
BOE District 5

BillCunningham

April 9, 2010 - 10:32 pm EDT

PiperScott,

Spot On !!

The N&R and their little punk scribes for the entitlement agenda will never write a word that suggests that fraud could be possible in this wonderful for the hungry "chilldreennn ".

larry45

April 5, 2010 - 11:00 pm EDT

“There’s a positive local impact because these schools will now have additional funding to determine the best strategies to increase student achievement,” said Kelly Hales, the school district’s director of Title I.

Let me understand. It's a good thing that the community has increasing poverty, so we can get additional funding. IT'S JACAZZ thinking like this that causes Greensboro to sag behind RTP and Charlotte. One specializes in biomedicine and research the other in banking and we pat ourselves on the back for increased poverty.

mom4

April 6, 2010 - 8:18 am EDT

I completely agree. I feel GCS has been slipping in quality education as compared with 10 years ago. I believe only one middle school is currently an Honor School of Excelence, and a very few number of elementary schools are. All schools are over-crowded and all budgets are too small. It's a community problem; we all need to put more money into our schools, but GCS' lack of good leadership the past decade has really taken its toll!

chieftp

April 6, 2010 - 12:18 am EDT

abolish government run schools...NOW!!!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search