news-record.com

NEWS

Water flows, but carries a price

Sunday, February 28, 2010
(Updated 7:37 am)

— You use it every day. To cook your spaghetti. To wash your socks. To feed your plants.

It costs the average customer only about $35 a month, but nearly every year, Greensboro water users face increased fees to cover the extensive costs of bringing liquid to their faucets.

This year — as the recession continues and everyone is watching our pennies — it may be even tougher for city leaders to strike the balance between controlling costs and running a top-notch water system.

It’s especially hard when new bills keep coming due.

“All we’re doing is try to take care of the citizens’ utility system. If the policy is 'Don’t take care of it. Let us fall back to where it was 10 to 15 years ago,’ that’s what we’ll do,” Greensboro water resources director Allan Williams said.

The average Greensboro water customer uses 4,500 hundred gallons a month — and spends more than $400 a year on water payments.

And it’s not the H²0 that drives the costs up. It’s miles of pumps, pipes and purification processes the water must travel through before — and after — it gets to your house.

For something that falls out of the sky, the business of water can be pricey.

Sewer upgrades in Latham Park cost a cool $55 million. Replacing the crumbling Townsend Dam will go for $40 million.

The city’s new incinerator will cost $25 million.

Those and other projects translate to higher payments for water users.

Since 2004, water rates have increased between 15 and 8 percent every year except this one.

Last spring, city staff members proposed a 6 percent rate hike to go into effect on Jan. 1.

But council members decided to dip into the water department’s reserve accounts for the year to hold off on raising rates again.

At the time, Williams warned the council that if it held off on the rate increase, the next increase could be in the range of 10 to 15 percent.

Since then, a new city manager was hired and a new, more fiscally conservative City Council was elected.

The elected officials, who have to set price increases, have already indicated they are going to keep an eye on fees.

“We’ve been having gigantic increases every year. We are trying to be more business-friendly. If you are in the hotel-motel industry and you increase the water rates, can you imagine?” said Councilwoman Trudy Wade, who spearheaded last year’s rate decision.

From the utility’s end, staff members have been working to keep costs down. That means putting off any and all work that isn’t mandated by law, Williams said.

“What we can, we defer,” Williams said. “We’ve done just about all we can.”

And for those things that can’t wait, staff members are trying creative ways to cut costs.

Two years ago, city staff members started a pilot project to test a new method for taking the nutrients out of the waste stream to meet new state standards to clean up Jordan Lake, a water supply lake within Greensboro’s watershed.

Existing technologies would force the city to add a lot of new pumps and tanks to the current system at the T.Z. Osborne Wastewater Treatment Plant — to the tune of an estimated $75 million.

Instead, city staff members tried a different solution.

They added small plastic wheels, about an inch in diameter with spokes and ridges, into existing tanks. This simple technology allows the city’s current treatment system to remove the nitrogen and phosphorus and doesn’t require as much new equipment.

It’s a solution that will save the city money.

“It’s pretty amazing what the technology will allow,” said Donald Howard, Greensboro’s water reclamation manager. “We can treat a whole lot more flow through the same size tank without the up-front capital costs.”

City staff now estimates it will cost about $4 million to design and another $50 million to build the Jordan Lake solution.

Williams declined to predict what the city staff members will recommend in terms of a rate increases this year.

But next year’s budget will include the first $2 million in design costs for the new system — further adding to the pressure on rates.

Contact Amanda Lehmert at 373-7075 or amanda.lehmert@news-record.com

 

Accompanying Photos

Stock photo

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

ilikegso

February 28, 2010 - 8:09 am EST

Think about how much you pay for cable? Or your cell phone? Now compare that to how much you pay for water. Now think about which is the most important for you to live. Funny how people will complain about the cost of having clean water to drink, cook with, shower, water your garden. Imagine if you didn't have this? Can you imagine paying ONLY $35 for around 4,500 gallons. Do you realize how much 4,500 gallons is? Lets just say, it's a lot.

Gso Resident

February 28, 2010 - 8:12 am EST

Worth a read.....

http://damscam.blogspot.com/

aintme

February 28, 2010 - 10:00 am EST

*Every* *single* *time* there is an article in N&R about water supply, drought, rates, etc. someone always brings up the Damscam. Fine, go read that miles and miles of whining if you haven't already, but hopefully you'll end up on the realistic side of the fence. Someone was bitter about losing his job as a victim of the political atmosphere and has spent years trying to prove a conspiracy. Don't you think that if there were any truth to it that there would have been media coverage a la David Wray?

Abner Doon

February 28, 2010 - 9:11 am EST

$19 Million for a Swimming Pool, $20 for the Science Center, $54 for water, $200 more for various city projects, Falling revenues, operating budget deficits.

If it wasn't here, Greensboro could be a municipal case study for how to tax a community to extinctiion.

scottb

February 28, 2010 - 10:28 am EST

Maybe you should move to another metro area. Then you'll figure out that Greensboro has low taxes. I think $54 per month for clean water, under good pressure, is a pretty good deal. As mentioned above, I wish I could say the same for all the other things I pay for.

Abner Doon

February 28, 2010 - 12:09 pm EST

Greensboro has the highest taxes of any large city in North Carolina.

clayton moore

February 28, 2010 - 10:34 am EST

the greensboro-guilford county folks will be glad to know that a large amount of their
drinking water entering the randleman reservoir
is coming directly from the EASTSIDE HIGH POINT SEWER PLANT.
call the water quality guys at 3367715000 and ask them what
they were thinking when they approved that mess.
NCDENR
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
336/771-5000

aintme

February 28, 2010 - 4:09 pm EST

I believe it. But I also know that any water discharged from a sewer treatment plant, called effluent, is highly treated (not to drinking water stage, but highly treated to remove contaminants). Besides, all the water coming out of Randleman for drinking water will go through a state-of-the-art treatment process, perhaps better than what Greensboro is using today. I'm not worried.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search