news-record.com

LIFE

Neighbors lock arms in dispute over evictions

Sunday, April 4, 2010
(Updated 8:21 pm)

— The tenants compare it to a light bulb coming on — a $3 light bulb.

It was the moment when neighbors at J.T. Hairston Memorial Apartments, owned by a nonprofit board from Shiloh Baptist Church, began comparing notes.

They had been cited with lease violations at their HUD-subsidized housing for minor repairs and upkeep charges, some as minor as a $10 mini-blind, and charged $3 for light bulbs.

Trivial as the charges sound, they added up to penalties, small claims court, families being evicted, and potentially more low-income mothers and their children being left homeless.

“We never knew each other before that,” Hairston resident Starlyn Nelson said last week. “I stayed in my house. I kept my children in my house.”

That changed. Beginning with a petition drive and then a series of court hearings in November, the tenants, most of them single mothers, began using LaTonya Stimpson’s kitchen off Marsh Street as an office. There, they wrote meeting agendas and drafted fliers. Weekly, they have walked picket lines, ventured into Shiloh on the occasional Sunday, phoned any public official who might help — with little success.

Thursday, coupled with a notice in their mailboxes that property management firm Westminster Co. will inspect apartments this week, a price list showed how repairs added up:

The charge for a maintenance call is $15 hourly during normal business hours. Added to the labor is parts: $18 for a toilet seat, for example, $6 for a stove burner drip pan, $8 for a toothbrush holder.

Tenants said other items, though they include labor, were unreasonably high: $8 for a key, $6 for a smoke alarm battery, all to be paid within 30 days, subject to penalty or eviction.

“They’re making money off us,” argued Nelson, a mother of four. “People say 'Just move.’ I’m not working, and I’ve been on a waiting list for Section 8 since ’04.”

Site managers at Hairston have referred questions to Westminster Regional Property Manager Ron Cagno, who did not return phone messages.

At Hairston, one of four HUD-subsidized complexes in Greensboro that the national company manages, Nelson lives rent-free in a four-bedroom, one-bath apartment across from Smith Homes.

A nonprofit board made up of members from Shiloh church, through its agent Westminster, is reimbursed by HUD $867 per month for Nelson’s unit, plus $150 for utilities.

The difficulties began when tenants complained about what they saw as inconsistent enforcement of rules by Westminster.

They also complained that there is nowhere for children to play at the 108-home community, a decision the church board said was for the residents’ own safety.

What started with a simple, door-to-door petition circulated by one mother, Stimpson, has pitted the tenants against one of the city’s historic black churches and a large national leasing company represented by a top city law firm.

Attorneys for the City Human Relations Department have sided with the tenants, arguing Stimpson is the target of retaliatory eviction.

With Stimpson due back in court Wednesday on a motion to stave off eviction until her case is heard this summer, the agency has tried to extract monetary settlements by Westminster on behalf of individual tenants.

According to a draft of one such conciliation agreement, Dante Townsend was offered $1,000 after having his family’s belongings left on the curb in December.

Townsend said last week he and his fiance rejected the settlement because it focused on discrimination rather than actual damages he and his family incurred when they lost their furniture, TV sets and children’s clothing.

Townsend said accepting a settlement also would weaken the ongoing efforts of the remaining tenants.

Tim Hopkins, a social justice activist who helped the tenants organize, called the offer, which was not announced publicly, “ridiculous.”

“If people only knew the insulting offer,” Hopkins said during a meeting at Faith Community Church. “The next stop is the homeless shelter.”

“No,” corrected Melva Florence, an anti-poverty specialist who is the director of the nonprofit The Last Straw. “There’s a 91-family waiting list at the homeless shelter. The next stop is the street.”

 

Contact Lorraine Ahearn at 373-7334 or lorraine.ahearn@news-record.com

 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

mohair.sam

April 4, 2010 - 8:51 am EDT

Truly, no good deed goes unpunished. If you don't like paying $6 for a smoke alarm battery, then GO BUY ONE YOURSELF. Good grief. The entitlement mentality has run out of control in this country. I'm all for affordable housing, but I am appalled that there are people who seem to think that everyone else owes them everything. We all pay a high social cost for that.

tlovely6

April 4, 2010 - 9:44 am EDT

I have a couple of questions I'm trying to understand. Was these rules put in your lease when you accepted the apartment? Is there something in your lease that prevent you from buying a dollar tree, wal-mart or any other department stores home items? If you dislike where you stay why not save and move when your lease is up? I'm not trying to put tenants down but as people always told me if life give you lemons make lemonade.

hugh

April 4, 2010 - 10:01 am EDT

Obama is supposed to take care of folks in this situation.

kikablue

April 4, 2010 - 7:21 pm EDT

Whites are not excluded from public housing. The reason these people are complaining as some of you has said why not just go to $ tree,or wal-mart and buy items needed. Simply housing does not except these brands a lot of the time. They buy from wholesale and want only their brands to be used. There are a lot of pro's and con's about public housing.

naynay

April 4, 2010 - 12:39 pm EDT

If you are too lazy to change a light bulb, and made someone come out and change it for you, only to not pay for the service call out of the money the taxpayers are giving you to buy necessities such as lightbulbs and miniblinds; then not only do you deserve to be evicted, but you also need a large dose of reality. That is stealing. Same as jumping out of a cab without paying. Except this is like calling a cab to take you to your neighbors house and then skipping out and running inside. You could have walked, just like you could have changed the lightbulb yourself. Discrimination? YES. I am discriminating against anyone who feels like their every whim should be met by those who support them, at the lowest price. When I have a bulb go out, I go to a store and buy a box for cheap. Then I screw it in clockwise and never am I EVER victimized or discriminated against in the process. You could go to the dollar store.... or you could go the route you chose. I wish you and your unfortunate children the best.

adassistantmom

April 4, 2010 - 5:54 pm EDT

All I have to say is "AMEN" detranov

antionette922

April 4, 2010 - 5:33 pm EDT

As a person who has lived in a HUD-reimbursed apartment in the past I think some of the comments are very mean and don't understand how it is. I wasn't living rent-free, never was -- always paid rent. My rent was probably more than most pay in some apartments. I was finally able to buy a home and have been in it for 19 years (Thank God!). What you don't understand is how you are treated in these type apartments. You can't buy your own toilet seat or mini blinds or stove drip pan, etc. Items like that had to be replaced by the managing company. For example: If your child, being a child damaged the blinds, you couldn't just go out and buy a replacement yourself. The lights they are talking about probably aren't regular light bulbs or light fixtures. You are treated like you are a child instead of a grown-up. I know some people might not be doing what they need to move .
Some people don't know how to get from under the "give me" mentality. Maybe instead of writing such negative comments volunteer to help mentor. There are some good people in these homes -- not everyone -- but there are some.

kikablue

April 4, 2010 - 7:28 pm EDT

Very well said antionette, to many of these posters have never had to apply for public housing so they run the people down. Yes there are some very good people in public housing, and some that do not deserve to be.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Local Tickets

View All

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search