news-record.com

NEWS

Politics in ’10 are likely to be unpredictable

Sunday, January 3, 2010
(Updated 5:02 am)

RALEIGH — Ask pretty much any political expert and they’ll tell you that what happens in North Carolina’s polling places next year will be tied to what happens in the state’s marketplaces.

“I’m going to watch unemployment numbers and housing starts and see what happens to the economy,” said Hunter Bacot, a political science professor and pollster at Elon University.

More than one political career, he said, may rise or fall with the economy, although your guess as to which ones might be as good as the experts’ at this point.

At this point in the 2008 campaign, former Sen. John Edwards was considered a viable presidential candidate, and national commentators had all but written off then-state Sen. Kay Hagan’s chances of knocking off Republican rock star Sen. Elizabeth Dole.

And any honest commentator will tell you predictions about this year are just as dicey.

That said, as we rocket into the 2010 election cycle, experts point to several stories that bear watching in politics and government.

U.S. Senate election

Midterm congressional elections are historically difficult for the president’s party. In this case, congressional Democrats might expect to lose seats even in ordinary times.

That could bode well for Republican incumbent Richard Burr as he runs for a second six-year term in the U.S. Senate, said longtime GOP strategist and commentator Carter Wrenn.

“The interesting political equation is the national trend toward Republicans,” Wrenn said. “That could go any number of ways. It could build and you could have a huge election for Republicans ... or (President Barack) Obama could make a comeback. The key thing with Burr is not so much what his campaign does but how that national trend shakes out.”

The U.S. Senate race is the only statewide election on North Carolina’s ballot in 2010. And more than any other race in the state, Democratic chances may be tied to the economy.

“If Obama’s policy on the economy is right and it starts turning around, the politics will follow for him,” Wrenn said. “If it goes the other way, there isn’t any amount of politics that’s going to save him or the Democrats.”

Meanwhile, national and statewide Democratic organizations point to polls showing potential contenders within striking distance of Burr.

The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee spent a considerable amount of time urging Cal Cunningham, a former state senator and Iraq war veteran, to run after higher-profile members of the party begged off the race in 2009.

Along with Cunningham, Secretary of State Elaine Marshall and Durham lawyer Kenneth Lewis are viewed as the strongest contenders for the Democratic nomination.

All 13 of the state’s U.S. House seats are also up for election. Most district lines are drawn to heavily favor either Democrats or Republicans, and incumbents have a strong advantage in running for re-election. Rep. Larry Kissell, a first-term Democrat in the 8th District near Charlotte, is expected to face the toughest re-election bid.

Scandals

Scandals that rocked state Democrats in 2009 will continue to play out in 2010, including:

  • Former Gov. Mike Easley was called to appear before the State Board of Elections and has been the subject of an investigation by federal prosecutors. Among the topics for which Easley is getting scrutiny is a land deal near the coast, unreported campaign contributions and the appearance that Easley might have helped key contributors with environmental permitting in exchange for financial support.
  • Former U.S. Sen. John Edwards also has faced federal inquiry related to his campaign finances and whether contributions were illegally used to silence Rielle Hunter. Edwards acknowledged an affair with the former campaign videographer but denied fathering her child.
  • Tony Rand, the soon-to-be-retired Democratic majority leader in the Senate, has faced public scrutiny over his role as chairman of LEA, a firm that has sold security equipment to the state. Rand faces allegations of illegal insider trading by two former executives as he prepares to lead the state’s parole commission.
  • State prosecutors say they plan to file felony assault charges against Sen. R.C. Soles in connection with a shooting at his home. Soles, a powerful and long-serving lawmaker, has faced scrutiny, including a now-recanted allegation of molestation, over his dealings with young men he describes as former clients. Soles said Wednesday he would not seek re-election.

“One of the things Republicans are going to be running against is the corruption,” N.C. Republican Party Chairman Tom Fetzer said.

Democrats argue that voters won’t punish local lawmakers for the transgressions of others, particularly retired senators and governors.

“I don’t think people in Alma Adams’ district or Maggie Jeffus’ district are going to blame them either because common sense tells you they had nothing to do with it,” House Speaker Joe Hackney said last year.

Recent history may bear this out. In 2006, then-House Speaker Jim Black of Matthews was immersed in scandals that eventually sent him to jail, but Democrats retained control of the House and Senate.

“It can resonate, but generally corruption is part of a larger narrative that is woven by candidates during the campaign,” said Andrew Taylor, an N.C. State political science professor. “It doesn’t become the central, defining issue.”

Regardless of their political impact, whether some of the state’s best-known political figures end up going to trial over their alleged transgressions will be closely watched.

Already there have been consequences.

Obama has nominated Charlotte lawyer Thomas Walker to be U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District. But Burr has blocked the nomination, saying that current prosecutor George Holding, a Bush administration appointee, should be allowed to finish his two high-profile investigations.

State budget and taxes

A week after the primary election May 4, the General Assembly will convene to adjust a two-year budget plan that already cut spending on some services and likely will face a gap of $300 million or more.

“Given the extent of the cuts that were made last year, it’s incredibly important we have a discussion about what further cuts to Medicaid and mental health would mean,” said Chris Fitzsimon, a writer for N.C. Policy Watch, which generally advocates for progressive or liberal causes.

Additional cuts to Health and Human Services would outrage the people who rely on those services, Fitzsimon said

That could prompt the General Assembly to raise taxes again or find other ways to raise money. Given the struggle to keep basic services intact, observers expect few sweeping legislative gestures this year.

“I don’t see anything really significant coming out of the General Assembly this spring,” said Rebecca Klase, a political science professor at Greensboro College. There will be little other than the budget to grab headlines, she said.

And conservative advocates say that whatever budget problems the state has to deal with in 2010, lawmakers should shy away from tax increases.

“How the legislature responds is going to dictate what the business community’s involvement may look like in the elections,” said John Rustin, executive director of the N.C. Free Enterprise Foundation, a conservative-leaning business group.

General Assembly races

“I will make a prediction right now that Republicans will gain a majority in both houses of the General Assembly in the 2010 elections,” Fetzer said.

The GOP, he said, will be able to use the sour economy and Democratic scandals to oust Democrats from power. Republicans haven’t held the state Senate since before 1900 and have enjoyed only two terms of outright control in the House during the same time.

Rustin said the 2010 elections will be particularly important for lawmakers because the next General Assembly will draw the state’s legislative districts after the upcoming census.

Republicans have long argued that legislative boundaries have favored Democrats, frustrating GOP efforts even when voters sided with them on the issues.

Klase said she thinks Democrats will lose some legislative seats but it’s unlikely that Republicans will wrest control of either house.

But N.C. State’s Taylor described a Republican takeover of the state House or Senate as “well within the realms of possibility.”

That’s particularly true, he said, in the Senate, where announced and probable retirements of senior leaders such as Rand, Soles and Gaston County’s David Hoyle expose long-held seats to tough campaigns.

But legislative Democrats are confident they’ll still be in control when the General Assembly convenes in 2011.

“We’ve got some seats we’d like to pick up,” said Rep. Hugh Holliman, a Lexington Democrat and the House majority leader.

Of all the local races, Holliman faces one of the toughest re-election campaigns in a district that is philosophically conservative despite Democratic advantages in terms of voter registration.

Rep. Laura Wiley, a High Point Republican, has announced that she will not run for re-election. All other Guilford County incumbents have said they plan to run to retain their seats.

Congressional action

As 2009 comes to a close, Congress is still debating reforms to the nation’s health care system that Obama originally said he wanted on his desk by August. However, lawmakers in both parties say it appears the health care bill will be out of the Senate and perhaps finished by mid-January.

Once that’s done, the Senate in particular will have a backlog of topics to tackle.

“The key area I’m focused on is jobs,” said Hagan, a Greensboro Democrat.

Although indicators such as the gross domestic product suggest the recession is over, workers continued to lose jobs throughout the fall. Economists say most people won’t feel the recovery until the job market begins to grow again.

Congressional Democrats who control the House and Senate say a jobs bill will be among their priorities in the new year. Other items on the congressional agenda include:

  • Late in 2009, the House passed a financial services reform bill that would create a new consumer protection agency and curb some abusive lending practices. The Senate is expected to offer its version soon.
  • After December’s climate change summit in Copenhagen, Congress is expected to craft its own bill aimed at curbing emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases linked to global warming.

Added pressure to act has been brought to bear by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which says it will regulate carbon dioxide even if Congress fails to act.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Contact Mark Binker at (919) 832-5549 or mark.binker@news-record.com
 

Accompanying Photos

News & Record

Stories to watch

There are plenty of other potential headlines for 2010. Here are few picks from the experts:

  • In other states, the Tea Party movement — an affiliation of conservatives upset with the direction of the federal government — has pledged to exert its influence on elections. Although the group has held rallies in North Carolina, it is less clear what impact it might have here. “It’s not so much a pro-Republican movement but an anti-politician one,” Republican strategist Carter Wrenn said.
  • The federal government will conduct the decennial census in 2010. This count of the United States population likely will show that North Carolina’s population has continued to grow, but estimates late in 2009 showed the state’s population may not have grown enough to gain a 14th congressional seat.
  • General Assembly observers say they’ll be watching for changes in the Senate’s operation after the retirement of longtime majority leader Sen. Tony Rand. His replacement, Sen. Martin Nesbitt, is seen as a more progressive or populist figure who is more sympathetic to liberal causes. However, the chamber’s top Democrat, President Pro Tempore Marc Basnight, has said those who deal with the chamber should expect no shift in philosophy.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

northoftheboro

January 3, 2010 - 7:36 am EST

As one political party holds a strong grip over national and N.C. state government, many feel that the 2010 elections are very predictable after economic, national security, and domestic conditions have deteriorated as a result of that particular party's incompetent policies and divisive, uncompromising attitudes. This theory may not be what many in the Obama-cheerleading press want to hear, but most polls have the Democrats seeing big loses in the November election. Some analyists are even predicting a repeat of 1994's Republican revolution. We shall see...

Panacea

January 3, 2010 - 9:33 am EST

I think you need to re-read the part about honest political experts not making predictions.

I don't think either party has a lock on anything, nationally or locally. I think both parties may end up with surprises on election day.

rmacz

January 3, 2010 - 1:44 pm EST

Honest political experts?.....I remember the weather experts telling us about global warming..Ha..that turned out to be junk science. Personally. the wise person is going to follow the money. 400 billion bad loans by Barney Frank, $250,000 per job in the stimulus package, and the unemployment numbers have doubled since 2006. The numbers don't lie, but the experts....well, you can decide for yourself.

rmacz

January 3, 2010 - 1:46 pm EST

Correction= $400 billion in bad loans

tonymo

January 3, 2010 - 2:21 pm EST

Much of this is simply wishful thinking by the typically partisan liberal media hack. This guy had a multi-year love affair with John Edwards, who Binker loved to report wqas a moderate, just as he now tries to sell Hagan as a moderate.

Binker doesn't even try to hide his bias, when in a previous column he told what his guys, the Demo-Rats have to do to win in 2010. Hagsan has voted for every TRILLION of the outragrous spending that is destroying our economy. Our dollar is getting killed, we are printing money like crazy which will one day create hyper inflation, and kill any kind of job growth.

I firmly believe that is the plan of these radical leftists. They don't have to march in with tanks to take over the country, they jusr destroy the dollar, confidence in the future, then tell us they will take care of us. All we have to give up is our liberty!

I wish some of you folks would go back and look at the economic date in January 2007 when the Demo-Rats got control of the congress. It will be quite a shock to you. The Dow was at 12,600, unemployment at about 4.8%, growth for the previous quarter was 3.1, the deficit was 2.3% of GDP (check it now!). So what does Obama do but turn the economy over to the Reid/Pelosi congress. Perhaps he did that because his administration has less than 10% of his advisors with private sector experience, the lowest of any administration in the past 100 years!

mundoqueganar

January 4, 2010 - 8:46 am EST

I'm hoping that the 20-some percent of Americans who persist in labeling as "socialist" a president who gives billions of dollars to the capitalist class to bail out their banks, pushes a so-called healthcare reform that transfers yet more wealth to more capitalists in the insurance industry, and wages wars on four fronts in order to maintain the capitalist class' lock on the world's energy reserves will, in 2010, learn the difference between capitalism and socialism.

Hey, I can dream, can't I?

Then again, maybe I should concentrate on a more realistic goal: convincing Americans who are *not* insane that they should stop defending Obama (which means defending the same imperialist policies they hated about Bush) from the right-wing nutcases, and start standing up for their principles--and their interests.

record2009

January 4, 2010 - 3:49 pm EST

Maybe this can be included in the agenda for our elected officials in Washington.

2010 is an election year for 1/3 of the senate and 1/2 of the house of representatives. It would be nice if congress got the message; the voting taxpayers are in charge now.

Social Security 2009
LET US SHOW OUR LEADERS IN WASHINGTON "PEOPLE POWER" AND THE POWER OF THE INTERNET.. PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL OF YOUR FRIENDS. IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU ARE REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT!
KEEP IT GOING!!!!
Propose this in 2009: START A BILL TO PLACE ALL POLITICIANS ON SOCIAL SECURITY

SOCIAL SECURITY: (This is worth reading. It is short and to the point.)
Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions during election years.
Our Senators and Congresswomen do not pay into Social Security and, of course, they do not collect from it. You see, Social Security benefits were not suitable for persons of their rare elevation in society. They felt they should have a special plan for themselves So, many years ago they voted in their own benefit plan. In more recent years, no congress person has felt the need to change it. After all, it is a great plan.

For all practical purposes their plan works like this: When they retire, they continue to draw the same pay until they die. Except it may increase from time to time for cost of living adjustments. ..... For example, Senator Byrd and Congressman White and their wives may expect to draw $7, 800,000.00 (that's Seven Million, Eight-Hundred Thousand Dollars), with their wives drawing $275, 000..00 during the last years of their lives.
This is calculated on an average life span for each of those two Dignitaries.
Younger Dignitaries who retire at an early age, will receive much more during the rest of their lives. Their cost for this excellent plan is $0.00. ZIP!! NADA!!! ZILCH!!!
This little perk they voted for themselves is free to them. You and I pick up the tab for this plan. The funds for this fine retirement plan come directly from the General Funds;

"OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK"!
From our own Social Security Plan, which you and I pay (or have paid) into, every payday until we retire (which amount is matched by our employer ), We can expect to get an average of $1,000 per month after retirement. Or, in other words, we would have to collect our average of $1,000 monthly benefits for 68 years and one (1) month to equal Senator Bill Bradley's benefits!
Social Security could be very good if only one small change were made.
That change would be to Jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan from under the Senators and Congressmen. . Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us
Then sit back..... And see how fast they would fix it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe good changes will evolve. How many people can YOU send this to? Better yet...... How many people WILL you send this to ?
P.S. The same goes for their healthplan

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search