news-record.com

NEWS

LabCorp to add about 350 jobs in Greensboro

Friday, February 12, 2010
(Updated 12:52 pm)

BURLINGTON — Laboratory Corp. of America will consolidate its billing operations in Greensboro, bringing approximately 350 new jobs into the state and transferring up to 50 employees from other locations.

Officials with the Burlington-based LabCorp said they expect to move into an existing building on Pinecroft Road in Greensboro sometime within the next four months. The company has pledged to invest nearly $4 million over the next three years.

Nearly $900,000 in incentives offered by the state, Greensboro and Guilford County did play a part in the company’s decision to relocate in Greensboro’s “urban area,” said LabCorp CEO David King . But other factors played a bigger part.

“The major deciding point was the availability of facilities that would meet the needs of a consolidated national billing center, as well as our perception, based on workforce surveys, that we already employ the vast majority of top flight workers here in Alamance County who would be eligible for these jobs,” King said.

Guilford County, he said, had a larger job pool from which the company could draw.

LabCorp is a national medical laboratory testing services company with about 28,000 employees. The average salary at the Greensboro location is estimated to be about $26,000 per year.

With the state’s economy still struggling, such a major jobs announcement drew accolades from a broad spectrum of government officials, including Gov. Bev Perdue, Rep. Brad Miller, Greensboro Mayor Bill Knight and Guilford County Commissioners Chairman Melvin “Skip” Alston.

“There is no question that the $373,000 (city-granted) incentive was the right thing at the right time for Greensboro,” Knight said. “In fact, this investment will be recouped in five years.”

Guilford County gave $248,000 in incentives.

Cities typically see incentives repaid by boosts in taxes paid by companies and their workers. King said he hoped the company’s investment would repay the government investment sooner than that and added that the billing center could expand in the future.

During her remarks, Perdue characterized the LabCorp deal as an example of “after care,” saying the state needed to tend to homegrown and existing companies to make sure they’re “happy and contented.” The governor also credited Linda Carlisle , a Greensboro businesswoman and volunteer who is now the state Secretary of Cultural Resources, with getting her directly involved in the deal.

In an interview after the official announcement, Carlisle played down her involvement, saying she only made a few phone calls and alerted Perdue to the deal in progress.

“Folks called me and said, 'We’re at a point, we’re really concerned that some other areas may be getting a leg up on this, and we really need an extra nudge on this,” Carlisle said. People working to recruit the project to Greensboro, she said, worried that other locations may have been more aggressively courting LabCorp.

Danville, Va., just north of the North Carolina border, was among the other cities considered by LabCorp.

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

File photo (News & Record)

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Risright

February 11, 2010 - 7:12 pm EST

Good for Greensboro! Way to go economic development people and initiatives that made this possible!

Packfan4life

February 12, 2010 - 3:35 am EST

These are not new jobs. They will be new to Greensboro, but they are closing 24 billing locations and moving them here. Good for Greensboro, bad for the people in 24 other locations. They need to find away to get our factories to move back here. Low corporate taxes in other countries will continue to win the day with companies.

holland4

February 12, 2010 - 8:02 am EST

I take it that you're a glass-half-full sort of person.

Risright

February 12, 2010 - 8:51 am EST

One very simple answer to getting jobs to move back to not only North Carolina but to the US: Eliminate the minimum wage. Then we can compete on the international stage with the developing countries. Is that realistic, probably not, but it is the raw straight forward fact. If a textile or furniture mill came back and said we are prepared to hire 300 people but we can only pay you $5/ hour , however that will allow us to make a quality, competitive product and a reasonable profit, you would have workers lined up outside the factory door wanting those jobs. Oh but the unions would scream bloody murder and would never let it happen. The Unions would rather scarifice any number of new jobs to give up one existing overpriced, uncompetitive job.

awsmview

February 12, 2010 - 10:10 am EST

A common term used for the word UNION. A Group of people working together for the BETTERMENT of the Group, often thru voting. The Democrat and Republican parties are a UNION. A CHURCH could be considered a UNION. A Basket Ball team could be a Union. Just a group of people Working Together for the betterment of the Group.
Even the North Carolina legislature / bills are VOTED ON. Is this not a union !!!!!!!!!!
Why would a union be good for one group and not another ?

Onegianteye

February 12, 2010 - 10:47 am EST

I wish many of our problems could be resolved by those simple answers. However, even a dollar an hour is more than many people make in a day in other countries, so it will still be cheaper to go overseas or hire undocumented workers. And I've met few people or shareholders who understand what "reasonable" profit is, which is why we have too-big-to-fail financial institutions. There was a reason unions formed. They exist where they make sense. And we've seen their bargaining power dwindle as jobs are lost. Nice way to break 'em, eh?

awsmview

February 12, 2010 - 9:19 pm EST

Onegianteye That is a pretty Brazen comment (hire undocumented workers) to make on a public form.You can't possible be suggesting that employers intentionally break State and Federal Laws. Execs caught with illegal workers have no idea what ICE will do to them or ask of their company. Sometimes the agency brings civil charges and other times criminal ones. Sometimes top-level executives are arrested and charged,while other times ICE charges lower-level managers, owners also are dragged into court. Often, the penalties are in the millions of dollars. A example Wal Mart Stores Inc. agreed to an $11 million civil settlement in March 2005. All for "reasonable" profits.

AirDoc

February 14, 2010 - 12:34 pm EST

awsm - not sure what point you are trying to make. Obviously the possible legal ramifications you mentioned of hiring undocumented workers is not enough to discourage such practices, as seen by the fact that illegals are still employed everywhere you look. If you want to call that suggestion brazen, then look at other entries on this site and you will see many such comments. In this comment section, readers can share thoughts and suggestions to almost anything. Thanks for mentioning what can happen to a company that hires illegals, but it is very clear that enforcement of such laws are unbelievably lax.

awsmview

February 14, 2010 - 2:05 pm EST

Air Doc - You can't be suggesting that ALL Americans should pick and choose what State and Federal laws they wish to Obey, follow, only because they are unbelievably lax in enforcing ?

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search