news-record.com

NEWS

City Council to hear from speakers first

Tuesday, February 16, 2010
(Updated Wednesday, February 17 - 12:18 am)

GREENSBORO — Got a beef with the City Council? Get it off your chest and go home.

Countering a decision made several weeks ago, the council on Tuesday night moved its public gripe session back to the beginning of its meetings.

Mayor Bill Knight had moved that session to the end of the meeting, saying last month that he wanted to do the city’s business first and then hear from residents.

But what council members have heard since then is a lot of protests from residents about putting their comments last.

After much debate Tuesday night, the City Council voted to hear speakers from the floor during the first 30 minutes of the council meeting.

The vote was a split decision, with members Trudy Wade, Zack Matheny, Mary Rakestraw and Knight voting against the change.

State law requires boards like the City Council to have a 30-minute session every month when residents can have their say. Greensboro residents use the time to air problems with the city, announce special events or thank leaders.

Under the former City Council, those sessions occasionally lasted hours.

In January, Knight moved the comment period toward the end of the agenda and put the business items first. He has limited comments to 30 minutes.

But his decision has been unpopular with people who have been concerned about stifling public expression.

The latest round of concerns came Tuesday night from the disabled riders of the city’s SCAT bus service, who said the change might make it more difficult for them to get a chance to speak if they have to wait until late in the evening.

Matheny suggested that the board should make a special exception for SCAT riders. But other council members said it wasn’t only bus riders who might have a hard time sticking around for the comment period at the end of the meeting.

Councilman Jim Kee asked the council to consider a compromise that would have the speakers at the beginning of the meeting only once a month.

Council members ultimately voted to keep the speakers to the first 30 minutes of the meeting — overruling the mayor.

Some members continued to be concerned that the public comment period may overwhelm the council meetings.

“We can’t do it in 30 minutes. I don’t believe that any council member on this board is going to stop engaging speakers from the floor,” Councilwoman Trudy Wade said. “We are going to engage, and we are going to be here for an hour or two.”

Matheny asked the council to consider not televising the comment period in order to prevent people from using the podium for publicity purposes. But he ultimately rescinded that request after some council members said they didn’t like the idea.

“We have all talked a lot of about openness and honesty and transparency,” Councilwoman Nancy Vaughan said. “I think we could be criticized for not televising speakers from the floor.”

Contact Amanda Lehmert at 373-7075 or amanda.lehmert@news-record.com

 

Council insider

News and notes from the City Council meeting Tuesday night:

Gung-ho for Google: City Council members unanimously agreed that the staff should move swiftly to apply for Google’s ultra-high speed Internet service. They said the staff could spend up to $50,000.

Liberty Road rezoning delayed: The council agreed to delay a rezoning request for Liberty Road until March 16 because the applicant was not feeling well.

The rezoning, if approved, would allow a therapy facility to be built in a neighborhood that is partly  made up of single family homes.

Transit facility moves ahead: Council members approved a $15.4 million contract with J.M. Thompson Co. to build the new GTA Transit Operations and Maintenance facility. The facility will be built with about $13 million worth of federal stimulus and transportation funds.

Appeal approved: The city will appeal a judge’s decision that recently voided a 2009 McLeansville annexation, moving  three subdivisions back into the county’s jurisdiction.

 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

jackhartjj

February 16, 2010 - 10:00 pm EST

Then it's real easy, do not let ANY council member make comments during this 'Special' time. And at 30 minutes, get on with business!
This appears to be a very good attempt to discredit Mayor Knight, and it worked.
As to the SCAT riders feeling that they had their rights stomped on...I said it in another LTE reply...do you not have one friend that can take you to a council meeting?

oh good grief

February 16, 2010 - 10:10 pm EST

Has the Council drawn up any "rules" for those 30 minutes of speaking on items not on the agenda for that particular Council meeting?

Will there be 10 speakers allowed 2 minutes each (with 1 minute allocated for walking to and walking away from the podium)?

Will there be 5 speakers allowed 5 minutes each (again with the 1 minute "walking time")?

Does the Council intend to strictly limit the "allotted" time for EACH speaker and how will the time limit be enforced?

Just a suggestion -- get a trapdoor installed in the floor where "from-the-floor-it's-not-on-the-agenda" speakers stand. If the "allotted" time is up and the speaker is still speaking, flip a switch and send the speaker into the bowels of the Jim Melvin Municipal Building.

They can always show back up at the next council meeting to either finish up or expound on their original speech which was so rudely interrupted by the "Greensboro City Council trapdoor maneuver."

Abner Doon

February 16, 2010 - 10:49 pm EST

The "Hartzman Rule" has been overturned.

jackhartjj

February 16, 2010 - 11:20 pm EST

What exactly is 'The Hartzman Rule?"

taxed out

February 17, 2010 - 6:32 am EST

I called SCAT last night. According to a representative from SCAT, they are aware of the concerns surrounding Speakers from the Floor needing to schedule a ride from the meeting. This representative told me that one person representing these folks should call (before the scheduled pickup time) and let them know the meeting is running longer. SCAT will pick up all the folks at the same time and take them home. He also told me that they would be available to pick them all up at one time even if it was after 11:00 pm.

bobiwc

February 18, 2010 - 8:56 am EST

So those same people that get up and speak every week about the same things -- trying to get airtime, trump actual city business. And those that have real items have to show up on time anyway, because it might be 30 minute, 1 hour, or 10 minutes before the real meeting starts. Here's an idea - do speakers from the floor from 5-6pm, but don't start the actual agenda until 6pm. But start it promptly at 6pm.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search