news-record.com

NEWS

Advocate: City must take steps to get fit

Tuesday, March 9, 2010
(Updated Wednesday, March 10 - 9:19 am)

GREENSBORO — Walking advocate Mark Fenton  doesn’t mince words: America is headed toward a massive health crisis triggered by a villain so pervasive it’s set in the concrete and asphalt, bricks and mortar all around us.

This nasty grinch discourages people from physical activity, sapping their vitality and leaving them overweight, chronically ill and often headed for an early grave.

The evildoer? A modern lifestyle geared toward effortless car travel and close-in parking, said Fenton, host of the PBS series “America’s Walking.”

“We are in the midst of an epidemic of physical inactivity and poor nutrition,” Fenton said Monday in a speech at Greensboro College.  “Obesity is the tip of a chronic disease iceberg.”

Fenton gave the keynote address at Monday’s Active Transportation Summit,  hosted by a coalition of local government, health care and civic groups aiming to do something about the problem.

The coalition, Get Healthy Guilford,  says the problem already has reached alarming proportions: Six of 10  adults in Guilford are overweight or obese. One child in three  is obese, meaning he or she is at greater risk for diabetes, heart disease, stroke, hypertension and several types of cancer.

“We’re seeing kids here as young as 9 or 10 being diagnosed with type II diabetes, 'adult’ diabetes,” coalition director Leslie Armeniox  said. “We all have to pitch in as a community and get people back to the idea of destination-driven activity.”

The group kicked off its “Get Guilford Moving” campaign at the summit, encouraging people to be more physically active and promoting changes in the urban and suburban landscapes to make that easier.

In his remarks to an audience of about 100,  Fenton discussed the ways public health officials have battled America’s car-centered aversion to healthy levels of physical activity: health fairs, scientific studies and giveaway programs with prizes for changed behavior.

They all achieve varying levels of success, but seldom in ways that make lasting changes, said Fenton, a resident of the Boston area who was an elite competitor on U.S. national race-walking teams during the 1980s.

Communities simply need to make it easier to go to school, work and stores on foot, bike and public transit, Fenton said. That’s the best way to guarantee a level of physical activity that leads to healthier living, he said. And it happens when officials make those alternatives less costly and more convenient than driving , he said.

Key steps include building more sidewalks, and making intersections safer and more welcoming to pedestrians. The “tool kit” also includes creating bike lanes in some places and “share the road” zones elsewhere, he said.

Using public transit is more active than traveling by car, he said, but many communities virtually ensure low ridership with a lack of shelters and other basic amenities at stops.

Fenton urged his listeners to be effective advocates for change by working with local officials in an encouraging way rather than being confrontational or too highly critical.

Get Healthy Guilford grew out of a United Way study several years ago that highlighted the county’s growing obesity problem. It operates on a grant from the Moses Cone-Wesley Long Community Health Foundation.

Contact Taft Wireback at 373-7100 or taft.wireback@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

Nelson Kepley

Photo Caption: Mark Fenton, host of the PBS television series "America's Walking," found this bicycle parked in front of a bank in downtown Greensboro.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

northoftheboro

March 9, 2010 - 6:32 am EST

As an avid jogger, being currently enrolled in a health and wellness course in college, I appreciate the need for all of us to be physically fit. However, I feel that this falls under the jurisdiction of personal responsibility instead of lobbying local municipalities to fork out more money in fitness trails, et al, and spending millions more in tax dollars that it already does not have. The city currently has sufficient parks, trails, and other methods set aside for exercise and activity without placing an even heavier burden on our overwhelmed taxpayers.

NC_Dawg

March 9, 2010 - 8:27 am EST

This isn't just about jogging trails. This is about providing access to all types of transportation, for all residents. This is about putting things back to the way the use to be, before we became beholden to the automobile industry in this country. People will drive around in circles waiting for a parking space to open up closer to the front door of a store instead of taking the first space available and walking a few more yards. Let's face it, Americans are lazy. Take a good look around town and you will see residents walking along the side of the road where there are no sidewalks. There are paths that are worn in the grass where people walk. Have you ever seen a group of people on the side of the road, literally sitting in the hot sun, waiting for the bus? We have very few bus shelters in this town. Every neighborhood should have sidewalks, not just the affluent areas. By providing these ammenities to everyone, they may be more likely to use them. And by using them, they will be healthier as a result.

aliluyya

March 9, 2010 - 9:48 am EST

North, I have to agree with Dawg. Greensboro is sadly lacking in sidewalks. If we want people to walk more, we have to invest in the safety of pedestrians. I am proud of GBoro for the bike lanes they already have and hope more are in the future. I live less than a mile from my work and I've walked a couple times, but every time I do I have to take my life in my hands. I have to cross Holden where it's 8 lanes wide. Forget crossing at a stop light, there is no time when (angry) motorists aren't turning - even for that 8 seconds when walkers have a signal. By the way, no matter how fast you walk or run -and my friends are always whining that I'm walking too fast-, the crossing signal at that intersection only give a walker enough time to get across 2 or 3 of the 8 lanes, then you have irate drivers honking and bearing down on you... not safe.

Plus, I get honked at, people yell obscene things out their windows.... doesn't anybody have any respect for their fellow citizens? Sometimes I just can't believe how men are such total pigs. Yea, I'm a woman walking down the road and I have the right not to be harassed.

So for my 15min walk, which could be very pleasant and relaxing, I am running across Holden like Frogger and then getting harassed... classy, real classy. :(

Pedestrians are taxpayers too! GM, Ford, etc. don't pay for the upkeep of the road their vehicles require, the citizens of GBoro do. And some of us want to walk or bike around!!!

Thackeray

March 9, 2010 - 11:09 am EST

As someone who identifies as politically right of center, I definitely share your concerns, northoftheboro, about government intervention in people’s lives.

However, I would note that taxpayer dollars are already being used to develop the city, and it probably wouldn’t cost that much more to make more walkable, human environments. My real concern is, is the way that we are developing establishing barriers to people who want (or even need) to get to their jobs and shops by foot or bike, and if we are going to develop anyway, couldn’t we just be smarter about how we do it so that we don’t have government barriers to industry?

Here are the reasons I think conservatives and liberals alike should be able to agree on a more walkable environment, built along the lines of the new urbanist model (you can read about it on wikipedia if you’re curious).

1. Better for business. Developers have learned in the last 15-20 years that walkable, mixed-use developments have a higher demand (and can therefore be more lucrative) than your average Post-war suburban/downtown development.

Also, shops in these kinds of developments are capable of selling to people who don’t have cars. The elderly and the too young to drive can participate in the marketplace independent of external assistance. That’s a great thing.

2. Better for aesthetics. Let’s face it: McMansion developments are ugly and unnatural- out of continuity with human traditions and the ways that people live. There is no architectural hierarchy in them, no sense of center and structure. There are reasons we all love Paris, and Rome. It has to do with the excitement of walking down a street where real people have both worked and lived for centuries. In an automobile driven society (haha), so much of that human experience is lost. It is an inorganic existence, at best. As a native North Carolinian, I want our cities to have the kind of longevitiy that these have had, and I believe the way that we have developed in the last 60 years has harmed that.

New Urbanism provides a model for optimal function and aesthetic appeal at every level of population density.

3. Better for community. While the way a city is design cannot automatically create relationships between people, it can facilitate those relationships by allowing for more interaction in public spaces. This raises everyone’s quality of living.

4. Better for health. Obviously, as this article mentions, a lifestyle where the automobile is our sole means of transportation has been terribly detrimental to American health. We need to face the fact that we have a problem in this country with our health: we are unhealthy, and unhappy, (and have high health insurance costs likely because of this) because we eat too much and then have almost NO physical activity, relative to other generations throughout human history. We are fat, and we are lazy, and while I don’t expect the government to fix this, the least it could is stop erecting barriers to physical activity (with our tax dollars) for those of us who actually want to live differently. This is also an issue of emotional well-being: people need to move around to FEEL good.

5. Finally, I would add that it would reduce our consumption of foreign oil. Tremendous geopolitical good can be done by driving down the demand for, and therefore the profit from, petroleum. Every dollar we save on gas is another dollar that we keep from OPEC, some of whose member nations do NOT have our country’s interests at heart.

aliluyya

March 9, 2010 - 2:49 pm EST

Well said, Thackeray. I will have to check out this "New Urbanism" you speak of.

Maybe we could all get along better ("left" & "right") if we spent some time talking to each other while we were out walking around and found that we have more similarities than differences.

aliluyya

March 10, 2010 - 8:43 am EST

So I walked to & from work yesterday, got honked at once on the way there, once on the way back. stupid pig men.

spa30

March 9, 2010 - 6:49 am EST

northoftheboro
I too am hesitant for more gov't involvement in what we should be taking personal responsibility but the fact is GSO is not an easy place to get around via walking or cycling. Yes there are bike lanes- not nearly enough and they are not connected to each other. Crosswalks are non-existent, try to imagine walking from Bruegger's Bagel on Battleground back over to the greenway- and crossing Battleground traffic. I think UNCG is doing a great job -by limiting parking- to get students, faculty and staff, to walk, bike or bus/bike/shuttle to campus. Are there policies that might be enacted that do not cost $$?

pippi69

March 9, 2010 - 8:34 am EST

in response to both of the previous comments, there is definitely a need for more bike lanes, crosswalks, and connections between the existing trails/parkways that are currently in use. However, there is also a much greater need for an attitude change. I have visited Portland OR and it amazed me how courteous and aware the car drivers were of the cyclists on a daily basis. Even on the most busiest of streets, drivers will yield to a cyclist, no matter who has the right of way. There is rarely tension between the two in the ability to successfully 'share the road'. I saw co-existance there like none that I have seen here locally. It can be done; perhaps GSO can boost it's education of the subject for less $$ than adding more opps for activity.

aliluyya

March 9, 2010 - 10:06 am EST

pippi, OR sounds like a refreshing place! It makes me so mad when people pass the stopped cars (usually taking left turns) on Spring Garden in the bike lanes. Some biker is going to die because of this one day, and it tears me up to think of it. UNCG has strict pedestrian right of way laws, as well as fairly strict laws governing the pedestrians.

I'm from Wilmington, NC, and my mom & I walk so much when I visit down there. We check out downtown, usually walking at least a couple miles and we also walk around our own neighborhood. When I was a car-less teen, I'd walk the 2 miles from my house to downtown, walk around downtown, then walk back, all in the 100+ degree heat (drinking lots of water, of course). Talk about exercise, catching up with the neighbors and being part of your community! I love it and I miss it sorely!

I was in DC for a concert this past weekend, and we parked the car Fri night when we got there and didn't use it again til we were leaving town. We mostly walked and took a few cabs. It was great.

I <3 human powered transportation!

Bosco

March 9, 2010 - 9:55 am EST

My son lives in NYC. Says you can always spot the tourist 'cause they're fat. Maybe a good first step would be to ban the fat, lame and lazy scooters you find at Wallyworld. At least put smaller baskets on them

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search