news-record.com

OPINION

Editorial: State deserved better

Wednesday, January 27, 2010
(Updated 4:05 am)

Last week's 64-page federal indictment of Ruffin Poole contains a bracing note of irony:

"On November 8, 2005, the Governor gave a speech in which he proposed making the state's ethics regulations stricter ... ."

Poole, an attorney who served as then-Gov. Mike Easley's top aide, was using his powerful position for his own benefit, according to charges of extortion, bribery and other crimes listed in the indictment.

A lawyer for Easley said the former governor "has no knowledge of the conduct that makes up the criminal allegations" against Poole.

Poole, who began his career in government working for Easley in the Attorney General's Office, later became known as the governor's "go-to guy" or "the little governor." Easley himself told people, "If you need something, talk to Ruffin."

Did they ever. The indictment alleges that certain developers, who also gave political support to Easley, often turned to Poole for help getting state permits quickly. They returned the favors, letting him in on lucrative investments, giving him gifts, taking him on expensive trips.

"If there was any doubt before today that North Carolina state government was for sale, that question's been put to rest with this 51-count indictment," former political operative Joe Sinsheimer told WRAL News in Raleigh.

There wasn't much doubt, as Sinsheimer knew. He was one of the first to point to corruption by former N.C. House Speaker Jim Black, now in federal prison.

Questions now focus on Easley's involvement. He remains under investigation by George Holding, the federal prosecutor who led the Poole probe.

Given Easley's hands-off approach to governing, it's not impossible he had little knowledge of Poole's activities. He didn't seem to know about the state's dysfunctional mental-health system or its faulty probation and parole system.

Yet, he apparently received favors from some of the same benefactors who were so generous to Poole.

Of course, ignorance is a damning indictment of its own. Among many other charges, Poole is accused of denying the people of North Carolina, who paid his salary, the right to receive honest service. Easley, as Poole's close and direct supervisor, should have made sure his top aide was working every day for the public's benefit. Was the governor so oblivious to these alleged activities?

The indictment notes that, on April 14, 2008, the governor granted Poole a state service award and congratulated him for providing "a true example of the best of North Carolina." Another irony.

The charges against Poole have not been proved in court. No charges have been brought against Easley. But, no matter where this case leads, it will speak volumes about the former governor's character that he would hold up his "go-to guy" for political supporters seeking favors as "the best of North Carolina."

North Carolina deserved much better.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Fred

January 27, 2010 - 6:44 am EST

There's corruption in State Government? I'm shocked!
Next someone will claim there is also corruption in county and city government.

Unaffiliated

January 27, 2010 - 7:55 am EST

Not only corruption but some elected officials locally in Guilford spread vicious rumors ( to win ) about their opponents and the voters do not ask the right questions before voting. Many candidates in the November, 2009 election were voted out because they "did the right thing" and followed the rules. Check out the final Board of Elections reports when they are posted and compare the contributors to favors already being given to these supporters. Voters: Wake up and do your homework .

Interested

January 27, 2010 - 7:23 am EST

It sounds like Easley suffered from a case of "willful blindness." Enough corruption cases swirled around NC for Easley to call for tougher ethics standards; it never occurred to him to look at how so many of his supporters were getting what they needed and how his go-to-guy accomplished what he did?

tonymo

January 27, 2010 - 11:39 am EST

Where were you folks while all of this was going on? The Carolina Journal, the only publication in the state that actually understands the purpose for their existence, to watch government. So long as he had a D in front of his name, and was in office you almost completely ignored his ongoinc corrupt acts!

It was the same thing with Edwards. He was the darling of the "progressives," and the liberal media waited as long as possible to tell the truth about that Charlatan!

Your publication is now insisting on calling Kay Hagan a "moderate!" If Hagan is a moderate then so is Ann Coulter!

marcusk

January 27, 2010 - 12:44 pm EST

Someone help refresh my memory.. did the News and Record endorse Easley both times he ran for Governor?

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search