news-record.com

NEWS

Realtor dues 'wrong’ but not illegal

Thursday, March 4, 2010
(Updated 11:36 pm)

RALEIGH — The N.C. Association of Realtors may have been “morally wrong” when they forced members to pay dues that were used in a massive anti-tax campaign, but they did not break the law, the State Board of Elections ruled Thursday.

Voting 5-0 , board members dismissed a case brought by a Wake County Realtor against the Greensboro-based association and took pains to say they were troubled by what they heard during the hearing.

The board ordered stronger reporting requirements for money raised and spent directly in support of referendums on the county level.

“I’m very pleased with the message from the board of elections to the Realtor association,” said Becky Harper , who brought the case.

In 2008, NCAR levied a one-time dues payment of $70 to replenish an issues-advocacy fund. That fund had been drained by efforts to prevent the General Assembly from allowing counties to raise the transfer tax charged on property sales.

When efforts to persuade lawmakers failed, NCAR funded committees to battle county efforts to put the new tax in place. All 24 of those referendums failed under withering criticism from Realtor-linked groups.

“I can’t make a living without being a member of this association,” Harper said. Without being a NCAR member, real estate agents cannot access the multiple listing service used by agents in finding and listing houses for sale.

Harper and her lawyers contended the Realtor association dues were tantamount to forcing members to pay for political speech with which they may disagree under the threat of losing their livelihoods.

State Board of Elections Chairman Larry Leake said he could not find a statute that would allow the board to fine the Realtors or refer them for prosecution. However, he called their actions “morally wrong” as a preface to dismissing the case.

“I think when you deprive an individual of their ability to earn a living because they differ with you on a political issue, that’s morally wrong,” Leake said after the hearing.

The Realtors’ attorney and Harper’s attorney spent much of the three-hour hearing sparring over facts and arcane bits of election law. At one point, Harper presented evidence that the Realtors’ total anti-transfer-tax effort totaled $2.6 million, which Realtors’ lawyer John Wallace said lumped together unrelated types of spending.

Asked after the hearing about Leake’s characterization of the group as morally wrong, director of government affairs Rick Zechini said the group would consider the statement.

“That’s something that would be before our membership,” Zechini said, characterizing the decision-making process that led to the special dues assessment as open and time consuming. “This is a membership-led association, and the membership supports this.”

Elections board members said they were troubled by evidence presented by Harper that showed dues money from the Realtors sloshing around two dozen referendum committees as well as other entities that mobilized to fight the transfer tax. Until this week, there was no comprehensive picture of how the Realtors spent money to oppose the transfer tax.

The state board ordered county boards of elections to report filings made by referendum committees to the state so they could be compiled in one place. That makes them more easily accessible to reporters and others who may be trying to piece together how a particular political effort is working.

Board members and campaign transparency advocates said this case exposed gaps in North Carolina laws made worse by the Citizens United decision, a U.S. Supreme Court case that opened the door for trade associations like the Realtors, labor unions and businesses to have direct involvement in political campaigns.

“We need to know where that money is coming from and how it’s being spent,” said Damon Circosta who leads the N.C. Center for Voter Education.

That can’t be done by election board fiat alone.

“I think the legislature is going to have to fix it,” said Chuck Winfree , a Republican member of the state board from Greensboro.

 

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com

 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

youvegottobekidding

March 4, 2010 - 8:47 pm EST

"The board did to order beefed-up reporting requirements for money raised and spent directly in support county-level referenda." What?

"sparing" Really?

Quality writing........ great job.

BillGuill

March 5, 2010 - 12:55 pm EST

I’d like to clarify a few points:

1) The state has been collecting Issues Mobilization Funds for years from its membership. They increased the amount in 2007, but the collection itself is nothing new.

2) The Board of Elections dismissed the complaint, which was filed by a REALTOR® against the NC Association of REALTORS® regarding the 2008 dues assessment and dues increase for the Issues Mobilization Fund.

3) Even before the meeting, the Board of Elections staff had found no campaign finance laws were broken. The board voted unanimously 5-0 to dismiss the complaint.

3) The Board of Elections Chairman, however, stated that, while not a violation of any campaign finance law, he would personally object to the termination of someone's access to the MLS for nonpayment of a dues assessment put in place solely for the purpose of funding a transfer tax referendum committee. That's not the case in this situation.

The assessment was for the Issues Mobilization Fund, which provides resources to local associations for many different purposes. NCAR’s Issues Mobilization Fund addresses a wide range of concerns, and is a crucial component of local associations’ ability to fight for property owner rights at the local level.

The Greensboro Regional REALTORS® Association is committed to fighting for Private Property rights, and to supporting buyers, sellers and homeowners whenever they are targeted by unfair and regressive tax policies.

Bill Guill
2010 President
Greensboro Regaional REALTORS® Association

NANASIX

March 6, 2010 - 12:09 am EST

Do you find it strange that dues for real estate agents is higher than filing annual reports for corporations in our state? I also find it strange that if you as a realtor fail to file an annual report for several years, that the real estate commission won't cancel your license unless the corporation you own is administratively dissolved by the SOS/Corp Div. I was a licensed agent in Va. for over 25 years, but found it wasn't worth the variety of cost here in N.C. to transfer my license, or get a N.C. License. For those of you who depend on your license, maybe it's time to review all the restrictions and ban together for the needed changes in N.C. It's almost like the Ins. Commission, and our Lottery money, they spend it where the big wigs want to spend it...check it out.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search