GREENSBORO — Parents and community members continue to hammer home with school officials their support for law enforcement officers in schools.
Several people told the Guilford County Board of Education on Thursday night that teachers and principals need school resource officers.
Lisa Clapp, who has two children in Guilford County Schools, said students who commit crimes at schools should be considered real threats. She warned the board to forget any idea of replacing school resource officers with private security guards.
“That is like putting a cocker spaniel as a guard dog,” Clapp said.
The school board met with representatives from the sheriff’s office and High Point and Greensboro police departments to discuss school officers and the use of stun guns by those officers. The board is split over the stun gun issue, and some board members have expressed concerns about the use of officers.
Groups opposing stun guns and school officers have lobbied the board in recent months, but it was only those in support who spoke Thursday night.
Other than the public comment, the school board did not take up the issue during the meeting.
In other business, the board very quickly reviewed a proposal to change policies that govern how it lays off employees.
The proposed policy change shifts the process away from a focus on seniority and places more emphasis on what positions the superintendent deems most necessary.
The board gave the policy initial approval, allowing it to be made available for public comment.
Board member Darlene Garrett, who sits on the committee that develops policy and procedures for the district, said she doesn’t think many people are aware of the proposed changes.
She said the committee took up revising the policy because it became clear it was outdated during the budget process last year, when the district faced a shortfall.
“It’s looking like it will be another bad year,” Garrett said.
The school board did not use the policies last year.
Positions were eliminated, but officials found jobs within the district for those employees who requested one. However, many annual contracts were not renewed.
Vice Chairman Amos Quick supported putting the policy out for comment but said he does not know enough yet about the policy to say whether he will support it.
Quick said he received several phone calls from people who had concerns about the policy change, but he said he was not able to get their specific concerns.
The board likely will take the policy up again next month.
Contact J. Brian Ewing at 373-7351 or brian.ewing@news-record.com
Not all of the newspaper's content appears online.
*There is a fee for downloading some older articles.