news-record.com

OPINION

Leonard Pitts Jr.: True faith doesn't fit on a rifle

Monday, January 25, 2010
(Updated 3:00 am)

Have you heard about the Jesus rifles?

ABC News broke the story last week. It seems there was this fellow named Glyn Bindon, who used weapons of war to speak for his faith.

Bindon, who lost his life in a 2003 plane crash, was the founder of Trijicon, a Michigan company that has a $600 million contract to provide gun sights to the U.S. military. Apparently he had a policy, which survived him, of inscribing coded references to Bible verses on the gun sights he manufactured for high-powered rifles used by U.S. service personnel. So that, for instance, one sight is marked, 2COR4:6, i.e., 2 Corinthians 4:6: "God said, 'Let light shine out of darkness.' He made his light shine in our hearts. It shows us the light of God's glory in the face of Christ."

Tom Munson, a Trijicon executive, told ABC there was nothing wrong or illegal about the inscriptions and noted pointedly that the issue was being raised by a group (presumably meaning the Muslims who have complained) that is "not Christian." On Thursday, the company agreed to discontinue the practice.

Still, Munson's remarks deserve a riposte. Here it is:

In the first place, the gun sights actually seem a clear violation of a regulation specifically prohibiting service personnel from proselytizing in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In the second place, the revelation is a fresh embarrassment for the United States, which has labored for nine years to convince the Muslim world that it is not leading a Christian crusade against Islam.

In the third place, the coded scriptural references provided a recruiting tool to warlords and terrorists who could truthfully tell followers they were being shot at by Jesus guns.

In the fourth place, Munson's airy dismissal of his critics as "not Christian" (e.g., we can ignore them) speaks volumes about the smug, insular fundamentalism at work here.

In the fifth place, there is a rather jarring cognitive disconnect involved in seeing weapons of war used to lionize the prince of peace.

And finally, in the sixth place: Is this not one of the cheesiest expressions of religious faith you've ever seen? Not that that would make it unique. On the contrary, we specialize in cheesy expressions of faith here in God's favorite country. Indeed, you could build a tower unto heaven itself out of all the roadside Jesuses, prayer cloths, Ten Commandments rocks and other trinkets of a cheap, disposable faith that says nothing, costs nothing, does nothing, risks nothing, that speaks not of God, external and eternal, but only of the grubby, temporal perspectives and fears of ground-bound women and men.

Last November, the University of Chicago published a study quantifying the blazingly obvious: People tend to create God in their own image, to ascribe to the deity their own opinions, interests and beliefs. But is that really faith, when you reduce God to a bigger version of you?

Mother Teresa's faith drove her to foreswear material riches and spend half a century working to uplift the wretched poor of Calcutta.

Martin Luther King's faith drove him to gamble his very life in a dangerous campaign to win human and civil rights for African American people.

And then there's Glyn Bindon, whose faith led him to inscribe coded Bible verses on his gun sights.

The point is not that he or we can do what Martin Luther King did or be who Mother Teresa was -- we all suffer in that comparison. No, the point is that truest faith is not seen in a secret code on a gun sight, a trinket from a store or words on a rock. Rather, faith is seen in the substance of a life lived in service to others, lived as if God were not in fact one's personal echo chamber in the sky.

I submit that this is the only kind of faith that matters. And that it speaks for itself.

Leonard Pitts Jr. is a columnist for the Miami Herald. Send e-mail to him at lpitts@miamiherald.com.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Get A Clue

January 25, 2010 - 6:58 am EST

"Thou shalt not kill."
Four simple words.
No exceptions.
I invite a self-proclaimed Christian to justify the use of Bible verses on gun sights for U.S. military use.

jstevenh1952

January 25, 2010 - 9:37 am EST

Let's see Clue, we issue the military weapons to attack our enemies or defend us from them, and you want "thou shalt not kill" on them? But just the Christian ones? Only the Christian faith believes in the sanctity of life?

Why is it that the name of Jesus Christ so angers folks like yourself and Pitts?

Get A Clue

January 25, 2010 - 10:19 am EST

I'll type slower this time in hopes that you'll be able to keep up. ;-)

The Bible clearly states, without exception, "Thou shalt not kill."
Never mind the fact that Bible references are being printed on weapons designed exclusively to take a human life.
I'm asking a Christian to explain to me their reasons, with Biblical references (as I have done), where the taking of a human life is justified. I've studied the Bible and have yet to find any asterisks or footnotes or addemdums to the 10 Commandments.
If you can't do that, jstevenh1952, then kindly save your spittle for someone else. But thanks for playing.

Badgolfer1

January 25, 2010 - 12:39 pm EST

Numbers 35:16 on for a few verses seems to say capital punishment is okay. That might be an exception to not killing.

LinTX

January 25, 2010 - 12:56 pm EST

The ten commandments do say "Thou shalt not kill" but it doesn't refer to war. It means intentional murder with malice. Like just going to your neighbors house and killing them. But God did indeed order the Israelites to war in the bible (1 Samuel 15:3; Joshua 4:13). He also ordered the death penalty (Exodus 21:12, 15; 22:19; Leviticus 20:11). We may not like war but it is often necessary to defeat an evil force. So I say God isn't against war and Jesus would never defy or argue against the Father. Also if you think about it the second coming of Christ is going to be the war of all wars (Revelation 19:11-21)! It will be quite violent. I pray I am not here to witness it and that God takes me home to be with Him prior..but it is going to be something! Trust me when I say Jesus is NOT a pacifist. War is always a result of sin, but as Ecclesiastes 3:8 says, there is a time for everything. Even war.

dcolin

January 25, 2010 - 3:36 pm EST

I feel better already.
Amen

jstevenh1952

January 25, 2010 - 1:22 pm EST

Thank you, there are many more scriptures as well. As I said, why does the name of Jesus Christ so infurriate you that you would seek to consistently challenge the faith and scriptures of those that believe. You mention Christians as your point. What your pointning to is Jewish scriptures. Scriptures that are part of both Christians and Jews. These commandaments were handed down from God to the Jews though Moses (a Jew) his messenger. Are you as angry or cynical towards the Jews? Or is it as I stated earlier, is it that the name of Jesus Christ is what you want to stop. Please say you have something more than just your hate towards Christians as the validation of your anger. Do you?

Get A Clue

January 25, 2010 - 3:18 pm EST

jstevenh1952, all your friends did the heavy lifting for you; you could at least thank them for actually answering my question.
One reason I did not open my question to Jews is because supposedly Jesus the Christ gave us the New Testament, or New Covenant as it is called by some. I know how the Jewish handle what only Christians call the Old Testament. Israel's brief history is rife with examples of their disrespect for life.
What I did learn (for the umpteenth time, by the way) is that Christians (those who responded) demonstrated by their own words that the verses of the Bible are, in fact, open to interpretation, discussion, disagreement and even nuance. That Christians can read the same passage and come away with completely different interpretations and that both can find other verses to support their own interpretations.
You'd think something written in the hand of God would be a tad more clear, wouldn't you?

Thanks for playing, everyone. ;-)

LinTX

January 25, 2010 - 5:26 pm EST

Get A Clue, I just want to be sure I understand that you are a non believer? If so, I understand because God gave us freewill to believe whatever we want..you included. He wants His people to willingly worship him. With that having been said, often times the bible would seem to be open for interpretation to those that do not believe. But to believers it is pretty plain because we have the Holy Spirit living in us to guide us and help us to understand what the non believer can not. But you have to willingly seek His word.
I believe that Jesus didn’t come to rid us of the law (The Old Testament) but instead to fulfill the law. The laws are written on the hearts of the believer and we strive to do what is right. But that darn flesh tends to get us. So we are to still to follow the commandments. We still need rules which lead us to Christ and help us discern the truth. If you are a non believer then you won’t understand these things. Christians are not perfect...just forgiven (taken from a bumper sticker).
As for the scripture on the sights, the military didn’t do it. The man who owned the manufacturing plant took it upon himself to put the scriptures there and they have been around for several decades now. He was a believer and this was his way of praising God. It isn’t considered proselytizing either. That is the act of attempting to convert people to another opinion and, particularly, another religion. Few people even knew it was there so I don’t see how that is proselytizing.

Get A Clue

January 25, 2010 - 6:19 pm EST

Thanks, but I'll use sources a bit deeper than bumper stickers to guide my life. I'll include myths, because it would be foolish to discount useful information simply because it was made up. Stories have proved quite beneficial throught recorded history in helping us become better people.

Panacea

January 25, 2010 - 7:27 pm EST

OK, you have a point in that I can't see Scripture printed on a gun sight as proslytizing.

It's still in incredibly poor taste. Pitts other comments are right on the money.

countryboy

January 25, 2010 - 10:03 pm EST

Not to split hairs with clueless....(I actually agree with SOME of Pitts points) but the proper Hebrew interpretation of "kill" is "murder". So yes...there are exceptions...which has nothing to do with the article...but that never stops clueless.

JGALT

January 25, 2010 - 7:04 am EST

I hope the bullets from those guns find their targets early and often.

jstevenh1952

January 25, 2010 - 9:30 am EST

Why does the N&R buy this guys column? I have never read a more progressive, anti-Christian individual than that o Pitts. I guess they just do it to prop up their progressive-liberal point of view. Does this guy have a life? People that love him? I don't get it?

Get A Clue

January 25, 2010 - 10:20 am EST

You answered your own question...with a question, but still....;-)

Panacea

January 25, 2010 - 7:29 pm EST

Anti-Christian?? Dude, you need to reread your own Bible. Pitts is shaking his head in sadness at the idea that so called Christians think it is OK to put Scripture on a gun sight. I think it is blasphemous.

dcolin

January 25, 2010 - 10:56 am EST

"God save me from your followers"

Gymnaseum

January 25, 2010 - 4:02 pm EST

If the military secretly (or not so secretly) feels that revving up the fundy Christian troops to kill fundy Muslims is a good tactic, with the result that the country is to them safer, then I am not surprised. I suspect many more reasonable and tolerant Christians would be so offended if they were given such sights they'd refuse to use them.

Next step: little fish insignia as sights.

LinTX

January 25, 2010 - 5:29 pm EST

The scripture on the sights, the military didn’t do it. The man who owned the manufacturing plant took it upon himself to put the scriptures there and they have been around for several decades now...not many people even knew they were there. He was a believer and this was his way of praising God. I'd tell you to take it up with him but he died.

Jeramy

January 26, 2010 - 12:01 pm EST

I find it amazing how many people will argue in favor of everyones religious freedoms, except when it differs from thier own. If that was what the owner of the company wants to do he has every right to do so and if the US military has issue with it then they could have purchased the sights from someone else. When did people forget that this is a free country, if thats how he choose to show his religious beliefs then more power to him.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Mobile
  • Social
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search