news-record.com

NEWS

Incentives lose favor in tough times

Sunday, March 28, 2010
(Updated 8:07 am)

— As Guilford County faces another tough budget year, some county commissioners are questioning the effectiveness of a relatively new grant program designed to foster more growth in the local tax base.

The program, adopted in October, offers grants to businesses for the amount of county taxes it paid on any improvements to real property — a  new construction or building expansion, for instance — for three years.

It was hoped the program would spur new construction and help small businesses improve and expand.

So far, however, only one property has applied for a grant: a shopping center already under construction in the 5800 block of North Church Street.

Last month Commissioners Vice-Chairman Steve Arnold, the policy’s author, found himself defending the program to his fellow commissioners. They said Granite Church Street, the company behind the shopping center, would have built it there anyway, regardless of the incentive program.

The developers are applying for a grant of $41,504 per year, or $124,512 over three years.

Arnold believes the county will see more applicants — and greater tax-base growth — once the economy rebounds.

“There are things that you can definitely do to create business growth and development in Guilford County across the board,” Arnold said. “Have the lowest taxes, have a planning department that’s easy to work with and give tax breaks if you can. The county commissioners as a whole are very interested in creating that growth.”

County Commissioner Paul Gibson said so far the program has yielded few results.

“The whole impetus behind that was to give small businesses — mom-and-pop type companies was the term used — some incentives, create some jobs,” Gibson said. “But there’s not any job requirement. If you don’t create any jobs, you still get the grant.”

Dan Lynch, president of the Greensboro Economic Development Alliance, said the business recruitment group supports the tax incentive plan.

He’s not distressed that more small businesses haven’t stepped up for the benefit.

“The fact that the economy hasn’t gotten any better,” Lynch said, has a lot to do with that. It “doesn’t surprise me that smaller businesses haven’t taken advantage of this,” he said.

Lynch said he understands Gibson’s argument, however.

“Paul (Gibson’s) position has been the minimum was really low and a lot of the commissioners were struggling with how it wasn’t tied to job creation, and we really need jobs right now,” Lynch added.

Any incentives policy should manage development, helping to encourage some types of growth that add more to the economy, said Rob Bencini, the former director of Guilford County’s economic policy and now an independent business consultant.

Policies in the past have not typically granted incentives for such projects as the Church Street development, with its emphasis on retail.

Retail jobs, he said, offer lower wages and are not the solution to this region’s employment problems, he said. Incentives should be targeted toward more lucrative jobs.

“I’m not against the project itself,” Bencini said. “Is it worth everyone’s while to give a tax subsidy for this project? It’s been on the books to be started for years. This wasn’t induced by Steve Arnold’s incentives. This thing’s been out there for a long time. They see an opportunity to grab some incentive money that wasn’t there before.”

Bencini said whether small or large businesses apply for the incentive, the policy should address more complex issues.

“The concept of incentivizing construction of already overbuilt sectors of the market, whether commercial or residential, is not economically wise and sustainable,” he said.

Commissioner Kirk Perkins said the county has real budget problems and that giving back tax money that would otherwise go toward helping isn’t the smart move.

“The textbook way that counties help pay their bills is increase tax revenue base and everyone pays their bills,” Perkins said. “When you take a class of property owners and say we’re going to give you a pass on taxes for three years, that’s not helping.”

In a year that’s already seeing county employees furloughed and laid off, Perkins said he can’t see the logic in forgoing revenue from businesses.

Contact Joe Killian at 373-7023 or joe.killian@news-record.com

Contact Richard M. Barron at 373-7371 or richard.barron@news-record.com
 

Accompanying Photos

Margaret Baxter (News & Record)

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Abner Doon

March 28, 2010 - 5:23 am EDT

"Granite Church Street, the company behind the shopping center, would have built it there anyway, regardless of the incentive program."

Who is Granite Church Street?

Did the commissioners give money to an unknown few?

Who are the principal beneficiaries?

Are any big campaign contributors owners?

Why wasn't Mike Winstead present for the vote to approve the incentives?

Taxpayer giveaway?

Crony Capitalism?

How can you write a story without providing enough information for the readers to come to reasoned conclutions?

Joe Killian

March 29, 2010 - 9:46 am EDT

Abner:

This isn't the last thing we'll write about this -- but this is not an investigative report of a single vote from weeks ago. It's a look at the policy as a whole and an examination of whether it iss doing what it's supposed to do, has merit and should continue.

The most pertinent information to those questions -- how the program works, how much in tax money we're talking about, what sort of businesses, etc -- are in the story, along with comments on it from both people who have a vote and a people who bring area economic knowledge to the table. This is more pertinent information for readers looking to come to a reasoned conclusion about the program.

But it's still worth mentioning: Mike Winstead didn't dodge this vote specifically. He was just absent at the meeting, missing all the various votes that night. Not every commissioner makes every meeting.

As we wrote about at time Billy Yow did recuse himself from the vote -- though he had a hard time doing it -- because he had a business relationship with the developers, having done some well work for them.

casper

March 28, 2010 - 11:13 am EDT

Lets not do anything to incentivize business growth, lets create some more social programs. That way we can guarantee no economic growth. Isn't that the tax and spend way?

Fecund Stench

March 29, 2010 - 12:33 pm EDT

I trust that at some point you are going to divulge that city councilman, Robbie Perkins, is a partner in Granite Church Street, LLC.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search