news-record.com

OPINION

Hardin: Bickering, the true sport of Guilford County

Tuesday, December 15, 2009
(Updated 8:43 am)

Sink or swim. That's not a question. Those are the only options we need to be discussing as we wade into the deep end of another civic argument that seems to define us.

We're always having these spats, aren't we? And they always seem to have something to do with sports — ballparks and coliseum issues, golf courses and high school athletics, concrete rivers and city council meetings. Yes, politics is our favorite sport in Guilford County.

The latest bickering — and, of course, it involves the newly elected City Council members who ran on the promise to end bickering — involves the proposed aquatics center agreed on by voters last year. The agreement was for a $12 million regional competitive swimming and diving center, which was only about two-thirds of what we now think it will cost, and thus the battle lines were drawn and here we are.

This afternoon the Council will return from a weekend retreat and basically re-examine the whole thing.

The issues splashing about are old issues really. Do we really need another swimming pool? Didn't we vote on it last year and say yes? How do we pay for the overruns? And just what in the world does a regional competitive aquatics center do?

OK, there are other issues such as taxes and blame and suspicion and skullduggery, but that's just business as usual in Greensboro. The only real issue here is: Are we going to do this? And if we do, are we going to do it right, or are we going to do it half-baked?

There was a time in this city when we did things right, and we didn't worry about all the other stuff. We just sort of made decisions based on the greater good and moved on, knowing darn well it might not work and it might cost a lot of money and it might not even be what we planned on to start with. But we did it anyway.

It was a can-do approach to politics and sports, which were always one and the same. We built the biggest coliseum in the Southeast, expanded it and made it bigger, then expanded it and made bigger again. And we knew it would lose money, and we did it anyway because it made us look good and it kept us from being bored all year long.

It had nothing to do with keeping up with Charlotte or Raleigh or Chattanooga or Rome. We did it because we didn't want to be a sleepy mill town that closed up and went away when the mills shut down. We didn't want to be a tobacco town without tobacco or a banking town without a bank. We wanted to be a sports and entertainment town.

And so that's what we became. We wanted Elvis to come here, and he did. We didn't want to be like Winston-Salem or Fayetteville or Gastonia or Asheville. We wanted to be different and distinct.

So we built a coliseum. We brought the Final Four here. The Atlantic Coast Conference was born here. NASCAR was born here. The Bassmaster Classic came here, three times. We're a PGA town and a soccer hotbed. We have the best minor-league baseball park in America.

And now, we're talking about building one of the best competitive swimming and diving centers in the country right out there on High Point Road, right in the middle of all that blight we've been talking about removing for all these years without doing anything about it. We're talking about competing with existing centers in Charlotte and Cary and Huntersville, not building one to match. We're talking about building one bigger and better.

Or at least we were. Now we're arguing again, and the Council's talking about paring it back or maybe throwing the whole thing back to the voters. There's talk of using hotel sales tax revenue to make up the difference between the $12 million agreed on and the $18 million we think it will really cost. Jim Melvin and the Bryan Foundation are not wading into this one. This is about Council politics and a legitimate vote. This is about cost overruns and what to do about them.

There's talk of doing away with the proposed diving well and just building another concrete pond. There's talk of getting a corporate sponsor, something this city has never done and hopefully never will.

None of these are really good ideas, and the best thing the Council can do today is listen to what the vocal swimming community has to say, argue it out among themselves and make a decision. That's what we elected them to do. We don't want this thing watered down. We don't want some corporation taking credit for it. We don't want it sent back to the voters.

The potential is for this to be a good thing for Greensboro and Guilford County. Say what you will about the vocal swimming community, but it's loud and it's real. There are a lot of people in this city, this county, this state and this nation who would come to this thing. This isn't a political beach ball. This isn't about Council members lining their pockets or pandering to their special-interest constituencies.

This is about swimming and diving and Greensboro. We either do this right or we don't do this at all.

Contact Ed Hardin at 373-7069 or ed.hardin@news-record.com

Accompanying Photos

City of Greensboro

Photo Caption: Artist's rendering of the proposed aquatic center.

Comments

This article has been closed to new comments. Comments are generally closed after 14 days. However, comments may be closed earlier at the discretion of the News & Record.

Inappropriate content? Please report abuse.

Norm*

December 15, 2009 - 6:05 am EST

It's only bickering when no one brings facts to the table and insists on using emotion to sway others. You just joined the fray.

fisher

December 15, 2009 - 9:13 am EST

Hence the "Opinion" heading at the top of the page. If you're just now looking for facts concerning the Aquatic Center, you haven't been paying attention.

Mike Sigmon

December 15, 2009 - 7:58 am EST

The era of "getting things done" was directly related to have our governing bodies (City Council and County Commissioners) elected at large. These officials had the best interest of the entire communinity in mind when these projects were undertaken, not just "what's in it for my district so I can get re-elected."

Molly the Dog

December 15, 2009 - 8:15 am EST

Ed, thanks for writing a clear article and summing up the history and issues. This is article is long overdue. I only fear what Allen Johnson will write afterwards!

letsswim

December 15, 2009 - 9:34 am EST

Mr. Hardin, thank you so much for writing this article. What a great view on our local politics. I thought, like a lot of others voters, that our new City Council would indeed get back to business with helping our city become a better place to attract businesses and families to our area. So much for "thinking"! It is politics, as usual. The newly proposed aquatic center is just stuck in the middle. I hope that the new city council will find a way to move the aquatic center project forward and make it another showcase for our city. Sending it back to the voters is not the answer. We voted already and the bond passed 58% in favor of.We have lost many opportunities to enhance our city. I hope we don't miss this chance.

DonMoore

December 15, 2009 - 10:22 am EST

Baseball Stadium - funded with private money.
Soccer Stadium at Bryan Park - funded with private money.
Aquatic Center - funded with Public Money, being added to another public facility that operates at a loss.

I don't know if anyone noticed; but there are currently people in need, roads that need repair, even city facilities that need repairs. Why expand the empire, if we cannot maintain the facilities and services we currently offer.

letsswim

December 15, 2009 - 10:43 am EST

Roads are being repaired and even "greenways" are being built with the $134,000,000 bond that also passed last year. Don't know if you remember, of the road bond that passed there was $12,000,000 earmarked for our "Greenway" (concrete or paved pathes connecting our city parks, etc. together). Benefit to our city? Attracts businesses, tourists, etc? The coliseum complex has all of the operating cost without the benefit of counting the revenue it brings to the city- ACC tournament, etc. You too would run in the negative if you weren't able to count the revenues that come to the city because we have a great center to host such events.

Molly the Dog

December 15, 2009 - 10:59 am EST

Carol Allen Baseball Park - Publicly funded
Greenways - Publicly funded
Barber Park - Publicly funded
Country Park - Publicly funded
Libraries - Publicly funded
Pullen Park and Aquatic Center (Ral) - Publicly funded
Mecklenburg Aquatic Center (Char) - Publicly funded
Chatham County Aquatic Center (Sav) - Publicly funded
Bryan Park Soccer Fields and Complex - Publicly funded
and on and on............

Norm*

December 15, 2009 - 12:09 pm EST

I'll stand by my previous comment. It seems to me that the pro-swim center folks feel so passionately about this project that they cannot separate their feelings from fact.

Molly the Dog

December 15, 2009 - 1:21 pm EST

I am confused norm, feeling and facts. please provide the specifics, and I will tell you if they are feelings, facts or garbage.

dcolin

December 15, 2009 - 8:32 pm EST

"This is about swimming and diving and Greensboro. We either do this right or we don't do this at all."

About swimming and diving in GSO
If we build it he will come?

Johnny Weissmuller ( Tarzan)

Lets don't do this at all.

'We don't want it sent back to the voters.'

This says i t all.

pragmatist

December 16, 2009 - 12:42 pm EST

For additional information, please visit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teMlv3ripSM

laserguidedloogie

December 17, 2009 - 8:05 am EST

There's nothing wrong with "bickering" as long as everyone gets to express their opinion.

I hear lefties these days decrying all the "meanspiritedness" (i.e. someone said something they didn't like) and I have to laugh. These are the people after all who instituted the concept back in the 60's that, "the personal is the political, " and who felt it was perfectly reasonable to engage in the most vicious sort of slander against people they disagreed with.

But anyway, arguing is good for the most part. The only thing that is wrong is when one side is shut out of the debate. I say, let's bicker some more. It's good for what ails ya.

Ken
http://www.LaserGuidedLoogie.com

eMail Updates

Advertisement | Advertise with Us

Featured Ads

Search

Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us
Advertisement | Advertise with Us

News & Record Network Sites

User Tools

  • Social Networking
  • RSS
  • Share
  • Sign in to MyNR

Search