news-record.com

OPINION

Kathleen Parker: Stupak betrayed pro-life movement

Wednesday, March 24, 2010
(Updated 3:00 am)

Stupak.

Etymology: Eponym for Congressman Bart Stupak.

Function: verb

1: In a legislative process, to obstruct passage of a proposed law on the basis of a moral principle (i.e. protecting the unborn), accumulating power in the process, then at a key moment surrendering in exchange for a fig leaf, the size of which varies according to the degree of emasculation of said legislator and/or as a reflection of just how stupid people are presumed to be. (Slang: backstabber.)

Poor Bart Stupak. The man tried to be a hero for the unborn, and then, when all the power of the moment was in his frail human hands, he dropped the baby. He genuflected when he should have dug in his heels and gave it up for a meaningless executive order.

Now, in the wake of his decision to vote "yes" for a health care bill that expands public funding for abortion, he is vilified and will be forever remembered as the guy who Stupaked health care reform and the pro-life movement.

Of all the disappointed activists, Brian Burch, president of CatholicVote.org and creator of StandWithStupak.com, was perhaps the most demonstrative in his support of pro-life Democrats. He even created a video with a remake of the final battle scene from "Braveheart."

A helmeted British Barack Obama says, "Our cavalry will ride them down like grass. ... Full attack!" Whereupon, Stupak, eyeglasses incongruously perched on his blue-painted face, commands his pitchfork army, "Steady. ... Hold, hold, hold."

Alas, Stupak couldn't hold.

Ultimately, he was weak and overwhelmed by raw political power. History is no stranger to such moments, but this one needs to be understood for what it was. A deception.

The executive order promising that no federal funds will be used for abortion is utterly useless, and everybody knows it. First, the president can revoke it as quickly as he signs it.

Second, an order cannot confer jurisdiction in the courts or establish any grounds for suing anybody in court, according to a former White House counsel. The order is therefore judicially unenforceable.

Finally, an executive order cannot trump or change a federal statute.

One can reasonably surmise that Obama, a former constitutional law professor, is well aware of the uselessness of his promise. Perhaps this is why he didn't mention it during the bill-signing ceremony Tuesday.

Stupak, too, knew that the executive order was merely political cover for him and his pro-life colleagues. He knew it because several members of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops explained it to him, according to sources. The only way to prevent public funding for abortion was for his amendment to be added to the Senate bill.

Clearly, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the president didn't want that. What they did want was the abortion funding that the Senate bill allowed.

Thus, the health care bill passed because of a mutually understood deception -- a pretense masquerading as virtue. No wonder Stupak locked his doors and turned off his phones Sunday, according to several pro-life lobbyists who camped outside his office.

The ticktock of what transpired during the final 72 hours before the vote will keep political science majors -- and psychologists -- happily lost in research for years. Meanwhile, whatever Americans feel about the health care bill and its relative merits, they should disabuse themselves of any idea that this was an honest play.

Ironically, the day before the vote, Obama said: "We are not bound to win, but we are bound to be true. We are not bound to succeed, but we are bound to let whatever light we have shine."

Democrats were bound to win, all right, but truth and light had nothing to do with it.

Stupak's clumsy fall from grace is a lesson in human frailty. In a matter of hours, he went from representing the majority of Americans who don't want public money spent on abortion to leading the army on the other side.

Something must have gone bump in the night.

Whatever it was, demonizing Stupak seems excessive and redundant given punishments to come. Already he has lost a speaking invitation to the Illinois Catholic Prayer Breakfast next month. His political future, otherwise, may have been foretold by a late-night anecdote.

After the Sunday vote, a group of Democrats, including Stupak, gathered in a pub to celebrate. In a biblical moment, New York Rep. Anthony Weiner was spotted planting a big kiss on Stupak's cheek.

To a Catholic man well versed in the Gospel, this is not a comforting gesture.

Kathleen Parker's e-mail address is kathleenparker@washpost.com

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

mamaboilermaker

March 24, 2010 - 6:32 am EDT

Stupak was a fool to trust that anything "pro-life" would come from a president who was just hunky-dorry with Illinois hospitals leaving babies in utility rooms to die if they survived abortions. What on earth was he thinking?

havegone

March 24, 2010 - 8:33 am EDT

Really? Is this the kind of conversation you "mommies" and "daddies" who are pro-life engage in these days? You guys are talking about dead babies in utility rooms? And no doubt, you're having these kinds of conversations during your "play dates" so that you can indoctrinate (traumatize) your kids as they grow up in this house of cards. No wonder abortion rates are highest in the Bible Belt.

mamaboilermaker

March 24, 2010 - 9:22 am EDT

So do you think babies who survive abortions should be killed anyway? That's what Obama thought when he was in the Illinois legislature. I guess it is embarrassing when a baby survives--somebody might see him/her and notice that she/he sure looks like the babies down the hall in the neonatal unit.

And how are children traumatized if they are taught that killing innocent life is a bad thing? Traumatized is a description that applies to the compassionate nurses who comforted those poor, rejected babies who survived brutal late-term abortions and were abandoned by their parents AND the doctors who should have helped them.

havegone

March 24, 2010 - 9:33 am EDT

No, I think people should be responsible and never get to the point of needing an abortion. That said, whatever a woman decides to do (in the event of an unwanted or unplanned pregnancy) is her private and personal choice. There is nothing more to say after that.

mamaboilermaker

March 24, 2010 - 10:25 am EDT

So does "whatever a woman decides to do" extend to telling the doctor to take the surviving infant away and leave it to die? There is absolutely no duty on anyone's part to help that baby? I would think if a baby survives an abortion he/she should receive at least the services offered to any other abused child.

havegone

March 24, 2010 - 10:59 am EDT

Your insistence on focusing on "a baby surviving abortion" is a clear indication that you aren't really serious about debating this issue and are more interested in making some kind of political (albeit macabre) point using bloody imagery of dead babies... and that, my friend, is an argument from another era (the 1970s and 80s)... and one that failed miserably at that.

mamaboilermaker

March 24, 2010 - 11:22 am EDT

So you're saying we should have evolved now to the point where a dead baby does not bother us. Sorry, but I am always bothered by dead babies. If anything, ultrasound should have made people more aware of just what they were doing--instead, they just hum loudly and shut their eyes and it doesn't bother them.

havegone

March 24, 2010 - 9:38 am EDT

RE: Trauma

Parents who are overly zealous in their pro-life positions usually leave their kids with a highly unrealistic impression of what the world out there is like for teens and young adults. These kids are usually incapable of handling situations that end with them becoming pregnant... ask Bristol Palin.

I understand this is an over-generalization... but the facts are out there. Check out the unplanned-unwanted pregnancy rates all across the Bible Belt... it is a laughable statistic for supposedly pious youth.

mamaboilermaker

March 24, 2010 - 10:34 am EDT

So we should have no standards because the world is just too tough for young people? My young adults know the world is tough. They have lost a friend to a drunk driver and they have seen relatives and friends struggle with the consequences of bad relationships. The key is to teach them to avoid whatever pitfalls they can, and to be tough enough to weather whatever they can't/don't avoid. The answer is NEVER to leave an innocent baby to die in a utility room.

mamaboilermaker

March 24, 2010 - 12:31 pm EDT

BTW, Bristol did handle the situation. She chose life.

Panacea

March 24, 2010 - 1:41 pm EDT

Actually, Obama never said that babies who "survived" a late term abortion should be killed. He opposed a bill outlawing late term abortion because its language effectively barred all abortion.

mamaboilermaker

March 24, 2010 - 4:28 pm EDT

Survived doesn't need quotes. Real live nurses witnessed babies still breathing after the "doctor" failed to kill them. Breathing without assistance means you are alive. As Gore might say, an inconvenient truth?

Panacea

March 24, 2010 - 5:37 pm EDT

Making respiratory effort is not the same thing as breathing. Without surfactant in the lungs, there is no ability to exchange air for oxygenation to take place.

mamaboilermaker

March 24, 2010 - 5:53 pm EDT

Well, I'm glad those nurses had compassion. Nobody should die alone, even if they aren't legally protected.

BTW, I know about surfactant--the subject of my husband's master's thesis. By your logic, would that mean that premature babies who are wanted by their mothers are still not alive until they receive the Exosurf (not sure about the brand name nowadays) that will enable them to breathe until their lungs mature?

All this arguing doesn't change the fact that Stupak sold out for an empty promise from a man who has a proven track record that is unequivocally pro-abortion. 30 pieces of silver and an executive order.

Panacea

March 24, 2010 - 8:47 pm EDT

It depends a lot on gestational age and weight. Fetuses born before 20 weeks are not viable and have never survived. Fetuses born before 25 weeks rarely survive no matter what we do. Some fetuses are so deformed that they would not survive even if the lungs were fully formed (for example, neonates born with anacephaly, or no brain).

I wasn't really addressing Mr. Stupak's actions. I find them to be politics as usual. The issue of abortion in health care reform was a non-issue for me either way: I have no problem with legislative action limiting the use of federal dollars for elective abortions so long as victims of rape and incest, and mothers whose lives are endangered by the pregnancy, have access to whatever form of abortion is appropriate to their situation--a decision to be made by physicians in consultation with the patient, not the government.

I can't really comment on what Mr. Stupak's motivations were. I don't know. I'm just glad he supported reform in the end.

notoriousBLOG

March 24, 2010 - 6:41 am EDT

Did you really expect any different from Stupak? Integrity in Washington is such a rare commodity and these days it seems to be non-existent. When we finally are able to find out what Obama's Democrats have done to us, people are going to be appalled. There is no way that we can afford to pay for this entitlement that has been enacted. Just living in this country should not be reason enough for you to be provided with all that life has to offer, and I shudder to think of how this is going to grow the federal bureaucracy, we are going to be seeing as much as a third of the population working for the government in one form or another.

Get A Clue

March 24, 2010 - 8:27 am EDT

Are right-wingers incapable of any cogent thought processes?

havegone

March 24, 2010 - 8:27 am EDT

Waaaaa... waaaa... waaa

If the pro-life movement actually stops to assess where the rest of the country is today, it would realize that they are losing the support of even the most anti-abortion (yet level-headed) people out there. Crying, whining, and hijacking the conversation - which is what Stupak tried to do - no longer work in this (finally) awakened electorate.

In this year-long marathon towards health care reform, the president clearly demonstrated that, in order to achieve real support, elected officials must resist all temptation to revert to reactionary politics.

Health Reform is now law. And, thanks to the slow, focused approach... we can be sure it will remain law for many generations to come.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search