news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: Parking issues need attention

Thursday, February 25, 2010
(Updated 3:00 am)

It’s good that Greensboro needs more parking downtown. And not so good.

Activities and attractions in the center city draw more people, who have to find places to leave their cars. The vitality is welcome.

But creating additional parking spaces presents big challenges.

The City Council listened to some ideas Tuesday, heard some cost estimates and decided to park the issue for the time being.

There’s nothing like an $8 million price tag to stall a conversation.

That’s the estimated cost of a proposed five-level parking deck at South Elm and McGee streets. It could be built with retail space on two lower levels and 420 parking spaces above. Council members were impressed with the design, Councilwoman Nancy Vaughan said Wednesday, but decided “it’s not something we have to act on today, although it needs to be on our radar.”

The city’s four downtown-area decks and six surface lots regularly reach capacity — especially those nearest the courthouse. People with business there, including employees and jurors, often have to park blocks away. The new jail, which already has eliminated a parking lot, will further increase demand for parking space. The issue begs for an effort by city leaders to bring the county into a parking partnership.

Another possible parking partnership, with a proposed new luxury hotel, didn’t figure into the City Council’s discussion Tuesday. It should the next time. Hotel developers have expressed interest in a long-term lease for spaces in a new parking deck. The prospect of a built-in customer base and revenue stream should influence the city’s decision on where and when to build.

Meanwhile, the council has to contend with the difficulties of crafting a budget for the next fiscal year. Its priorities are jobs/economic development, public safety and infrastructure. Downtown parking touches on all three. Whether that justifies an $8 million commitment now poses a tough question.

But the council can’t stall for long. A busy downtown depends on safe, convenient places to park.
 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

newkid

February 25, 2010 - 10:36 pm EST

And are we exploring a public-private partnership for this endeavor? Many cities have private, or privately operated parking facilities. Of course they charge more than 50 cents per hour to park. That low rate can't even cover the cost of parking attendants in GSO's city lots and enforcement for the metered spaces. At these rates, it would probably the taxpayers less to have totally free parking and not employ lot attendants and parking enforcement personnel.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search