news-record.com

NEWS

MagicJack's next act: disappearing cell phone fees

Friday, January 8, 2010
(Updated 1:41 pm)

LAS VEGAS (AP) — The company behind the magicJack, the cheap Internet phone gadget that's been heavily promoted on TV, has made a new version of the device that allows free calls from cell phones in the home, in a fashion that's sure to draw protest from cellular carriers.

The new magicJack uses, without permission, radio frequencies for which cellular carriers have paid billions of dollars for exclusive licenses.

YMax Corp., which is based in Palm Beach, Fla., said this week at the International Consumers Electronics Show that it plans to start selling the device in about four months for $40, the same price as the original magicJack. As before, it will provide free calls to the U.S. and Canada for one year.

The device is, in essence, a very small cellular tower for the home.

The size of a deck of cards, it plugs into a PC, which needs a broadband Internet connection. The device then detects when a compatible cell phone comes within 8 feet, and places a call to it. The user enters a short code on the phone. The phone is then linked to the magicJack, and as long as it's within range (YMax said it will cover a 3,000-square-foot home) magicJack routes the call itself, over the Internet, rather than going through the carrier's cellular tower. No minutes are subtracted from the user's account with the carrier. Any extra fees for international calls are subtracted from the user's account with magicJack, not the carrier.

According to YMax CEO Dan Borislow, the device will connect to any phone that uses the GSM standard, which in the U.S. includes phones from AT&T Inc. and T-Mobile USA. At a demonstration at CES, a visitor's phone with a T-Mobile account successfully placed and received calls through the magicJack. Most phones from Verizon Wireless and Sprint Nextel Corp. won't connect to the device.

Borislow said the device is legal because wireless spectrum licenses don't extend into the home.

AT&T, T-Mobile and the Federal Communications Commission had no immediate comment on whether they believe the device is legal, but said they were looking into the issue. CTIA — The Wireless Association, a trade group, said it was declining comment for now. None of them had heard of YMax's plans.

Borislow said YMax has sold 5 million magicJacks for landline phones in the last two years, and that roughly 3 million are in active use. That would give YMax a bigger customer base than Internet phone pioneer Vonage Holdings Corp., which has been selling service for $25 per month for the better part of a decade. Privately held YMax had revenue of $110 million last year, it says.

U.S. carriers have been selling and experimenting with devices that act similarly to the wireless magicJack. They're called "femtocells." Like the magicJack, they use the carrier's licensed spectrum to connect to a phone, then route the calls over a home broadband connection. They improve coverage inside the home and offload capacity from the carrier's towers.

But femtocells are complex products, because they're designed to mesh with the carrier's external network. They cost the carriers more than $200, though some sell them cheaper, recouping the cost through added service fees. YMax's magicJack is a much smaller, simpler design.

Accompanying Photos

Photo Caption: MagicJack CEO and founder Dan Borislow holds up the new and improved MagicJack at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Yoda

January 8, 2010 - 10:15 am EST

This is great, maybe it will drive the cell phone prices lower and give more minutes. Go Magicjack Go!

aliluyya

January 8, 2010 - 10:15 am EST

Innovation marches on, regardless of what the big boys (Verizon, AT&T, etc.) want. We saw it with the music industry, they were nearly killed by their own refusal to change when the consumer was fed up and worked around them. If the phone execs are smart, they will work with companies like MagicJack to create the next big thing, or, if they are dumb & set in their ways, they will fight against companies like MagicJack and consumers. And in this age of internet feedback being immediate to companies, the consumer has muscle and a voice, and the fat cats don't always win anymore. The internet is really bringing the power to the people.

scottb

January 8, 2010 - 10:30 am EST

Yea for the News & Record reporting on AP feeds from the Consumer Electronics show in Las Vegas. :-D Let's continue to expand our horizons outside of central North Carolina.

Michael Grossman

January 8, 2010 - 10:52 am EST

Thanks for the feedback :)

Joe Killian

January 8, 2010 - 11:03 am EST

Hey -- I offered to let them fly me to Vegas and put me up at the MGM Grand so I could cover the conference.

Failing that, this is what the AP's for -- getting some interesting news from outside the local sphere into the local paper. I was certainly excited to read the story this morning.

Mike Fuchs

January 8, 2010 - 11:06 am EST

Extra yea. Grossman, you're brilliant. OK in full disclosure he's my boss. Anyway, we'd report it ourselves but for some reason they won't expense a round-trip for me to check it out in person and write about it. Sheesh. In any event, this one's a no-brainer. Who cares if it's an AP feed. http://bit.ly/8rlC69

hotelangel

January 8, 2010 - 11:42 am EST

I've only heard bad things about the magic jack for regular phones, so I wont put much hope into one for cell phones.

Mike Fuchs

January 8, 2010 - 11:51 am EST

Works fine for me. Where are you hearing all these "bad things?" Curious. From Consumer Reports: "Calls connected, and voice quality was clear, though not as clear as on a good corded phone on a regular line" and "But if you can live with a few limitations, it's a great deal." http://bit.ly/5EknIL

ravencottage

January 8, 2010 - 2:19 pm EST

I absolutely LOVE my MagicJack! Never any problems...I even use it for sending faxes since I no longer have a landline telephone.

kurgun

January 8, 2010 - 11:48 am EST

I was wondering when this was coming, I knew it wasn't too far off. I can't wait for this service, I'll happily be leaving my Verizon wireless service in place of this new MJ. I often or very often thought the cell phone companies were ripping people off with their prices, and the plea in this article of money they have to spend to offer their service only strengthens my belief that they are bonified liars and typical corporations. They can cry all the way to the bank, the cell phone companies, I think they are all crooks when it comes to monthly fees and all their taxes and surcharges ETC, PFFFFT. <<<------- That's to all the cell phone companies, you're all crooks.

scottb

January 8, 2010 - 12:11 pm EST

I wouldn't mind seeing lower prices either. However, consider that mobile carriers have had to build their infrastrcuture over the past 10-20 years--that's expensive. The wires for analog phones have been around for a long time and their cost is generally for maintenance only.

Mobile phone service is a lot less expensive now than it was 10 - 15 years ago. Compare $1 per minute in 1996 to the five-to-10 cents per minute you would pay today. That's quite a difference.

jstevenh1952

January 8, 2010 - 3:28 pm EST

You know this only works in your house, don't you? In fact it won't work unless you have an account with a mobile company. It has no way to find the towers on its own.

jstevenh1952

January 8, 2010 - 1:56 pm EST

This will cause little ruffle with the carriers. Maybe some will press the FCC to propose new legislation, but given time they (carriers) will update their signal and compress it in such a way as to limit the ability to transmit on their license. We are probably just an algorithium away.

Don't give up on technology folks, people are always thinking. Remember, since the product must be in the range of the PC, which means it will certaintly be used exclusively in the home the impact is not that significant. Most mobile phone usage is outside of the home and from what I can see, behind the wheel of a car.

mela

January 8, 2010 - 3:15 pm EST

Thank you magicJack. Give A&T Wireless some fierce competition.

horselady09

January 9, 2010 - 5:47 pm EST

I purchased the MagicJack last November a year ago,from an advertisement on TV, before they were available at Walgreens, Radio Shack,etc.Was told by a relative that lives out west that it didn't work. I was a little dissappointed by this news,but when mine arrived in the mail, I was very pleased with the performance of the device.
There is a little inconvenience at the start up of the device, but otherwise I am very satisfied with my product.I plug it in when I need to use it,I only have a cell phone and not a landline. A lot of people now only have a cell, with unlimited plans. I don't think I will be purchasing the new device, but I am very pleased with the regular MagicJack!

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search