news-record.com

OPINION

1st white attended A&T before sit-ins were staged

Monday, February 15, 2010
(Updated 5:14 am)

— Three years before the 1960 Woolworth sit-ins, Rodney Jaye Miller staged his own sit-down.

A white man, Miller took a seat and opened a textbook in a classroom at previously all-black N.C. A&T.

Unlike the four black A&T students refused service when they sat at the whites-only Woolworth lunch counter, Miller was not asked to leave the university.

He became the first white student to enroll at A&T, which was founded in 1891 for black students. He was also, according to news accounts of the time, the first white student in North Carolina to be admitted to a state-supported black university.

In January 1957, Miller was an engineering student at N.C. State in Raleigh.

He and his then-wife decided to live that summer in Greensboro, their hometown. He planned to work at his parents’ business, but he also wanted to take summer engineering courses available only at A&T.

He applied after he and his wife became friends at St. Benedict’s Catholic Church with two A&T professors. One was black, and the other was from India.

The professors went to A&T’s president (the office is now chancellor), Warmoth Gibbs, who gave his blessing to Miller’s admission.

Miller found A&T students and professors welcoming, his former wife, Elizabeth Sparger Burke, recalls.

“We really didn’t think it was all that big of a deal until the repercussions started,” she says. “We were shocked it caused such an uproar.”

Burke and Miller divorced in 1964. She later remarried but stayed friends with Miller until his death at age 62 in 2002.

The backlash about his admission to A&T came after the local press published a story about Miller’s historic action. The story went nationwide over the news wire services and was mentioned on the “CBS Evening News.”

Burke says the ugly calls and letters invaded the couple’s home. A letter from Mississippi was so threatening the Millers turned it over to the authorities.

“It scared me, and I was mad,” Burke says. “Even back then, I was for equal rights for black people. My husband felt the same way.”

Despite the couple’s beliefs, Burke says Miller’s A&T enrollment wasn’t meant as a moral or political statement. He needed courses; A&T had them.

Miller later returned to N.C. State, but he didn’t graduate. The couple moved back to Greensboro, where Miller worked for the Lennox heating and air-conditioning franchise his family owned. He spent most of his life in that line of work.

Elizabeth Burke, a nurse, worked here for local doctors and later spent 32 years in New York City as an X-ray technician. She now lives in Florida.

The Millers’ son, Eric Miller of Myrtle Beach, S.C., said in an e-mail after the opening of the International Civil Rights Center & Museum, that his father was worthy of public attention for integrating A&T’s student body. (The school did have white professors).

Eric Miller said he has always been proud his father did what few people at the time would have even considered.

Neither A&T nor N.C. State was mentioned in Miller’s obituary. But, his son said, his father’s A&T enrollment was saluted at his funeral.

Elizabeth Burke says she remains politically liberal. Her former husband became a conservative, she says, but his belief in racial equality didn’t waver.

“Looking back,” she says, “I think it was very brave of him to do what he did” 53 years ago.

Contact Jim Schlosser at 601-9879 or beale1@ clearwire.net

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Get A Clue

February 15, 2010 - 7:45 am EST

"Three years before the 1960 Woolworth sit-ins, Rodney Jaye Miller staged his own sit-down."

You spend the rest of your article contradicting your first sentence. The facts show that Mr. Miller simply needed courses and thought little of his enrollment until some angry, misplaced backlash happened. Even then he chose to not allow the actions of a few to color his perceptions of civil rights for all Americans.

I have to ask what Mr. Schlosser's hidden agenda is.

"Unlike the four black A&T students refused service when they sat at the whites-only Woolworth lunch counter, Miller was not asked to leave the university."

Keep reading your own words until you get a clue, Mr. Schlosser.

Panacea

February 15, 2010 - 10:36 am EST

Miller had to have thought of the social implications of attending a black school in the 1950's. I'm sure it must have been nerve wracking to walk onto an all black campus in a time that did everything it could to keep the races separate. It's hard to go out of ones comfort zone.

The article may not have been written as well as you would like. But I wouldn't diminish the importance of Miller's actions simply because you don't like the how the writer wrote.

Get A Clue

February 15, 2010 - 1:17 pm EST

panacea, it was not my intent to dininish Mr. Miller's actions at all. I'm sure he didn't just skip tralala onto campus, look up and wonder why he was the only white guy. ;-)
I got the distinct sense the author's hidden agenda was along the lines of attempting to diminish the lunch counter event's importance with just a tad more window-dressing than our usual racist friends who populate these boards. Fact is, we wouldn't have needed 'all black' anything back then had the all white institutions practiced what our Constitution guarantees. I'm glad Mr. Miller opened the doors he did and for the right reasons. No one should be treated as a second-class citizen at school or at a lunch counter. Period. I'm sure you and I agree on that point.

jstevenh1952

February 15, 2010 - 8:49 am EST

I guess it is the policy of this paper that each "writer" have a story on the Woolworth's sit-ins. Will Karen Neil and Dustin Long be contributing as well?

Its getting pretty boring.

militarybrat

February 15, 2010 - 11:00 am EST

"Unlike the four black A&T students refused service when they sat at the whites-only Woolworth lunch counter ...."

Wheres the real proof it was for whites only and not just a disturbance? Blacks ate at that counter for years in the 50s 60s 70s before it was closed and thats fact so dont buy this crap. Was a complaint ever filed with the owner of the lunch counter? Reverse racism is never discussed but it was much worse and still is. Its called the Karl Marx class struggle doctrine. Contrary to popular belief it was blacks not whites who hated integration and hated being assigned and bused to white schools. Can you blame them? This side is never depicted.

andy_in_nc

February 15, 2010 - 1:06 pm EST

I love the term "reverse racism". That must be where you like somebody because of the color of their skin.

Get A Clue

February 15, 2010 - 1:19 pm EST

Dear Brat,
Did you ever finish that G.E.D., or did they deny the certificate because you couldn't spell it correctly?
;-)

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search