news-record.com

City Council considers tax cut

Tuesday, March 16, 2010
(Updated Wednesday, March 17 - 8:56 am)

GREENSBORO – Trying to save your pennies?

Consider yourself in good company.

City Council members have been contemplating a rare move in Greensboro’s political history: reducing the tax rate.

As a group, the council already asked the city manager to keep taxes flat this year. Now some are wondering if there is a way to cut taxes.

“The citizens in this type of economy need a break,” Councilman Jim Kee said.

“You have to look at what the people desire and what they need and the cost of what they want and need. It’s just a matter of what people are willing to give up.”

Figuring out how to get there – a process that will be spelled out over the next few months – will be the difficult part, council members said.

City Manager Rashad Young will meet with council members about the budget at the end of the month. Next year’s budget must be adopted by June 30.

A penny on the tax rate costs the average homeowner $20 a year, assuming you have a home worth $200,000. So if the city taxes get cut by 2 cents, you save about $3.33 a month – a savings that will afford you three Krispy Kreme donuts with a few pennies to spare.

On the city revenue side, a penny is worth approximately $2.2 million. For every 2 cents, there will have to be about $4.4 million in cuts to come out of the city’s $255 million general fund.

Except for times when the tax rates were readjusted after a countywide revaluation, the city has reduced taxes only once since the 1970s.

It was in 1998 – and it was a very different economy. The city was flush with revenue and found plenty of stuff to spend it on, including 33 new positions in the police department and a reduction in bus fares.

This year, the City Council already has to figure out how to close an $11.2 million budget deficit. A reduction in the tax rate would mean even more cuts, and council members want to be cautious and see what might need to be cut to accomplish a tax reduction.

“I’m all for a tax decrease,” Councilwoman Nancy Vaughan said. “Let’s decide how we are going to get there.”

Councilman Danny Thompson, who has advocated budget cuts up to four percent, has suggested reviewing the $96 million in bond projects proposed to start this year.

“I’m thinking instead of piling on a bunch of debt on the backs of the unemployed and those struggling to make ends meet….why not do a couple of prudent things and be good stewards,” Thompson said. “Why not give a little bit back?”

Some council members are concerned that tax cuts could put the city in a tough position to cover the basic needs of residents.

Councilman Zack Matheny said the city is suffering because of some prior cuts, such as eliminating the road resurfacing budget.

“You’ve got bonds the people voted on. You got infrastructure needs,” Matheny said. “We need to look at all of them.”

Contact Amanda Lehmet at 373-7075 or amanda.lehmert@news-record.com.
 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

western85

March 16, 2010 - 8:47 pm EDT

Reopen the landfill and stop paying to have our trash transported away! That would bring in millions in revenue and would save millions in expenditures. The landfill probably has 50+ years of life. Simple fix!

Panacea

March 16, 2010 - 8:56 pm EDT

:smacks forehead:

The City can't pay its bills, is throwing millions of dollars away on an unpopular swim center and now wants to CUT taxes?

These people are insane! You don't increase spending and then cut taxes!

Incompetence has hit a new low.

northoftheboro

March 16, 2010 - 9:57 pm EDT

Actually, history has proven, time and time again, that cutting taxes INCREASES incoming tax revenue. It's about time tax relief is being proposed on an over-burdened taxpaying population. Wish my town and county would follow suit, but local governments here are run by tax-and-spend Democrats, which explains our current budget crisis, 12% unemployment, and economic stagnation in Rockingham County. Oh well, don't blame me; I voted G-O-P!

yankeefan

March 16, 2010 - 11:51 pm EDT

Only revisionist history could prove that cutting taxes increases revenues. It's so easy to fall into the party-line accusations that all Democrats are "tax and spend." Let's not forget that the last Democratic President and his administration left behind a budget SURPLUS (That means they took in MORE money than they SPENT.)

Republicans preach tax cuts as the cures for all government evils, but they never seem to follow through with cuts in spending to correspond to the reductions in revenues. The term, "Gut and Spend" is more appropriate for conservative Republicans who worship at the altar of tax cuts so long as they don't impact all the benefits they feel entitled to receive.

By the way, the city can keep the approximately $12 the proposed reduction would provide my family, so long as they use it to fill a few more potholes. Totally worth the investment to save my car's suspension and tires.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search