news-record.com

NEWS

Tough budget again for schools

Thursday, March 18, 2010
(Updated 11:18 am)

GREENSBORO With less than a month before Superintendent Maurice “Mo” Green is scheduled to present his budget proposal, it’s still unclear if he will recommend cutting more school jobs.

Green declined to talk about possible budget cuts this week: “At this point, I’m not at a place where I can talk about potential layoffs.”

Green said there is a possibility his budget will include tiers of proposed spending cuts similar to the plan developed last year.

Guilford County Schools saw a nearly $21.9 million reduction in funding last year. That led the school board to eliminate some teaching positions, but officials were able to find new jobs within the district for many of the teachers.

A state budget shortfall forced school districts to make deep cuts last year. The General Assembly approved a two-year budget last year, but it isn’t clear what adjustments might be made in the May session.

“We have great needs in public education, and we’re going to try to meet those needs as best we can,” state Sen. Don Vaughan said.

Vaughan, a Greensboro Democrat, sits on the Senate budget committee that oversees education. He said early indications are revenue will remain flat and the best the state will be able to do is hold education budgets where they are.

Still, other school districts are planning for more cuts.

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools is preparing for $80 million in budget cuts. Forsyth County school officials are expecting to cut $5.2 million .

Diminished county budgets likely will have a big impact on school districts as well. Last year, Guilford County commissioners cut $3 million from the school district’s requested budget. The maintenance budget bore the brunt of the cut, with the school district delaying repairs and upgrades.

A group of school board members and commissioners are meeting regularly to discuss the school district budget.

Commissioners said they’re trying to learn more about the school board’s budget process, but they also have questioned the school district’s spending.

The commissioners will expect more belt tightening from the district this year.

“I think we’ve already expressed our commitment to hold the line,” Commissioner Steve Arnold said .

The school district made several budget cuts last year but many of those were deferred spending rather than real cuts, Arnold said. He wants to see what more could be done.

School board Chairman Alan Duncan said a hold-the-line budget from either the state or the county has the effect of a budget cut because the school district is expected to grow.

Officials project 71,765 students will enroll in the fall, about 300 more students than this school year.

“I have concerns, particularly at state level, because the state has not prioritized K-12 education as highly as I think it should,” Duncan said.

Duncan declined to speculate on what cuts might be made during the budget process.

Although it isn’t clear if layoffs will happen, the district is taking steps if it comes to that. The school board is considering revisions to its reduction-in-force policy. The policy governs when and how employees are selected for layoffs. The proposed revisions would place less emphasis on seniority.

The Guilford County Association of Educators is resisting the proposal. It said officials need to look beyond employees to deal with budget needs.

“We just hope the cuts will not trickle down to the classroom,” said Tijuana Hayes , president of GCAE.

“Our goal is to advocate to find ways to raise revenue,” she said. “You reach a point where you just can’t continue to do more with less.”

The school board could vote on the reduction-in-force proposal next month. Green is scheduled to present his budget to the school board on April 6.

Contact J. Brian Ewing at 373-7351 or brian.ewing@news-record.com

 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

dalekm123

March 18, 2010 - 6:30 am EDT

Someone please ask Mo about the massive Health Insurance increase GCS is facing in the coming months.

I am very surprised that GCS is not kicking and shouting about this new added cost, given all the talk about health care in the media.

This is were your tax money is going folks....to pay the health providers.

Might be a good cost saving to GCS, and to avoid lay offs, to stop providing health insurance as part of the package. Pay staff the individual "cost" of insurance, and then let staff go buy coverage on the market.

I bet you hear from staff once they realize how much it costs.

Please ask the question directly to Mo.....it needs to be talked about and made public...NOW.

go88ampng

March 18, 2010 - 7:37 am EDT

GCS employees are considered State Employees and therefore GCS has no control over the health insurance rates. The State determines the employer cost not the district.

JackK

March 18, 2010 - 10:29 am EDT

And the state pays the employee's cost. The one thing GCS did cover was dental insurance, but that is now paid for by employees.

teachertruth

March 18, 2010 - 8:52 am EDT

teachers pay keeps getting cut while insurance rates, etc. keep going up......the answer is to why there is no outcry is b/c we are used to it...teachers always get stuck on the bottom of the pile.

dalekm123

March 18, 2010 - 12:41 pm EDT

And this is SAD.

Health care keeps going up...and teachers / staff get screwed. ENOUGH.

And rumor has it that the insurance company covering GSC is talking about / planing to introduce BMI index for each person.
What this means if you are overweight YOU might have to pay a "penalty" premium.

Many questions to be asked....but no one is asking them.

igliigli

March 18, 2010 - 7:17 am EDT

Sports are entertainment, not academics. Get rid of all the coaches and sports teams and use the money to pay the real teachers.

angie123

March 18, 2010 - 7:20 am EDT

Sports also bring in money to the schools. I would not support this.

teachertruth

March 18, 2010 - 8:53 am EDT

Just one more person talking without knowing......I DARE you to take sports out of schools. Sports are sometimes the ONLY thing that some of our kids have to look forward to and participate in. Take them out and behavior gets 100% worse.

pippi69

March 18, 2010 - 9:09 am EDT

& I guess in your way of thinking, arts - drama - band - orchestra - chorus, etc can all go too? wow, THAT sounds like a great way to reach our kids & keep them excited about learning - you know, about life in general. I don't suppose it's occured to you that these "non-academic" programs teach many children lessons that they carry into the classroom, and vice-versa.
please....cutting out entire programs from schools that aren't "academic" is defenitely not the way to approach this.

DaveW

March 18, 2010 - 11:00 am EDT

Learning takes place in all venues including classrooms,science labs,music rooms, auditoriums and athletic facilities.ALL learning is positive.Definition of coaching " To train or tutor or to act as a trainer or tutor." Is this not the same thing as teaching?

pippi69

March 18, 2010 - 9:14 am EDT

what about if GCS adpots a 'co-op' type mentality? if lay-offs have to happen, for teacher assistants as an example, can we not reach out to the community & parents to have them volunteer time to fill that void? My childrens' school has pretty much 1 Asst per grade level, and it seems logical to recruit parents, relatives, other community members to fill in slots & do volunteer work to help get the work done. just a thought.....

novel

March 18, 2010 - 11:06 am EDT

That's what they do in charter schools. Parents of kids enrolled there make a commitment to a certain # of volunteer hours. I think it's a win-win solution! It helps parents feel more a part of the school, plus it helps keep expenses down and helps the kids see their parents involved in school. Parental involvement is wonderful!

On the other hand, having the county tell the schools to submit a "hold the line" budget is in reality telling them to cut their budgets b/c enrollment goes up each year.

JackK

March 18, 2010 - 11:35 am EDT

How amazing that when parents HAVE to make a commitment, and thus have an investment in their children's education, they get involved and good things happen. And when all parents have to do is get their child to the bus stop most of the time and their child will be fed twice, given school supplies, and watched, at the ver least for nearly 8 hours a day, they don't get involved. Actually, maybe it's not so amazing after all. Time was most parents, whether wealthy or not, had middle class aspirations for their children to do better and maybe find a way up the ladder; more prosaically, to get out of here and not have the sort of menial labor mom and dad had to do. Honestly, I don't see or hear much of that anymore except from the children of recent immigrants, especially from SE Asia. Sad, really, if education isn't seen as opening doors anymore as it once was.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search