news-record.com

OPINION

Charles Davenport Jr.: Education reformers making progress

Sunday, March 7, 2010
(Updated 3:00 am)

Little Johnny can't read or write because, in government schools, the interests of teachers' unions prevail over the interests of children. Unions may be beneficial to educators, but they are indifferent -- if not hostile -- to the intellectual development of children.

But education reformers nationwide are celebrating a rare victory for the kids. Last month in Rhode Island, Superintendant Frances Gallo fired the entire staff of Central Falls High School -- a total of 93 people. The grateful citizens of Central Falls have erected a billboard in Gallo's honor. Rightly so. Gallo, Rhode Island Education Commissioner Deborah Gist and the Central Falls school board (which approved the firings on a 5-2 vote) are an inspiration to the public school reform movement.

Central Falls High is one of the worst schools in Rhode Island. Only 45 percent of the students are proficient in reading, 29 percent in writing and, incredibly, only 4 percent in math. Compare those abysmal numbers to Rhode Island's (somewhat less embarrassing) statewide averages in the same subjects: 69, 42 and 27 percent, respectively. Furthermore, half of the students at Central Falls are failing every subject, and the school's graduation rate is 48 percent.

Only teachers' unions could defend such a spectacular failure. Several hundred bused-in, placard-waving educators and their union representatives showed up in Central Falls hours before the firings. "We are behind Central Falls teachers," proclaimed Mark Bostic of the American Federation of Teachers, "and we will be here as long as it takes to get justice." But on Tuesday, the Central Falls union publicly pledged to support Gallo's reforms, and she said she's willing to negotiate.

Surely one aspect of justice is an education system that teaches kids how to read and write. Superintendant Gallo offered the teachers -- who make $72,000 per year -- $30 an hour for the extra instruction time in her "transformation" plan. Because the union insisted on $90 per hour, Gallo was forced to implement the "turnaround" strategy, which entails terminating the entire staff.

Defenders of the incompetent teachers at Central Falls argue that, because 75 percent of the students live in poverty, they are doomed to fail. But many schools with worse demographics manage to succeed. The Wall Street Journal recently featured an article on Baltimore's Ujima Village Academy, the student body of which is 98 percent black. Eighty-four percent of its students qualify for free or reduced-price meals. This is a recipe for failure, right?

Apparently not. For three years in a row, Ujima's eighth-graders earned the highest math scores in the state. The secret? Ujima Academy is a KIPP charter school, which entails longer school days, Saturdays and summer classes. But educators in Maryland's charter schools are required to join the union, and the Baltimore Teachers Union is demanding additional pay for its members at Ujima. Consequently, the school has been forced to scale back its hours of operation. As is so often the case, the union wins, the kids lose.

Still, revolution is in the air. Although we happily take credit for drawing attention to the failures of government schools, reform is no longer strictly a "right-wing" cause. Three weeks ago on this page, Fred Hiatt, editorial page editor of the Washington Post, skewered Democrats and teachers' unions for scrapping a successful voucher program for poor children in Washington, D.C.

In mid-January, the editors of this newspaper wrote that schools need to turn out "students who can read and write well, understand math, communicate, work in teams, solve problems, think critically and learn. Too many high school graduates lack those skills, never mind the dropouts." It is refreshing to see an acknowledgment of problems in public education, but perhaps we should request the basics first: reading, writing and arithmetic.

Two weeks ago, the editors highlighted a study from the Carolina Institute for Public Policy, which concluded, in part: "If UNC and its campuses wish to help the state &ellipses; provide all children with a sound basic education, teacher preparation programs at UNC campuses will have to produce teachers who perform well above the current standard."

Meanwhile, the Wake County school board has been taken over by serious-minded reformers who will abolish that system's "socioeconomic diversity" policy and emphasize neighborhood schools. To our south, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools is preparing to cut 880 jobs, and the first employees to be escorted to the door will be "under-performing" teachers, regardless of how many years they have been in the system.

Perhaps some of these examples will be useful to reformers on the local level. For far too long, school boards, teachers' unions and their allies (including the N.C. Association of Educators) have defended mediocrity, incompetence and failure.

Charles Davenport Jr. (cdavenportjr@hotmail .com) writes a monthly column for the News & Record.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

left-wing conspiracy theorist

March 7, 2010 - 6:22 am EST

Charles

First, I would like to address your repeated snide 'government school' remark. You can proclaim your innocence, but we all know what you mean: government can't do anything right, as home schooled kids perform much better. With the possible exception of science, as the following link will explain:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100306/ap_on_re/us_rel_home_school_evolutio...

In this article, it can be inferred that 83% of home schooled children receive their educational material from staunch science and fact-based stalwarts such as Bob Jones University. Scary stuff, I know. Nonetheless, home school kids perform better because, for the most part, their parents are actively engaged in their children's education, although I do personnally know some parents who are high school dropouts themselves who 'home skool' their children (until the age of 16, of course!) because they can't 'make' Johnny go to school.

I know of poor families, where the father works in such menial occupatons as at a car wash that set high expectations for their children and actually theme accountable for their achievement and behavior. I know of a single mother who is raising four children under the age of 12 all of whom get excellent grades with minimal support- financial or otherwise from the father. So I agree with you when you say poverty can be a non-factor.

However, I also know of families in which the custodial grandparents bribe their 12 year old grandchildren off with cigarettes, then threaten to cut them off if they 'don't act right', or even smoke marijuana with them. I know a child, who after refusing to go to school for an entire semester, 'promised' his grandparents last summer that he would go to school if his grandparents bought him a desired video game system. Needless to say, they did and he didn't. Why are grandparents (in one case I know of 'great grandmother') 'raising' these children? Typically mom is fighting a substance abuse problem and dad is either unknown, invisible, or incarcerated.

The point of all this is it is unfair to make teachers responsible for the academic achievement for children such as these. These children need PARENTS. To quote Chris Rock: "If a child can't read, it's momma's fault. If a child can't read because the light bill ain't paid, that's daddy's fault."

I am utterly amazed that you continue to spend so much of your time and energy bashing public school teachers without ever walking a mile in their shoes. Why don't you put your Liberty University education to good use and become a teacher through the lateral entry program so you can show everybody how it's done?

mamaboilermaker

March 7, 2010 - 7:02 am EST

Re your link: some of us believe that all scientific theories, even evolution (GASP!) should be scrutinized. Since none of us were actually present when the universe began, I object to teachers and textbooks mindlessly presenting theory as fact. Change within species happens, yes. Change from one species to another--I defy anyone to prove it.

My kids understand the THEORY of evolution. They also know it is a theory, not a proven fact. They can give a teacher the expected answers, but they don't believe it. You may have your faith in the unseen process of evolution over millions or billions or gazillions of years, but do not expect me to accept your religion any more than I can compell you to accept my faith that a transcendant God spoke the world into existence in 6 days--no more preposterous that the idea that all the diversity we see today was a big accident.

More important than how it all got her is this: what do we all do now that we are here? How do we use science to enhance health and safety? How do we behave around others of our species and of other species?

2fer

March 7, 2010 - 1:05 pm EST

Mamaboilermaker, the problem is that you and others with a similar world view want to "scrutinize" scientific theories (without understanding what a scientific theory is), but you don't apply equivalent scrutiny to "alternative theories." One simple reason for this is that these alternative theories, call them creationism, intelligent design, pan spermia, or whatever, have no testable hypotheses - they all depend on miracles or guesswork events, and since every scientific test of miracles has come a cropper, you deny science's ability to test miracles and ignore the failures and harp on untested anecdotes, then clam that your assumptions are science.
Another reason is that these alternatives have no respect for scientific methodology - indeed deny its ability to determine truth from observations and prefer the methods of "other ways of knowing," but what can thus be known you know not - and have no basic concept of truth.
These alternative theories make fundamental errors and omissions in basic knowledge, they are contain numerous mutually contradictory concepts, and their advocates are outright and prolific liars when it comes to discussing the scientific record. I have sat through a one-man "debate" given by the one creationist who is qualified to comment on paleontology and is considered an "honest creationist," and I can assure you that his "the light of the Truth of the claims of scripture" is as full of mistakes and lies as any other creationists when he's speaking before a church audience - he only gets "honest" when he knows other scientists will have an opportunity to correct him.
Every year, it seems, some Republican legislator (not to say that all Republicans are ignoramuses about science, but it's always a Republican) somewhere submits a proposal to mandate the scrutiny of evolution, and every year I write them and ask if his (it's always a he) state's teachers will be allowed to apply a similar scrutiny to "alternative theories." I'll let you know if I ever get a response.
As we read about states adopting history, literature, and culture courses based on religious scripture, courses that are a part of many if not most home school programs, you might ask if the standards of historians will be allowed in those courses, or if fiction devices and metaphorical poetry will be labeled as such, or if culturally determined practices and world views will be so identified - in short, will errors, flights of fancy, and omissions in the source texts be identified and, where necessary, corrected. My guess is that any teacher who would be competent and courageous enough to do so would be summarily disqualified from teaching such a course. What's your guess?

Get A Clue

March 7, 2010 - 1:17 pm EST

Save your breath, 2fer, you can't fix stupid.
Just have fun with them, like I do. ;-)
Besides, they're obviously happy swimming in the shallow end of the gene pool.

2fer

March 7, 2010 - 2:22 pm EST

I hope to distinguish willful ignorance from stupidity and to rectify ignorance when possible. If not possible, then I am content to make a record for the best we humans can accomplish rather than the worst.
The aforementioned creationist also said that he didn't care beans for the evidence, as he knew The Truth. I prefer that my truth be intimately concerned with the evidence.

mamaboilermaker

March 7, 2010 - 7:11 pm EST

What is the testable hypothesis in evolution and how does one test it?

BTW, I don't try to impose my books on the public schools--I simply opt out of the public schools. That saves them the trouble of accommodating me. I'll bet my kids know more about evolution than publicly educated students do about alternatives to evolutionary theory--because anyone who tries to teach a public school child to question the "fact" of evolution is villified, right? They'd be ridiculed (shallow end of the gene pool, anyone) for daring to question authority.

Whatever the rest of you think, I am, by objective, secular measures such as the GRE, in the far right tail of the Bell Curve. However, I don't presume to have evolved into God, so I take His word for certain things.

I pay may taxes, I feed my kids, I try to help other people when I can, and I believe God spoke the world into existence. Sorry that offends some. What about diversity? Diversity is only allowed when people are liberals and evolutionists--diversity goes right out the window when people dare to leave the govt system and teach their own children that they are more than animals with libidos--they are humans with souls.

Panacea

March 8, 2010 - 8:45 am EST

There are a couple of ways, mama.

One way is to make predictions, based on the scientific hypothesis. This is how Einstein proved his ideas of gravity and the curvature of space; he predicted mathematically that planets would move in a certain way (specifically Mercury). Astronomers then made observations of Mercury during a total solar eclipse. Einstein's theories were actually proved by an astronomer who believed Einstein was wrong (but who, as a true scientist, was delighted to find he in fact was incorrect). However, that's hard to do with evolution because of the time factor involved.

The other way is to form plausible hypotheses and observe for data to support or disprove the hypothesis. Paleontologists do this by examining the fossil record. Darwin did it by observing living species in the South Pacific.

Modern scientists are using our knowledge of genetics to study evolution. In one case, scientists examined ancient genes and modern genes in mice, and replaced the genes of living mice with the ancient genes. The result allowed mice who were unable to close their eyes to then do so; the changed genetics restored an ability the mice had lost. Here are a couple of links:

http://www.unews.utah.edu/p/?r=073106-1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyJGA_1_v8A

That you believe God spoke the world into existence doesn't offend me, mama. However, that you refuse to look objectively at what science is and does makes me sad for you. I have no problem with you teaching your children they have a soul, and that God loves us. I believe these things myself. However, if you are teaching them that evolution is wrong, you are doing them a disservice. The Earth still revolves around the Sun, in spite of the fears of the Church. They got over it, why can't you? It does not help your kids to teach them to ignore knowledge simply because you can't figure out how to reconcile faith and science.

Evolution is a fact. The only debate in evolution is in our understanding of how it works. If you want to disprove evolution, you must offer scientific evidence that it is wrong. Simply saying, "because I believe the Word of God" is not proof in science, rather it is superstition. How do you propose to disprove evolution?

Given that you don't understand how science works, I don't think you can. But shouting that the Sun revolves around the Earth, or that the Earth is flat doesn't make it true.

mamaboilermaker

March 8, 2010 - 8:55 am EST

I do embrace the heloicentric nature of our solar system. Did I ever say otherwise? You take my disagreement with ONE theory and try to totally discredit my entire brain?

You still have not cited anything that would convince me that one species can turn into another species. Isn't DNA specific to species and don't most mutations result in death, severe disability, or inability to reproduce? How does all this diversity of life happen accidentally through a process of mutations, most of which we know from experince to be fatal or debilitating? I still think it takes a lot of faith to believe in macro-evolution of everything as opposed to evolution WITHIN a species.

Panacea

March 8, 2010 - 1:00 pm EST

NO. I make use of examples. I realize you understand how the solar system works. I make the contrast to illustrate how ideas that were once terrifying are now casually accepted . . . because they are true. However, that you refuse to accept evolution as science places you in the same role as the Church who persecuted Galileo.

*sigh* mama, I don't have the time or space to cite the entirety of the biological literature of the subject to you. Evolution does not mean a fish literally turns into a cow. It means it adapts to its environment in ways that, millions of years later, results in a totally different animal.

Look at most dog species. We have bred dogs specifically for so many different traits that the modern dog little resembles the wild dog species they derive from. This took thousands of years of deliberate breeding by man.

We share 99% of our DNA with chimpanzees. If you examine the 3 day embryos of chimps, humans, pigs, and chickens, you could not tell the difference with the naked eye. It takes a VERY small change in DNA to produce radical differences between species.

It is true most mutations result in death. However, for those that survive, if the mutation turns into an advantage, then that mutation becomes an adaptation that is passed on from one generation to the next. Excellent examples of this can be found in the eye. Cats have essentially reflectors that bounce light around in the eye, enhancing their night vision with the limited light available. Humans, by contrast, lose a lot of that light. We have better color vision, however. Predators developed stereo vision to help hunting. Herbivores eyes lack this; but have greater field of vision to allow them to spot predators.

I don't believe in intelligent design because it is not science. However, my faith does not require me to identify the hand of God in His creations. I accept them for what they are. We weren't created by accident. The natural laws that govern our universe allowed the best adaptations to succeed. That's not an accident.

It doesn't take faith to believe in what you call "macro-evolution", which isn't evolution at all. It takes faith to accept the science for what it is while trusting in God.

Did you know that Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is a born again Christian? And that he believes in evolution? Check out this interview with him; it is most enlightening: http://blogs.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/archive/2009/07/09/president-obama-pic....

kurt lauenstein

March 8, 2010 - 10:10 am EST

Change from one species to another has been demonstrated multiple times in laboratories by exposing developing eggs of animals to various chemicals. I don't understand how anybody still believes what has been shown by labs all over the world since the late 1950's.

Panacea

March 7, 2010 - 9:17 am EST

Scientists don't use the word theory in the same sense that the general population does. Most people think theory means "what could have happened" or "how it could work." That's more derived from the legal sense of the word than the scientific.

Science uses the word theory to describe a line of thinking that has proven itself true through so much observation and/or experimentation that it is accepted as true. However, science always keeps the door open for new thoughts. For example, Newton's Laws were once considered unassailable until Einstein came along. Newtonian physics still works so well on small scales that it is preferred for solving many types of modern problems. Einsteinian physics works best on a larger scale.

Darwin's ideas are accepted by the scientific community as true through decades of observation and experimentation. We know there are areas of Darwin's original ideas that were wrong, but that's OK; finding those errors are part of the scientific process. However, no serious scientist would say that Darwin's core idea (that species change over time) is wrong.

Evolution is fact as far as science is concerned. How evolution works is the only area of scientific debate, not does it exist.

Scientists don't have "faith" in this. They use evidence: experimentation and observation.

The idea that God literally created the world in six days is preposterous; the scientific record does not support this. I accept the fact that my ancestors could not have understood things like geology and physics. God gave ancient man a message he could understand at that time in our development. But to try and twist God's message to fit modern science doesn't work. I take faith for faith, and science for science. There is no conflict between the two as long as they aren't mixed.

Take, for example, the findings of Copernicus and Galileo. Both realized that the sun, stars, and planets don't revolve around the Earth, that the Earth is not the center of the Universe. But the idea was so explosive that the Church suppressed it. Denying the science did not change the fact that the Earth revolves around the Sun. Understanding that basic concept of astronomy laid the foundation for further scientific research that gave us the ability to go to the moon, that lets us keep satellites in orbit for our cell phones and 24 hour media.

Evolution is bearing similar dividends. Despite the denial from people who find the idea uncomfortable, we have learned so much from our observations of how species change over time that we are learning to unlock the genome, giving rise to a new class of medical treatments that could finally beat diseases like cancer and Parkinson's.

It's a shame some people find the idea of evolution uncomfortable, that it threatens their self image of humanity's place in God's world. But it does not change the fact that the principles of evolution are sound.

So let me answer your question, mama: what do we all do now that we are here? We do what we've always done. We try to understand the world around us. Science cannot enhance health and safety as long as we cherry pick what we want to believe from the scientific evidence. Science is what it is: sometimes strange, sometimes frightening, often wonderful, always exciting.

As for how we behave around others of our species, and of other species: the Golden Rule works for me.

left-wing conspiracy theorist

March 7, 2010 - 9:22 am EST

Amen!

Get A Clue

March 7, 2010 - 1:19 pm EST

Reality or magic?
That's an easy choice for me.
The laws of physics or wishful thinking?
Agaian, easy choice.

mamaboilermaker

March 7, 2010 - 7:21 pm EST

Aren't you talking about change within a species rather than the "evolving" of one species into another species? The first I accept, the second, I do not.

Theologically speaking, Christianity and evolution do not work together because evolution would require death before the Fall--incompatible with Christian theology. If a bunch of critters had to mutate and die before the first man came about, then death preceded sin.

Get A Clue

March 8, 2010 - 1:51 am EST

Fortunately, evolution doesn't care if you believe in it for it to work. That's the difference between reality and magic. And you're right--evolution is incompatible with Christian theology. Thanks for simply restating what I've been saying all along: reality trumps magic every time.

mamaboilermaker

March 8, 2010 - 6:25 am EST

You've actually seen evolution "work"? How did you design the experiment? What were the variables and constants?

I know you think I just crawled out of the primordial slime, but I actually understand how to design an experiment using the scientific method. Unlike evolutionists, I readily admit my theory of origins is not scientifically testable. I am honest about the faith basis for my worldview and I don't expect people not of my faith to accept it. How does my worldview threaten you? Why do you care so much you must convince yourself I'm a drooling idiot?

Yes, true science will work whatever we believe. Gravity always wins, for instance, even if I believe I am a bird. I have observed gravity. I have not observed fish turning into another life form--although the evolutionists have conveniently explained that away by telling me it took bazillions of years--thus making them above questioning. How convenient for them.

Panacea

March 8, 2010 - 9:34 am EST

Mama, I suggest you actually read "On the Origins of Species." Darwin came up with his ideas through his observations of the natural world. He didn't need the 4 1/2 billion years (not bazillions, whatever that is) that the Earth has actually existed.

I'm glad you admit your ideas are not testable. That's a start. However, evolution has been tested and found sound.

Of course you can't observe a fish turning into a cow. Evolution doesn't make that claim. However, we do know that marine based life forms made gradual adaptations that allowed them to come onto land, and that those life forms diversified into the many different land based forms we have now. We still have fish that can move from one nearby stream or pond to another. Our observations of the fossil record show us how this happened.

Your world view does not threaten me physically, mama, but intellectually because it is dishonest. Misinformation stunts our understanding of the world around us and keeps us mired in superstition. It keeps us from asking questions and seeking answers. Everything in our modern world exists because someone challenged "what everyone knew" to ask questions and seek answers.

Your method is stagnation.

mamaboilermaker

March 8, 2010 - 10:51 am EST

So long as I honestly admit my assumptions and disclose them, I don't even threaten you intellectually. I am not dishonest so long as I disclose my admitted biases. Does the other side ever admit to having any biases?

"I'd rather have Jesus than silver or gold. I'd rather be His, than have riches untold. I'd rather have Jesus, than worldwide fame. I'd rather be true to His holy name." Andre' Crouch

Panacea

March 8, 2010 - 1:03 pm EST

You don't have to believe nonsense to be true to God.

left-wing conspiracy theorist

March 8, 2010 - 5:48 pm EST

Here's something else to think about. If modern day humans evolved from 'lower life forms', isn't it a bit presumptuous to say we're done evolving? Here's a theory a friend of mine stumbled on to.

Disclaimer: MamaB, I don't think you'll like this much:

"Forty Six and Two Theory-There are three totally different kinds of humans on the Earth, meaning that they perceive the One reality in three different ways, interpreted differently. The first kind of human has a chromosome composition of 42+2. They comprise a unity consciousness that does not see anything outside themselves as being separate from themselves. To them, there is only one energy - one life, one beingness that moves everywhere. Anything happening anywhere is within them, as well. They are like cells in the body. They are all connected to a single consciousness that moves through all of them. These are the aboriginals in Australia. There might be a few African tribes left like this. Then, there is our level, comprising 44+2 chromosomes. We are a disharmonic level of consciousness that is used as a steppingstone from the 42+2 level to the next level, 46+2...These two additional chromosomes change everything." -Drunvalo Melchizedek

The human genome - the complete set of human genes - is composed of twenty three separate pairs of chromosomes. Twenty-two, of which, are numbered in order of size, from the largest (1), to the smallest (22). The remaining pair consists of the sex chromosomes. Therefore, we have 44+2 chromosomes.

According to the teachings of Drunvalo Melchizedek, who is the founder of the flower of life teachings, and the originator of this theory, there are three grids for human consciousness around planet Earth, which correspond directly with the chromosomes in the human body. The first one is forty-two plus two, the second is forty-four plus two (our current evolutionary position), and a third which consists of forty-six plus two chromosomes. The third grid contains "Christ" consciousness.

As anyone with a bit of education and half an ounce of intelligence will tell you, the current number of chromosomes (23) is of no significance at all. Many species, including our closest species among the apes, have even more chromosomes, and many have fewer.

Although like with any religion or philosophy the validity of the facts at face value may look false, but it does stimulate the mind, and Melchizedek definitely has an interesting theory behind consciousness. He also has some very interesting information about sacred geometry and how it relates to you personally. If you haven’t already, read Nothing in This Book Is True, But It's Exactly How Things Are, by Bob Frissell. In the book, Bob tells the story of Druvalos teachings, and reveals sacred geometry to you in an easy to understand way.

With many other theories and philosophies, it is important to use them as a way to explore a temporary belief system (coined by Robert Anton Wilson), also known as a reality tunnel, which stimulates the mind, and allowed themselves to explore a new way of thinking about consciousness and reality itself.

Beliefs are often crippling to the mind, you should try and explore anything and everything. Even if you encounter success with a particular meditation, such as the MERKABA, or ritual magic, once you start to develop your own dogma, your mind is dead. Temporary belief systems, temporary egos, or temporary reality tunnels (one in the same) are the way to go, because belief systems create the kind of complacency where ignorance thrives. This is the way to the true forty six and two state of emotional evolution.

DaveW

March 8, 2010 - 12:02 am EST

Nice job with the science explanation, Panacea. I give you credit when it is due. I am actually following the "Golden Rule".I also realize that this will never be reciprocated.I'll believe that the Golden Rule works for you when I actually see it posted here by you towards a post by me.

Panacea

March 8, 2010 - 9:26 am EST

Thanks for the compliment, Dave. You do realize, I hope, that you made it a left handed compliment with what you wrote after wards?

mamaboilermaker

March 8, 2010 - 10:39 am EST

My sister is left handed and is a very nice person. Wonder why we use "left-handed" in derogatory ways?

Panacea

March 8, 2010 - 1:05 pm EST

My mother is left-handed as well, and also a very good person. Lefties tend to be artistically gifted, because they use the right brain, which holds our creative centers.

I merely use a term of speech to point out that Dave's compliment is, in fact, no compliment at all.

However, I apologize to any leftie who may have been offended.

mamaboilermaker

March 8, 2010 - 4:50 pm EST

No offense taken--I just was wondering aloud why lefties get a bad rap : ) I guess they never organized to protest? Too busy creating great art, probably.

My leftie sister is, in fact, a professional artist.

Panacea

March 8, 2010 - 5:17 pm EST

Heh :D

DaveW

March 9, 2010 - 12:24 am EST

Left handed or right handed I agree 100% about your view on science and religion. They can and should both coexist.I took a graduate course at UNCG in 1983 under the professor in charge of science education there. This same person was an elder at my church. You do have some good ideas but you are not the only one that has them that posts here and you do not bat 1.000. You can also be full of ----- at times.You also like to disagree in posts just to try to irritate me when deep down you agree.I , on the other hand will tell you exactly like it is. If you are correct I agree and if you are not I will call you out. I do not go on tangents. You have said some off the wall things here such as" there will be a backlash against high school athletics and they will be in trouble" due to last year's Northern Guilford scandal.You acted like a teenager and did not think before you posted.I am saving it for now but I have a whole list of less than steller ideas that you have expressed on this site. You are not right 100% of the time.I could actually like you if you did not believe that you were the extreme authority on ALL ISSUES.

Discrimination

March 7, 2010 - 11:58 am EST

Touro College, School of Health Sciences discriminated me, dismissed me from the Occupational Therapy Program, its College as well as prohibited me from pursuing opportunities it offers in other academic disciplines, disregarded my appeal letters, took away my right to pursue education and framed me for a crime I did not commit. Attempted falsifying business records 2nd degree. Bellow you will find the description of what took place in Touro College, School of Health Sciences Occupational Therapy Program. I have also included in the package two loose leaf binders. One binder has transcripts, registration papers, appeal letters, e-mails from professors and staff, an audio cassette and a CD of a conversation that took place with me and Professor Claire Daffner who discriminated me in the dual degree B.S. in Health Sciences and M.S. in Occupational Therapy Program in Touro College. The other binder has exams and term papers. I reported and sent my evidence to various agencies including, United States Department of Education Office for Civil Rights who later dropped the investigation. I also reported Touro College's discrimination to channels, CBS 2, NBC 4, ABC 7, WPIX 11. I also contacted the FBI and explained my situation about my discrimination and unfair practices and reported how police came to my residents without court a order, or subpoena and did not read me Miranda Warning, or told me the charges brought against me. I told the FBI that Touro College has illegal practices and abuses its power as well as wrote an e-mails to United States Student Association who responded quickly to me, but Touro College has not made any attempt to resolve the situation. I am afraid to go to jail.

Below you will find a more detailed version of my story and the experience I have been going through since I joined Touro College as a student. Touro College, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences with the help of Michael Cherner's graduation form awarded me its Associate in Arts (A.A.) Degree in Interdisciplinary Liberal Arts & Sciences, June 28, 2005.

THIS IS MY STORY
My name is Michael and I live in Brooklyn, New York. I identify myself as an American Citizen who came to this country as a young boy from Belarus. It used to be part of former Soviet Union. I am in a legal loophole. Touro College framed me for crime I did not commit and took away my right for education. I received a misdemeanor and, I may get a jail sentence. I am afraid because I do not want to go to jail. Misdemeanor, which I got, is unjust because police, lawyers and the U.S. Department of Education authorities hided most evidence under the influence of Touro College.

In 2005 Spring, I came to see Michael Cherner's in his office at 1726 Kings Highway Touro College Campus. I asked my Michael Cherner if I would be eligible for graduation. Michael Cherner asked my Student ID then looked into his computer. He told me that I have good grades and I have enough credits for graduation. He gave me a graduation form with major declaration for me to sign then told me to give it to the registrar and bursar. A month or so later, I logged into my Touro College Academic account and noticed that 2 backdated History courses I never attended appeared for 2004 Fall Semester and they are (GHS – 105 – YA U.S HISTOR Y – 1763-1900 4 Credits Grade A) and (GJS – 271 – OL AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY 3 Credits Grade A). Few months passed and 2005 Spring Semester 2 more backdated History courses I never attended appeared and they are (GCA – 133 -YM HIST OF MUSIC I: ANCIENT TO BAROQUE 4 Credits grade A) (GHS-106-YA HISTORY OF THE U S 1877 TO PRESENT 4 Credits Grade A).

One day, in the morning, when I was getting ready to go to work, police came to my home without a court order. They did not read me Miranda Warning and told me to take off my tie. My lawyer Ilya Z. Kleynerman told me that if I pursue a court appeal it will ruin my life and make Assistant District Attorney Jonathan Lenzner very angry.

It all started when I applied to Touro College School of Health Sciences program in dual degree in BS in Health Sciences and MS in Occupational Therapy. In the year of 2004 I was invited for an interview with Claire Daffner a professor in the Occupational Therapy program in Touro College. On the interview Professor Claire Daffner, asked me questions regarding my national origin, my family socioeconomic status as well as made racial remarks. Claire Daffner asked me the following questions during the interview, "Do you live in a Russian Ghetto?, What do your parents do for a living?, Are you an Introvert or an Extravert?, What are you going to do if you are not going to be accepted into the program?”

Within a month, in mail I received a rejection letter stating that I was not accepted into the program.

Later, I was accepted in the program for the Fall of 2005 semester with the assistance of Michael Cherner and Andrique Baron. I was invited to Bayshore campus to meet with Elyse Pimsler and in her office she told me, “Andrique Barron is no longer your advocate.” As the semester went along in Gross Anatomy course at Bayshore Occupational Therapy Program I was segregated away from Occupational Therapy students and forced to sit with Physical Therapy students during examinations and lectures. I received unfair exams, was graded unfairly and did not receive class curves as other OT students received. I was truly neglected by professors. I believe that as an Occupational Therapy student I was a performing better than average but my grades were lowered and not curved as the rest of the class. Unfortunately the lack of support and negative environment produced by faculty and staff made it difficult for me to pursue my dream of becoming an Occupational Therapist. I turned to Professor Piroska Szabo the Gross Anatomy Professor for help, but unfortunately she was the one lowering my grades. Professor Piroska Szabo said to me, “"No one will ever ask you about your grades, and you are used to failing". Imagine what I have been going through. In Gross Anatomy cadaver dissection laboratory I was placed in the back of the class and received little attention from instructors. I felt hopeless and had no one to turn to. I was emotionally tormented by the events that took place.

Not knowing what to do next, I turned to Michael Cherner the Director of Kings Highway Touro College campus and Andrique Barron Director of admissions in Touro College for help; who were both sent to jail recently. My Gross Anatomy Professor Piroska Szabo failed me in the course and I met with the Occupational Therapy Department Leave of Absence and Academic Standing Committee to discuss my future in Occupational Therapy Program and asked for a second chance to retake the Gross Anatomy course. The committee put me on academic probation with the condition that If I do well in the Gross Anatomy course I will be allowed to continue my studies. I retook the Gross Anatomy course in Manhattan Campus for Spring 2006 semester with Professor Stephen Kanter who gave me an excellent grade. Afterward, the committee sent me a letter stating that I would be placed on academic probation and be allowed to transfer to Manhattan Occupational Therapy Program and begin my full time studies in Summer of 2006 semester under the conditions that I maintain my GPA, not fail more than 3 courses and Professor Claire Daffner would be my academic advisor and that I would have to see her weekly.
Later, I was invited to Claire Daffner's class, where she gave me and other students registration papers to select courses for the upcoming Summer 2006 semester in Occupational Therapy program at Manhattan campus. I chose a full time course load of twenty credits for this semester. Claire Daffner collected my signed registration papers along with other students in the class.

The courses I registered for are: (HS-150 Kinesiology 4 Credits), (HS-190 Neurosciences 4 Credits), (OT-123 Growth & Development II 2 Credits), (OT-131 Psycho Social 3 Credits), (OT-135 Substance Abuse Seminar 1 Credit), (OT-175 OT Theory & Practice I 3 Credits).

During my mandatory weekly meetings with her, she verbally abused me, made threats that I will fail all of my courses, diagnosed me with an "Auditory Processing Disorder" (She is not a medical doctor), as well as told me that other students are smarter and better than me. I have this on audio recording tape and CD. Claire Daffner told me, "You don't know what I am capable of doing." As a student, I did well in all of my courses but Instructors under Claire Daffner's influence lowered my grades and made my learning environment unbearable for me. As a result, Claire Daffner Professor of OT-175 OT Theory & Practice I 3 Credits failed me in her course. Professor Lana Goodman of OT-131 Psycho Social 3 Credits failed me despite of my excellent performance in her class. I received a letter in mail stating that I am dismissed from the Occupational Therapy Program. The requirement to be kicked out from the program is by failing 3 courses. Theoretically I did not fail 3 courses but Gross Anatomy course which I retook and received an excellent grade was not accounted for as a passing course. It is Claire Daffner who did this. Afterward, I appealed to the Occupational Therapy Committee including Dean School of Health Sciences Joseph Weisberg as well as Associate Dean School of Health Sciences Gerald D. Barry Ph.D to allow me continue my education and become an Occupational Therapist, but I was denied every appeal by Occupational Therapy Department Leave of Absence and Academic Standing Committee. I also asked Joseph Weisberg to arrange a hearing with me but he never did. During a meeting with Vera-Jean Clark Brown the Director of Occupational Therapy Program, she said to me, “You will never become an Occupational Therapist”. Months later to a year after I have been dismissed from the Occupational Therapy Program I noticed in my Touro College student log in account that I was missing 27 credits in the following courses and they were not reflected anymore on my transcript.

The following courses were deleted are:
(HS-104 Gross Anatomy 7 Credits), For Spring 2006 Semester, I retook
(HS-150 Kinesiology 4 Credits), For Summer 2006 Semester
(HS-190 Neurosciences 4 Credits), For Summer 2006 Semester
(OT-123 Growth & Development II 2 Credits), For Summer 2006 Semester
(OT-131 Psycho Social 3 Credits), For Summer 2006 Semester
(OT-135 Substance Abuse Seminar 1 Credit), For Summer 2006 Semester
(OT-175 OT Theory & Practice I 3 Credits). For Summer 2006 Semester

As soon as I found out that my courses has been deleted, I contacted the Director of Occupational Therapy Program, Vera-Jean Clark Brown. Ms. Clark Brown told me that I should not see the professors in regard to my missing courses and grades instead, see Vladimir Rozin the main Registrar at the Manhattan Touro College Campus at 27-33 West 23 Street. She also told me, “You're a nice guy I feel sorry for you.”
During a meeting with the Registrar Vladimir Rozin I demanded that he return my courses and that I was discriminated by Professor Claire Daffner in addition to that, I have exams and paperwork to prove that I did attend those courses as well as have appeal letters where the courses are defined. He told me that it is the administration's fault and that I should find my registration papers for these courses on my own. He also said to me, “You smell like a criminal”.

Months later, I wanted to complete my Bachelor Degree, despite the fact that my grades were stolen from me. I met with Lacey Shaw an Adviser at Touro College, who told me that I will not be able to be accepted into Touro College and that I will be told the same thing by everyone including the Dean. But he gave me registration forms for courses to complete my Bachelor's Degree. I went through the registration process twice and at the end I was told to see Vladimir Rozin who told me that I should have asked his permission before I began my admission and registration process. Rozin told me to go with him to see Middle States representative about my situation and was told by both of them that there is nothing they can do. The Representative told me to apply to Excelsior College and later on I sent my transcript to Excelsior College.

Recently, I met with Dr. Bernard Lander president of Touro College and I respectfully requested that he give me a second chance at life and allow me to complete my Bachelor's Degree.

I contacted the Office of the President who told me to see Avery Horowitz, Associate Dean of Students for Advisement and Counseling. Mr. Avery Horowitz told me that I would be allowed to register for courses he even asked me about what degree which would I want to pursue. I told him Psychology or Liberal Arts. He told me it is okay and that I should see Sofia Volfson an Academic Adviser at Touro College Flatbush Ave J campus to register for courses. During my advisement with Ms Sofia Volfson I filled out registration papers for courses. I was even advised by her to sit in Experimental Psychology course while registration would process. I set in one class, but later she told loudly in the hallway, "I was set up, I couldn't do anything!" She told me that I have a permanent Touro College hold. She even attempted to snatch away my student copy of registration papers for courses I signed up for. I felt frightened and left the building not knowing what to do next.

Later, I wrote numerous appeals to President Bernard Lander, Allan Kadish Senior Provost, and to Office of the President asking them to give me a second chance to complete my Bachelor's degree but I had no reply from them. Allan Kadish took over Touro College after Bernard Lander retired.

Later, I contacted and reported these problems to the United Stated Department of Education Office for Civil Rights as well as the FBI, United States Students Association, CBS 2, NBC 4, ABC 7, WPIX 11, letting them know about the events that took place at Touro College and that my rights have been violated numerous times. U.S Department of Education Office for Civil Rights sent me a letter in mail stating that my request for Touro College investigation is denied and that my occupation of study is Physical Therapy and not Occupational Therapy. Office for Civil Rights dropped the investigation.

I don't know what to do next, I am afraid to go to jail.

Sincerely,

Michael

2fer

March 7, 2010 - 12:25 pm EST

Is Michael's point that religiously affiliated, private colleges make mistakes just as secular public colleges do?

Get A Clue

March 7, 2010 - 1:21 pm EST

Michael,
If I needed serious help the last place I'd look would be an itty bitty blog in the middle of North Carolina.
I'm just sayin'.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search