news-record.com

NEWS

Inside Scoop: South Elm redevelopment effort returns to its mixed-use plan

Monday, March 15, 2010
(Updated 2:45 pm)

GREENSBORO — Four months after the Greensboro Redevelopment Commission considered getting into the hotel business, the group is returning to its long-held plans for its South Elm Street mixed-use redevelopment.

But there is still tension among some members of the council-appointed board over the Ole Asheboro Hotel proposal and the return to plans to get a developer to take over the whole South Elm project.

Two of the commission’s longest-serving and most vocal members, Jerry Leimenstoll and Bob Mays, expressed concerns last week about whether the city management and the City Council would do what it takes — including offering the financial backing — to finish the project.

Leimenstoll said he would leave the commission if there did not seem to be a commitment to the project and more open communication between the elected leaders, city staff and the commission.

“The project we are working on is one that is very complicated. It can be a beautiful project … if city government and the City Council and everybody in town works together,” he said.

City Manager Rashad Young told the commission he couldn’t make the council members commit to anything, nor would he ask them to write a blank check for the redevelopment.

But he said his staff is committed to working on the project — and he believes the council would understand the benefit of redeveloping a crucial area of downtown.

Leimenstoll said he was feeling more optimistic about the prospects after Young’s assurances.

The staff has written a draft request for proposals to lure developers. The city may hire a consultant to help develop the final request.

Miller slams Davis over independent candidacy

Guilford County Commissioner Bruce Davis has ruffled his share of feathers over his decision to run as an independent candidate for state Senate in District 28.

Davis, a Democrat, did not file to run in his party’s primary because Democratic incumbent Katie Dorsett had filed to run. Dorsett scrapped her plans to run again on the last day of filing — but did not tell Davis or other Democrats. She did tip off friend Gladys Robinson, who got in under the wire and whose candidacy she supports.

Feeling snubbed but having missed the filing deadline, Davis is collecting signatures to get on the ballot as an independent. Some critics say he could end up splitting the Democratic vote and throwing the election to City Councilwoman Trudy Wade, a popular Republican running for the seat.

Robinson did not return calls seeking comment on the race last week, but Evelyn Miller, her only challenger in the Democratic primary, had plenty to say.

“The biggest threat to the Democratic victory in November is the write-in candidacy of a candidate who chose not to run and is now using scare tactics to get voters to elect him to the seat,” Miller said.

If Davis can get 5,000 signatures before June 25 he won’t technically be a write-in candidate — he’ll appear on the ballot as a candidate unaffiliated with either major party.

Miller said she is confident that voters will “make the right decision and keep the seat Democratic.”

Speakers still airing live on Channel 13

You might have heard that the City Council was planning to cut speakers from the floor from the televised portion of their bimonthly meetings.

The idea was floated to start airing the meetings on Channel 13 and online after the public comment period ended. But it didn’t go anywhere.

Jim Collins, who works for the city’s public affairs department and oversees the television operations, says there is no truth to the rumor the council is going for the off-air plan.

Channel 13 will continue to provide streaming video with closed captioning for the hearing impaired for the entire meeting, he wrote in an e-mail.

So be on notice: Be ready for prime time in your best outfit — unless you want the whole city to knows it’s laundry day at your house.

Speakers from the floor time begins promptly at 5:30 p.m. Tuesday.

 

Staff writers Amanda Lehmert and Joe Killian contributed.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

buzzman

March 15, 2010 - 4:32 am EDT

I don't think anyone has heard that speakers from the floor would not be televised. Although it was discussed at the last council meeting, the idea was withdrawn. Instead of concocting a rumor, the N&R needs to simply report the news.
Any developer in their right mind will have absolutely no interest in the South Elm project - at this time. Folks need to wake up to the fact that the economy is in the toilet and will remain there for quite some time.

Newzerboy

March 15, 2010 - 8:43 am EDT

Buzzman, I hear what you're saying, but the people pushing for this don't care that the economy is in the toilet. To them the answers have always come from the government so economic pressures are irrelevant to their desires. They WANT something so the government MUST give it to them. And if they don't get their way they'll pitch a fit and start lashing out with allegations against anyone who would dare to question their desires.

casper

March 15, 2010 - 7:25 am EDT

The city council will not get behind any wasteful spending right now, if these people want to see that area redeveloped, they should put up the money. Otherwise, don't look for the taxpayers to fund your giddy dreams, those days are over.

rmacz

March 15, 2010 - 11:38 am EDT

I want to know what happened to hope and change....ha!

newtogso

March 15, 2010 - 1:49 pm EDT

buzzman, don't let the facts get in the way, please. The City is not developing the site, but they have already spent money buying the properties and cleaning them up in order to stimulate development. These are called brownfields and developers won't typically touch them because of potential environmental contamination. Developed wisely, the South Elm Development will bring in jobs, tax dollars and new residents to the south end of downtown. The City is asking for developers to put for their ideas for developing this area in its entirety. There was already interest (remember the Guilfor Co. Schools proposal?) prior to the Ole Asheboro Hotel distraction.

buzzman

March 15, 2010 - 3:50 pm EDT

NEWTOGSO - There is nothing in my comment that indicates that I think that the CITY is developing the site. You must be having trouble reading!!! Also, you must be someone who has a chance to gain some $$$$$ if something does happen in that area. Or, perhaps you're just slow!

newtogso

March 15, 2010 - 11:48 pm EDT

Dear buzzman...or I actually live nearby and am looking forward to the site taking shape, or I realize that this is a great opportunity for Greensboro to extend its downtown, or I realize the benefit in jobs and tax dollars this will have for the City. Or i realize it''ll just make people like you who continue to look down on progress in this city look sheepish.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search