news-record.com

NEWS

Local lawmakers rake in the cash

Sunday, February 7, 2010
(Updated 3:00 am)

RALEIGH — Greensboro-area lawmakers reported flush campaign coffers in reports filed with the State Board of Elections Friday, although at least two local incumbents will likely have to file corrections to their reports.

With the three-week filing period for the 2010 elections due to open Monday, the News & Record reviewed campaign finance reports filed by local incumbents at the General Assembly.

Rep. Pricey Harrison was the most prolific fundraiser among local House members in 2009. The Greensboro Democrat reported raising $64,755.53 in the last six months of the year and had $108,368.75 to begin 2010. All of that came with just one contribution from a political action committee, the Democratic Women of Guilford County.

“I have a particular problem with the level of influence of campaign money on the debate over issues at the legislature,” Harrison said, adding that the influence of campaign cash had harmed the prospects of environmental legislation she had backed in the past.

Harrison said she has a self-imposed prohibition on taking money from committees associated with corporate or other interest groups.

“It lets me feel a little more liberated when I vote,” she said.

On the Senate side, Republican Phil Berger led the way, reporting he raised $119,295 in the last half of 2009. Berger is his party’s leader in the Senate, so it’s not unusual to see him collect contributions from across the state, which he then uses to help other GOP campaigns.

Aside from Harrison, almost any local lawmaker who raised a significant amount of money saw political action committees give to their account.

Duke Energy, Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Bank of America and various medical and development related interests were all common givers.

Rep. Earl Jones, a Greensboro Democrat, raised only $3,000 in the last half of 2009, $1,700 of that from individuals with ties to the video sweepstakes businesses.

Jones has been a vocal proponent of regulating and returning video gambling to a clearly legal status in the state.

Although stand-alone video poker machines were outlawed in 2006, a slightly different form of video-based gaming has operated

here since. Jones argues lawmakers should give the games full legal sanction and tax them.

“They have a legitimate interest in being regulated,” Jones said. “Really, to me, they’re exercising their First Amendment rights.”

Two local lawmakers will likely have to file corrections with the board of elections.

Rep. Hugh Holliman’s reports suggest he took amounts over the limits set by law. For example, Holliman reported a $4,000 contribution from the UNC booster PAC Citizens for Higher Education, but an additional notation showed that it was part of $15,000 he had received from the group during the campaign cycle — far more than $4,000 per election candidates can collect.

“We’re very careful and we don’t collect more than we’re supposed to,” Holliman said, chalking the too-high total up to a software error.

Rep. Harold Brubaker, an Asheboro Republican, did not sufficiently report how he spent $21,386.85 .

Brubaker’s two reports detailing transactions in 2009 show 13 different payments to credit card issuer Capitol One. The payments are given labels such as “legislative conference expense” or “issue overview and opinion research,” but do not detail specifically where the money is spent as required by state law.

“He’ll be ask to provide the actual vendor,” said Kim Westbrook Strach, a deputy director at the State Board of Elections who oversees campaign finance matters. That request will likely come when the board audits Brubaker’s committee.

Brubaker said Friday he thought his campaign had been reporting the spending correctly, but will be happy to furnish whatever information was requested.

“Nobody explained that to me,” said the former House speaker. “We can break it down any way they want it.”

 

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com

 

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Interested

February 7, 2010 - 6:46 am EST

In light of recent stories concerning real estate developers donations, their interests, and their connection to Mike Easley, it seems like an area that might warrant more than just a cursory look.

I would also suggest that writing off large donations merely because a candidate is high up the political totem pole, and therefore able to attract contributions from across the state, is a little cavalier. Don't you suppose that this was the initial assumption with Mr. Easley and Mr. Black when they first began collecting large sums? And isn't that just the sort of contribution you should be concerned with - "this candidate is powerful, perhaps he can help me in the future?" That is not to say that I suspect Mr. Berger of any shenanigans, merely that turning a blind eye simply because a candidate is some sort of party powerhouse left the door open for others in the past to abuse our trust.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search