news-record.com

NEWS

Tenants oppose evictions at apartment complex

Sunday, January 17, 2010
(Updated 3:00 am)

GREENSBORO — Tenants of a church-affiliated housing complex allege they were evicted because some of them petitioned the manager to resign and questioned how a HUD-backed loan was spent.

The management at J.T. Hairston Memorial Apartments, owned by a nonprofit board from Shiloh Baptist Church, put out six families in December, some for failing to pay for repairs ranging from $82.09 to a broken mini-blind that cost $10.35.

In the case of a tenant and his fiancee with nine children, the apartment was padlocked, according to neighbors, and the furniture and children’s clothing put on the sidewalk.

Mary Mims, chairwoman of the nonprofit board that owns the complex, said property manager Westminster Co. followed the rules.

“I’m very comfortable with the way Westminster applies the regulations,” said Mims, a member of Shiloh Baptist Church, which built the complex in 1968 and later formed a separate nonprofit to run it. “We have HUD regulations. We have to comply with them.”

Magistrate H.L. Mebane Jr., who signed the orders of possession Nov. 25, declined to comment, saying he did not recall the cases because he had heard thousands of matters since.

Speaking generally, Mebane said subsidized housing, in which tenants pay on a sliding scale and some live rent-free, can require tenants to be evicted if they do not pay for repairs within 30 days.

“Technically, that is a breach of their lease agreement,” the magistrate said. “It is not like other types of rental housing.”

An attorney at Legal Aid agreed that those receiving Section 8 rental assistance and public housing tenants are subject to more rules than private sector tenants. But Janet McAuley Blue said federal housing rules that govern the vouchers in a housing community such as J.T. Hairston also provide greater protections to tenants.

“I would say there is a higher threshold (for evictions),” said Blue, a managing attorney in the local office. “The regulations spell out, to a certain extent, what the landlord can evict the tenant for.”

In June and again on Nov. 25, a property site manager from Westminster Co., which manages the 108-unit complex across from Smith Homes, took a series of tenants to small claims court on lease violations.

The cases taken out by manager Stephanie Ridge stated that the tenants failed to reimburse the landlord for repairs within 30 days, constituting a “serious violation of the lease agreement.”

In the case of Kia Pair of 1208-D Orchard St., the repair was a $10.35 mini-blind. Pair did not appear in court.

For Quintelle Mitchell, the damages came to $68.54, including touch-up paint and drip-pans under the stove burners. Likewise, Keoshea Gee was evicted for failure to repay $42.59 for mini-blinds and drip pans.

“Me and my kids were homeless for Christmas,” Gee, a full-time student at GTCC who has four children, said last week. “I’m homeless now, staying with friends and different family.”

When Gee tried to repay the money at Hairston’s office, she said she was told it was too late. Gee said she does not understand why she was evicted. She said she was only home at night, in time to go to bed.

LaTonya Stimpson, who has appealed her case to District Court and faces a Feb. 1 eviction, alleges the evictions are retribution for a petition the residents circulated calling for the property manager to resign, along with residents’ services coordinator Twana Chavis.

“I’m the one who drew up the petition,” said Stimpson, a single mother of four. “Not only did I sign it.”

At the management office, Ridge referred questions to Westminster’s corporate office. Senior vice president Leah Lyerly said the filing of court papers was automatic, and had nothing to do with retribution.

“They know what they owe. We file on everybody who owes,” she said. “If they owe $1, we file.”

Regional Property Manager Ron Cagno said he has not been given the petition, in which residents listed a series of grievances. For example:

l Visitors were not allowed after 10 p.m., according to residents, and their cars have been towed from the complex.

l The management is adopting a plan next month to require that tenants get photo ID cards, and announcing housekeeping inspections whether or not tenants are at home.

l A $4.7 million rehab completed in 2008 with a FHA-backed refinance loan guaranteed by HUD did not provide a playground for children.

Mims said Friday that, in general, rule changes at Hairston have been designed to help tenants in a neighborhood bordering a high-crime area at Freeman Mill Road and Florida Street.

She said basketball courts had been removed from the complex following complaints from the community’s elderly. The decision not to include a playground in the rehab was, Cagno said, a safety issue.

Mims agreed: “The older kids come in and take over. It turns into a hangout for teenagers and young adults.”

 

Contact Lorraine Ahearn at 373-7334 or lorraine.ahearn@news-record.com

 

Accompanying Photos

Jerry Wolford (News & Record)

Photo Caption: Iris Austin (left) and her children, Dalaysha Warren, 10, and Shuron Miller, 13, find their furniture and belongings on the street Jan. 5 after the family was evicted from its Marsh Street apartment at Smith Homes.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Yoda

January 17, 2010 - 7:23 am EST

To manage these kind of apartments you have to be heartless (In their minds). Leah Lyerly and Ron Cagno are two of the best. I know both of them. I have seen when it comes to money or someone proves them wrong out comes the ruthlessness. I have seen where things have been manufactured against a resident to make the case to get them out. I have seen where the truth as been twisted if not void completely to make their case. Leah's remarks about court papers being filed automatic is untrue. The charging people is fairly new or the enforcing of them paying the bill. Them requiring payment is only about 3-5 years old, that's not long in comparison to how long they been managing apartments and many aren't made to pay. Ron Cagno stating he hasn't been given the petition might not be true, he's been known in the pass either delay or even denies receiving paper work if he knew they were going to end up in court. The basketball courts being done away with for safety reasons isn't necessarily true either. I have seen them take them down when there was no problem with them being there, they assumed it might cause a problem. Yes these people more than likly owe these damages, but I have known many times where people have owe for damages and it never went to court. Those that owe were allow to pay small amounts each month or not made to pay at all. These two mentioned here will do whats needed to win in court.

divotmom2002

January 17, 2010 - 12:38 pm EST

So do you not think they were giving plenty of time to get them money to them? A company can not come in an evict someone over night~

Get Over It

January 17, 2010 - 3:36 pm EST

Questioning why people have children is stupid. What should be questioned is did the tenants pay during the 30 day time period they where given and was the rights violated for the tenants?

While many people have rules that are created the management company needs to sit back and review are they doing what is best for their tenants or are they creating a more negative environment.

What I would like to read is more information about the over 4 million dollar grant and why these tenants and children do not have the equipment that the was suppose to be purchased with the grant money?

Where is the grant application and details?

This is 2010 and we have a church that is not supporting the families that have been put out with CHILDREN!
I hope that if anyone that is a member of this church is not supporting these families that GOD will take care of them. IF I was a member of this church I would be asking questions and waiting to hear when a special called meeting was going to take place for the church members and the tenants to GET ANSWERS!!!

I will continue to pray for everyone involved and hope that this negative situation is RESOLVED soon children have to attend school, children have to get a education, children have to be focused and need a home to do so!

Unfortunately the children will have to suffer and hopefully in the future any judicial personnel will review and read the paperwork and what makes since verse just signing documentation just to say they are following the law.

COMMON SENSE and what is right must come into play!

Jacked Rabbit

January 17, 2010 - 11:35 am EST

I'd like to take this moment to thank my parents for telling me to stay in school, make something of myself and teaching me about contraception. now as for the grievances... is safety not a priority for these people? you chose to live in the projects and oh my God, i can't believe there are rules for living in the projects! 10 p.m. seems like a reasonable time to be out of the neighbor"hood" if you don't live there. hell, i wouldn't go through there at noon. if they did put in a playground, the local gangs would hang out, drink, do drugs and probably leave various things like broken glass and what not lying around. what if one of them ditched their illegal weapon on the playground? your kid finds it, shoots another kid and guess who gets sued? and as for the housekeeping checks... there are other complexes that require this and it helps not only for safety issues but in terms of folks cleaning up after themselves. but hey, what do i know right? I don't have 2,3,4 or 9 kids living in the hood thinking the local government and the world owes me something.

divotmom2002

January 17, 2010 - 12:41 pm EST

Totally agree~ You would think if they were getting free or close to free housing they could get there self to the health department and get some FREE BIRTH CONTROL! If you can't afford to feed, clothe and provide a warm safe enviroment for them then you need to prevent yourself from getting pregant!!!

newsTime

January 17, 2010 - 2:07 pm EST

They need to be sterilized if they are on welfare. This will prevent more babies that the tax payers have to support. Over population is one of this countries (the usa) and the worlds biggest problems. They are a burden to society. Food stamps, section 8 housing, free or low rent , free medical care, free or low cost transportation, free or low cost phone service, earned income credit on their federal tax returns, ect. The cost for welfare is huge. Many of them refuse to get off welfare because they live better that way and if they work then their standard of living will be lower. If they get a job the welfare payments stop. Poverty is a bad cycle. The government actually weakens most of these people because welfare gives most of them no incentive or ambition in life to be productive and self supporting citizens. They make more money from welfare by having more babies. What sense does that make ?

tledford

January 17, 2010 - 8:52 pm EST

Maybe people should be sterilized because they're stupid. That way, in ten to twenty years there would be no Republicans!

:-D

josieb

January 18, 2010 - 9:08 am EST

How much do you want to bet that the tenants voted for Obama?

Panacea

January 18, 2010 - 10:34 am EST

Are you the reincarnation of Adolph Hitler?

Bystander2

January 17, 2010 - 5:14 pm EST

As a person who has worked with Section 8 properties and tenants, as well as the US Department of HUD, I can tell you that the comments posted on this article illustrate exactly the problem with the Section 8 program and what is leading to its downfall. Section 8 sponsored apartments and homes were always meant as a “stepping stone”, if you will, for people who need temporary help with a place to live. They were NEVER intended to be permanent homes for generations of families. There seems to be a misplaced sense of entitlement somehow. I own my home. If my blinds get broken, or I need something repaired or replaced, I have to pay for it. Immediately. Yes, it is extremely sad when people are evicted from their homes. However, eviction from a property like this is a process. It does not happen immediately or “overnight”. It probably took 60 to 90 days or more. If these people came home to find their things on the sidewalk, I can guarantee it was not a surprise. Sadly, if the tenants, owners and management put as much energy into supporting their community and making it better instead of pointing fingers, we would all be better off. The writer of this article makes the apartment managers out to be the bad guys, throwing innocent folks out in the street. I would be willing to wager there’s more to each one of those stories. I would also bet that every tenant at the property had an opportunity to look at and comment on plans for any HUD sponsored rehab projects that were done, including whether a playground would be added or not.

Jacked Rabbit

January 17, 2010 - 6:34 pm EST

so why not have a 4 year time limit with no excuses? that should be more than enough time to save up and get out. hell, lets go ahead and make it an even 5 years. thats enough time to go to GTCC and get an associates degree in something and find a job that probably starts you off at $8-12 an hour. assuming you don't act up and get fired, 3 more years of saving should be able to get you up and out. I know it may be hard for some not to crank out a kid a year like clock work but if they are really focused on getting out... thats how you do it.

lth11

January 17, 2010 - 5:30 pm EST

It is inhumane to throw people & children out of their apartments into the freezing cold and lock their apartment doors behind them. Their personal belongings being thrown to the curb is yet another violation. If everyone that owed $10 to $80 dollars were to be thrown out in the cold then even the middle class, educated and the wealthy would be locked out in the cold as well. Anyone operating and managing an apartment complex should show compassion as well as fairness (not racism & greed). Why so many rules for these tenants? No visitors after 10 pm or their cars will be towed, photo IDs of tenants and inspections unannounced... it sounds more like a prison then a place to live. Maybe those people that were kicked out are better off. It sounds like the management wanted to throw some people out in the cold and that is just plain wrong! This is the most asinine thing that I have heard about lately. If you find yourself facing difficult financial times the last thing that you need is to be treated like this! And by the way there is nothing wrong with a basketball court it helps to create community, team building skills and it helps kids to stay out of trouble. I just hope and pray that the people that were kicked out find nice new places to live where they can be treated with respect. Hopefully the negative media attention and the voices of the community will send a strong message to the people responsible that this was an unjust way to go about business. Treating people the way that you would like to be treated is a golden rule.

yyke

January 17, 2010 - 8:43 pm EST

Look you jacked rabbit, there are no gangs and in case you don't know J.T Hairston Homes are not the projects they are project based apartments. Lots of people who resides here work, pay rent , and are well educated. We are well mannered people. We are not all single parents,some of us are married.You don't know a damn thing,who are you to judge anyone, last I recalled that is GODS job. He blessed us with these children and they are not mistakes . GOD does not make mistakes. They would not be here if they were not meant to be. People do work there way from the bottom to the top.I DON'T LOOK DOWN ON NO ONE HERE. One day you may fall and not get back up,so I advise you to choose your words wisely and stop judging people cause you don't know there story!

countryboy

January 18, 2010 - 8:37 am EST

My only question....since this is an entity of Shiloh Baptist Church, are they providing free financial counseling to these tenents as part of their ministry?

MelvaLFlorance

January 21, 2010 - 6:15 pm EST

I find it interesting that most of the comments are a direct attack on the residents who have chosen to speak out. This could not have been easy for them, displaying their pain and “embarrassment” to basically the world. Most people lack the ability to stand up for themselves in the presence of people they know, love or have some type of relationship. People living in low income communities “the projects” tend to keep to themselves because the “mainstream” has never had a problem making their feelings here – so the messages printed here are not a surprise. The abusive language, ignorant biases, and blatant personal attacks reflect the prejudices that perpetuate the “status quo” in Greensboro, NC. Chronicling Greensboro's civil rights history or even the history of racism and discrimination in the US is pointless. If by 2010 you don't get it there is no point in wasting my time.
What bothers me about this situation is these are the same issues Greensboro struggled with in the ten years leading up to November 3, 1979. (For those of you who don’t know look it up) Issues of particular concern in poor communities: Housing conditions not fit for habitation, and unwillingness on behalf of landlords to make repairs, negligent/lack of enforcement of the housing code, lack of adequate legislation to protect against unscrupulous landlords, Use of redevelopment as a tool to destroy viable communities without consulting residents, forcing many out of redeveloped communities then building new residences unaffordable for the prior residents.
These women have spoken out about their treatment and reached out for help. They tell a tale of victimization and predatory practices that even someone with no clue about the law knows is unfair. They have detailed accounts of abuses of power, breaches of trust and outright usury that may not explain how they found themselves in J.T. Hairston Memorial Apartments, but it does explain why they felt like they had to take it. J.T. Hairston Memorial Apartments were founded “to provide, on a nonprofit basis, housing for low and moderate income families, and families displaced from renewal areas as a result of governmental action, where no adequate housing exists for such groups, pursuant to Section 221 (d)(3) of the National Housing Act, as amended.” So the idea that the residents have a sense of entitlement…to some degree may be valid, because this community was founded SPECIFICALLY for the people who came before them.
There is a larger social issue at stake, and history has a way of repeating itself. These issues were presented in 1969 and were wrestled with and culminated in a gunfight. Too many people lost their lives in an effort to protect the fundamental American right. Living in an under resourced community does not automatically nullify your American Citizenship. Too many people know this happens and “…turn the other cheek….” This is contrary to the very foundation of the Constitution. It is the responsibility of those who can do something about injustice to do something about injustice. One of the incorporators of J. T. Hairston Memorial Homes was Ezell Blair, Sr. the father of Ezell Blair, Jr. one of the Greensboro Four. Ezell Blair, Sr. taught his son how to stand up to injustice and he grew up to change the world. Sadly, Greensboro, NC is a harsh and unforgiving place and he had to move away to build a fruitful life for himself and his family. Unable to move away, David Richmond lived hard and died “early”. Greensboro never forgave him for rocking the boat.

New to social justice issues these women are not "poor" helpless people living in poverty. They are tough resilient women who just need a hand finding there way around unfamiliar territory. I applaud them.

StyxPix

January 25, 2010 - 4:42 pm EST

The comments in favor of these free loaders is unbelievable to me. First off I find it very hard to believe that these people who were evicted did not have the money to pay for the repairs which they knew they would be responsible to pay when they signed their lease and moved in, second it is not up to these residents to decide how the non profit spends the money it receives in the form of grants, donations or other assistance. The owners of the complex have a duty to protect their investment and their property and a duty to do so in the most fiscally responsible way possible. This also includes evicting persons who do not abide their legal lease agreement as well as conducting yearly, monthly or even weekly inspections of the units with reasonable notice provided to the tenant.

An additional point of fact is how this story was written. These people were not simply thrown out on their butts as the writer wants readers to think. There are several courses of action that take place prior to even appearing before a magistrate for an eviction hearing. If the property owner is awarded the judgment for the eviction they is period of time which the resident has to either appeal the decision or to move out. The property owner then gets a writ of execution of the eviction order and schedules a time with the sheriffs department who in turn executes the order and if need be supervises the property owner locking up the premises. All of this does not happen overnight, it takes weeks and in some cases even months. Sorry but I do not feel the least bit sorry for these people who are doing nothing but sitting back and sucking off the teat of the public welfare rolls getting every free service and hand out they can get. How many want to bet these people could afford to have cable tv? Cell Phones? New rims for their ride? New sound system? Flat screen tv? maybe even some bling?
The social injustice here is the fact that people like this are allowed to promote generation after generation of freeloading and to teach and pass it onto their children as if it is a right and an entitlement. If you are an able body person receiving welfare, food stamps, child care, college at the expense of the taxpayers then you are able to go to parks and roadsides and pick up trash, mow grass, clean up streams, sweep sidewalks and streets, work at the local food bank or homeless shelter etc in exchange for your monthly paycheck and food stamp card.

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search